Misplaced Pages

Race and Ethnicity Equality Directive 2000

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Directive 2000/43/EC
European Union directive
TitleCouncil directive implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin
Made byCouncil
Made underArt. 13 TEC
Journal referenceL180, 22–26
History
Date made2000-06-27
Entry into force2000-07-19
Implementation date2003-07-19
Current legislation

The Race Equality Directive 2000/43/EC is a legal act of the European Union, concerning European labour law. It implements the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic group. Since the Treaty of Amsterdam came into force in 1999, new EC laws, or Directives, have been enacted in the area of anti-discrimination, and this directive complements other directives on gender and age, disability, religion and sexual orientation (specifically the Equality Directive 2000).

Overview

The principle rules laid down are as follows:

  1. Implements the principle of equal treatment between people irrespective of racial or ethnic origin.
  2. Gives protection against discrimination in employment and training, education, social protection (including social security and healthcare), social advantages, membership and involvement in organisations of workers and employers and access to goods and services, including housing.
  3. Contains definitions of direct and indirect discrimination and harassment and prohibits the instruction to discriminate and victimisation.
  4. Allows for positive action measures to be taken, in order to ensure full equality in practice.
  5. Gives victims of discrimination a right to make a complaint through a judicial or administrative procedure, associated with appropriate penalties for those who discriminate.
  6. Allows for limited exceptions to the principle of equal treatment, for example in cases where a difference in treatment on the ground of race or ethnic origin constitutes a genuine occupational requirement.
  7. Shares the burden of proof between the complainant and the respondent in civil and administrative cases, so that once an alleged victim establishes facts from which it may be presumed that there has been discrimination, it is for the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the equal treatment principle.
  8. Provides for the establishment in each Member State of an organisation to promote equal treatment and provide independent assistance to victims of racial discrimination.

See also

Direct discrimination cases
Equality Act 2010 ss 13 and 136
Stefanko v Doherty and Maritime Hotel Ltd IRLR 322
Horsey v Dyfed County Council ICR 755
R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council AC 1155
James v Eastleigh BC UKHL 6
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2) UKHL 13
Smith v Safeway plc ICR 868
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd ICR 449 (C-249/96)
Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan UKHL 48
Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary UKHL 11
Roma Rights Centre v Prague Immigration UKHL 55
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire UKSC 15
Coleman v Attridge Law (2008) C-303/06
English v Sanderson Blinds Ltd EWCA Civ 1421
Grainger plc v Nicholson IRLR 4 (EAT)
see UK labour and equality law
Indirect discrimination cases
Equality Act 2010 ss 14 and 19
Griggs v Duke Power Co, 401 US 424 (1971)
Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co KG (2010) C-555/07
Mandla v Dowell-Lee UKHL 7
Rutherford v SS for Trade and Industry UKHL 19
Redfearn v Serco Ltd EWCA Civ 659
Eweida v United Kingdom EWCA Civ 80
Ladele v London Borough of Islington EWCA Civ 1357
Hampson v Dept of Education and Science ICR 179
London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2) IRLR 157
Jones v University of Manchester ICR 474
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz (1986) C-170/84
Rinner-Kühn v FWW Gebäudereinigung KG (1989) C-171/88
Kutz-Bauer v Hansestadt Hamburg (2003) C-187/00
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (2004) C-256/01
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes UKSC 16
EA 2010 s 14
Ministry of Defence v DeBique IRLR 471
see UK labour and equality law
Sources on justifying discrimination
Equality Act 2010 Sch 9
Etam plc v Rowan IRLR 150
Johnston v Royal Ulster Constabulary (1986) C-222/84
R (Amicus) v SS for Trade and Industry EWHC 860
Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97
Kreil v Germany (2000) C-285/98
Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality ICR 768
Tottenham Green Nursery v Marshall (No 2) ICR 320
Equality Act 2010 s 19(2)(d)
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz (1984) C-170/84
Kontofunktionaerernes Forbund v Danfoss (1989) C-109/88
Rinner-Kühn v FWW Gebäudereinigung KG (1989) C-171/88
Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (1991) C-184/89
Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (2003) C-187/00
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (2004) C-256/01
see UK labour law

References

  1. Belavusau, Uladzislau; Henrard, Kristin, eds. (2020). EU Anti-Discrimination Law Beyond Gender. Hart. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-5099-3868-1.

External links

Stub icon

This article about the European Union is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: