Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
An LC circuit can be quantized using the same methods as for the quantum harmonic oscillator. An LC circuit is a variety of resonant circuit, and consists of an inductor, represented by the letter L, and a capacitor, represented by the letter C. When connected together, an electric current can alternate between them at the circuit's resonant frequency:
Like the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator problem, an LC circuit can be quantized by either solving the Schrödinger equation or using creation and annihilation operators. The energy stored in the inductor can be looked at as a "kinetic energy term" and the energy stored in the capacitor can be looked at as a "potential energy term".
The Hamiltonian of such a system is:
where Q is the charge operator, and is the magnetic flux operator. The first term represents the energy stored in an inductor, and the second term represents the energy stored in a capacitor. In order to find the energy levels and the corresponding energy eigenstates, we must solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation,
Since an LC circuit really is an electrical analog to the harmonic oscillator, solving the Schrödinger equation yields a family of solutions (the Hermite polynomials).
Magnetic flux as a conjugate variable
A completely equivalent solution can be found using magnetic flux as the conjugate variable where the conjugate "momentum" is equal to capacitance times the time derivative of magnetic flux. The conjugate "momentum" is really the charge.
Using Kirchhoff's Junction Rule, the following relationship can be obtained:
Since , the above equation can be written as follows:
Converting this into a Hamiltonian, one can develop a Schrödinger equation as follows:
where is a function of magnetic flux
Quantization of coupled LC circuits
Two inductively coupled LC circuits have a non-zero mutual inductance. This is equivalent to a pair of harmonic oscillators with a kinetic coupling term.
The Lagrangian for an inductively coupled pair of LC circuits is as follows:
As usual, the Hamiltonian is obtained by a Legendre transform of the Lagrangian.
Promoting the observables to quantum mechanical operators yields the following Schrödinger equation.
One cannot proceed further using the above coordinates because of the coupled term. However, a coordinate transformation from the wave function as a function of both charges to the wave function as a function of the charge difference , where and a coordinate (somewhat analogous to a "Center-of-Mass"), the above Hamiltonian can be solved using the Separation of Variables technique.
The CM coordinate is as seen below:
The Hamiltonian under the new coordinate system is as follows:
In the above equation is equal to and equals the reduced inductance.
The separation of variables technique yields two equations, one for the "CM" coordinate that is the differential equation of a free particle, and the other for the charge difference coordinate, which is the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator.
The solution for the first differential equation once the time dependence is appended resembles a plane wave, while the solution of the second differential equation is seen above.
Hamiltonian mechanics
Classical case
Stored energy (Hamiltonian) for classical LC circuit:
Hamiltonian's equations:
,
where stored capacitor charge (or electric flux) and magnetic momentum (magnetic flux),
capacitor voltage and inductance current, time variable.
Nonzero initial conditions:
At we shall have oscillation frequency:
,
and wave impedance of the LC circuit (without dissipation):
Hamiltonian's equations solutions:
At we shall have the following values of charges, magnetic flux and energy:
Definition of the phasor
In the general case the wave amplitudes can be defined in the complex space
where .
,
where – electric charge at zero time, capacitance area.
,
where – magnetic flux at zero time,
inductance area.
Note that, at the equal area elements
we shall have the following relationship for the wave impedance:
.
Wave amplitude and energy could be defined as:
.
Quantum case
In the quantum case we have the following definition for momentum operator:
Momentum and charge operators produce the following commutator:
.
Amplitude operator can be defined as:
,
and phazor:
.
Hamilton's operator will be:
Amplitudes commutators:
.
Heisenberg uncertainty principle:
.
Wave impedance of free space
When wave impedance of quantum LC circuit takes the value of free space
In the classical case the energy of LC circuit will be:
where capacitance energy, and
inductance energy. Furthermore, there are the following relationships between charges (electric or magnetic) and voltages or currents:
Therefore, the maximal values of capacitance and inductance energies will be:
Note that the resonance frequency has nothing to do with the energy in the classical case. But it has the following relationship with energy in the quantum case:
So, in the quantum case, by filling capacitance with the one electron charge:
and
The relationship between capacitance energy and the ground state oscillator energy will then be:
where quantum impedance of LC circuit.
The quantum impedance of the quantum LC circuit could be in practice of the two types:
So, the energy relationships will be:
and that is the main problem of the quantum LC circuit: energies stored on capacitance and inductance are not equal to the ground state energy of the quantum oscillator.
This energy problem produces the quantum LC circuit paradox (QLCCP).
Possible solution
Some simple solution of the QLCCP could be found in the following way. Yakymakha (1989) (eqn.30) proposed the following DOS quantum impedance definition:
where magnetic flux, and
electric flux,
So, there are no electric or magnetic charges in the quantum LC circuit, but electric and magnetic fluxes only. Therefore, not only in the DOS LC circuit, but in the other LC circuits too, there are only the electromagnetic waves. Thus, the quantum LC circuit is the minimal geometrical-topological value of the quantum waveguide, in which there are no electric or magnetic charges, but electromagnetic waves only. Now one should consider the quantum LC circuit as a "black wave box" (BWB), which has no electric or magnetic charges, but waves. Furthermore, this BWB could be "closed" (in Bohr atom or in the vacuum for photons), or "open" (as for QHE and Josephson junction). So, the quantum LC circuit should has BWB and "input – output" supplements. The total energy balance should be calculated with considering of "input" and "output" devices. Without "input – output" devices, the energies "stored" on capacitances and inductances are virtual or "characteristics", as in the case of characteristic impedance (without dissipation). Very close to this approach now are Devoret (2004), which consider Josephson junctions with quantum inductance, Datta impedance of Schrödinger waves (2008) and Tsu (2008), which consider quantum wave guides.
Explanation for DOS quantum LC circuit
As presented below, the resonance frequency for QHE is:
where cyclotron frequency,
and
The scaling current for QHE will be:
Therefore, the inductance energy will be:
So for quantum magnetic flux , inductance energy is half as much as the ground state oscillation energy. This is due to the spin of electron (there are two electrons on Landau level on the same quantum area element). Therefore, the inductance/capacitance energy considers the total Landau level energy per spin.
Explanation for "wave" quantum LC circuit
By analogy to the DOS LC circuit, we have
two times lesser value due to the spin. But here there is the new dimensionless fundamental constant:
which considers topological properties of the quantum LC circuit. This fundamental constant first appeared in the Bohr atom for Bohr radius:
where Compton wavelength of electron.
Thus, the wave quantum LC circuit has no charges in it, but electromagnetic waves only. So capacitance or inductance "characteristic energies" are
times less than the total energy of the oscillator. In other words, charges "disappear" at the "input" and "generate" at the "output" of the wave LC circuit, adding energies to keep balance.
Total energy of quantum LC circuit
Energy stored on the quantum capacitance:
Energy stored on the quantum inductance:
Resonance energy of the quantum LC circuit:
Thus, the total energy of the quantum LC circuit should be:
In the general case, resonance energy could be due to the "rest mass" of electron, energy gap for Bohr atom, etc.
However, energy stored on capacitance is due to electric charge. Actually, for free electron and Bohr atom LC circuits we have quantized electric fluxes, equal to the electronic charge,
.
Furthermore, energy stored on inductance is due to magnetic momentum. Actually, for Bohr atom we have Bohr Magneton:
In the case of free electron, Bohr Magneton will be:
the same, as for Bohr atom.
Applications
Electron as LC circuit
Electron capacitance could be presented as the spherical capacitor:
where electron radius and Compton wavelength.
Note, that this electron radius is consistent with the standard definition of the spin. Actually, rotating momentum of electron is:
where is considered.
Spherical inductance of electron:
Characterictic impedance of electron:
Resonance frequency of electron LC circuit:
Induced electric flux on electron capacitance:
Energy, stored on electron capacitance:
where is the "rest energy" of electron. So, induced electric flux will be:
Thus, through electron capacitance we have quantized electric flux, equal to the electron charge.
Magnetic flux through inductance:
Magnetic energy, stored on inductance:
So, induced magnetic flux will be:
where magnetic flux quantum. Thus, through electron inductance there are no quantization of magnetic flux.
Bohr atom as LC circuit
Bohr radius:
where Compton wavelength of electron,
fine-structure constant.
Bohr atomic surface:
.
Bohr inductance:
.
Bohr capacitance:
.
Bohr wave impedance:
Bohr angular frequency:
where Bohr wavelength for the first energy level.
Induced electric flux of the Bohr first energy level:
Energy, stored on the Bohr capacitance:
where is the Bohr energy. So, induced electric flux will be:
Thus, through the Bohr capacitance we have quantized electric flux, equal to the electron charge.
Magnetic flux through the Bohr inductance:
So, induced magnetic flux will be:
Thus, through the Bohr inductance there are no quantization of magnetic flux.
Photon as LC circuit
Photon "resonant angular frequency":
Photon "wave impedance":
Photon "wave inductance":
Photon "wave capacitance":
Photon "magnetic flux quantum":
Photon "wave current":
Quantum Hall effect as LC circuit
In the general case 2D- density of states (DOS) in a solid could be defined by the following:
,
where current carriers effective mass in a solid, electron mass, and dimensionless parameter, which considers band structure of a solid. So, the quantum inductance can be defined as follows:
,
where – the ‘’ideal value’’ of quantum inductance at and another ideal quantum inductance:
Since defined above quantum inductance is per unit area, therefore its absolute value will be in the QHE mode:
,
where the carrier concentration is:
,
and is the Planck constant. By analogically, the absolute value of the quantum capacitance will be in the QHE mode:
,
where
,
is DOS definition of the quantum capacitance according to Luryi, – quantum capacitance ‘’ideal value’’ at , and other quantum capacitance:
,
where dielectric constant, first defined by Yakymakha (1994) in the spectroscopic investigations of the silicon MOSFETs.
The standard wave impedance definition for the QHE LC circuit could be presented as:
,
where von Klitzing constant for resistance.
The standard resonant frequency definition for the QHE LC circuit could be presented as:
,
where standard cyclotron frequency in the magnetic field B.
Hall scaling current quantum will be
,
where Hall angular frequency.
Josephson junction as LC circuit
Electromagnetic induction (Faraday) law:
where magnetic flux, Josephson junction quantum inductance and
Josephson junction current.
DC Josephson equation for current:
where Josephson scale for current,
phase difference between superconductors.
Current derivative on time variable will be:
AC Josephson equation:
where reduced Planck constant, Josephson magnetic flux quantum,
and electron charge.
Combining equations for derivatives yields junction voltage:
where
is the Devoret (1997) quantum inductance.
AC Josephson equation for angular frequency:
Resonance frequency for Josephson LC circuit:
where is the Devoret quantum capacitance, that can be defined as:
Total electric charge on the first energy level of FA:
,
where Bohr quantum area element. First FA was discovered by Yakymakha (1994) as very low frequency resonance on the p-channel MOSFETs. Contrary to the spherical Bohr atom, the FA has hyperbolic dependence on the number of energy level (n)
^ Yakymakha O.L.(1989). High Temperature Quantum Galvanomagnetic Effects in the Two- Dimensional Inversion Layers of MOSFET's (In Russian). Kyiv: Vyscha Shkola. p. 91. ISBN5-11-002309-3. djvuArchived June 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
Devoret M.H., Martinis J.M. (2004). "Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits". Quantum Information Processing, v.3, N1. PDF
Raphael Tsu and Timir Datta (2008) "Conductance and Wave Impedance of Electrons".
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Hangzhou, China, March 24–28.
PDF
^ Yakymakha O.L., Kalnibolotskij Y.M. (1994). "Very-low-frequency resonance of MOSFET amplifier parameters". Solid- State Electronics 37(10), 1739–1751. PDF
Serge Luryi (1988). "Quantum capacitance device". Appl.Phys.Lett. 52(6). PDF
Devoret M.H. (1997). "Quantum Fluctuations". Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 351–386. PDFArchived April 1, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
Yakymakha O.L., Kalnibolotskij Y.M., Solid- State Electronics, vol.38, no.3,1995, pp. 661–671. PDF
Sources
W. H. Louisell, "Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation" (Wiley, New York, 1973)
Michel H.Devoret. Quantum Fluctuation in Electric Circuit. PDF
Fan Hong-yi, Pan Xiao-yin. Chin.Phys.Lett. No.9(1998)625. PDF
Xu, Xing-Lei; Li, Hong-Qi; Wang, Ji-Suo Quantum fluctuations of mesoscopic damped double resonance RLC circuit with mutual capacitance inductance coupling in thermal excitation state. Chinese Physics, vol. 16, issue 8, pp. 2462–2470 (2007).
Hong-Qi Li, Xing-Lei Xu and Ji-Suo Wang. Quantum Fluctuations of the Current and Voltage in Thermal Vacuum State for Mesoscopic Quartz Piezoelectric Crystal.
Boris Ya. Zel’dovich. Impedance and parametric excitation of oscillators. UFN, 2008, v. 178, no 5. PDF