Misplaced Pages

Publius Plautius Hypsaeus

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
1st century BC Roman politician.

Publius Plautius Hypsaeus was a politician of the Roman Republic during the first century BCE.

He was probably the grandson of Marcus Plautius Hypsaeus, consul in 125 BCE who, in 73 BCE, prosecuted Marcus Crassus for incestum with a Vestal Virgin.

Hypsaeus was Quaestor in around 60 BCE under Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, and he was said to have had his amicitia (friendship/political backing). He was Aedile Curulus in 58 BCE and Praetor in 55 BCE.

In 52 BCE, Hypsaeus was one of three men – along with Titus Annius Milo and Quintus Metellus Scipio – who campaigned for the consulship. Their campaign was divisive, involving extensive bribery of the people and the formation of armed gangs loyal to each candidate. The open hostility was particularly marked between Publius Clodius Pulcher and Titus Annius Milo. Milo, backed by Cicero, was on one side, while Clodius and both Hypsaeus and Scipio were on the other. Their open violence culminated in the murder of Clodius and the burning down of both the Curia Julia and the Basilica Porcia in the Forum Romanum.

In consequence, the elections for the consulship and praetorship could not be completed, and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus was made sole Consul for the year. One of his acts in this position was to propose trials for several offences, in particular the giving and receiving of bribes. He allowed that anyone who wished to could call anyone to account for a period of almost twenty years, specifically since his first consulship.

Hypsaeus was one of a number of prominent citizens to be prosecuted under these new laws. Pompey, despite their amicitia, was quick to abandon Hypsaeus during the prosecution for electoral malpractice in the following way: While he was coming from his bath, Hypsaeus threw himself at his feet, begging for help as a nobleman and a friend. Pompey insulted him, and walked away, saying that he was keeping him from his dinner. He was found guilty and exiled, but he retained his wealth, unlike Milo, exiled under the same law.

References

  1. Ronald Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy p.87
  2. Martin Stone, A Year of One's Own: Dating the Praetorship of Marcus Crassus. (Academia.au)
  3. Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Commentary on Cicero’s Pro Milone C16-18.
  4. Ronald Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy, p. 255.
  5. Syme, Augustan Aristocracy, p.492.
  6. CIL 1.159 ILLRP 386
  7. Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Milone.
  8. Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Commentary on Cicero’s Pro Milone.
  9. John T Ramsey How and Why was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 BCE?, Historia (Jstor) 65, 2016/3, p.298-324.
  10. Appian, The Civil Wars, 2.23.
  11. John T Ramsey, How and Why was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 BCE?, Historia (Jstor) 65, 2016/3 298-324
  12. Valerius Maximus, Memorable Doings and Sayings, 9.5
  13. Plutarch, Life of Pompey 55.
  14. Appian, The Civil Wars, 2.23


Stub icon

This article about an ancient Roman politician is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: