Misplaced Pages

Q-ball

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Type of non-topological soliton For other uses, see Q-ball (disambiguation). For the ball used in billiards and other cue sports, see Cue ball.
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In theoretical physics, Q-ball is a type of non-topological soliton. A soliton is a localized field configuration that is stable—it cannot spread out and dissipate. In the case of a non-topological soliton, the stability is guaranteed by a conserved charge: the soliton has lower energy per unit charge than any other configuration. (In physics, charge is often represented by the letter "Q", and the soliton is spherically symmetric, hence the name.)

Intuitive explanation

A Q-ball arises in a theory of bosonic particles when there is an attraction between the particles. Loosely speaking, the Q-ball is a finite-sized "blob" containing a large number of particles. The blob is stable against fission into smaller blobs and against "evaporation" via emission of individual particles, because, due to the attractive interaction, the blob is the lowest-energy configuration of that number of particles. (This is analogous to the fact that nickel-62 is the most stable nucleus because it is the most stable configuration of neutrons and protons. However, nickel-62 is not a Q-ball, in part because neutrons and protons are fermions, not bosons.)

For there to be a Q-ball, the number of particles must be conserved (i.e. the particle number is a conserved "charge", so the particles are described by a complex-valued field ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } ), and the interaction potential V ( ϕ ) {\displaystyle V(\phi )} of the particles must have a negative (attractive) term. For non-interacting particles, the potential would be just a mass term V free ( ϕ ) = m 2 | ϕ | 2 {\displaystyle V_{\text{free}}(\phi )=m^{2}|\phi |^{2}} , and there would be no Q-ball. But if one adds an attractive − λ | ϕ | 4 {\displaystyle -\lambda |\phi |^{4}} term (and positive higher powers of ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } to ensure that the potential has a lower bound), then there are values of ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } where V ( ϕ ) < V free ( ϕ ) {\displaystyle V(\phi )<V_{\text{free}}(\phi )} , i.e. the energy of these field values is less than the energy of a free field. This corresponds to saying that one can create blobs of non-zero field (i.e. clusters of many particles) whose energy is lower than the same number of individual particles far apart. Those blobs are therefore stable against evaporation into individual particles.

Construction

In its simplest form, a Q-ball is constructed in a field theory of a complex scalar field ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } , in which Lagrangian is invariant under a global U ( 1 ) {\displaystyle U(1)} symmetry. The Q-ball solution is a state that minimizes energy while keeping the charge Q associated with the global U ( 1 ) {\displaystyle U(1)} symmetry constant. A particularly transparent way of finding this solution is via the method of Lagrange multipliers. In particular, in three spatial dimensions we must minimize the functional

E ω = E + ω [ Q − 1 2 i ∫ d 3 x ( ϕ ∗ ∂ t ϕ − ϕ ∂ t ϕ ∗ ) ] , {\displaystyle E_{\omega }=E+\omega \left,}

where the energy is defined as

E = ∫ d 3 x [ 1 2 ϕ ˙ 2 + 1 2 | ∇ ϕ | 2 + U ( ϕ , ϕ ∗ ) ] , {\displaystyle E=\int d^{3}\,x\left,}

and ω {\displaystyle \omega } is our Lagrange multiplier. The time dependence of the Q-ball solution can be obtained easily if one rewrites the functional E ω {\displaystyle E_{\omega }} as

E ω = ∫ d 3 x [ 1 2 | ϕ ˙ − i ω ϕ | 2 + 1 2 | ∇ ϕ | 2 + U ^ ω ( ϕ , ϕ ∗ ) ] , {\displaystyle E_{\omega }=\int d^{3}\,x\left,}

where U ^ ω = U − 1 2 ω 2 ϕ 2 {\displaystyle {\hat {U}}_{\omega }=U-{\frac {1}{2}}\omega ^{2}\phi ^{2}} . Since the first term in the functional is now positive, minimization of this terms implies

ϕ ( r → , t ) = ϕ 0 ( r → ) e i ω t . {\displaystyle \phi ({\vec {r}},t)=\phi _{0}({\vec {r}})e^{i\omega t}.}

We therefore interpret the Lagrange multiplier ω {\displaystyle \omega } as the frequency of oscillation of the field within the Q-ball.

The theory contains Q-ball solutions if there are any values of ϕ ∗ ϕ {\displaystyle \phi ^{*}\phi } at which the potential is less than m 2 ϕ ∗ ϕ {\displaystyle m^{2}\phi ^{*}\phi } . In this case, a volume of space with the field at that value can have an energy per unit charge that is less than m {\displaystyle m} , meaning that it cannot decay into a gas of individual particles. Such a region is a Q-ball. If it is large enough, its interior is uniform and is called "Q-matter". (For a review see Lee et al. (1992).

Thin-wall Q-balls

The thin-wall Q-ball was the first to be studied, and this pioneering work was carried out by Sidney Coleman in 1986. For this reason, Q-balls of the thin-wall variety are sometimes called "Coleman Q-balls".

We can think of this type of Q-ball a spherical ball of nonzero vacuum expectation value. In the thin-wall approximation we take the spatial profile of the field to be simply

ϕ 0 ( r ) = θ ( R − r ) ϕ 0 . {\displaystyle \phi _{0}(r)=\theta (R-r)\phi _{0}.}

In this regime the charge carried by the Q-ball is simply Q = ω ϕ 0 2 V {\displaystyle Q=\omega \phi _{0}^{2}V} . Using this fact, we can eliminate ω {\displaystyle \omega } from the energy, such that we have

E = 1 2 Q 2 ϕ 0 2 V + U ( ϕ 0 ) V . {\displaystyle E={\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {Q^{2}}{\phi _{0}^{2}V}}+U(\phi _{0})V.}

Minimization with respect to V {\displaystyle V} gives

V = Q 2 2 U ( ϕ 0 ) ϕ 0 2 . {\displaystyle V={\sqrt {\frac {Q^{2}}{2U(\phi _{0})\phi _{0}^{2}}}}.}

Plugging this back into the energy yields

E = 2 U ( ϕ 0 ) ϕ 0 2 Q . {\displaystyle E={\sqrt {\frac {2U(\phi _{0})}{\phi _{0}^{2}}}}\,Q.}

Now all that remains is to minimize the energy with respect to ϕ 0 {\displaystyle \phi _{0}} . We can therefore state that a Q-ball solution of the thin-wall type exists if and only if

min = 2 U ( ϕ ) ϕ 2 {\displaystyle \min ={\frac {2U(\phi )}{\phi ^{2}}}} for ϕ > 0 {\displaystyle \phi >0} .

When the above criterion is satisfied the Q-ball exists and by construction is stable against decays into scalar quanta. The mass of the thin-wall Q-ball is simply the energy

M ( Q ) = ω 0 Q . {\displaystyle M(Q)=\omega _{0}Q.}

Although this kind of Q-ball is stable against decay into scalars, it is not stable against decay into fermions if the scalar field ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } has nonzero Yukawa couplings to some fermions. This decay rate was calculated in 1986 by Andrew Cohen, Sidney Coleman, Howard Georgi, and Aneesh Manohar.

History

Configurations of a charged scalar field that are classically stable (stable against small perturbations) were constructed by Rosen in 1968. Stable configurations of multiple scalar fields were studied by Friedberg, Lee, and Sirlin in 1976. The name "Q-ball" and the proof of quantum-mechanical stability (stability against tunnelling to lower-energy configurations) come from Sidney Coleman.

Occurrence in nature

It has been theorized that dark matter might consist of Q-balls (Frieman et al. 1988, Kusenko et al. 1997) and that Q-balls might play a role in baryogenesis, i.e. the origin of the matter that fills the universe (Dodelson et al. 1990, Enqvist et al. 1997). Interest in Q-balls was stimulated by the suggestion that they arise generically in supersymmetric field theories (Kusenko 1997), so if nature really is fundamentally supersymmetric, then Q-balls might have been created in the early universe and still exist in the cosmos today.

It has been hypothesised that the early universe had many energy lumps that consisted of Q-balls. When these eventually interacted with each other they ‘’popped’’, i.e., dispersed, creating more matter particles than antimatter particles and explaining why matter predominates in the visible universe. It should be possible to verify this by detecting gravitational waves propagated by the ''popping'' of the Q-balls.

Fiction

  • In the movie Sunshine, the Sun is undergoing a premature death. The movie's science adviser, scientist Brian Cox, proposed "infection" with a Q-ball as the mechanism for this death, but this is mentioned only in the commentary tracks and not in the movie itself.
  • In the fictional universe of Orion's Arm, Q-balls are one of the speculated sources for the large amounts of antimatter used by certain groups.
  • In the TV series Sliders, Q-Ball is the nickname given by Rembrandt Brown (Crying Man) to Quinn Mallory.

References

  1. T. D. Lee; Y. Pang (1992). "Nontopological solitons". Physics Reports. 221 (5–6): 251–350. Bibcode:1992PhR...221..251L. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90064-7.
  2. ^ S. Coleman (1985). "Q-Balls". Nuclear Physics B. 262 (2): 263–283. Bibcode:1985NuPhB.262..263C. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90286-X. And erratum in "Fourth order supergravity S. Theisen, Nucl. Phys. B263 (1986) 687". Nuclear Physics B. 269 (3–4): 744. 1986. Bibcode:1986NuPhB.269Q.744.. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90519-5. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-5DEB-5.
  3. A. Cohen; S. Coleman; H. Georgi; A. Manohar (1986). "The Evaporation of Q-balls". Nuclear Physics B. 272 (2): 301. Bibcode:1986NuPhB.272..301C. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90004-0.
  4. G. Rosen (1968). "Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 9 (7): 996–998. Bibcode:1968JMP.....9..996R. doi:10.1063/1.1664693.
  5. R. Friedberg; T. D. Lee; A. Sirlin (1976). "Class of scalar-field soliton solutions in three space dimensions". Physical Review D. 13 (10): 2739. Bibcode:1976PhRvD..13.2739F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2739.
  6. J. Frieman; G. Gelmini; M. Gleiser; E. Kolb (1988). "Solitogenesis: Primordial Origin Of Nontopological Solitons". Physical Review Letters. 60 (21): 2101–2104. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..60.2101F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2101. PMID 10038260. Archived from the original on 2007-03-12. Retrieved 2006-05-15.
  7. A. Kusenko; M. Shaposhnikov (1998). "Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter". Physics Letters B. 418 (1–2): 46–54. arXiv:hep-ph/9709492. Bibcode:1998PhLB..418...46K. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01375-0. S2CID 8776744.
  8. S. Dodelson; L. Widrow (1990). "Baryon Symmetric Baryogenesis". Physical Review Letters. 64 (4): 340–343. Bibcode:1990PhRvL..64..340D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.340. PMID 10041955.
  9. K. Enqvist; J. McDonald (1998). "Q-Balls and Baryogenesis in the MSSM". Physics Letters B. 425 (3–4): 309–321. arXiv:hep-ph/9711514. Bibcode:1998PhLB..425..309E. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00271-8. S2CID 119095016.
  10. A. Kusenko (1997). "Solitons in the supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model". Physics Letters B. 405 (1–2): 108–113. arXiv:hep-ph/9704273. Bibcode:1997PhLB..405..108K. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00584-4. S2CID 14866256.
  11. Hamer, Ashley (2021-12-15). "Weird quantum objects known as Q balls could explain why we exist". livescience.com. Retrieved 2021-12-20.

External links

Categories: