Misplaced Pages

Polsby–Popper test

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Polsby–Popper test is a mathematical compactness measure of a shape developed to quantify the degree of gerrymandering of political districts. The method was developed by lawyers Daniel D. Polsby and Robert Popper, though it had earlier been introduced in the field of paleontology by E.P. Cox. The method was chosen by Arizona's redistricting commission in 2000.

Definition

The formula for calculating a district's Polsby–Popper score is P P ( D ) = 4 π A ( D ) P ( D ) 2 {\displaystyle PP(D)={\frac {4\pi A(D)}{P(D)^{2}}}} , where D {\displaystyle D} is the district, P ( D ) {\displaystyle P(D)} is the perimeter of the district, and A ( D ) {\displaystyle A(D)} is the area of the district. A district's Polsby–Popper score will always fall within the interval of [ 0 , 1 ] {\displaystyle } , with a score of 0 {\displaystyle 0} indicating complete lack of compactness and a score of 1 {\displaystyle 1} indicating maximal compactness. Only a perfectly round district will reach a Polsby–Popper score of 1.

Compared to other measures that use dispersion to measure gerrymandering, the Polsby–Popper test is very sensitive to both physical geography (for instance, convoluted coastal borders) and map resolution.

Contradiction to other measures

Fairness criteria for gerrymandering can stand in contradiction to each other. For example, there are cases in which, in order to sufficiently fulfill the One man, one vote criterion and a low efficiency gap, one needs to take a low Polsby–Popper compactness into account.

See also

References

  1. Polsby, Daniel D.; Popper, Robert D. (1991). "The Third Criterion: Compactness as a procedural safeguard against partisan gerrymandering". Yale Law & Policy Review. 9 (2): 301–353.
  2. Cox, E.P. 1927. "A Method of Assigning Numerical and Percentage Values to the Degree of Roundness of Sand Grains." Journal of Paleontology 1(3): pp. 179–183
  3. Monorief, Gary F. Reapportionment and Redistricting in the West pg. 27
  4. Crisman, Karl-Dieter, and Jones, Michael A. The Mathematics of Decisions, Elections, and Games pg. 3
  5. Miller, William J., and Walling, Jeremy D. The Political Battle Over Congressional Redistricting pg. 345
  6. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Palmer, Maxwell A Two Hundred-Year Statistical History of the Gerrymander pp. 6–7
  7. Alexeev, Daniel D.; Mixon, Dustin G. (2017). "An Impossibility Theorem for Gerrymandering". The American Mathematical Monthly.
Category: