Misplaced Pages

Petteway v. Galveston County

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
2024 United States case on voting rights
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
An editor has performed a search and found that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Petteway v. Galveston County" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article possibly contains original research. Citations directly to the ruling Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Petteway v. Galveston County
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Full case name Terry Petteway, Derreck Rose, and Penny Pope vs. Galveston County, Mark Henry, and Dwight D. Sullivan
ArguedMay 14, 2024
DecidedAugust 1, 2024
Court membership
Judges sittingPriscilla Richman, Edith Jones, Jerry Edwin Smith, Rhesa Barksdale, Carl E. Stewart, Jennifer Walker Elrod, Leslie H. Southwick, Catharina Haynes, James E. Graves Jr., Stephen A. Higginson, Don Willett, James C. Ho, Kyle Duncan, Kurt D. Engelhardt, Andrew Oldham, Cory T. Wilson, Dana Douglas, Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Case opinions
MajorityJones, joined by Richman, Smith, Barksdale, Elrod, Southwick, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson

Petteway v. Galveston County 86 F.4th 1146 (5th Cir. 2023) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case in which the court held that racial and ethnic groups may not aggregate their populations in Voting Rights Act violation claims. The decision overrules the court's prior decision in Campos v. City of Baytown (1988). The case was decided en banc.

Background

Redistricting in Galveston County

Further information: Redistricting in Texas

After the 2020 United States census was received, Galveston County began redistricting efforts. Two redistricting maps were suggested regarding the county's third precinct; one proposal retained the precinct's majority minority status, while the other reduced the precinct's minority population to the lowest of the four precincts. The Commissioners' Court voted to enact the second map with Stephen Holmes, who represents the third precinct, dissenting.

Lower court history

Terry Petteway, Derreck Rose, and Penny Pope filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Commissioners' Court's decision, with the NAACP and the Department of Justice filing separate lawsuits. The plaintiffs argued that the enacted proposal violated Section II of the Voting Rights Act by reducing the voter representation of Galveston County's African American and Hispanic population; furthermore, Petteway and the NAACP alleged that the redistricting violated the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments as intentionally discriminatory.

The District Court for the Southern District of Texas determined that the enacted proposal violated Section II, enjoining the country from using the proposal and adhering to Campos v. City of Baytown (1988). Galveston County appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

U.S. Court of Appeals

Circuit judge Edith Jones authored the majority opinion in Petteway v. Galveston County.

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit voted to rehear the case en banc and stayed the District Court for the Southern District of Texas's order. The Fifth Circuit heard arguments for Petteway v. Galveston County on May 14, 2024.

On August 1, 2024, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Voting Rights Act does not authorize racial and ethnic groups to aggregate their populations in vote dilution claims, overruling the court's decision in Campos v. City of Baytown (1988), citing the statutory text of Section II and precedent in cases such as Bartlett v. Strickland (2009). Edith Jones authored the majority, joined by eleven judges; chief judge Priscilla Richman did not join section II.D and James C. Ho joined sections I, II.C, and III only. Six judges dissented. The decision applies to Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Notes

  1. Richman did not join section II.D.
  2. Ho joined sections I, II.C, and III only.
  3. In its ruling, the Fifth Circuit consolidated United States v. Galveston County and Dickinson Bay Area Branch NAACP v. Galveston County into Petteway v. Galveston County.

References

Primary

  1. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 5
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 5
  3. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 5-6
  4. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 6
  5. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 11
  6. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2024, p. 2

Secondary

  1. Schneider, Andrew (May 13, 2024). "Galveston County voting rights case set to go before full 5th Circuit appellate court". Houston Public Media. Archived from the original on August 2, 2024. Retrieved August 2, 2024.
  2. ^ Wines, Michael (August 2, 2024). "Appeals Court Further Narrows Voting Rights Act's Scope". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 2, 2024. Retrieved August 2, 2024.

Sources

Categories: