Misplaced Pages

The prevalence of circumcision is the percentage of males in a given population who have been circumcised, with the procedure most commonly being performed as a part of preventive healthcare, a religious obligation, or cultural practice.

Since 2010, both the World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS have been promoting a higher rate of circumcision prevalence as a prevention against HIV transmission and some STIs in areas with high HIV transmission and low circumcision rates. According to Hay & Levin, 2012, around 50% of all circumcisions worldwide are performed for reasons of preventive healthcare, while the other 50% are predominately performed for religious or cultural reasons.

Overview

Present

Rates vary widely, from 99.9% in Morocco, and similarly high rates in many Muslim-majority countries, to 91.7% in Israel, 80% in the United States, to 75% in South Korea, to 58% in Australia, to 45% in South Africa, to 20.7% in the United Kingdom, 14% in China, 9% in Japan, and 1% in Honduras.

In 2016, the global prevalence of circumcision was estimated to be around 38%, with notable increases of circumcision prevalence seen in the United States, the Middle East, and Africa; major medical organizations have promoted a higher rate of circumcision in Africa as a preventive against the spread of HIV/AIDS. In 2020, the World Health Organization reiterated that it is an efficacious prophylactic intervention if carried out by medical professionals under safe conditions in areas of high HIV/AIDS prevalence.

Between 2008 and 2010, the prevalence of circumcision in the United States was estimated to be around 80%. Similarly, Wolters Kluwer estimated that close to 80% of United States males in 2021 were circumcised. Large portions of Africa have adopted the practice as a preventive measure against the spread of HIV. It has overwhelming prevalence in the Muslim world and in Israel due to the religious beliefs of most Muslims and Jews; however, some non-Muslim groups living within Muslim-majority countries, such as Armenians and Assyrians, do not practice it. It is prevalent in some Muslim-majority countries in southeast Asia such as Indonesia and Malaysia; however, the WHO states that there is "little non-religious circumcision in Asia, with the exceptions of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines". In parts of Africa it is often practiced as part of tribal customs from Christians, Muslims and Animists. In contrast, rates are much lower in most of Europe, parts of southern Africa, most of Asia, Oceania and Latin America, constituting South America, Central America, the Caribbean and Mexico. Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are examples of countries that have seen a decline in male circumcision in recent decades, while there have been indications of increasing demand in southern Africa, partly for preventive reasons due to the HIV epidemic there.

Africa

Studies suggest that about 62% of African males are circumcised. However, the rate varies widely between different regions, and among ethnic and religious groups, with Muslim North Africans practising it for religious reasons, central Africans as part of ethnic rituals or local custom, and some traditionally non-circumcising populations in the South recently adopting the practice due to measures by the World Health Organization to prevent AIDS. Williams, B.G. et al. commented that: "Most of the currently available data on the prevalence of are several decades old, while several of the recent studies were carried out as adjuncts to demographic and health surveys and were not designed to determine the prevalence of male circumcision."

Prevalence of circumcision in Africa Country WHO (2006) Williams et al (2006) Morris et al (2016)  Angola >80 66 57.5  Central African Republic 20–80 67 63  Chad >80 64 73.5  Republic of the Congo >80 70 70  Democratic Republic of the Congo >80 70 97.2  Gabon >80 93 99.2  Burundi <20 2 61.7  Djibouti >80 94 96.5  Eritrea >80 95 97.2  Ethiopia >80 76 92.2  Kenya >80 84 91.2  Rwanda <20 10 13.3  Somalia >80 93 93.5  Sudan 20–80 47 39.4  Tanzania 20–80 70 72  Uganda 20–80 25 26.7  Botswana <20 25 15.1  Lesotho 20–80 0 52  Malawi <20 17 21.6  Mozambique 20–80 56 47.4  Namibia <20 15 25.5  South Africa 20–80 35 44.7  Eswatini <20 50 8.2  Zambia <20 12 21.6  Zimbabwe <20 10 9.2  Benin >80 84 92.9  Burkina Faso >80 89 88.3  Cameroon >80 93 94  Equatorial Guinea >80 86 87  Gambia >80 90 94.5  Ghana >80 95 91.6  Guinea >80 83 84.2  Guinea-Bissau >80 91 93.3  Côte d'Ivoire 20–80 93 96.7  Liberia >80 70 97.7  Mali >80 95 86  Mauritania >80 78 99.2  Niger >80 92 95.5  Nigeria >80 81 98.9  Senegal >80 89 93.5  Sierra Leone >80 90 96.1  Togo >80 93 95.2

Less than 20%

Botswana, Rwanda, Eswatini, Zimbabwe.

Between 20% and 80%

Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo (Rep), Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia.

South Africa

It is estimated that 48.7% of males are circumcised in South Africa. One national study reported that 54.2% of black Africans were circumcised, with 32.1% of those traditionally circumcised and 13.4% circumcised for medical reasons.

More than 80%

Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Congo (Dem Rep), Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Togo.

Americas

Less than 20%

Less than 20% of the population are circumcised in Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Saint Lucia, The Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela.

The Bahamas

The reported circumcision rate for younger individuals (age 15–18) is 16.7% (2019).

Argentina

The circumcision rate among homosexual men in Buenos Aires is reported to be 13% (2013).

Brazil

The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6.9%. The reported rate is 13% in Rio de Janeiro, indicating possible differences between urban and rural rates.

Colombia

The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6.9%.

Between 20% and 80%

Mexico

In 2006 the prevalence of circumcision in Mexico was estimated to be 10% to 31%. A recent (2020) HIV study conducted in Mexico City found a participant circumcision rate of 23% (255/1118).

Puerto Rico

In 2012 a random sample of male visitors to a STI center in San Juan were surveyed on various topics, the reported circumcision rate was 32.4%.

Canada

Circumcision in Canada followed the pattern of other English speaking countries, with the practice being adopted during the 1900s on hygienic grounds, but with the rate of circumcision declining in the latter part of the 20th century, particularly after a new policy position was released in 1975. The Canadian Paediatric Society estimated that, in 1970, 48 percent of males were circumcised. However, studies conducted in 1977–1978 revealed a wide variation in the incidence of circumcision between different provinces and territories. For example, Yukon reported a rate of 74.8 percent, while Newfoundland reported an incidence of 1.9 to 2.4 percent. The rate continued to drop, with the newborn circumcision rate in Ontario in 1994–95 dropping to 29.9%.

A survey of Canadian maternity practices conducted in 2006/2007, and published in 2009 by the national public health agency, found a newborn circumcision rate of 31.9%. Rates varied markedly across the country, from close to zero in Newfoundland and Labrador to 44.3% in Alberta and 43.7% in Ontario. In 2015, the Canadian Paediatric Society used those statistics in determining the national circumcision rate it currently quotes.

A more recent survey conducted in 2011 on expecting couples in Saskatchewan (average age 30.3) found the circumcision rate of the male participants to be 61%.

Over 80%

United States

As of 2014, an estimated 80.5% of American men aged 14-59 are circumcised. Morris et al. found a present rate of 77% in 2010, when accounting for underreporting. During the 2000s, the prevalence of circumcision in men aged 14–59 differed by race: 91 percent of non-Hispanic white men, 76 percent of black men, and 44 percent of Hispanic men (of any race) were circumcised, according to Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Wolters Kluwer estimated that closer to 80% of males as of April 2023 were circumcised.

Medicaid funding for infant circumcision used to be available in every state, but starting with California in 1982, 13 states (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, and Washington) had eliminated Medicaid coverage of routine circumcision by 2024, with several states reversing their decisions and reinstating coverage for the procedure. One study in the Midwest of the U.S. found that this had no effect on the newborn circumcision rate but it did affect the demand for circumcision at a later time. Another study, published in early 2009, found a difference in the neonatal male circumcision rate of 24% between states with and without Medicaid coverage. The study was controlled for other factors such as the percentage of Hispanic patients.

The CDC uses two data sources to track circumcision rates. The first is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which records circumcisions performed at any time at any location. The second is the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), which does not record circumcisions performed outside the hospital setting or those performed at any age following discharge from the birth hospitalization. Methodologically flawed calculations throughout the 2000s and 2010s showed the rate decreasing off of these statistics, but this data is believed to be misleading due to an increasing trend of performing neonatal circumcisions outside of hospitals, a trend not reflected in hospital discharge data.

Circumcision was the second-most common procedure performed on patients under one year of age, after routine inoculations and prophylactic vaccinations. There are various explanations for why the infant circumcision rate in the United States is different from comparable countries. Many parents' decisions about circumcision are preconceived, which may contribute to the high rate of elective circumcision. Brown & Brown (1987) reported the most correlated factor is whether the father is circumcised.

Asia

Less than 20%

Armenia, Bhutan, Burma, China, Cambodia, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Laos, Mongolia, Nepal, North Korea, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam.

India

According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) the overall circumcision rate in India is 16%.

China

The overall prevalence of circumcision in China is reported to be 14%.

Hong Kong

A sample of children aged <12 found a circumcision rate of 3.4% (1982). A survey on men who regularly visit female sex workers from 2012 found a circumcision rate of 28%.

Singapore

The prevalence of circumcision in Singapore is estimated to be 14.9%.

Taiwan

It is estimated that the circumcision rate for men aged 20–40 is between 10 and 15%.

Cambodia

The overall prevalence of circumcision in Cambodia is reported to be 3.5%.

Between 20% and 80%

Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, and South Korea.

South Korea

Circumcision is largely a modern-day phenomenon in South Korea. While during the twentieth century, the rate of circumcision increased to around 80%, virtually no circumcision was performed prior to 1945, as it was against Korea's long and strong tradition of preserving the body as a gift from parents. A 2001 study of 20-year-old South Korean men found that 78% were circumcised. At the time, the authors commented that "South Korea has possibly the largest absolute number of teenage or adult circumcisions anywhere in the world. Because circumcision started through contact with the American military during the Korean War, South Korea has an unusual history of circumcision." According to a 2002 study, 86.3% of South Korean males aged 14–29 were circumcised. In 2012, it is the case of 75.8% of the same age group. Only after 1999 has some information against circumcision become available (at the time of the 2012 study, only 3% of Korean internet sites, using the most popular Korean search engine Naver, were against indiscriminate circumcision and 97% were for). The authors of the study speculate "that the very existence of information about the history of Korean circumcision, its contrary nature relative to a longstanding tradition, its introduction by the US military, etc., has been extremely influential on the decision-making process regarding circumcision.".

More than 80%

Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bahrain, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Palestine, the Philippines, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen.

The overall prevalence of circumcision (tuli) in the Philippines is reported to be 92.5%. Most circumcisions in the Philippines are performed between the ages of 11 and 13.

Europe

Less than 20%

Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom.

Germany (<15 %)

An exact number for the circumcision rate in Germany is not available. A 2016 study in Population Health Metrics quotes a survey stating 6.7% for men aged 30 to 61. Public health insurances in Germany paid for 32 thousand circumcisions on boys in 2020.

In this context, a peer-reviewed study found that circumcisions of minors increased slightly throughout the study period between 2013 and 2018. The corresponding population-related number rose from 7.5 circumcisions per 1,000 minors in 2013 to 8 in 2018. A peer-reviewed study in 2021 found that circumcisions were more frequent in the first 5 years of life and above 15 years of age, whereas preputium-preserving procedures were preferred in the age groups between 5 and 14 years of age. Its also claims a decrease in the number of circumcisions in recent years, stating that "he hnumber of circumcisions and preputium-preserving operations decreased in absolute and relative numbers" and that "he increasing trend towards neonatal circumcision observed in the United States is absent in Germany". Neonatal in this context refers to circumcisions shortly after birth.

Another peer-reviewed study in 2023 also reports that among than 38,000 German homosexual men without migration background 19.7% were circumcised.

United Kingdom (15.8%)

A national survey on sexual attitudes in 2000 found that 15.8% of men or boys in the United Kingdom (ages 16–44) were circumcised by their parents' choosing, while 11.7% of 16- to 19-year-olds, and 19.6% of 40- to 44-year-olds said they had been circumcised. Apart from black Caribbeans, men born overseas were more likely to be circumcised. Rickwood et al. reported that the proportion of English boys circumcised for medical reasons had fallen from 35% in the early 1930s to 6.5% by the mid-1980s. As of 2000 an estimated 3.8% of male children in the UK were being circumcised for medical reasons by the age of 15. The researchers stated that too many boys, especially under the age of 5, were still being circumcised because of a misdiagnosis of phimosis. They called for a target to reduce the percentage to 2%.

The Netherlands (9 - 16%)

Among participants of the HELIUS study, recruited between 2011 and 2015 (age 18–70), the circumcision rate for Dutch men without a migration background was 9%. The rate was > 95% for men of Moroccan, Turkish or Ghanaian background. A small study from 2019 that recruited homosexual men suffering from various STDs found that 16% of the participants were circumcised.

France (14%)

In France, according to a telephone survey (TNS Sofres Institute, 2008), 14% of men are circumcised.

Bulgaria (13.4%)

The circumcision rate in Bulgaria is estimated to be 13.4%.

Russia (11.8%)

The circumcision rate in Russia is estimated to be 11.8%.

Sweden (11.8%)

A study on hypospadias in 2016 recruited a control group (i.e. men without hypospadias) via the Swedish Population Registry; the reported circumcision rate of the controls was 11.8% with a mean age of 33.

Denmark (1.6 - 7%)

In 1986, 511 out of approximately 478,000 Danish boys aged 0–14 years were circumcised. This corresponds to a cumulative national circumcision rate of around 1.6% by the age of 15 years.

A recent survey (2017–2018) called Project SEXUS surveyed 62,675 Danes aged 15–89 years on sexual topics. The survey found the male circumcision rate to be 7%. Of the respondents 5% were circumcised for medical or other reasons, while 2% were circumcised for religious or traditional reasons.

Spain (6.6%)

The overall prevalence of circumcision in Spain is reported to be 6.6%.

Poland (5%)

A 2017 survey of Polish university students (average age - 25) found a circumcision rate of 5%. This figure is an estimate and fully representative only for students of the university where the survey took place. A 2016 study estimated a prevalence rate of 0.11% in total population.

Slovenia (8.5%)

In Slovenia, a 1999–2001 national probability sample of the general population aged 18–49 years found that overall, 4.5% of Slovenian male citizens reported being circumcised. Prevalence strongly varied across religious groups, with 92.4% of Muslims being circumcised, 1.7% of Roman Catholics, 0% of other religious affiliations (Evangelic, Serbian Orthodox, other), and 7.1% of those with no religious affiliation.

The circumcision rate was reported to be 8.5% in 2016.

Finland (2-4%)

In Finland, the overall prevalence of circumcision is 2–4%, according to a recent publication by the Finnish Health Ministry.

Croatia (1.34%)

A 2016 report found that the circumcision rate in Croatia was 1.34%.

Between 20% and 80%

Belgium, Albania, North Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Bosnia and Herzegovina (58.7% or 41.6%)

In Bosnia and Herzegovina the circumcision rate was 58.7% in 2018. Another study shows a circumcision rate of 41.6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Albania (36.8% or 47.7%)

In Albania during the years 2008–09 the percentage of men age 15–49 who reported having been circumcised was 47.7%. In the years 2017–18 the circumcision rate in Albania had declined to 36.8%.

Belgium (~22%)

A study on genital sensitivity from 2013 recruited ~1400 adult men through leaflets randomly distributed at railway stations in Belgium. In this study 22.6% of the participants reported being circumcised. The majority identified as being Caucasian with only a very small minority reporting being Asian, Arabic or African. In another more recent (2023) and similarly designed study on genital sensitivity 21.7% (152 out of 702) of participants reported being circumcised.

According to data from the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI or RIZIV), the number of circumcisions performed in Belgium amounted to 25,286 in the year of 2011. The vast majority of the procedures were performed on individuals aged < 16 years old. If this rate remains stable it is estimated that over time the circumcision rate for boys aged 16 will reach 31.71%.

Over 80%

Kosovo (91.7%), Azerbaijan (98.5%) and Turkey (98.6%).

Oceania

Australia

Circumcision reached its peak in Australia in the 1950s with a rate of more than 80%, but steadily fell to an estimated 15% in 2012.

The Australian Longitudinal Study of Health and Relationships is a computer assisted telephone interview of males aged 16–64 that uses a nationally representative population sample. In 2005 the interview found that the prevalence of circumcision in Australia was roughly 58%. Circumcision status was more common with males over 30 than males under 30, and more common with males who were born in Australia. 66% of males born in Australia were circumcised and less than 1/3 of males under 30 were circumcised. There has been a decline in the rate of infant circumcision in Australia. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) estimated in 2010 that 10 to 20 percent of newborn boys were being circumcised, but the prevalence of male circumcision is much higher due to the presence of older circumcised males remaining in the population. Medicare Australia records show the number of males younger than six months that underwent circumcision dropped from 19,663 in 2007/08 to 6,309 (4%) in 2016/17 and further to 3,992 (2.48%) in 2023.

New Zealand

According to the World Health Organization, fewer than 20% of males are circumcised in New Zealand in 2007. In New Zealand routine circumcision for which there is no medical indication is uncommon and no longer publicly funded within the public hospital system. In a study of men born in 1972–1973 in Dunedin, 40.2% were circumcised. In a study of men born in 1977 in Christchurch, 26.1% were circumcised. A 1991 survey conducted in Waikato found that 7% of male infants were circumcised.

Pacific Islands

Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries.

See also

• Genital modification and mutilation

References and notes

Notes

References

1. Staff. "Sexually transmitted infections (STIs)". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 11 June 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
2. Leach P (2010). The Essential First Year. Dorling Kindersley Limited. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-7566-6331-5.
3. Perry S, Hockenberry M, Cashion M, Rhodes Alden K, Olshansky E, Leonard Lowdermilk D (2022). "Nursing Care of the Newborn and Family". Maternal child nursing care (7th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 978-0-323-82587-0. The World Health Organization recognizes male circumcision as an important intervention in reducing the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV in men.
4. Manual for early infant male circumcision under local anaesthesia (PDF). Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2022. Retrieved 31 May 2022.
5. Hay W, Levin M (25 June 2012). Current Diagnosis and Treatment Pediatrics 21/E. McGraw Hill Professional. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-07-177971-5. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016.
6. ^ Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (2016). "Table 1 Percentage of circumcised males in each of the 237 countries and territories in the world". Population Health Metrics. 14: 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
7. ^ Ferris JA, Richters J, Pitts MK, Shelley JM, Simpson JM, Ryall R, et al. (April 2010). "Circumcision in Australia: further evidence on its effects on sexual health and wellbeing". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 34 (2): 160–164. doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00501.x. PMID 23331360.
8. ^ Pang MG, Kim DS (January 2002). "Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes". BJU International. 89 (1): 48–54. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02545.x. PMID 11849160.
9. ^ Introcaso CE, Xu F, Kilmarx PH, Zaidi A, Markowitz LE (July 2013). "Prevalence of circumcision among men and boys aged 14 to 59 years in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005-2010". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 40 (7): 521–525. doi:10.1097/01.OLQ.0000430797.56499.0d. PMID 23965763. S2CID 31883301.
10. Homfray V, Tanton C, Mitchell KR, Miller RF, Field N, Macdowall W, et al. (July 2015). "Examining the association between male circumcision and sexual function: evidence from a British probability survey". AIDS. 29 (11): 1411–1416. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000745. PMC 4502984. PMID 26091302. The prevalence of male circumcision in Britain was 20.7% .
11. ^ Weiss H, Polonsky J, Bailey R, Hankins C, Halperin D, Schmid G (2007). Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety, and acceptability (PDF). Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 8. ISBN 978-92-4-159616-9. OCLC 425961131. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
12. "Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2010. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2015.
13. ^ Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (1 March 2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14 (1): 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
14. ^ Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE (May 2014). "Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have?". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 89 (5): 677–686. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001. PMID 24702735.
15. Hart-Cooper GD, Tao G, Stock JA, Hoover KW (November 2014). "Circumcision of privately insured males aged 0 to 18 years in the United States". Pediatrics. 134 (5): 950–956. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1007. PMID 25332502. S2CID 14839564.
16. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (1 March 2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14: 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
17. "Preventing HIV through safe voluntary medical male circumcision for adolescent boys and men in generalized HIV epidemics: recommendations and key considerations". www.who.int. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
18. "Circumcision Rates in Sub-Saharan Africa Spike After Partnership with Local Religious Leaders". WCM Newsroom. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
19. Baskin L (29 April 2021). Lockwood C, Wilcox D, Eckler K (eds.). "Patient education: Circumcision in baby boys (Beyond the Basics)". UpToDate. Archived from the original on 22 November 2022. Retrieved 22 November 2022. ...this is probably an underestimate of the true incidence of circumcised males, which is likely closer to 80 percent...
20. Vardanyan AN (2013). "Reclaiming Circumcision: Armenian Stories". Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements. pp. 307–315. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_20. ISBN 978-94-007-6406-4.
21. Drain PK, Halperin DT, Hughes JP, Klausner JD, Bailey RC (November 2006). "Male circumcision, religion, and infectious diseases: an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries". BMC Infectious Diseases. 6 (1): 172. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-172. PMC 1764746. PMID 17137513.
22. Wise J (July 2006). "Demand for male circumcision rises in a bid to prevent HIV". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 84 (7): 509–511. PMC 2627386. PMID 16878217. As a result, there are already indications of increasing demand for male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising societies in Southern Africa.
23. Lawal TA, Olapade-Olaopa EO (April 2017). "Circumcision and its effects in Africa". Translational Andrology and Urology. 6 (2): 149–157. doi:10.21037/tau.2016.12.02. PMC 5422680. PMID 28540221.
24. "Questions and answers: NIAID-sponsored adult male circumcision trials in Kenya and Uganda". National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. December 2006. Archived from the original on 9 March 2010.
25. ^ Williams BG, Lloyd-Smith JO, Gouws E, Hankins C, Getz WM, Hargrove J, et al. (July 2006). "The potential impact of male circumcision on HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa". PLOS Medicine. 3 (7): e262. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030262. PMC 1489185. PMID 16822094.
26. ^ "Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention: insert 2" (PDF). World Health Organization. p. 2.
27. ^ Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (4 April 2016). "Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0080-6. PMC 4820865. PMID 27051352.
28. Peltzer K, Onoya D, Makonko E, Simbayi L (2014). "Prevalence and acceptability of male circumcision in South Africa". African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 11 (4): 126–130. doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v11i4.19. PMC 4202407. PMID 25392591.
29. George C, Roberts R, Deveaux L, Brennen DF, Read SE (20 August 2019). ""Getting to Zero New HIV Infections in the Caribbean": Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Male Circumcision Among Adolescent Males in The Bahamas". American Journal of Men's Health. 13 (4): 1557988319872074. doi:10.1177/1557988319872074. PMC 6704421. PMID 31431104.
30. Pando MA, Balan IC, Dolezal C, Marone R, Barreda V, Carballo-Dieguez A, et al. (June 2013). "Low frequency of male circumcision and unwillingness to be circumcised among MSM in Buenos Aires, Argentina: association with sexually transmitted infections". Journal of the International AIDS Society. 16 (1): 18500. doi:10.7448/IAS.16.1.18500. PMC 3676535. PMID 23746302.
31. ^ Castellsagué X, Peeling RW, Franceschi S, de Sanjosé S, Smith JS, Albero G, et al. (November 2005). "Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female partners of circumcised and uncircumcised adult men". American Journal of Epidemiology. 162 (9): 907–916. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi284. PMID 16177149.
32. Périssé AR, Schechter M, Blattner W (April 2009). "Association between male circumcision and prevalent HIV infections in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil". Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 50 (4): 435–437. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181958591. PMC 2864635. PMID 19322041.
33. Van Howe RS, Cold CJ, Lajous M, Lazcano-Ponce E, Mueller N (February 2006). "Human papillomavirus link to circumcision is misleading". Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 15 (2): 405, author reply 405-405, author reply 406. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0818. PMID 16492939. Circumcision is not usually performed by public sector health care providers in Mexico and we estimate the prevalence to be 10% to 31%, depending on the population.
34. Dávila-Conn V, García-Morales C, Matías-Florentino M, López-Ortiz E, Paz-Juárez HE, Beristain-Barreda Á, et al. (November 2021). "Characteristics and growth of the genetic HIV transmission network of Mexico City during 2020". Journal of the International AIDS Society. 24 (11): e25836. doi:10.1002/jia2.25836. PMC 8583431. PMID 34762774.
35. Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Clatts MC, Jovet-Toledo GG, Vargas-Molina RL, Goldsamt LA, García H (November 2012). "More than foreskin: circumcision status, history of HIV/STI, and sexual risk in a clinic-based sample of men in Puerto Rico". The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 9 (11): 2933–2937. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02871.x. PMID 22897699. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
36. ^ "Data Tables — The Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) 2006–2007 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey" (PDF). Public Health Agency of Canada. p. 267. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 October 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
37. "Newborn male circumcision | Canadian Paediatric Society". Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
38. "Circumcision Policy Statements". www.cirp.org. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
39. "Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society". CMAJ. 154 (6): 769–780. March 1996. PMC 1487803. PMID 8634956. Archived from the original on 23 October 2007.
40. Wirth JL (November 1980). "Current circumcision practices: Canada". Pediatrics. 66 (5): 705–708. doi:10.1542/peds.66.5.705. PMID 7432876. S2CID 35235748. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2012.
41. Goel V, ed. (May 1996). Patterns of Health Care in Ontario, 2nd edition (PDF). Canadian Medical Association. pp. 295. ISBN 978-0-920169-79-7.
42. Sorokan ST, Finlay JC, Jefferies AL (2015). "Newborn male circumcision". Paediatrics & Child Health. 20 (6): 311–320. doi:10.1093/pch/20.6.311. PMC 4578472. PMID 26435672. Archived from the original on 30 October 2019. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
43. Rediger C, Muller AJ (February 2013). "Parents' rationale for male circumcision". Canadian Family Physician. 59 (2): e110–e115. PMC 3576965. PMID 23418252. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023.
44. Introcaso CE, Xu F, Kilmarx PH, Zaidi A, Markowitz LE (July 2013). "Prevalence of circumcision among men and boys aged 14 to 59 years in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005-2010". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 40 (7). American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association: 521–525. doi:10.1097/01.OLQ.0000430797.56499.0d. PMID 23965763. S2CID 31883301.
45. ^ Baskin L, Lockwood C, Wilcox D, Eckler K (April 2023). "Patient education: Circumcision in baby boys (Beyond the Basics)". Retrieved 22 June 2024. ...this is probably an underestimate of the true incidence of circumcised males, which is likely closer to 80 percent...
46. Adler PW (December 2011). "Is it lawful to use Medicaid to pay for circumcision?". Journal of Law and Medicine. 19 (2): 335–353. PMID 22320007.
47. "Florida Managed Medical Assistance Program" (PDF). Agency for Health Care Administration State of Florida. 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
48. "Provider Bulletin" (PDF). Missouri Department of Social Services. 12 June 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
49. "Clinical Policy 1A-22, Medically Necessary Circumcision Revised | NC Medicaid". medicaid.ncdhhs.gov. 29 December 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2024.
50. "Medicaid Bulletin: SCDHHS policy updates for July 1, 2021" (PDF). Healthy Connections Medicaid. 3 June 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
51. "Provider Bulletin" (PDF). Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Colorado. September 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
52. Quayle SS, Coplen DE, Austin PF (October 2003). "The effect of health care coverage on circumcision rates among newborns". The Journal of Urology. 170 (4 Pt 2): 1533–6, discussion 1536. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000091215.99513.0f. PMID 14501653.
53. Leibowitz AA, Desmond K, Belin T (January 2009). "Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States". American Journal of Public Health. 99 (1): 138–145. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.134403. PMC 2636604. PMID 19008503. The mean mewborn male circumcision rate was 55.9%. When we controlled for other factors, hospitals in states in which Medicaid covers routine male circumcision had circumcision rates that were 24 percentage points higher than did hospitals in states without such coverage (P < .001).
54. Waskett JH (August 2007). "Hospital Discharge Data Underestimate Circumcision Rates". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 34 (8): 624. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3180de2120. PMID 17667534 – via doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3180de2120 PMID 17667534. Researchers should be aware that infant circumcision rates are likely to be significantly higher than hospital discharge data might suggest.
55. Fairbanks-Rossi L (1 July 2011). "Fretting over Foreskin". Inlander. Retrieved 22 June 2024. "The reason the stats are bogus," Dr. Seppa explains, "is that the numbers are based on what happens in hospitals … it's underestimated because people no longer circumcise at the hospital." Seppa estimates it would take "months of tallying" procedures at every private office and clinic in the community to get an accurate number.
56. Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C (October 2013). Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2011. HCUP Statistical Brief No. 165. (Report). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Archived from the original on 24 October 2013.
57. Report 10 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (I-99): Neonatal Circumcision. 1999 AMA Interim Meeting: Summaries and Recommendations of Council on Scientific Affairs Reports. American Medical Association. December 1999. p. 17. Archived from the original on 5 July 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2006.
58. Brown MS, Brown CA (August 1987). "Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns". Pediatrics. 80 (2): 215–219. doi:10.1542/peds.80.2.215. PMID 3615091. S2CID 245205819. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
59. ^ "An Outpatient Observation of the Foreskin Among Chinese Children in Hong Kong" (PDF). Singapore Medical Journal. 24 (2). April 1982. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
60. "National Family Health Survey". rchiips.org. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
61. Wang Z, Lau JT, Gu J (October 2012). "Acceptability of circumcision among clients of female sex worker in Hong Kong". AIDS and Behavior. 16 (7): 1836–1845. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-0088-7. PMID 22080385. S2CID 23556728.
62. Chen CH, Cheng WM, Fan YH, Chang TP (February 2023). "Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan". Scientific Reports. 13 (1): 2313. Bibcode:2023NatSR..13.2313C. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20140-8. PMC 9911792. PMID 36759665. S2CID 256667132.
63. ^ Kim D, Koo SA, Pang MG (December 2012). "Decline in male circumcision in South Korea". BMC Public Health. 12: 1067. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1067. PMC 3526493. PMID 23227923.
64. Ku JH, Kim ME, Lee NK, Park YH (February 2003). "Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea: community based survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 79 (1): 65–67. doi:10.1136/sti.79.1.65. PMC 1744613. PMID 12576619.
65. Or MY (November 2006). "Israel teaches WHO about circumcision". Ynetnews. ynet news. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
66. Darby R (August 2011). "Routine peripubertal circumcision?". CMAJ. 183 (11): 1283–1284. doi:10.1503/cmaj.111-2060. PMC 3153524. PMID 21825054.
67. Ong C (29 May 2008). "Philippine doctors question medical benefits of circumcision". Channel News Asia. MediaCorp. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
68. Kamtsiuris P, Bergmann E, Rattay P, Schlaud M (2007). "" [Use of medical services. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz (in German). 50 (5–6): 836–850. doi:10.1007/s00103-007-0247-1. PMID 17514470. S2CID 29786579.
69. ^ Dave SS, Fenton KA, Mercer CH, Erens B, Wellings K, Johnson AM (December 2003). "Male circumcision in Britain: findings from a national probability sample survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 79 (6): 499–500. doi:10.1136/sti.79.6.499. PMC 1744763. PMID 14663134.
70. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (4 April 2016). "Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0080-6. PMC 4820865. PMID 27051352.
71. Schäfer M (2 May 2022). "Betroffener zu Jungen-Beschneidungen: "Die Politik ist gescheitert"". Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung (NOZ).
72. "Entwicklung der Zirkumzisionszahlen in Deutschland seit Billigung der rituellen Beschneidung". springermedizin.de (in German). Retrieved 2 April 2024.
73. Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C, Gödeke J, Muensterer OJ (7 March 2021). "Circumcision and its alternatives in Germany: an analysis of nationwide hospital routine data". BMC Urology. 21 (1): 34. doi:10.1186/s12894-021-00804-9. ISSN 1471-2490. PMC 7938535. PMID 33678182.
74. Schmidt AJ, Ross MW, Berg RC, Altan P (January 2023). "Impact of Migration and Acculturation on Turkish Men Who Have Sex with Men in Germany: Results from the 2010 European MSM Internet Survey". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 52 (1): 283–290. doi:10.1007/s10508-022-02468-4. hdl:10037/28769. PMID 36396921.
75. Rickwood AM, Kenny SE, Donnell SC (September 2000). "Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice". BMJ. 321 (7264): 792–793. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7264.792. PMC 27490. PMID 11009516.
76. Alberts CJ, Michel A, Bruisten S, Snijder MB, Prins M, Waterboer T, et al. (June 2017). "High-risk human papillomavirus seroprevalence in men and women of six different ethnicities in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: The HELIUS study". Papillomavirus Research. 3: 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2017.01.003. PMC 5883189. PMID 28720457.
77. Van Bilsen WP, Kovaleva A, Bleeker MC, King AJ, Bruisten SM, Brokking W, et al. (December 2019). "HPV infections and flat penile lesions of the penis in men who have sex with men". Papillomavirus Research. 8: 100173. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100173. PMC 6595232. PMID 31226447.
78. "Telephone survey of the TNS Sofres Institute (commissioned by Manix)". 2008. Archived from the original on 8 August 2011..
79. Örtqvist L, Fossum M, Andersson M, Nordenström A, Frisén L, Holmdahl G, et al. (March 2017). "Sexuality and fertility in men with hypospadias; improved outcome". Andrology. 5 (2): 286–293. doi:10.1111/andr.12309. PMID 27992969. S2CID 207012229.
80. Frisch M, Friis S, Kjaer SK, Melbye M (December 1995). "Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943-90)". BMJ. 311 (7018): 1471. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1471. PMC 2543732. PMID 8520335.
81. "Projekt SEXUS". www.projektsexus.dk (in Danish). Archived from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
82. Ganczak M (20 October 2017). "Polish medical students' attitudes regarding male circumcision as a strategy to HIV prevention". European Journal of Public Health. 27 (3). doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.036.
83. Klavs I, Hamers FF (February 2008). "Male circumcision in Slovenia: results from a national probability sample survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 84 (1): 49–50. doi:10.1136/sti.2007.027524. PMID 17881413. S2CID 24535897.
84. Maija K, Taskinen S. "Esinahan kirurgia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
85. ^ Bronselaer GA, Schober JM, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, T'Sjoen G, Vlietinck R, Hoebeke PB (May 2013). "Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort". BJU International. 111 (5): 820–827. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x. PMID 23374102. S2CID 25379775. Archived from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
86. ^ Claeys W, Bronselaer G, Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Spinoit AF (March 2023). "The self-assessment of genital anatomy, sexual function, and genital sensation (SAGASF-M) questionnaire in a Belgian Dutch-speaking male population: A validating study". Andrology. 11 (3): 489–500. doi:10.1111/andr.13348. hdl:1854/LU-01GK3RWXT98FGJFERRT7WF2NRF. PMID 36426587. S2CID 253880096. Archived from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
87. "13 HIV/AIDS-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior" (PDF). Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Institute of Statistics (Albania). p. 247. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2019.
88. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, et al. (2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14: 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
89. "12.10 Male Circumcision" (PDF). Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. March 2010. p. 203. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
90. "Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Final Report (English)". Institute of Statistics, Institute of Public Health, and ICF. Tirana, Albania. 2017–2018. Archived from the original on 4 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
91. "Trends in pediatric circumcision in Belgium and the Brussels University Hospital from 1994 to 2012 | Scriptieprijs". scriptiebank.be. Archived from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
92. "Incidence and prevalence of circumcision in Australia". Circumcision Information Australia. January 2013. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
93. Smith AM, Pitts MK, Shelley JM, Richters J, Ferris J (July 2007). "The Australian longitudinal study of health and relationships". BMC Public Health. 7: 139. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-139. PMC 1931435. PMID 17608953.
94. Richters J, Smith AM, de Visser RO, Grulich AE, Rissel CE (August 2006). "Circumcision in Australia: prevalence and effects on sexual health". International Journal of STD & AIDS. 17 (8): 547–554. doi:10.1258/095646206778145730. PMID 16925903. S2CID 24396989.
95. "Circumcision of Male Infants". Royal Australasian College of Physicians. September 2010. Archived from the original on 10 February 2013. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
96. The incidence of circumcision in Australia was very high until 1971 when it started a steep decline. Consequently, circumcised males tend to be older.
97. Yosufzai R (19 February 2018). "Why is the number of male circumcisions declining in Australia?". SBS News. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
98. "Medicare Australia - Statistics - MBS Item Statistics". Medicare Australia - MBS Item Statistics. January 2024. Archived from the original on 3 September 2024. Retrieved 3 September 2024.
99. ^ Afsari M, Beasley SW, Maoate K, Heckert K (March 2002). "Attitudes of Pacific parents to circumcision of boys". Pacific Health Dialog. 9 (1): 29–33. PMID 12737414. Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries.
100. Dickson N, van Roode T, Paul C (August 2005). "Herpes simplex virus type 2 status at age 26 is not related to early circumcision in a birth cohort". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 32 (8): 517–519. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000161296.58095.ab. PMID 16041257. S2CID 34088021.
101. Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ (November 2006). "Circumcision status and risk of sexually transmitted infection in young adult males: an analysis of a longitudinal birth cohort". Pediatrics. 118 (5): 1971–1977. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1175. PMID 17079568. S2CID 72751030.
102. Lawrenson RA (May 1991). "Current practice of neonatal circumcision in the Waikato". The New Zealand Medical Journal. 104 (911): 184–185. PMID 1898442.

• Circumcision
• Circumcision debate
• Gender-related violence
• Men's health
• Men's rights