Misplaced Pages

Quasi-unmixed ring

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Noetherian ring in algebra

In algebra, specifically in the theory of commutative rings, a quasi-unmixed ring (also called a formally equidimensional ring in EGA) is a Noetherian ring A {\displaystyle A} such that for each prime ideal p, the completion of the localization Ap is equidimensional, i.e. for each minimal prime ideal q in the completion A p ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {A_{p}}}} , dim A p ^ / q = dim A p {\displaystyle \dim {\widehat {A_{p}}}/q=\dim A_{p}} = the Krull dimension of Ap.

Equivalent conditions

A Noetherian integral domain is quasi-unmixed if and only if it satisfies Nagata's altitude formula. (See also: #formally catenary ring below.)

Precisely, a quasi-unmixed ring is a ring in which the unmixed theorem, which characterizes a Cohen–Macaulay ring, holds for integral closure of an ideal; specifically, for a Noetherian ring A {\displaystyle A} , the following are equivalent:

  • A {\displaystyle A} is quasi-unmixed.
  • For each ideal I generated by a number of elements equal to its height, the integral closure I ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {I}}} is unmixed in height (each prime divisor has the same height as the others).
  • For each ideal I generated by a number of elements equal to its height and for each integer n > 0, I n ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {I^{n}}}} is unmixed.

Formally catenary ring

A Noetherian local ring A {\displaystyle A} is said to be formally catenary if for every prime ideal p {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}} , A / p {\displaystyle A/{\mathfrak {p}}} is quasi-unmixed. As it turns out, this notion is redundant: Ratliff has shown that a Noetherian local ring is formally catenary if and only if it is universally catenary.

References

  1. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1965, 7.1.1
  2. Ratliff 1974, Definition 2.9. NB: "depth" there means dimension
  3. Ratliff 1974, Remark 2.10.1.
  4. Ratliff 1974, Theorem 2.29.
  5. Ratliff 1974, Remark 2.30.
  6. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1965, 7.1.9
  7. L. J. Ratliff, Jr., Characterizations of catenary rings, Amer. J. Math. 93 (1971)

Further reading

  • Herrmann, M., S. Ikeda, and U. Orbanz: Equimultiplicity and Blowing Up. An Algebraic Study with an Appendix by B. Moonen. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New-York, 1988.


Stub icon

This commutative algebra-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: