Misplaced Pages

Pedro Pierry

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Chilean judge
Pedro Pierry
Personal details
Born (1941-05-30) 30 May 1941 (age 83)
Valparaíso, Chile
EducationThe Mackay School
Alma mater
ProfessionLawyer

Pedro Pierry Arrau (born 30 May 1941) is a Chilean lawyer who was a member of the Supreme Court of Chile. In his country, he was known for his conflicts of interest in the approval of the HidroAysén megaproject.

From 2006 to 2010, he was Minister of the Supreme Court of Chile as well as Minister of the Qualifying Court of Elections of Chile for the period 2008−2012.

Biography

From mid-1940s and 1950s, he realized his basic and secondary education at The Mackay School in Vina del Mar. Then, in 1959, he entered the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso Law School, where he graduated in 1966.

In 1966−68, he started a PhD in Administrative Law at the Faculty of Law of Paris, but he never finished it. In France, he also obtained a postgraduate diploma in Public Administration in an international institute.

In January 1966, Pierry was appointed a lawyer for the State Defense Council (CDE) in the Valparaíso Attorney General's Office. Twenty five years later, in April 1991, he was appointed as advisor of the CDE, becoming president of the contentious-administrative section. Similarly, he was a member of the Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales representing the CDE in two different periods: from January 1993 and December 1995; and July 2005 and December 2006.

Controversies

HidroAysén and Río Cuervo

On 4 April 2012, the Chilean Supreme Court approved the HidroAysén megaproject of the company formed by Endesa and Colbún SA, so rejected all the protection resources against it. Thus, Minister Pierry –who voted in favor of the project– then owned 109.840 Endesa shares, which acquired in 1988 and at the time of the ruling were valued at more than US$200.000. Homogeneuosly, Perry's vote was decisive in the split judgment which ended 3−2 in favour of HidroAysén. Pierry defended his performance by ensuring that the law didn't force him to disqualify himself (because he didn't have a 10% of shares or more according the 196th Article of the Organic Code of the 1980 Constitution). In that way, Pierry's action generated parliamentary complaints against his role by the Senators from the then opposition (centre-left) and from the officialism (centre-right).

Later, in May 2012, Pierry voted against the protection resources against the Río Cuervo hydroelectric project, but now the appeal was approved by the Supreme Court by three votes over two. Despite that result, the parliamentary complaints took effect and the case of Perry was led to the Ethics Committee of the Supreme Court.

On June 12, the Plenary of the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the complaints dealt with the ethics committee arguing that Minister Pierry had less participation than that established by the Art 196, No. 8 in the Constitution.

See also

References

  1. "Ministro de la Corte Suprema que votó a favor de HidroAysén posee acciones de Endesa". Radio Bío-Bío. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
  2. "Greenpeace denuncia que ministro de Corte Suprema posee acciones de Endesa". CNN Chile. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  3. "HidroAysén: Todos contra Pierry". 24 Horas. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  4. "Vía libre al gigante eléctrico sobre la Patagonia chilena". El País. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  5. "Juez Pierry que falló en favor de Hidroaysén: "A mí tampoco me gustan las represas y las torres de alta tensión"". La Tercera. 5 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  6. "Abogado y voto de Pedro Pierry por HidroAysén: "Él debería haber tomado una decisión éticamente"". ADN Radio Chile. 5 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  7. "Nibaldo Mosciatti: "Pierry debió haberse inhabilitado en términos éticos"". CNN Chile. 10 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  8. "Expresan al Presidente de la Corte Suprema inquietud por "conflicto de intereses" en fallo sobre Hidroaysén". Senate of Chile. 9 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  9. "Senadores solicitan a presidente de la Corte Suprema pronunciamiento sobre ministro Pedro Pierry". 9 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  10. "Corte Suprema acoge recurso de protección y paraliza proyecto hidroeléctrico Río Cuervo". 11 May 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  11. "Comisión de Ética de la Suprema investigará a juez que falló a favor de Hidroaysén". Radio Universidad de Chile. 9 May 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  12. "Suprema respalda a juez que votó a favor de HidroAysén pese a sus acciones en Endesa". Emol. 12 June 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2021.

External links

Categories: