Misplaced Pages

Reduction of order

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Technique for solving linear ordinary differential equations
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Reduction of order (or d’Alembert reduction) is a technique in mathematics for solving second-order linear ordinary differential equations. It is employed when one solution y 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(x)} is known and a second linearly independent solution y 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)} is desired. The method also applies to n-th order equations. In this case the ansatz will yield an (n−1)-th order equation for v {\displaystyle v} .

Second-order linear ordinary differential equations

An example

Consider the general, homogeneous, second-order linear constant coefficient ordinary differential equation. (ODE) a y ( x ) + b y ( x ) + c y ( x ) = 0 , {\displaystyle ay''(x)+by'(x)+cy(x)=0,} where a , b , c {\displaystyle a,b,c} are real non-zero coefficients. Two linearly independent solutions for this ODE can be straightforwardly found using characteristic equations except for the case when the discriminant, b 2 4 a c {\displaystyle b^{2}-4ac} , vanishes. In this case, a y ( x ) + b y ( x ) + b 2 4 a y ( x ) = 0 , {\displaystyle ay''(x)+by'(x)+{\frac {b^{2}}{4a}}y(x)=0,} from which only one solution, y 1 ( x ) = e b 2 a x , {\displaystyle y_{1}(x)=e^{-{\frac {b}{2a}}x},} can be found using its characteristic equation.

The method of reduction of order is used to obtain a second linearly independent solution to this differential equation using our one known solution. To find a second solution we take as a guess y 2 ( x ) = v ( x ) y 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)=v(x)y_{1}(x)} where v ( x ) {\displaystyle v(x)} is an unknown function to be determined. Since y 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)} must satisfy the original ODE, we substitute it back in to get a ( v y 1 + 2 v y 1 + v y 1 ) + b ( v y 1 + v y 1 ) + b 2 4 a v y 1 = 0. {\displaystyle a\left(v''y_{1}+2v'y_{1}'+vy_{1}''\right)+b\left(v'y_{1}+vy_{1}'\right)+{\frac {b^{2}}{4a}}vy_{1}=0.} Rearranging this equation in terms of the derivatives of v ( x ) {\displaystyle v(x)} we get ( a y 1 ) v + ( 2 a y 1 + b y 1 ) v + ( a y 1 + b y 1 + b 2 4 a y 1 ) v = 0. {\displaystyle \left(ay_{1}\right)v''+\left(2ay_{1}'+by_{1}\right)v'+\left(ay_{1}''+by_{1}'+{\frac {b^{2}}{4a}}y_{1}\right)v=0.}

Since we know that y 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(x)} is a solution to the original problem, the coefficient of the last term is equal to zero. Furthermore, substituting y 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(x)} into the second term's coefficient yields (for that coefficient) 2 a ( b 2 a e b 2 a x ) + b e b 2 a x = ( b + b ) e b 2 a x = 0. {\displaystyle 2a\left(-{\frac {b}{2a}}e^{-{\frac {b}{2a}}x}\right)+be^{-{\frac {b}{2a}}x}=\left(-b+b\right)e^{-{\frac {b}{2a}}x}=0.}

Therefore, we are left with a y 1 v = 0. {\displaystyle ay_{1}v''=0.}

Since a {\displaystyle a} is assumed non-zero and y 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(x)} is an exponential function (and thus always non-zero), we have v = 0. {\displaystyle v''=0.}

This can be integrated twice to yield v ( x ) = c 1 x + c 2 {\displaystyle v(x)=c_{1}x+c_{2}} where c 1 , c 2 {\displaystyle c_{1},c_{2}} are constants of integration. We now can write our second solution as y 2 ( x ) = ( c 1 x + c 2 ) y 1 ( x ) = c 1 x y 1 ( x ) + c 2 y 1 ( x ) . {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)=(c_{1}x+c_{2})y_{1}(x)=c_{1}xy_{1}(x)+c_{2}y_{1}(x).}

Since the second term in y 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)} is a scalar multiple of the first solution (and thus linearly dependent) we can drop that term, yielding a final solution of y 2 ( x ) = x y 1 ( x ) = x e b 2 a x . {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)=xy_{1}(x)=xe^{-{\frac {b}{2a}}x}.}

Finally, we can prove that the second solution y 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)} found via this method is linearly independent of the first solution by calculating the Wronskian W ( y 1 , y 2 ) ( x ) = | y 1 x y 1 y 1 y 1 + x y 1 | = y 1 ( y 1 + x y 1 ) x y 1 y 1 = y 1 2 + x y 1 y 1 x y 1 y 1 = y 1 2 = e b a x 0. {\displaystyle W(y_{1},y_{2})(x)={\begin{vmatrix}y_{1}&xy_{1}\\y_{1}'&y_{1}+xy_{1}'\end{vmatrix}}=y_{1}(y_{1}+xy_{1}')-xy_{1}y_{1}'=y_{1}^{2}+xy_{1}y_{1}'-xy_{1}y_{1}'=y_{1}^{2}=e^{-{\frac {b}{a}}x}\neq 0.}

Thus y 2 ( x ) {\displaystyle y_{2}(x)} is the second linearly independent solution we were looking for.

General method

Given the general non-homogeneous linear differential equation y + p ( t ) y + q ( t ) y = r ( t ) {\displaystyle y''+p(t)y'+q(t)y=r(t)} and a single solution y 1 ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(t)} of the homogeneous equation [ r ( t ) = 0 {\displaystyle r(t)=0} ], let us try a solution of the full non-homogeneous equation in the form: y 2 = v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{2}=v(t)y_{1}(t)} where v ( t ) {\displaystyle v(t)} is an arbitrary function. Thus y 2 = v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{2}'=v'(t)y_{1}(t)+v(t)y_{1}'(t)} and y 2 = v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + 2 v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) . {\displaystyle y_{2}''=v''(t)y_{1}(t)+2v'(t)y_{1}'(t)+v(t)y_{1}''(t).}

If these are substituted for y {\displaystyle y} , y {\displaystyle y'} , and y {\displaystyle y''} in the differential equation, then y 1 ( t ) v + ( 2 y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) y 1 ( t ) ) v + ( y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + q ( t ) y 1 ( t ) ) v = r ( t ) . {\displaystyle y_{1}(t)\,v''+(2y_{1}'(t)+p(t)y_{1}(t))\,v'+(y_{1}''(t)+p(t)y_{1}'(t)+q(t)y_{1}(t))\,v=r(t).}

Since y 1 ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(t)} is a solution of the original homogeneous differential equation, y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + q ( t ) y 1 ( t ) = 0 {\displaystyle y_{1}''(t)+p(t)y_{1}'(t)+q(t)y_{1}(t)=0} , so we can reduce to y 1 ( t ) v + ( 2 y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) y 1 ( t ) ) v = r ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(t)\,v''+(2y_{1}'(t)+p(t)y_{1}(t))\,v'=r(t)} which is a first-order differential equation for v ( t ) {\displaystyle v'(t)} (reduction of order). Divide by y 1 ( t ) {\displaystyle y_{1}(t)} , obtaining v + ( 2 y 1 ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) ) v = r ( t ) y 1 ( t ) . {\displaystyle v''+\left({\frac {2y_{1}'(t)}{y_{1}(t)}}+p(t)\right)\,v'={\frac {r(t)}{y_{1}(t)}}.}

One integrating factor is given by μ ( t ) = e ( 2 y 1 ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) ) d t {\displaystyle \mu (t)=e^{\int ({\frac {2y_{1}'(t)}{y_{1}(t)}}+p(t))dt}} , and because

( 2 y 1 ( t ) y 1 ( t ) + p ( t ) ) d t = 2 y 1 ( t ) y 1 ( t ) d t + p ( t ) d t = 2 ln ( y 1 ( t ) ) + p ( t ) d t = ln ( y 1 2 ( t ) ) + p ( t ) d t , {\displaystyle \int \left({\frac {2y_{1}'(t)}{y_{1}(t)}}+p(t)\right)\,dt=2\int {\frac {y_{1}'(t)}{y_{1}(t)}}\,dt+\int p(t)\,dt=2\ln(y_{1}(t))+\int p(t)\,dt=\ln(y_{1}^{2}(t))+\int p(t)\,dt,}

this integrating factor can be more neatly expressed as μ ( t ) = e ln ( y 1 2 ( t ) ) + p ( t ) d t = y 1 2 ( t ) e p ( t ) d t . {\displaystyle \mu (t)=e^{\ln(y_{1}^{2}(t))+\int p(t)\,dt}=y_{1}^{2}(t)e^{\int p(t)dt}.} Multiplying the differential equation by the integrating factor μ ( t ) {\displaystyle \mu (t)} , the equation for v ( t ) {\displaystyle v(t)} can be reduced to d d t ( v ( t ) y 1 2 ( t ) e p ( t ) d t ) = y 1 ( t ) r ( t ) e p ( t ) d t . {\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dt}}\left(v'(t)y_{1}^{2}(t)e^{\int p(t)dt}\right)=y_{1}(t)r(t)e^{\int p(t)dt}.}

After integrating the last equation, v ( t ) {\displaystyle v'(t)} is found, containing one constant of integration. Then, integrate v ( t ) {\displaystyle v'(t)} to find the full solution of the original non-homogeneous second-order equation, exhibiting two constants of integration as it should: y 2 ( t ) = v ( t ) y 1 ( t ) . {\displaystyle y_{2}(t)=v(t)y_{1}(t).}

See also

References

Category: