Misplaced Pages

R v Reed

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "R v Reed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

R v Reed (Nicholas) Crim. L.R. 819 is an English criminal law case, dealing with suicide and criminal conspiracy. The court ruled that the event that the defendant conspired about did not have to take place for an offence to have been committed.

Facts

The defendant was arranging suicide pacts, but no one actually committed suicide.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2018)

Judgment

The court decided that if anyone had committed suicide, he would have been charged with, among other things, conspiring to aid and abet a suicide, so he should be charged now with the conspiracy.

See also

References

English criminal law
Classes of crimes
Elements of crimes
Doctrines
Inchoate offences
Defences
Offences against
the person
Sexual offences
Public order offences
Offences against property
Forgery, personation
and cheating
Offences against justice
Other common law areas


Flag of United KingdomJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Stub icon

This crime-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: