Misplaced Pages

In mathematics, a projective bundle is a fiber bundle whose fibers are projective spaces.

By definition, a scheme X over a Noetherian scheme S is a P-bundle if it is locally a projective n-space; i.e., ${\displaystyle X\times _{S}U\simeq \mathbb {P} _{U}^{n}}$ and transition automorphisms are linear. Over a regular scheme S such as a smooth variety, every projective bundle is of the form ${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} (E)}$ for some vector bundle (locally free sheaf) E.

The projective bundle of a vector bundle

Every vector bundle over a variety X gives a projective bundle by taking the projective spaces of the fibers, but not all projective bundles arise in this way: there is an obstruction in the cohomology group H(X,O*). To see why, recall that a projective bundle comes equipped with transition functions on double intersections of a suitable open cover. On triple overlaps, any lift of these transition functions satisfies the cocycle condition up to an invertible function. The collection of these functions forms a 2-cocycle which vanishes in H(X,O*) only if the projective bundle is the projectivization of a vector bundle. In particular, if X is a compact Riemann surface then H(X,O*)=0, and so this obstruction vanishes.

The projective bundle of a vector bundle E is the same thing as the Grassmann bundle ${\displaystyle G_{1}(E)}$ of 1-planes in E.

The projective bundle P(E) of a vector bundle E is characterized by the universal property that says:

Given a morphism f: T → X, to factorize f through the projection map p: P(E) → X is to specify a line subbundle of fE.

For example, taking f to be p, one gets the line subbundle O(-1) of pE, called the tautological line bundle on P(E). Moreover, this O(-1) is a universal bundle in the sense that when a line bundle L gives a factorization f = p ∘ g, L is the pullback of O(-1) along g. See also Cone#O(1) for a more explicit construction of O(-1).

On P(E), there is a natural exact sequence (called the tautological exact sequence):

${\displaystyle 0\to {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbf {P} (E)}(-1)\to p^{*}E\to Q\to 0}$

where Q is called the tautological quotient-bundle.

Let E ⊂ F be vector bundles (locally free sheaves of finite rank) on X and G = F/E. Let q: P(F) → X be the projection. Then the natural map O(-1) → qF → qG is a global section of the sheaf hom Hom(O(-1), qG) = q G ⊗ O(1). Moreover, this natural map vanishes at a point exactly when the point is a line in E; in other words, the zero-locus of this section is P(E).

A particularly useful instance of this construction is when F is the direct sum E ⊕ 1 of E and the trivial line bundle (i.e., the structure sheaf). Then P(E) is a hyperplane in P(E ⊕ 1), called the hyperplane at infinity, and the complement of P(E) can be identified with E. In this way, P(E ⊕ 1) is referred to as the projective completion (or "compactification") of E.

The projective bundle P(E) is stable under twisting E by a line bundle; precisely, given a line bundle L, there is the natural isomorphism:

${\displaystyle g:\mathbf {P} (E){\overset {\sim }{\to }}\mathbf {P} (E\otimes L)}$

such that ${\displaystyle g^{*}({\mathcal {O}}(-1))\simeq {\mathcal {O}}(-1)\otimes p^{*}L.}$ (In fact, one gets g by the universal property applied to the line bundle on the right.)

Examples

Many non-trivial examples of projective bundles can be found using fibrations over ${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{1}}$ such as Lefschetz fibrations. For example, an elliptic K3 surface ${\displaystyle X}$ is a K3 surface with a fibration

${\displaystyle \pi :X\to \mathbb {P} ^{1}}$

such that the fibers ${\displaystyle E_{p}}$ for ${\displaystyle p\in \mathbb {P} ^{1}}$ are generically elliptic curves. Because every elliptic curve is a genus 1 curve with a distinguished point, there exists a global section of the fibration. Because of this global section, there exists a model of ${\displaystyle X}$ giving a morphism to the projective bundle

${\displaystyle X\to \mathbb {P} ({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(4)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(6)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}})}$

defined by the Weierstrass equation

${\displaystyle y^{2}z+a_{1}xyz+a_{3}yz^{2}=x^{3}+a_{2}x^{2}z+a_{4}xz^{2}+a_{6}z^{3}}$

where ${\displaystyle x,y,z}$ represent the local coordinates of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(4),{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(6),{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}}$, respectively, and the coefficients

${\displaystyle a_{i}\in H^{0}(\mathbb {P} ^{1},{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(2i))}$

are sections of sheaves on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{1}}$. Note this equation is well-defined because each term in the Weierstrass equation has total degree ${\displaystyle 12}$ (meaning the degree of the coefficient plus the degree of the monomial. For example, ${\displaystyle {\text{deg}}(a_{1}xyz)=2+(4+6+0)=12}$).

Cohomology ring and Chow group

Let X be a complex smooth projective variety and E a complex vector bundle of rank r on it. Let p: P(E) → X be the projective bundle of E. Then the cohomology ring H(P(E)) is an algebra over H(X) through the pullback p. Then the first Chern class ζ = c₁(O(1)) generates H(P(E)) with the relation

${\displaystyle \zeta ^{r}+c_{1}(E)\zeta ^{r-1}+\cdots +c_{r}(E)=0}$

where c_i(E) is the i-th Chern class of E. One interesting feature of this description is that one can define Chern classes as the coefficients in the relation; this is the approach taken by Grothendieck.

Over fields other than the complex field, the same description remains true with Chow ring in place of cohomology ring (still assuming X is smooth). In particular, for Chow groups, there is the direct sum decomposition

${\displaystyle A_{k}(\mathbf {P} (E))=\bigoplus _{i=0}^{r-1}\zeta ^{i}A_{k-r+1+i}(X).}$

As it turned out, this decomposition remains valid even if X is not smooth nor projective. In contrast, A_k(E) = A_k-r(X), via the Gysin homomorphism, morally because that the fibers of E, the vector spaces, are contractible.

See also

• Proj construction
• cone (algebraic geometry)
• ruled surface (an example of a projective bundle)
• Severi–Brauer variety
• Hirzebruch surface

References

1. Hartshorne 1977, Ch. II, Exercise 7.10. (c).
2. Hartshorne 1977, Ch. II, Proposition 7.12.
3. Hartshorne 1977, Ch. II, Lemma 7.9.
4. Propp, Oron Y. (2019-05-22). "Constructing explicit K3 spectra". arXiv:1810.08953 .
5. Fulton 1998, Theorem 3.3.

• Elencwajg, G.; Narasimhan, M. S. (1983), "Projective bundles on a complex torus", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1983 (340): 1–5, doi:10.1515/crll.1983.340.1, ISSN 0075-4102, MR 0691957, S2CID 122557310
• Fulton, William (1998), Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge., vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-62046-4, MR 1644323
• Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157

• Algebraic topology
• Algebraic geometry