Misplaced Pages

Criminology and penology
Theory Anomie Biosocial criminology Broken windows Collective efficacy Crime analysis Criminalization Differential association Deviance Expressive function of law Labeling theory Psychopathy Rational choice Risk & actuarial criminology Social control Social learning Strain Subculture Symbolic interactionism Victimology
Major theorists Émile Durkheim Hans Eysenck Enrico Ferri Michel Foucault Alexandre Lacassagne Cesare Lombroso Archibald Reiss
Types of crime Against Humanity Person State Class Blue-collar White-collar Cold case Perfect Corporate Hate International Juvenile Organized Political Public-order State State-corporate Transnational Victimless War
Methods Comparative Profiling Critical theory Ethnography Uniform Crime Reports Crime mapping Crime statistics Positivist school Qualitative Quantitative BJS NIBRS
Penology Denunciation Deterrence Incapacitation Trial Prison abolition open reform Prisoner Prisoner abuse Prisoners' rights Rehabilitation Recidivism Justice in penology Participatory Restorative Transformative Retributive Utilitarian Solitary confinement
Schools Anarchist Chicago Classical Conflict Critical Environmental Feminist Integrative Italian Marxist Neo-classical Positivist Postmodernist Realism Left Right
Subfields American Anthropological Biosocial criminology Conflict Criminology Critical Culture Cyber Demography Development Environmental Experimental Organizational Political Public Radical criminology
Browse Index Journals Organizations People
v t e

Solitary confinement is a form of imprisonment in which an incarcerated person lives in a single cell with little or no contact with other people. It is a punitive tool used within the prison system to discipline or separate incarcerated individuals who are considered to be security risks to other incarcerated individuals or prison staff, as well as those who violate facility rules or are deemed disruptive. However, it can also be used as protective custody for incarcerated individuals whose safety is threatened by other prisoners. This is employed to separate them from the general prison population and prevent injury or death.

A robust body of research has shown that solitary confinement has profound negative psychological, physical, and neurological effects on those who experience it, often lasting well beyond one's time in solitary. While corrections officials have stated that solitary confinement is a necessary tool for maintaining the safety and security of prisons and jails, numerous medical, mental health, and legal professional organizations have criticized the practice and hold the view that it should be sharply curtailed.

Nelson Mandela, the South African anti-apartheid activist, described solitary confinement as "the most forbidding aspect of prison life." Human rights experts have stated that prolonged solitary confinement may amount to torture, and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (known as the Mandela Rules) were revised in 2015 to prohibit placements in solitary for longer than 15 days.

History

The practice of solitary confinement in the United States traces its origins to the late 18th century, when Quakers in Pennsylvania used the method as a substitution for public punishments. Research surrounding the possible psychological and physiological effects of solitary dates back to the 1830s. When the new prison discipline of separate confinement was introduced at Eastern State Penitentiary as part of the "Pennsylvania" or separate system in 1829, commentators attributed the high rate of mental breakdown to the system of isolating prisoners in their cells. Charles Dickens, who visited the Philadelphia Penitentiary during his travels to America, described the "slow and daily tampering with the mysteries of the brain to be immeasurably worse than any torture of the body."

The Supreme Court of the United States made its first comment about the deleterious effects of solitary confinement in 1890, noting that the use of solitary led to reduced mental and physical capabilities (In re Medley 134 U.S. 160). Records from Danish prisons between 1870 and 1920 indicate that individuals in solitary confinement there had also experienced signs of acute mental distress, including anxiety, paranoia, and hallucinations.

The use of solitary confinement increased greatly during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to the rising prevalence of the virus inside prisons and jails. Many correctional facilities were locked down for up to 23 hours a day, confining people in their cells with no programming, phone access, or human contact. In the United States alone, more than 300,000 incarcerated people were held in virus-related lockdowns during the early months of the pandemic.

Purpose

Extracting confessions

Solitary confinement is often used to induce a confession from a prisoner in pre-trial detention. This practice has been more common in Denmark and other Scandinavian countries in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

Protective custody

Solitary confinement is used on incarcerated individuals when they are considered a danger to themselves or others. It is also used on individuals who are at high risk of being harmed by others, for example because they are transgender, have served as a witness to a crime, or have been convicted of crimes such as child molestation or abuse. This latter form of isolation is known as protective custody, and can be either voluntary or involuntary.

Though proponents of solitary have often expressed the belief that solitary confinement promotes safety in correctional facilities, there is substantial evidence that points to the contrary. In 2002, the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America, chaired by John Joseph Gibbons and Nicholas Katzenbach, found that "the increasing use of high-security segregation is counter-productive, often causing violence inside facilities and contributing to recidivism after release."

Shira E. Gordon has argued that solitary confinement "has not come close to solving the very problem it was meant to reduce: prison violence." In support of this view, Gordon cites a 2012 study showing that the rate of violence in California prisons is 20 percent higher than it was in 1989, when California's first supermax prison opened. Gordon also cites the Northern District of California court in Toussaint v. McCarthy, which found that solitary confinement "increase rather than decrease antisocial tendencies among inmates" at Folsom and San Quentin State Prisons in California.

Punishment

Solitary confinement is also commonly used as punishment for those who have violated prison rules or committed other disciplinary infractions. The practice is the norm in super-maximum security (supermax) prisons, where individuals who are deemed dangerous or high risk are held.

Suppressing protest

Critics allege solitary confinement has been used to punish and suppress organizing, activism, and other political activities in prisons. In immigration detention centers, reports have surfaced that immigrant detainees are being placed in solitary to keep those knowledgeable about their rights away from other detainees. Individuals who go on hunger strike to protest poor conditions in immigration facilities are also frequently placed in solitary. Although immigration officials have claimed that their policy of isolating hunger strikers is for the protection of the detained person, medical and legal experts have pointed out that there is no medical basis behind the policy, and that, in the United States, it constitutes a violation of the detainee's First Amendment rights.

Solitary confinement is similarly used as retaliation in prisons and jails, including against whistleblowers who raise awareness of inhumane conditions and jailhouse lawyers who assist others in litigating their rights. There have been further reports of people being placed in solitary based on their race, religion, or sexual orientation.

By country or region

Europe

While solitary confinement is less commonplace in Europe than in other parts of the world including the United States, it is still widely used in many European countries today.

The European Court of Human Rights distinguishes between complete sensory isolation, total social isolation and relative social isolation and notes that "complete sensory isolation, coupled with total social isolation can destroy the personality and constitutes a form of inhuman treatment which cannot be justified by the requirements of security or any other reason. On the other hand, the prohibition of contacts with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons does not in itself amount to inhuman treatment or punishment."

The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, or CPT, defines solitary confinement as "whenever a prisoner is ordered to be held separately from other prisoners, for example, as a result of court decision, as a disciplinary sanction imposed within the prison system, as a preventive administrative measure or for the protection of the prisoner concerned." The CPT "considers that solitary confinement should only be imposed in exceptional circumstances, as a last resort and for the shortest possible time."

Iceland

Iceland has faced criticism for decades over its extensive use of pre-trial solitary confinement. A 2023 report by Amnesty International documented that 61 percent of pre-trial detainees had spent time in solitary confinement in 2021; of those detained that year, 57 percent were foreign nationals, a percentage far higher than the percentage of foreign nationals in Iceland (around 14 percent of the population in 2021).

Italy

Italian prisoners subject to special surveillance ("41-bis regime") may be in de facto solitary confinement. A person sentenced to multiple life sentences in Italy may be required by the Minister of Justice to serve a period of between 6 months to years in the "41-bis regime" of solitary confinement, subject to extension and review.

United Kingdom

In 2015, segregation (solitary confinement) was used 7,889 times. 54 out of 85,509 prisoners held in England and Wales in 2015 were placed in solitary confinement cells in Close Supervision Centres (Shalev & Edgar, 2015:149), England and Wales' version of the US 'Supermax'.

The use of solitary confinement on juveniles and children, as elsewhere, has been a subject of contention. Critics argue that, in the United Kingdom, the state has a duty to "set the highest standards of care" when it limits the liberties of children. Frances Crook is one of many to believe that incarceration and solitary confinement are the harshest forms of possible punishments and "should only be taken as a last resort". Because children are still mentally developing, Crook writes, incarceration should not encourage them to commit more violent crimes.

The penal system has been cited as failing to protect juveniles in custody. In the United Kingdom, 29 children died in penal custody between 1990 and 2006: "Some 41% of the children in custody were officially designated as being vulnerable". That is attributed to the fact that isolation and physical restraint are used as the first response to punish them for simple rule infractions. Moreover, Frances Crook argues that these punitive policies not only violate their basic rights but also leave the children mentally unstable and left with illnesses that are often ignored. Overall, the solitary confinement of youth is considered to be counterproductive because the "restrictive environment... and intense regulation of children" aggravates them, instead of addressing the issue of rehabilitation.

Solitary confinement is colloquially referred to in British English as "the block", "The Segregation Unit" or "the cooler".

United States

Solitary confinement first arose in the United States in the late 1700s among religious groups like the Quakers, who thought isolation would promote repentance and rehabilitation. Though the practice fell out of use in the early 1900s, it experienced a resurgence during the tough on crime era in the 1980s and 1990s. This period also saw the construction of supermax prisons, which typically house individuals in indefinite solitary confinement consisting of upwards of 22 hours a day of isolation.

In the United States penal system today, more than 20 percent of individuals in state and federal prisons and 18 percent of individuals in local jails are placed in solitary confinement or another form of restrictive housing at some point during their incarceration. According to a 2023 report from Solitary Watch and Unlock the Box, it is estimated that more than 122,000 people are held in solitary confinement in state and federal prisons and local jails in the United States on any given day. A report from the Liman Center at Yale Law School found that between 41,000 and 48,000 individuals were held daily in solitary confinement in state and federal prisons for 15 days or more in 2021, with over 6,000 individuals found to have been held in solitary for over a year.

Since 2009, there have been legislative efforts in numerous states to ban the use of solitary confinement for vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and LGBTQ+ people, as well as to end the use of long-term solitary confinement. In 2020, New Jersey passed the Isolated Confinement Restriction Act, which bans the use of solitary beyond 20 consecutive days. As of June 2023, New York, Connecticut, and Nevada have passed legislation banning the use of solitary beyond 15 consecutive days, bringing their use of isolation in line with the United Nations' Mandela Rules.

In July 2023, United States Representative Cori Bush (D-Mo.) introduced the End Solitary Confinement Act, which would prohibit solitary confinement except for up to a four-hour maximum in all federal prisons, jails, and immigration detention centers if passed. The bill would also incentivize similar legislation to be enacted at the state and local levels.

Racial and other disparities

Statistics indicate that members of marginalized groups are disproportionately likely to end up in solitary confinement. A 2019 Correctional Leaders Association/Yale Law School study found that Black women make up 21.5 percent of the United States female prison population, but 42.1 percent of the U.S. female prison population held in solitary. Another study found that 11 percent of all Black men born in Pennsylvania between 1986 and 1989 had been held in solitary by the age of 32. Disparities in the use of solitary have also been found to exist for LGBTQ+ people, Latinos, and Native Americans.

The disproportionate use of solitary on marginalized groups has been attributed to racism and other forms of discrimination which are exacerbated by the correctional environment. People of color may be more likely to be perceived as threatening and consequently receive more disciplinary tickets that land them in solitary; LGBTQ+ individuals may be placed in solitary as protective custody (either voluntarily or involuntarily) to prevent them from being assaulted or otherwise victimized. Notably, some transgender individuals have stated that they would rather risk their safety in the general prison population than being held in the isolation of protective custody.

As Angela J. Hattery and Earl Smith have written, "Solitary confinement is a place where racial history is on full display... Not only are the majority of the staff white and the majority of the prisoners Black and brown, but the very premise of solitary confinement relies on the foundation of white supremacy on which this country was built."

Venezuela

The headquarters for the Bolivarian Intelligence Service (SEBIN) in Plaza Venezuela, Caracas, have an underground detention facility that has been dubbed La Tumba (The Tomb). The facility is located at the place that the underground parking for the Metro Caracas was to be located. The cells are two by three meters that have a cement bed, white walls, security cameras, no windows, and barred doors, with cells aligned next to one another so that there is no interaction between prisoners. Such conditions have caused prisoners to become very ill, but they are denied medical treatment. Bright lights in the cells are kept on so that prisoners lose their sense of time, with the only sounds heard being from the nearby Caracas Metro trains. Those who visit the prisoners are subjected to strip searches by multiple SEBIN personnel.

Allegations of torture in La Tumba, specifically white torture, are also common, with some prisoners attempting to commit suicide. Those conditions according to the NGO Justice and Process are intended to make prisoners plead guilty to the crimes that they are accused of.

Effects

Psychological

Solitary confinement has been associated with significant negative effects on mental health. Research indicates that the psychological effects of solitary confinement may encompass a range of adverse symptoms including "anxiety, depression, anger, cognitive disturbances, perceptual distortions, obsessive thoughts, paranoia, and psychosis." These symptoms are so widespread among individuals held in solitary that some psychiatrists have labeled them "SHU Syndrome," with SHU standing for Special Housing Unit or Security Housing Unit. In a 1983 journal article, Stuart Grassian described SHU Syndrome as a "major, clinically distinguishable psychiatric syndrome." Grassian notes solitary confinement can cause extremely vivid hallucinations in multiple sensory modalities including visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory. Some other effects include dissociative features including amnesia, motor excitement with aimless violence and delusions.

For those who enter the prison system already diagnosed with a mental illness, solitary confinement can significantly worsen their condition. Incarcerated individuals with mental health conditions often "decompensate in isolation, requiring crisis care or psychiatric hospitalization." The lack of human contact and sensory deprivation that characterize solitary confinement have been shown to cause permanent or semi-permanent changes to brain physiology. Alterations to brain physiology can lead individuals to commit suicide or self-harm.

Self-harm

A major issue within the prison system in general, and solitary confinement in particular, is the high number of incarcerated individuals who turn to self-harm. Such self-harm can include, but is not limited to, cutting, head-banging, and swallowing foreign objects.

A 2014 study of New York City jail admissions published in the American Journal of Public Health found that, after controlling for length of jail stay, age, race/ethnicity, and mental illness status, individuals placed in solitary confinement were 6.9 times more likely to commit self-harm and 6.3 times more likely to commit potentially fatal self-harm than the general jail population. While 7.3 percent of jail stays included any time in solitary, 53.3 percent of acts of self-harm and 45 percent of acts of potentially fatal self harm took place among people who had spent time in solitary during their stay.

Incarcerated individuals who attempt self-harm or suicide are often placed on suicide watch, an intensive form of isolation and monitoring often in a room with few if any furnishings. While on suicide watch, individuals are typically denied clothing and bedding (to prevent them from hanging themselves using bedsheets), as well as denied programming and contact visits. Though these conditions are intended to prevent individuals from committing suicide, they often exacerbate trauma and other pre-existing mental health conditions. Despite controls in place, individuals in suicide watch cells have still found ways to harm themselves.

Physical

Solitary confinement has been reported to cause hypertension, headaches, profuse sweating, dizziness, and heart palpitations. Many individuals in solitary experience extreme weight loss due to digestion complications and abdominal pain. They can also develop neck and back pain and muscle stiffness due to long periods of little to no physical activity. These symptoms have been linked to the intense anxiety and sensory deprivation caused by isolation, and often worsen with repeated visits to solitary.

Studies have shown that solitary confinement also has a marked effect on the human brain. fMRI scans have found that social isolation causes brain activity nearly identical to hunger cravings, and that it activates the same regions of the brain as physical pain. Furthermore, the sensory deprivation of solitary has been found to cause reduced electroencephalography (EEG) frequency on brain scans. The part of the brain that plays a major role in memory has been shown to physically shrink after long periods without human interaction. One study that placed adult rats in solitary-like conditions found that, after a month in isolation, the rats' neurons had shrunk by 20 percent.

Social

Some sociologists argue that prisons create a unique social environment that do not allow individuals to create strong social ties inside or outside of the facility. The social isolation that incarcerated individuals experience is especially acute in solitary confinement, where they may be denied access to phone calls, mail, and visits from loved ones.

The psychological effects of isolation continue long after individuals are released from solitary, affecting society as a whole. Upon their reentry into society, many individuals who have spent long periods of time in solitary report having difficulty adjusting back to life outside the prison walls. They are often startled easily, and avoid crowds and public spaces. They seek out small, confined spaces because public areas overwhelm their sensory stimulation.

Anthony Graves, who spent more than 18 years in solitary confinement on the Texas death row before being exonerated in 2010, described the lasting effects of solitary in his testimony for the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights:

Solitary confinement does one thing, it breaks a man's will to live and he ends up deteriorating. He's never the same person again… I have been free for almost two years and I still cry at night, because no one out here can relate to what I have gone through. I battle with feelings of loneliness. I've tried therapy but it didn't work. The therapist was crying more than me. She couldn't believe that our system was putting men through this sort of inhumane treatment.

According to numerous studies, any amount of time in solitary confinement can increase the risk of recidivism after release. A 2007 matched control study of Washington State prisons found that people in the study cohort who spent time in supermax prisons had a 3-year felony recidivism rate of 53 percent, which was 15 percent higher than that of their counterparts in the general prison population. The recidivism rate was even higher among people who were released directly from supermax into the community, at 69 percent.

Legality

The legality of solitary confinement has been frequently challenged over the past sixty years as conceptions surrounding the practice have changed. Much of the legal discussion concerning solitary confinement has centered on whether or not it constitutes torture or cruel and unusual punishment. While international law has generally begun to discourage solitary confinement's use in penal institutions, opponents of solitary confinement have been less successful at challenging it within the United States legal system.

United Nations Special Rapporteurs on Torture Manfred Nowak and Juan Méndez have "repeatedly and unequivocally stated that prolonged solitary confinement is cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and may amount to torture," though their statements are not primary sources in international law.

A 2005 law journal article argued America's detention system is far below the basic minimum standards for treatment of prisoners under international law and has caused an international human rights concern: "U.S. solitary confinement practices contravene international treaty law, violate established international norms, and do not represent sound foreign policy."

Torture

Critics of solitary confinement regard the practice as a form of psychological torture with measurable physiological effects, particularly when the period of confinement is longer than a few weeks or is continued indefinitely.

In October 2011, attorney and activist Juan E. Méndez, then the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, called on all countries to eliminate the practice except in "very exceptional circumstances and for as short a time as possible," with a complete ban for juveniles and individuals with mental disabilities. "Solitary confinement is a harsh measure which is contrary to rehabilitation," Méndez told the General Assembly's Third Committee, which deals with social, humanitarian, and cultural affairs. He continued: "Considering the severe mental pain or suffering solitary confinement may cause, it can amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment when used as a punishment, during pre-trial detention, indefinitely or for a prolonged period, for persons with mental disabilities or juveniles."

The United Nations Committee Against Torture cited use of solitary confinement in the United States as excessive and a violation of the Convention Against Torture in 2014. The United Nations' "Mandela Rules", which were adopted in 2015 and establish minimum standards for the treatment of prisoners, prohibit placements in solitary beyond 15 consecutive days.

In Detention and Torture in South Africa: Psychological, Legal, and Historical Studies, psychologist Don Foster lists solitary confinement as one of the most common forms of torture used on South African detainees. "Given the full context of dependency, helplessness and social isolation common to conditions of South African security law detention," Foster writes, "there can be little doubt that solitary confinement under these circumstances should in itself be regarded as a form of torture."

Ethics

The harsh effects of solitary confinement on the individuals who experience it, particularly those diagnosed with mental illness, have led many to view the practice as cruel and unethical.

In an article for Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Jeffrey Metzner and Jamie Fellner write that solitary confinement may constitute a violation of medical ethics. As the authors note, healthcare professionals are "ethically obligated to refrain from countenancing, condoning, participating in, or facilitating torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment," yet human rights experts have stated that solitary confinement may amount to such treatment. "It is not ethically defensible for health care professionals to acquiesce silently to conditions of confinement that inflict mental harm and violate human rights," they write.

Metzner and Fellner call on physicians not only to provide adequate medical services to individuals in isolation, but to advocate for changes to segregation policies in the facility in which they are employed and to undertake public advocacy to raise awareness of the harms of solitary in society as a whole.

Protests

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (June 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

For nearly as long as solitary confinement has existed, there have been individuals and organized movements protesting its existence. As early as 1838, Quaker prison reformer Elizabeth Fry traveled throughout England and Scotland to speak to policymakers about the dangers of solitary and to call for a reduction in its use. During the mid- to late-20th century, solitary confinement served as a site of resistance for imprisoned Black radicals. At New York's Attica Correctional Facility, for example, Black Muslims purposely filled restrictive housing units to prevent them from being used punitively against members of the Nation of Islam.

In July 2011, individuals held in Security Housing Units (SHU) at Pelican Bay State Prison began a hunger strike to protest the "torturous conditions" in SHU. The participants also sought to advocate for an end to California's policy of holding alleged gang members in indefinite solitary confinement, as well as the termination of the debriefing process, which compels people in solitary to identify either themselves or others as gang members in order to leave isolation. Over the course of the strike, more than 6,000 incarcerated individuals throughout the California prison system stood in solidarity with the Pelican Bay hunger strikers by refusing food.

The men at Pelican Bay organized another strike in 2013, this time drawing 32,000 participants across 33 California prisons. As a result of the strike and subsequent litigation by the Center for Constitutional Rights, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation agreed to end indefinite solitary confinement for all individuals in custody. The Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition, a coalition of grassroots organizations and family members of strike participants, played a key role in raising public awareness for the strikers and their demands.

In the years following the Pelican Bay strikes, incarcerated individuals across the United States have continued to organize for improved prison conditions, including an end to prolonged solitary confinement. In 2022, incarcerated workers in Alabama withheld labor to draw attention to harsh prison conditions and the need for decarceration. In 2023, dozens of incarcerated individuals in Texas went on hunger strike to protest the state's solitary confinement policies. Prison officials in some cases have retaliated against strike participants by sending them to solitary confinement.

Alternatives and reform

In light of the increasing public scrutiny of solitary confinement and its documented effects, corrections leaders, policymakers, and advocates have begun to look to alternatives. The New York City Department of Correction announced in 2013 that it would start transferring individuals with severe mental illness who commit disciplinary infractions to a setting similar to a hospital ward, where they would receive medication and therapy. Those with less severe mental illness who violate facility rules are still placed in solitary, but with increased hours of therapy and a behavioral intervention program.

Another approach that facilities have taken to reduce their reliance on solitary is to restrict the reasons for which people can be sent to solitary in the first place. In 2013, Maine replaced its policy of using solitary as a punishment for every infraction with a system of "informal sanctions" of reductions in privileges, which helped the state cut its then-full supermax population in half. In 2021, Washington State ended its use of disciplinary segregation entirely, stating in a press release that "the agency's data indicates that disciplinary segregation… has not been proven to be an effective sanction or deterrent to negative behavior."

A number of jurisdictions have also enacted legislation prohibiting the use of solitary for vulnerable groups or limiting it to a set number of days for the general prison population. New York's Humane Alternatives to Long-Term (HALT) Solitary Confinement Act prohibits people from being placed in solitary for more than 15 consecutive days, or 20 days in any 60-day period. The legislation also bans placements in solitary for individuals 21 and under or 55 and older; people with physical, medical, or mental disabilities; and people who are pregnant or have recently given birth. Legislative efforts to curb the use of solitary, many of which reflect aspects of HALT, have taken place or are underway in at least 44 other states.

Finally, some corrections agencies have drawn inspiration from European countries such as Norway and Germany for reforming their use of solitary. In these countries, solitary confinement is typically used far less often and for shorter periods of time than in the United States. Norwegian prison cells are also usually more spacious and better furnished compared to their North American counterparts. However, scholars have noted that the experience of solitary confinement in Norway is not necessarily less painful, and have been critical of prison reformists for prioritizing aesthetic sensibilities over the lived experiences of incarcerated people. In 2018, the United Nations Committee against Torture criticised the "high rates of prolonged isolation" of prisoners in Norway, of which it stated, "amounts to solitary confinement".

See also

• Cabin fever
• Isolation to facilitate abuse
• Prison#Control units
• Prison abolition movement
• Single-celling
• Separate system
• Box (form of torture involving solitary confinement in an overheated room)
• Solitary Watch
• Suicide watch

References

1. ^ Lobel, Jules; Smith, Peter Scharff, eds. (2019). Solitary Confinement: Effects, Practices, and Pathways toward Reform. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-094792-7.
2. ^ Browne, Angela; Cambier, Alissa; Agha, Suzanne (1 October 2011). "Prisons Within Prisons: The Use of Segregation in the United States". Federal Sentencing Reporter. 24 (1): 46–49. doi:10.1525/fsr.2011.24.1.46.
3. ^ Bottos, Shauna (2007). Profile of Offenders in Administrative Segregation: A Review of the Literature (Report). Ottawa: Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada. Research Report No. B-39.
4. Haney, Craig (2018). "Restricting the Use of Solitary Confinement". Annual Review of Criminology. 1: 285–310. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092326. ISSN 2572-4568.
5. Mears, Daniel; Hughes, Vivian; Pesta, George B. (November 2021). "Managing Prisons Through Extended Solitary Confinement: A Necessary Approach or a Signal of Prison System Failure?". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 68 (1): 62–84. doi:10.1177/0306624X211058948. PMID 34784829. S2CID 244390888.
6. "Position Statement on Segregation of Prisoners with Mental Illness" (PDF). American Psychiatric Association. December 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
7. "Solitary Confinement as a Public Health Issue". American Public Health Organization. 5 November 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
8. Rawles, Lee (5 February 2018). "ABA House passes measure urging curbs on solitary confinement: 'This is inhumane'". ABAJournal. American Bar Association. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
9. Gilmour, Andrew. "The Nelson Mandela Rules: Protecting the Rights of Persons Deprived of Liberty". UN Chronicle. United Nations. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
10. ^ Section, United Nations News Service (18 October 2011). "UN News - Solitary confinement should be banned in most cases, UN expert says". UN News Service Section. Archived from the original on 24 June 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
11. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules) (General Assembly resolution (annex) A/RES/70/175). 17 December 2015. Rules 44, 45. Rule 44: For the purpose of these rules, solitary confinement shall refer to the confinement of prisoners for 22 hours or more a day without meaningful human contact. Prolonged solitary confinement shall refer to solitary confinement for a time period in excess of 30 consecutive days. Rule 45: (1) Solitary confinement shall be used only in exceptional cases as a last resort, for as short a time as possible and subject to independent review, and only pursuant to the authorization by a competent authority. It shall not be imposed by virtue of a prisoner's sentence. "Nelson Mandela International Day". Archived from the original on 20 August 2022. Retrieved 20 August 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
12. Dickens, Charles (1842). American Notes. Chapman and Hall.
13. "In re Medley/Opinion of the Court - Wikisource, the free online library". Archived from the original on 13 August 2018. Retrieved 12 August 2018.
14. Arrigo, Bruce A.; Bullock, Jennifer Leslie (December 2008). "The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prisoners in Supermax Units". International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology. 52 (6): 622–640. doi:10.1177/0306624X07309720. PMID 18025074. S2CID 10433547.
15. Smith, Peter Scharff (August 2008). "'Degenerate Criminals': Mental Health and Psychiatric Studies of Danish Prisoners in Solitary Confinement, 1870–1920". Criminal Justice and Behavior. 35 (8): 1048–1064. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.559.5564. doi:10.1177/0093854808318782. S2CID 220593357.
16. Cloud, David H.; Ahalt, Cyrus; Augustine, Dallas; Sears, David; Williams, Brie (6 July 2020). "Medical Isolation and Solitary Confinement: Balancing Health and Humanity in US Jails and Prisons During COVID-19". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 35 (9): 2738–2742. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05968-y. ISSN 0884-8734. PMC 7338113. PMID 32632787.
17. "As COVID-19 Spreads In Prisons, Lockdowns Spark Fear Of More Solitary Confinement". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
18. "Solitary Confinement Is Never the Answer: A Special Report on the COVID-19 Pandemic in Prisons and Jails, the Use of Solitary Confinement, and Best Practices for Saving the Lives of Incarcerated People and Correctional Staff" (PDF). Solitary Watch and Unlock the Box. June 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
19. ^ Smith, Peter Scharff (January 2006). "The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History and Review of the Literature". Crime and Justice. 34 (1): 441–528. doi:10.1086/500626. S2CID 144809478.
20. Shalev, Sharon (2015). "Solitary Confinement: The View from Europe". Canadian Journal of Human Rights. 4: 143.
21. Rain Tree, Sara (2023). "Solitary Confinement and Prison Safety" (PDF). Solitary Watch. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
22. John J. Gibbons; Nicholas de B. Katzenbach (8 June 2006). "Confronting Confinement: A Report of The Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2013. Retrieved 18 June 2011.
23. Gordon, Shira E. "Testimony Presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights 'Reassessing Solitary Confinement II: The Human Rights, Fiscal, and Public Safety Consequences'" (PDF). Retrieved 28 June 2023.
24. ^ "Behind Closed Doors: Abuse and Retaliation Against Hunger Strikers in U.S. Immigration Detention" (PDF). ACLU and Physicians for Human Rights. 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
25. Venters, Homer; Dasch-Goldberg, Dana; Rasmussen, Andrew; Keller, Allen S. (May 2009). "Into the Abyss: Mortality and Morbidity Among Detained Immigrants". Human Rights Quarterly. 31 (2): 474–495. doi:10.1353/hrq.0.0074. S2CID 143979116.
26. Gladden, Alex (12 May 2023). "Prisoner advocate says inmate put in solitary for talking to reporter". Montgomery Advertiser. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
27. Barnes, Roxanne (22 December 2021). "Jailhouse Lawyers Are Often Punished With Solitary Confinement". Solitary Watch. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
28. James, Kayla; Vanko, Elena (April 2021). "The Impacts of Solitary Confinement" (PDF). Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
29. Shalev, Sharon (2015). "Solitary confinement: the view from Europe". Canadian Journal of Human Rights. 4 (1). Archived from the original on 26 May 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
30. Oslo District Court (20 April 2016). Krav om fastsettelsesdom for brudd på EMK art. 3 og 8 [Request for declaratory judgement for breach of the ECHR art. 3 & 8] (PDF) (Report) (in Norwegian Bokmål). Anders Behring Breivik v. The State, with Ministry of Justice and Public Security. p. 3. 15-107496rVt-OTrR/02. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 April 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2016 – via Dagbladet., citing Ramirez Sanchez v. France (ECHR 59450/00) sec. 136.
31. Grand Chamber (4 July 2006). Case of Ramirez Sanchez v. France (Judgment). European Court of Human Rights. sec. 123, 136. 59450/00. Archived from the original on 20 August 2022. Retrieved 20 August 2022., citing Messina v. Italy (no. 2) (dec.) (ECHR 25498/94) sec. "The Law" ss. 1.
32. "Solitary confinement of prisoners". 21st General Report of the CPT (Report). European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Council of Europe. 10 November 2011. Archived from the original on 6 June 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020, sec. 54; CPT Standards (2015) sec. 29.
33. CPT Report 2011, sec. 56b, 64.
34. Report to the Icelandic Government on the visit to Iceland carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (PDF) (Report). 28 June 1994. Archived from the original on 1 May 2006.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
35. Cox, Simon (15 May 2014). "The Reykjavik Confessions" (interactive feature). BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018.
36. "Iceland's abusive use of solitary confinement must end immediately". Amnesty International. 31 January 2023.
37. "Iceland: "Waking up to nothing" - Harmful and unjustified use of pre-trial solitary confinement". Amnesty International. EUR 28/6373/2023: 17–18. 31 January 2023.
38. ^ Report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 12 to 22 March 2019 (Report). CPT. 21 January 2020. pp. 28–38. CPT/Inf (2020) 2. Archived from the original on 20 May 2022. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
39. Marini, Fernando (4 March 2019). "Report Decries Use of Solitary Confinement in Italian Prisons". Civil Liberties Union for Europe. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 20 August 2022, citing Palma, Mauro (7 January 2019). Thematic report on the special prison regime pursuant to Article 41-bis of the Penitentiary Act (2016–2018) (PDF) (Report). Italian Parliament reports. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 20 August 2022 – via Garante nazionale dei diritti delle personeprivate della libertà personale.
40. Shalev, Sharon; Edgar, Kimmett (2015). Deep Custody: Segregation units and close supervision centres in England and Wales. London: Prison Reform Trust. ISBN 978-1-908504-97-5. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
41. Tapley, Lance (1 November 2010). "The Worst of the Worst: Supermax Torture in America". Boston Review. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
42. ^ Crook, Frances (September 2006). "Where Is Child Protection in Penal Custody?". Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 16 (3): 137–141. doi:10.1002/cbm.627. PMID 16838387.
43. "Army captain was real life 'Cooler King' from The Great Escape". The Daily Telegraph. London. 17 June 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 16 April 2010.
44. "Cooler King recalls Great Escape". BBC News. 16 March 2004. Archived from the original on 23 August 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2010.
45. ^ Wykstra, Stephanie (17 April 2019). "The case against solitary confinement". Vox. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
46. Kurki, Leena; Morris, Norval (2001). "The Purposes, Practices, and Problems of Supermax Prisons". Crime and Justice. 28: 385–424. doi:10.1086/652214. ISSN 0192-3234. JSTOR 1147678. S2CID 147129265.
47. "Nearly 20 Percent of Prison and Jail Inmates Spent Time in Segregation or Solitary Confinement in 2011–12". Bureau of Justice Statistics. United States Department of Justice. 23 October 2015. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020.
48. "Calculating Torture: Analysis of Federal, State, and Local Data Showing More Than 122,000 People in Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons and Jails" (PDF). Solitary Watch and Unlock the Box. June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
49. The Guardian, 24 Aug. 2022 "Nearly 50,000 People Held in Solitary Confinement in US, Report Says" Archived 26 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine
50. ^ "Banning Torture: Legislative Trends and Policy Solutions for Restricting and Ending Solitary Confinement throughout the United States" (PDF). Unlock the Box. January 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
51. "Gov. Murphy Signs Isolated Confinement Restriction Act Into Law". ACLU New Jersey. 11 July 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
52. "Senate Passes the 'HALT' Solitary Confinement Act". New York State Senate. 18 March 2021. Archived from the original on 31 March 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
53. "Governor Lamont Signs Legislation Limiting the Use of Isolated Confinement". ct.gov. 10 May 2022. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
54. "Lombardo Signs Bill to Limit Use of Solitary Confinement in Nevada Prisons". ACLU Nevada. 16 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
55. Ortiz, Erik (27 July 2023). "Bill to ban solitary confinement in federal prisons introduced in House". NBC News. Retrieved 28 July 2023.
56. "Time-in-Cell 2019: A Snapshot of Restrictive Housing" (PDF). Association of State Correctional Administrators and the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program. September 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
57. Pullen-Blasnik, Hannah; Simes, Jessica T.; Western, Bruce (26 November 2021). "The Population Prevalence of Solitary Confinement". Science Advances. 7 (48): eabj1928. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.1928P. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1928. PMC 8626064. PMID 34826243.
58. Beck, Allen J. (October 2015). "Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011-12" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
59. ^ Eskender, Melat (2022). "Racism and Solitary Confinement" (PDF). Solitary Watch. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
60. Truman, Jennifer L.; Morgan, Rachel E. (June 2022). "Violent Victimization by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, 2017-2022" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
61. Law, Victoria (25 May 2023). "Maryland Solitary Confinement Reform Bill Stalls in Democratic State Legislature, Despite Rare Support From Corrections Union". Solitary Watch/The Nation. Retrieved 9 July 2023. One month after was placed in segregation, staff offered her a choice. She could sign a body waiver, in which she would accept the purported risk of returning to general population, or she could remain in isolation. 'Had I not signed the body waiver, I very well might have killed myself,' Scheibe told Solitary Watch and The Nation. 'I would rather take my chances in general population than be locked in a six-foot cell.'
62. Hattery, Angela J.; Smith, Earl (2022). Way Down in the Hole: Race, Intimacy, and the Reproduction of Racial Ideologies in Solitary Confinement. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-1978823785.
63. ^ Vinogradoff, Ludmila (10 February 2015). ""La tumba", siete celdas de tortura en el corazón de Caracas". ABC. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
64. "Statement of Santiago A. Canton Executive Director, RFK Partners for Human Rights Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights" (PDF). United States Senate. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 July 2015. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
65. ^ "Un calabozo macabro". Univision. 2015. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
66. ^ "Political protesters are left to rot in Venezuela's secretive underground prison". News.com.au. 25 July 2015. Archived from the original on 21 October 2015. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
67. "UNEARTHING THE TOMB: INSIDE VENEZUELA'S SECRET UNDERGROUND TORTURE CHAMBER". Fusion. 2015. Archived from the original on 29 July 2015. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
68. Walker, J.; et al. (18 November 2013). "Changes in Mental State Associated with Prison Environments: A Systematic Review". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 129 (6): 427–36. doi:10.1111/acps.12221. PMID 24237622. S2CID 9187097.
69. ^ Metzner, Jeffrey L.; Fellner, Jamie (March 2010). "Solitary Confinement and Mental Illness in U.S. Prisons: A Challenge for Medical Ethics". J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 38 (1): 104–108. PMID 20305083. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
70. ^ Grassian, Stuart (November 1983). "Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement". American Journal of Psychiatry. 140 (11): 1450–1454. doi:10.1176/ajp.140.11.1450. PMID 6624990. S2CID 6716834.
71. ^ Grassian, Stuart (January 2006). "Psychiatric effects of solitary confinement" (PDF). Wash. U. J. L. & Pol'y. 22: 325. Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2008.
72. Haney, Craig (January 2003). "Mental Health Issues in Long-Term Solitary and "Supermax" Confinement". Crime & Delinquency. 49 (1): 124–156. doi:10.1177/0011128702239239. S2CID 145380807.
73. ^ Kaba, Fatos; et al. (March 2014). "Solitary Confinement and Risk of Self-Harm Among Jail Inmates". American Journal of Public Health. 104 (3): 442–447. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301742. PMC 3953781. PMID 24521238.
74. Quandt, Katie Rose (22 May 2023). "When 'Suicide Watch' Becomes a Death Sentence". The Nation. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
75. Shalev, Sharon (2014). Prisons in health. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. pp. 27–35. ISBN 978-92-890-5059-3.
76. Corcoran, Mary. "Effects of Solitary Confinement on the Wellbeing of Prison Inmates". Applied Psychology Opus. NYU Steinhardt. Archived from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2021.
77. ^ Riccobene, Veronica (June 2023). "Solitary Confinement and the Brain: The Neurological Effects" (PDF). Solitary Watch.
78. Herring, Tiana (8 December 2020). "The research is clear: Solitary confinement causes long-lasting harm". Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
79. Heng V, Zigmond MJ, Smeyne RJ (5 November 2018). Neurological effects of moving from an enriched environment to social isolation in adult mice. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting.
80. Kupers, Terry A. (August 2008). "What To Do With the Survivors? Coping With the Long-Term Effects of Isolated Confinement". Criminal Justice and Behavior. 35 (8): 1005–1016. doi:10.1177/0093854808318591. S2CID 146474911.
81. Goode, Erica (3 August 2015). "Solitary Confinement: Punished for Life". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 6 December 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
82. Graves, Anthony (19 June 2012). "Testimony Presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on The Constitution, Civil Rights & Human Rights 'Reassessing Solitary Confinement: The Human Rights, Fiscal and Public Safety Consequences'" (PDF). Anthony Believes. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
83. Nguyen, Anh (2018). The Determinants and Consequences of Solitary Confinement: Risk Factor, Future Criminal Justice Involvement, and Mortality (Thesis). PhD Thesis. hdl:2027.42/145805. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
84. Mears, Daniel; Bales, William D. (December 2009). "Supermax incarceration and recidivism". Criminology. 47 (4): 1131–1166. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00171.x.
85. Lovell, David; Johnson, Clark; Cain, Kevin (October 2007). "Recidivism of Supermax Prisoners in Washington State". Crime & Delinquency. 53 (4): 633–656. doi:10.1177/0011128706296466. S2CID 53064653.
86. ^ Conley, Anna (April 2013). "Torture in US Jails and Prisons: An Analysis of Solitary Confinement Under International Law". Vienna J. On Int'l Const. Law. 7: 415–453. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
87. Vasiliades, Elizabeth (2005). "Solitary Confinement and International Human Rights: Why the US Prison System Fails Global Standards" (PDF). American University International Law Review. 21: 71–101. Archived from the original on 19 August 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
88. Gawande, Atul (7 January 2009). "Is long-term solitary confinement torture?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 16 July 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2010.
89. A. Vrca; V. Bozikov; Z. Brzović; R. Fuchs; M. Malinar (September 1996). "Visual evoked potentials in relation to factors of imprisonment in detention camps". International Journal of Legal Medicine. 109 (3): 114–117. doi:10.1007/BF01369669. PMID 8956983. S2CID 21450401.. This is the study of 57 Yugoslav POWs referenced in Atul Gawande's 2009 New Yorker article.
90. Hresko, Tracy (Spring 2006). "In the Cellars of the Hollow Men". Pace International Law Review. Archived from the original on 1 September 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
91. Nambiar, Sridevi (5 December 2014). "UN Committee on Torture Says U.S. Must Reform Its Use of Solitary Confinement". Solitary Watch. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
92. "The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners" (PDF). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
93. ^ Foster, Don (1 January 1987). Detention and Torture in South Africa: Psychological, Legal and Historical Studies. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 136.
94. Polizzi, David (2017). Solitary Confinement: Lived Experiences and Ethical Implications. Bristol, United Kingdom: Policy Press. ISBN 9781447337539.
95. Winters, Ali (2019). "The Ethical Conflicts of Working in Solitary Confinement" (PDF). Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics. 16 (2): 18–27.
96. Doshi, Riya (Spring 2020). "An Ethical Analysis of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons". Scaffold: A Showcase of Vanderbilt First-Year Writing. 2. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
97. Flower, Ruth (28 September 2016). "Solitary Confinement and Quakers". Friends Committee on National Legislation. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
98. Felber, Garrett (January 2020). Those Who Know Don't Say: The Nation of Islam, the Black Freedom Movement, and the Carceral State. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. p. 68.
99. ^ Cohn, Marjorie (Spring 2011). "Prisoners Strike Against Torture in California Prisons". National Lawyers Guild Review. 68 (1): 61–62. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
100. Miles, Kathleen (9 July 2013). "California Prison Hunger Strike: 30,000 Inmates Refuse Meals". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
101. "Landmark Agreement Ends Indeterminate Long-Term Solitary Confinement in California". Center for Constitutional Rights. 1 September 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
102. "About". Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity. 3 June 2011. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
103. ^ Ware, Jared (11 November 2022). "Alabama prison strikers' demands push for decarceration". Prism. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
104. Flahive, Paul (26 April 2023). "A Texas prisoners' hunger strike didn't bring the change they'd hoped. Inmates plan to strike again". WBUR. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
105. Honig, Doug; Lee, Melissa (4 April 2014). "Hunger Strikers Released from Solitary Confinement at New Detention Center". American Civil Liberties Union of Washington State. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
106. Yee, Vivian (12 May 2013). "City Plans New Approach to Disciplining Mentally Ill Inmates". New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 August 2022. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
107. Tapley, Lance (25 May 2011). "Reform comes to the supermax". Portland Phoenix. Archived from the original on 2 May 2014.
108. "Press Release: Washington State Department of Corrections Ends Disciplinary Segregation". Washington State Department of Corrections. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
109. "Summary of the Humane Alternatives to Long-Term (HALT) Solitary Confinement Act (A.2500/S.1623)". New York Campaign for Alternatives to Isolated Confinement. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
110. ^ Guthrie, Janelle (11 March 2020). "Looking to Norway for Inspiration on Reducing the Use of Solitary Confinement". Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
111. Subramanian, Ram; Shames, Alison (October 2013). "Sentencing and Prison Practices in Germany and the Netherlands: Implications for the United States" (PDF). Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
112. Crumpler, Rachel (24 July 2023). "How do prisons in other countries prepare inmates for life outside?". Retrieved 24 July 2023.
113. ^ Angelis, Sophie (December 2022). "Limits to Prison Reform". UC Irvine Law Review. 13 (1).
114. Orange, Richard (13 December 2023). "EXPLAINED: How different is the Norwegian prison system really?". The Local Norway. Retrieved 7 March 2024.

Bibliography

• Birckhead, T. R. (2015). Children in isolation: The solitary confinement of youth. Wake Forest Law Review 50(1), 1-80.
• Shalev, S. & Edgar, K. (2015). Deep Custody: Segregation Units and Close Supervision Centres in England and Wales. London: Prison Reform Trust.
• Shalev, S. (2009). Supermax : controlling risk through solitary confinement. Cullompton, UK: Willan. ISBN 978-1-84392-409-8.

External links

• 6×9: A virtual experience of solitary confinement. The Guardian.
• Seeing Solitary: A Project of the Liman Center at Yale Law School
• Stop Solitary - Advocacy Campaign Tools. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
• Voices from Solitary: Dispatches from People Surviving the Lived Experience of Solitary Confinement. Solitary Watch.
• Why US prisons need to abolish solitary confinement | Laura Rovner | TEDxMileHigh. TED (conference).

Organisations

• Campaign for the Abolition of Solitary Confinement
• New York Campaign for Alternatives to Isolated Confinement (CAIC)
• solitaryconfinement.org
• Solitary Watch
• The End Solitary Confinement Act
• Together to End Solitary Confinement
• Unlock the Box

• Law

• Forensic psychology
• Penal imprisonment
• Penology
• Torture
• Human rights by issue
• Prisoner abuse