Misplaced Pages

Re Dolphin's Conveyance

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Re Dolphin’s Conveyance)

Re Dolphin’s Conveyance
A street of houses in Selly Oak, Birmingham. The question was whether more intensive development was covenant-barred, unless later released. The question was decided in the affirmative.
CourtHigh Court
Full case name Birmingham Corpn v Boden
Citations Ch 654
3 WLR 31
2 All ER 664, Ch D
Case history
Prior actionnone
Subsequent actionnone
Court membership
Judge sittingMr Justice Stamp
Keywords
Covenants

Re Dolphin's Conveyance Ch 654 is an English land law case, concerning covenants. The general legal requirement for a building scheme to exist to enable constrain certain types of development on adjoining land was on the facts satisfied as the multiple vendors were in fact common beneficiaries selling on identical legal terms and no drawing of a cogent estate plan was here necessary.

Facts

Robert Dolphin, owner of Selly Hill Estate, Birmingham, died and the plots were sold in nine conveyances. The first four by his sisters, the last five by his nephew, all on the same legal terms, with covenants about the house type to be built on each plot. These sellers covenanted they would impose similar covenants on the other sale of plots. The current owner, a subsequent owner of one of the houses, wished to redevelop in breach of covenants and asked the Court whether they were enforceable.

Judgment

Stamp J held that even though there was no common vendor and the estate had not been laid out prior to sale, there was a building scheme created.

Cases cited

Applied

  • Baxter v Four Oaks Properties Ltd Ch 816; 2 WLR 1115; 1 All ER 906, Ch D

Distinguished

  • White v Bijou Mansions Ltd Ch 351, CA
  • Elliston v Reacher 2 Ch 665, CA

See also

Cases and main statutes on covenants
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd 2 KB 500
Law of Property Act 1925 s 56(1)
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 s 1(1)
Tulk v Moxhay (1848) 2 Ph 774
Halsall v Brizell Ch 169
Rhone v Stephens 2 AC 310
Law of Property Act 1925 s 79(1)
Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford UFC Ch 459
Law of Property Act 1925 s 78(1)
Re Dolphin’s Conveyance Ch 654
Easements Reform (2008)
Wrotham Park Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd 1 WLR 798
Law of Property Act 1925 s 84(1)
see English land law and covenants

Notes

  1. ^ Index Card: in Re Dolphin's Conveyance ICLR, London
Categories: