Misplaced Pages

Pygmy marmoset
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Primates
Suborder:	Haplorhini
Infraorder:	Simiiformes
Family:	Callitrichidae
Genus:	Cebuella J. E. Gray, 1866
Type species
Iacchus pygmaea Spix, 1823
Species
Cebuella pygmaea Cebuella niveiventris

Pygmy marmosets are two species of small New World monkeys in the genus Cebuella. They are native to rainforests of the western Amazon Basin in South America. These primates are notable for being the smallest monkeys in the world, at just over 100 g (3.5 oz). They are generally found in evergreen and river-edge forests and are gum-feeding specialists, or gummivores.

About 83% of the pygmy marmoset population lives in stable troops of two to nine individuals, including a dominant male, a breeding female, and up to four successive litters of offspring. The modal size of a standard stable troop would be six individuals. Although most groups consist of family members, some may also include one or two additional adult members. Members of the group communicate using a complex system including vocal, chemical, and visual signals. Three main calling signals depend on the distance the call needs to travel. These monkeys may also make visual displays when threatened or to show dominance. Chemical signaling using secretions from glands on the chest and genital area allow the female to indicate to the male when she is able to reproduce. The female gives birth to twins twice a year and the parental care is shared among the group.

The pygmy marmoset has been viewed as somewhat different from typical marmosets, most of which are classified in the genera Callithrix (where they were placed in a subgenus) and Mico, and thus is accorded its own genus, Cebuella, within the family Callitrichidae. Their biggest threats are habitat loss and the pet trade.

Evolution and taxonomy

Debate has arisen among primatologists concerning the proper genus in which to place the pygmy marmoset. An examination of the interstitial retinol binding protein nuclear gene (IRBP) in three marmoset species showed that Callithrix as constructed in the 1990s also needed to include C. pygmaea to be monophyletic, and that the times of separation of pygmaea and the argentata and jacchus species groups from one another are less than 5 million years ago, as might be expected for species of the same genus. However, subsequent separation of the argentata and jacchus species groups into different genera (the argentata group having been moved to Mico) justifies maintaining a separate genus for the pygmy marmosets, as Callithrix is no longer paraphyletic.

The two species described of the pygmy marmoset are:

Few morphological differences occur between these species, as they may only differ slightly in color, and they are only separated by geographical barriers, including large rivers in South America.

The evolution of this genus diverged in terms of body mass from typical primates, with a high rate of body-mass reduction. This involves large decreases in prenatal and postnatal growth rates, furthering the thought that progenesis played a role in the evolution of this animal.

Physical description

Pygmy marmosets are the smallest true monkey, with a head-body length ranging from 117 to 152 mm (4.6 to 6.0 in) and a tail of 172 to 229 mm (6.8 to 9.0 in). The average adult body weight is just over 100 g (3.5 oz) with the only sexual dimorphism of females being a little heavier. The fur colour is a mixture of brownish-gold, grey, and black on its back and head and yellow, orange, and tawny on its underparts. Its tail has black rings and its face has flecks of white on its cheeks and a white vertical line between its eyes. It has many adaptations for arboreal living, including the ability to rotate its head 180° and sharp, claw-like nails used to cling to branches and trunks of trees. Its dental morphology is adapted to feeding on gum, with specialised incisors that are used to gouge trees and stimulate sap flow. The cecum is larger than usual to allow for the greater time gum needs to break down in the stomach. Pygmy marmosets walk on all four limbs and can leap up to 5 m (16 ft) between branches.

Ecology

Geographic range and habitat

Pygmy marmosets can be found in much of the western Amazon Basin, in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. The western pygmy marmoset, C. pygmaea, occurs in the state of Amazonas, Brazil, eastern Peru, southern Colombia, and north-eastern Ecuador. The eastern pygmy marmoset, C. niveiventris, is also found in Amazonas, but also in Acre, Brazil, eastern Peru, and northern Bolivia. The distribution of both species is often limited by rivers. They typically live in the understory of the mature evergreen forests and often near rivers. Population density is correlated with food-tree availability. They can be found between ground level and about 20 m (66 ft) into the trees, but generally do not enter the top of the canopy. They are often found in areas having standing water for more than three months of the year.

Diet

These monkeys have a specialized diet of tree gum. They gnaw holes in the bark of appropriate trees and vines with their specialized dentition to elicit the production of gum. When the sap puddles up in the hole, they lap it up with their tongues. They also lie in wait for insects, especially butterflies, which are attracted to the sap holes. They supplement their diet with nectar and fruit. A group's home range is 0.1 to 0.4 ha (0.25 to 0.99 acres), and feeding is usually concentrated on one or two trees at a time. When those become depleted, a group moves to a new home range. Brown-mantled tamarins are generally sympatric with pygmy marmosets and often raid pygmy marmosets' gum holes.

Pygmy marmosets have adapted insect-like claws, known as tegulae, to engage in a high degree of claw-clinging behaviors associated with plant exudate exploitation. Claw-clinging is primarily used during feeding, but also during plant exudate foraging.

Behaviour

A pygmy marmoset group, ranging from two to nine members, contains one or two adult males and one or two adult females, including a single breeding female and her offspring. Interbirth interval ranges from 149–746 days. In contrast to other callitrichines, no relationship exists between the number of adult males and the number of infants and offspring. A significant positive relationship exists, though, between the number of juveniles and the number of adult and subadult group members. Young marmosets typically remain in the group for two consecutive birth cycles. The pygmy marmoset uses special types of communication to give alerts and warning to its family members. These include chemical, vocal, and visual types of communication. It is believed to serve to promote group cohesion and avoidance of other family groups.

Social systems

Infant pygmy marmosets, along with their parents, twins, and other siblings, form co-operative care groups. Babbling, or vocalizing, by the infant marmoset is a key part of its relationships with its family members and is a major part of its development. As the infant develops, the babbling gradually changes to resemble and eventually become adult vocalization. Many similarities are seen between the development of vocalization in infant pygmy marmosets and speech in infant humans. Vocalizing gives the infant advantages, such as increased care, and allows the entire family to coordinate their activities without seeing each other.

Siblings also participate in infant care. Infant marmosets require the most attention, so having more family members participating in the care decreases the cost for any individual and also teaches parenting skills to the juvenile marmosets. Members of the group, usually female, may even put off their own reproduction through a temporary cessation of ovulation to care for the offspring of others in the group. The ideal number of caregivers for an infant marmoset has been shown to be around five individuals. Caregivers are responsible for finding food for the infants and helping the father watch for predators.

Pygmy marmosets are not seasonal breeders and usually give birth to twins once or twice a year. Single births, however, occur in 16% and triplet births occur in 8% of pregnancies. The pygmy marmoset is usually monogamous, though some variation happens within the species in terms of breeding systems. Polyandry also occurs, as male marmosets are responsible for carrying the infants on their backs. Having a second male to carry the offspring can be beneficial, as marmoset litters are often twins and this decreases the physiological cost to any particular male. The daily range of pygmy marmosets, however, is relatively small, which decreases the rate of polyandry.

Male and female pygmy marmosets show differences in foraging and feeding behavior, although male and female dominance and aggressive behavior vary within the species. Males have less time to search out food sources and forage due to the constraints of their infant-caring responsibilities and predator vigilance. Without an infant to carry, female pygmy marmosets have greater freedom to forage, giving them an apparent feeding priority, which may serve to compensate mothers for the energetic costs of carrying and lactating for two offspring at a time. Since breeding priority is also given to females without offspring, the argument is weakened. Instead, female feeding priority may have evolved through sexual selection. Females may choose mates that invest more time in infant care and predator vigilance. Such males have less time to look for food, allowing the female feeding priority.

Communication

Pygmy marmosets are well known for their communication abilities, including an intricate system of calls. The trill is used during feeding, foraging, and when travelling and the group is close together. The J-call is a series of fast notes repeated by the caller and is used at medium distances. Both calls are used as contact calls. The long call is used when the group is spread out over distances greater than 10 m or in response to a neighboring group. The pygmy marmoset uses the trill for short-distance communication, J-calls for intermediate distances, and long calls for long distances; these have respectively decreasing frequencies. They interpret these calls not only by type, but also through subtle sonic variance, by individual calling. Research based on audio playback tests shows that calls recorded from different individuals in captivity varied significantly in all seven auditory parameters analyzed for each type of call. Behavioral responses to trills were greatest when the caller was the dominant male of the group. Responses to J-calls were greatest when the caller was the monkey's mate or a same-sex monkey from outside the group. Varying responses to individual callers were only observed when the call was given spontaneously from another animal rather than being played back from a recording, with one exception. That exception was that male monkeys responded to playbacks of their own calls differently from those of other monkeys, when the call was played back from a familiar location. The pygmy marmoset is thought to react at first to the type of call that is being made and then adjusts its behavior slightly to react to the specific individual that is making the call. This allows the marmoset to react appropriately to all calls, but show some variation when the call gives extra information.

Environmental factors play a role in communication by affecting the frequency of the signal and how far the signal can travel and still be audible to communicate the desired message. Since pygmy marmosets are often found in the rain forest, plant life and the humid atmosphere add to the normal absorption and scattering of sound. Because low-frequency calls are affected less by the disturbances than high-frequency ones, they are used for communication across longer distances. The pygmy marmoset changes the characteristics of its calls when its social environment is changed. Adult marmosets show modifications in the structure of their calls, which mimic those of their group members. In addition to changes of existing calls, novel calls may be heard from marmosets after pairing.

Pygmy marmosets have other ways to communicate information about matters such as a female's ovulatory state. New World monkeys do not show genital swelling during ovulation as female Old World monkeys do. Instead, a lack of female aggression towards males can serve as a signal of ovulation. Scent glands on her chest, anus, and genitals are also rubbed on surfaces, which leave chemical signals about the reproductive state of the female. Pygmy marmosets also perform visual displays such as strutting, back-arching, and piloerection when they feel threatened or to show dominance.

Conservation

Both species of pygmy marmosets are listed as vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. They are threatened by habitat loss in some areas of their range, and by the pet trade in others (i.e. Ecuador). Interaction between humans and pygmy marmosets is associated with a number of behavioral changes in the animal, including social play and vocalization, both of which are important to communication between animals in the species. Particularly in areas of heavy tourism, pygmy marmosets have a tendency to be less noisy, less aggressive, and less playful with other individuals. They are also pushed into higher strata of the rainforest than they would normally prefer. Tourism in areas native to the pygmy marmoset is also correlated with increased capture of the animal. Due to its small size and relatively docile nature, captured pygmy marmosets are often found in exotic pet trades. Capture causes even more behavioral variations, including a decrease in both the number and the sound level of vocalizations. Pygmy marmosets can also be found at local zoos, where they exist in groups.

As pets

Finger monkeys' (pygmy marmoset) value is associated with their being the smallest primate in the world. Listed as Vulnerable to extinction, they are rare to find in the market for purchase. Prices range from $1,000 to $4,000. Generally, a pygmy marmoset's lifespan is 15 to 20 years; they are known to have a shorter life in the wild mainly because they fall out of trees.

Another expense for these creatures as pets is the necessary essentials to maintain them. Creating an environment similar to where they are from is important. For food, these creatures as pets are often fed fruits, insects, and smaller lizards. As pets, a baby pygmy marmoset needs to be fed every two hours for at least two weeks. Understanding their natural diet is also important because it helps maintain their good health from the necessary protein, calcium, and other nutrients they need to survive.

In the United States, each state has different regulations regarding ownership of pet monkeys. Another factor that needs to be considered is that a regular veterinarian might not be able to help provide medical evaluations or care; one would need to seek out a veterinarian with a primate specialization. In South America, either importing or exporting these creatures is illegal. Understanding the laws within those countries is important when considering owning or taking care of a pygmy marmoset. Many people do not agree that pygmy marmosets should be pets. The argument is usually that they have a longer lifespan when they are in good care from a human. However, the UK RSPCA says they should "not be considered as pets in the accepted sense of the word. They are wild, undomesticated animals that cannot be house trained or fully tamed".

In popular culture

• Fingerlings, the hit toy of Christmas 2017 produced by WowWee, is based on pygmy marmosets.

See also

• Mammals portal
• Primates portal

References

1. ^ Groves, C. P. (2005). "Subgenus Cebuella". In Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.
2. ^ Rylands, A. B.; Mittermeier, R. A. (2009). "The diversity of the New World primates (Platyrrhini)". In Garber, P. A.; Estrada, A.; Bicca-Marques, J. C.; Heymann, E. W.; Strier, K. B. (eds.). South American Primates: Comparative Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer. pp. 23–54. ISBN 978-0-387-78704-6.
3. Gray, J. Edw. (1866). "Notice of some New Species of Marmoset Monkeys (Hapale and Midas)". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1865: 734. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
4. Soini, Pekka (1982). "Ecology and Population Dynamics of the Pygmy Marmoset, Cebuella Pygmaea". Folia Primatologica. 39 (1–2): 1–21. doi:10.1159/000156066. PMID 6815036.
5. de la Torre, Stella; Snowdon, Charles T.; Bejarano, Monserrat (2000). "Effects of human activities on wild pygmy marmosets in Ecuadorian Amazonia". Biological Conservation. 94 (2): 153–163. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00183-4.
6. Barroso, C. M. L.; Schneider, H.; Schneider, M. P. C.; Sampaio, I.; Harada, M. L.; Czelusniak, J.; Goodman, M. (1997). "Update on the phylogenetic systematics of New World monkeys: Further DNA evidence for placing the pygmy marmoset (Cebuella) within the genus Callithrix". International Journal of Primatology. 18 (4): 651–674. doi:10.1023/A:1026371408379. S2CID 24741900.
7. ^ Rylands, A.B.; de la Torre, S. (2008). "Cebuella pygmaea ssp. pygmaea". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2008: e.T136926A4350391. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T136926A4350391.en.
8. Groves, Colin P. (2001). Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian.
9. Montgomery, S. H.; Mundy, N. I. (2013). "Parallel episodes of phyletic dwarfism in callitrichid and cheirogaleid primates". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (4): 810–819. doi:10.1111/jeb.12097. PMID 23442013.
10. Nowak, R. M. (1999). Walker's Mammals of the World (6th ed.). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 566. ISBN 978-0-8018-5789-8.
11. ^ Soini, P. (1982). "Ecology and population dynamics of the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea". Folia Primatologica. 39 (1–2): 1–21. doi:10.1159/000156066. PMID 6815036.
12. ^ Kinzey, W. G. (1997). "Synopsis of New World primates (16 genera)". In Kinzey, W. G. (ed.). New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior. New York: Aldine De Gruyter. pp. 169–324.
13. ^ Sussman, R. W. (2000). Primate Ecology and Social Structure. Vol. 2: New World Monkeys. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
14. ^ Jackson, C. P. (2011). "The positional behavior of pygmy marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea) in northwestern Bolivia". Primates. 52 (2): 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10329-011-0237-7. PMID 21360318. S2CID 36923830.
15. Genoud, M.; Martin, R. D.; Glaser, D. (1997). "Rate of metabolism in the smallest simian primate, the pygmy marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea)". American Journal of Primatology. 41 (3): 229–245. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)41:3<229::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-Z. PMID 9057967. S2CID 20927342.
16. Lang, Kristina Cawthon. "Primate Factsheets: Pygmy marmoset (Callithrix pygmaea) Taxonomy, Morphology, & Ecology". Retrieved 24 September 2013.
17. Nancy G. Solomon; Jeffrey A. French (1997). Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. Cambridge University Press. pp. 51–54. ISBN 9780521454919.
18. ^ Ziegler, T. E.; Snowdon, C. T.; Bridson, W. E. (1990). "Reproductive performance and excretion of urinary estrogens and gonadotropins in the female pygmy marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea)". American Journal of Primatology. 22 (3): 191–203. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350220305. PMID 31952429. S2CID 86258142.
19. Heymann, E. W.; Soini, P. (1999). "Offspring number in pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea, in relation to group size and the number of adult males". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 46 (6): 400–404. doi:10.1007/s002650050635. S2CID 23577540.
20. ^ de la Torre, S.; Snowdon, C. T. (2002). "Environmental correlates of vocal communication of wild pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea". Animal Behaviour. 63 (5): 847–856. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1978. S2CID 53188541.
21. ^ Snowdon, C. T.; Cleveland, J. (1980). "Individual recognition of contact calls by pygmy marmosets". Animal Behaviour. 28 (3): 717–727. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80131-X. S2CID 53186935.
22. Elowson, A. M.; Snowdon, C. T.; Lazaro-Perea, C. (1998). "'Babbling' and social context in infant monkeys: Parallels to human infants". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2 (1): 31–37. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01115-7. PMID 21244960. S2CID 20241230.
23. Snowdon, C. T.; Ziegler, T. E. (2007). "Growing up cooperatively: Family processes and infant care in marmosets and tamarins" (PDF). The Journal of Developmental Processes. 2 (1): 40–66. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
24. Goldizen, A. W. (1988). "Tamarin and marmoset mating systems: Unusual flexibility" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 3 (2): 36–56. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(88)90045-6. hdl:2027.42/27403. PMID 21227069.
25. Davies, N. B.; Krebs, J. R.; West, S. A. (2012). "Mating systems". An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. John Wiley & Sons. p. 258. ISBN 978-1-4443-9845-8. Retrieved 1 December 2012.
26. Bicca-Marques, J. C. (2003). "Sexual selection and the evolution of foraging behavior in male and female tamarins and marmosets" (PDF). In Jones, C. (ed.). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Primates: New Perspectives and Directions. Norman, OK: American Society of Primatologists. pp. 455–475.
27. Snowdon, C. T.; Elowson, A. M. (1999). "Pygmy marmosets modify call structure when paired". Ethology. 105 (10): 893–908. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00483.x.
28. Converse, L. J.; Carlson, A. A.; Ziegler, T. E.; Snowdon, C. T. (1995). "Communication of ovulatory state to mates by female pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea". Animal Behaviour. 49 (3): 615–621. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80194-4. S2CID 54321327.
29. Soini, P. (1988). "The pygmy marmoset, genus Cebuella". In Mittermeier, R. A.; Coimbra-Filho, A. F.; da Fonseca, G. A. B. (eds.). Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. Vol. 2. Washington DC: World Wildlife Fund. pp. 79–129. OCLC 180684863.
30. de la Torre, S.; Shanee, S.; Palacios, E.; Calouro, A.M.; Messias, M.R.; Valença-Montenegro, M.M. (2021). "Cebuella pygmaea". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021: e.T136926A200203263. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T136926A200203263.en. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
31. de la Torre, S.; Calouro, A.M.; Wallace, R.B.; Mollinedo, J.M.; Messias, M.R.; Valença-Montenegro, M.M. (2021). "Cebuella niveiventris". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021: e.T136865A191707236. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T136865A191707236.en. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
32. Suddath, Claire (3 January 2011). "Pygmy Marmosets". Time. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
33. de la Torre, S. (2000). "Effects of human activities on wild pygmy marmosets in Ecuadorian Amazonia". Biological Conservation. 94 (2): 153–163. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00183-4.
34. "Pygmy Marmoset". San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance | Animals & Plants. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
35. ^ Douglas, Long. "How Much Does a Finger Monkey Cost?". FingerMonkey.us. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
36. ^ Kulwant, Singh. "Finger Monkey: Information, Fact and Cost of keeping". loyfly. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
37. ^ Ben, Garrod (28 February 2016). "No more monkey business: why primates should never be pets". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
38. ^ National Primate Research Center. "Primates as Pets". Primate Info Net. University of Wisconsin. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
39. "Primates kept as pets | rspca.org.uk". RSPCA. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
40. Corkery, Michael (9 December 2017). "How the Fingerling Caught On (Robot Grip and All) as 2017's Hot Toy". The New York Times.

External links

• Twin albino pygmy marmosets born in Sweden
• Primate Info Net Callithrix pygmaea Factsheet

v t e Haplorhini
Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Primates
Haplorhini †"Omomyidae" Altanius? Altiatlasius? Bownomomys Kohatius Microchoerinae Indusomys Melaneremia Microchoerus Nannopithex Necrolemur Paraloris Pseudoloris Quercyloris Vectipithex "Anaptomorphinae" Absarokius Anaptomorphus Anemorhysis Arapahovius Aycrossia Chlororhysis Gazinius Pseudotetonius Sphacorhysis Strigorhysis Tatmanius Teilhardina Tetonius Tetonoides Trogolemur Walshina "Omomyinae" Ageitodendron Asiomomys Brontomomys Chipetaia Chumashius Diablomomys Dyseolemur Ekwiiyemakius Gunnelltarsius Hemiacodon Jemezius Loveina Macrotarsius Nesomomys Omomys Ourayia Rooneyia Shoshonius Steinius Stockia Uintanius Utahia Washakius Wyomomys Yaquius Tarkadectinae Tarka Tarkadectes Tarkops Tarsiiformes †Archicebus †Afrotarsiidae? †"Omomyidae"? Tarsiidae Carlito Cephalopachus †Hesperotarsius †Oligotarsius Tarsius †Xanthorhysis? Simiiformes see below↓
Simiiformes Simiiformes †Altiatlasius? †Amamria †Aseanpithecus †Nosmips? †Phileosimias? †Afrotarsiidae? Afrasia Afrotarsius †Eosimiidae Bahinia Eosimias Phenacopithecus †Amphipithecidae Amphipithecus Bugtipithecus? Ganlea Krabia Myanmarpithecus Pondaungia Siamopithecus †Parapithecoidea Arsinoea Biretia Proteopithecidae Proteopithecus Serapia Parapithecidae Abuqatrania Apidium Parapithecus Qatrania Ucayalipithecus Platyrrhini †Parvimico †Perupithecus †Szalatavus †Canaanimico †Branisella †Lagonimico Aotidae Aotus †Tremacebus Pitheciidae †Antillothrix Cacajao Callicebus †Carlocebus †Cebupithecia Cheracebus Chiropotes †Homunculus †Insulacebus †Mazzonicebus †Miocallicebus †Nuciruptor Pithecia Plecturocebus †Proteropithecia †Soriacebus †Xenothrix Atelidae Alouatta Ateles Brachyteles †Caipora †Cartelles †Chilecebus Lagothrix †Mohanamico Oreonax †Paralouatta †Protopithecus †Solimoea †Stirtonia Cebidae †Acrecebus Cebus †Dolichocebus †Killikaike †Panamacebus †Patasola Saimiri Sapajus Callitrichidae Callimico Callithrix Cebuella Leontocebus Leontopithecus Mico †Micodon Saguinus Catarrhini see below↓
Catarrhini Catarrhini †Micropithecus †Saadanius †Oligopithecidae Catopithecus Oligopithecus Talahpithecus †Propliopithecidae Aegyptopithecus Propliopithecus †Pliopithecoidea Krishnapithecus Paidopithex †Kapi Pliopithecidae Epipliopithecus Pliopithecus Dionysopithecidae Dionysopithecus Platodontopithecus Crouzeliidae Anapithecus Barberapithecus Crouzelia Egarapithecus Fanchangia Laccopithecus Plesiopliopithecus Pliobates Cercopithecoidea †Alophe †Victoriapithecidae Noropithecus Nsungwepithecus? Prohylobates? Victoriapithecus Zaltanpithecus Colobinae †Cercopithecoides Colobus †Dolichopithecus †Kuseracolobus †Libypithecus †Mesopithecus †Microcolobus Nasalis †Paracolobus †Parapresbytis Piliocolobus Presbytis Procolobus Pygathrix †Rhinocolobus Rhinopithecus †Sawecolobus Semnopithecus Simias Trachypithecus Cercopithecinae Cercopithecini Allenopithecus Allochrocebus Cercopithecus Chlorocebus Erythrocebus Miopithecus †Nanopithecus Papionini Cercocebus †Dinopithecus †Gorgopithecus Lophocebus Macaca Mandrillus Papio †Paradolichopithecus †Parapapio †Pliopapio †Procercocebus †Procynocephalus Rungwecebus †Soromandrillus Theropithecus Hominoidea see below↓
Hominoidea Hominoidea †Afropithecus †Ekembo †Equatorius †Griphopithecus †Kamoyapithecus? †Kenyapithecus †Morotopithecus †Nacholapithecus †Otavipithecus †Proconsul †Samburupithecus †Dendropithecidae Dendropithecus Micropithecus? Nyanzapithecus Oreopithecus? Rangwapithecus Rukwapithecus Simiolus Turkanapithecus Hylobatidae †Bunopithecus Hoolock Hylobates †Junzi Nomascus Symphalangus †Yuanmoupithecus Hominidae †Buronius †Graecopithecus †Nakalipithecus †Ouranopithecus Ponginae †Ankarapithecus †Gigantopithecus †Indopithecus †Khoratpithecus †Lufengpithecus †Meganthropus Pongo †Sivapithecus Homininae †Dryopithecini Anoiapithecus Danuvius Dryopithecus Hispanopithecus? Pierolapithecus? Rudapithecus Gorillini †Chororapithecus? Gorilla †Nakalipithecus? Hominini Pan Hominina †Ardipithecus? †Australopithecus †Graecopithecus? Homo †Kenyanthropus †Orrorin? †Sahelanthropus? †Paranthropus

• Mammals of Bolivia
• Primates of Brazil
• Mammals of Colombia
• Mammals of Ecuador
• Mammals of Peru
• Taxa named by John Edward Gray