Misplaced Pages

Poynting–Robertson effect

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Poynting-Robertson effect) Process in which solar radiation causes a dust grain orbiting a star to lose angular momentum

The Poynting–Robertson effect, also known as Poynting–Robertson drag, named after John Henry Poynting and Howard P. Robertson, is a process by which solar radiation causes a dust grain orbiting a star to lose angular momentum relative to its orbit around the star. This is related to radiation pressure tangential to the grain's motion.

This causes dust that is small enough to be affected by this drag, but too large to be blown away from the star by radiation pressure, to spiral slowly into the star. In the case of the Solar System, this can be thought of as affecting dust grains from 1 μm to 1 mm in diameter. Larger dust is likely to collide with another object long before such drag can have an effect.

Poynting initially gave a description of the effect in 1903 based on the luminiferous aether theory, which was superseded by the theories of relativity in 1905–1915. In 1937 Robertson described the effect in terms of general relativity.

History

Robertson considered dust motion in a beam of radiation emanating from a point source. A. W. Guess later considered the problem for a spherical source of radiation and found that for particles far from the source the resultant forces are in agreement with those concluded by Poynting.

Source of the effect

The effect can be understood in two ways, depending on the reference frame chosen.

Radiation from a star (S) and thermal radiation from a particle seen (a) from an observer moving with the particle and (b) from an observer at rest with respect to the star.

From the perspective of the grain of dust circling a star (panel (a) of the figure), the star's radiation appears to be coming from a slightly forward direction (aberration of light). Therefore, the absorption of this radiation leads to a force with a component against the direction of movement. The angle of aberration is extremely small since the radiation is moving at the speed of light while the dust grain is moving many orders of magnitude slower than that.

From the perspective of the star (panel (b) of the figure), the dust grain absorbs sunlight entirely in a radial direction, thus the grain's angular momentum is not affected by it. But the re-emission of photons, which is isotropic in the frame of the grain (a), is no longer isotropic in the frame of the star (b). This anisotropic emission causes the photons to carry away angular momentum from the dust grain.

Note that this anisotropic emission does not imply that an isolated radiating body in motion would decelerate (which would violate the principle of relativity). In this case, there would still be a net deceleration force (i.e. a decrease in momentum over time), but since the body's mass decreases as energy is radiated away, its velocity can remain constant.

The Poynting–Robertson drag can be understood as an effective force opposite the direction of the dust grain's orbital motion, leading to a drop in the grain's angular momentum. While the dust grain thus spirals slowly into the star, its orbital speed increases continuously.

The Poynting–Robertson force is equal to

F PR = v c 2 W = r 2 L ⊙ 4 c 2 G M ⊙ R 5 , {\displaystyle F_{\text{PR}}={\frac {v}{c^{2}}}W={\frac {r^{2}L_{\odot }}{4c^{2}}}{\sqrt {\frac {GM_{\odot }}{R^{5}}}},}

where v is the grain's velocity, c is the speed of light, W is the power of the incoming radiation, r the grain's radius, G is the universal gravitational constant, M☉ the Sun's mass, L☉ is the solar luminosity, and R the grain's orbital radius.

Relation to other forces

The Poynting–Robertson effect is more pronounced for smaller objects. Gravitational force varies with mass, which is ∝ r 3 {\displaystyle \propto r^{3}} (where r {\displaystyle r} is the radius of the dust), while the power it receives and radiates varies with surface area ( ∝ r 2 {\displaystyle \propto r^{2}} ). So for large objects the effect is negligible.

The effect is also stronger closer to the Sun. Gravity varies as R − 2 {\displaystyle R^{-2}} (where R is the radius of the orbit), whereas the Poynting–Robertson force varies as R − 2.5 {\displaystyle R^{-2.5}} , so the effect also gets relatively stronger as the object approaches the Sun. This tends to reduce the eccentricity of the object's orbit in addition to dragging it in.

In addition, as the size of the particle increases, the surface temperature is no longer approximately constant, and the radiation pressure is no longer isotropic in the particle's reference frame. If the particle rotates slowly, the radiation pressure may contribute to the change in angular momentum, either positively or negatively.

Radiation pressure affects the effective force of gravity on the particle: it is felt more strongly by smaller particles, and blows very small particles away from the Sun. It is characterized by the dimensionless dust parameter β {\displaystyle \beta } , the ratio of the force due to radiation pressure to the force of gravity on the particle:

β ≡ F r F g = 3 L Q PR 16 π G M c ρ s , {\displaystyle \beta \equiv {\frac {F_{\text{r}}}{F_{\text{g}}}}={\frac {3LQ_{\text{PR}}}{16\pi GMc\rho s}},}

where Q PR {\displaystyle Q_{\text{PR}}} is the Mie scattering coefficient, ρ {\displaystyle \rho } is the density, and s {\displaystyle s} is the size (the radius) of the dust grain.

Impact of the effect on dust orbits

Particles with β ≥ 0.5 {\displaystyle \beta \geq 0.5} have radiation pressure at least half as strong as gravity and will pass out of the Solar System on hyperbolic orbits if their initial velocities were Keplerian. For rocky dust particles, this corresponds to a diameter of less than 1 μm.

Particles with 0.1 < β < 0.5 {\displaystyle 0.1<\beta <0.5} may spiral inwards or outwards, depending on their size and initial velocity vector; they tend to stay in eccentric orbits.

Particles with β ≈ 0.1 {\displaystyle \beta \approx 0.1} take around 10,000 years to spiral into the Sun from a circular orbit at 1 AU. In this regime, inspiraling time and particle diameter are both roughly ∝ 1 / β {\displaystyle \propto 1/\beta } .

Note that, if the initial grain velocity was not Keplerian, then circular or any confined orbit is possible for β < 1 {\displaystyle \beta <1} .

It has been theorized that the slowing down of the rotation of Sun's outer layer may be caused by a similar effect.

See also

References

  1. Guess, A. W. (1962). "Poynting-Robertson Effect for a Spherical Source of Radiation". Astrophysical Journal. 135: 855–866. Bibcode:1962ApJ...135..855G. doi:10.1086/147329.
  2. Burns; Lamy; Soter (1979). "Radiation Forces on Small Particles in the Solar System". Icarus. 40 (1): 1–48. Bibcode:1979Icar...40....1B. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2.
  3. Wyatt, Mark (2006). "Theoretical Modeling of Debris Disk Structure" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-07-27. Retrieved 2014-07-16.
  4. Flynn, George J. (2005-06-16). "Interplanetary dust particle (IDP)". Britannica Online. Archived from the original on 2017-02-17. Retrieved 2017-02-17.
  5. Klačka, J.; Kocifaj, M. (27 October 2008). "Times of inspiralling for interplanetary dust grains". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 390 (4). Oxford: 1491–1495. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.390.1491K. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13801.x. Sec. 4, Numerical results
  6. "Giving the Sun a brake". University of Hawaiʻi System News. 2016-12-12. Archived from the original on 2022-06-01. Retrieved 2017-02-17.
  7. Cunnyngham, Ian; Emilio, Marcelo; Kuhn, Jeff; Scholl, Isabelle; Bush, Rock (2017). "Poynting-Robertson-like Drag at the Sun's Surface". Physical Review Letters. 118 (5): 051102. arXiv:1612.00873. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118e1102C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.051102. PMID 28211737. S2CID 206285189.
  8. Wright, Katherine (2017-02-03). "Focus: Photons Brake the Sun". Physics. 10: 13. doi:10.1103/Physics.10.13. Archived from the original on 2017-02-17. Retrieved 2017-02-17.

Additional sources

Categories: