Misplaced Pages

R v Viljoen

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
South African legal case

R v Viljoen is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division on 23 April 1941, with judgment handed down on 6 May. De Wet CJ, Watermeyer JA, Tindall JA, Centlivres JA, and Feetham JA presided.

Facts

A statement had been made by the accused to a peace officer without compliance with the formalities prescribed by section 273(1) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.

Judgment

That statement, the court found, although it was capable of implying an admission of guilt, was also capable of a rational explanation, which did not include any such admission. The court held, therefore, that the statement was not a confession within the meaning of the section.

See also

References

Case law

  • R v Viljoen 1941 AD 366.

Legislation

  • Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 31 of 1917.

Notes

  1. 1941 AD 366.
  2. 31 of 1917
Stub icon

This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: