| Napo river | |
|---|---|
 The Napo River to the east of Coca | |
 Map of the Amazon Basin with the Napo River highlighted | |
| Location | |
| Countries | |
| Physical characteristics | |
| Source | |
| • location | Confluence of Jatunyaçu and Anzu, Ecuador |
| • coordinates | 1°2′48.6204″S 77°48′27.4392″W / 1.046839000°S 77.807622000°W / -1.046839000; -77.807622000 |
| • elevation | 430 m (1,410 ft) |
| 2nd source | |
| • location | Jatunyaçu–Verdeyaçu, Andes, Ecuador |
| • coordinates | 0°38′22.6248″S 78°3′29.1924″W / 0.639618000°S 78.058109000°W / -0.639618000; -78.058109000 |
| • elevation | 3,419 m (11,217 ft) |
| 3rd source | |
| • location | Jatunyaçu–Mulatos, Andes, Ecuador |
| • coordinates | 0°53′55.0464″S 78°24′32.8824″W / 0.898624000°S 78.409134000°W / -0.898624000; -78.409134000 |
| • elevation | 3,871 m (12,700 ft) |
| 4th source | |
| • location | Anzu River, Andes, Ecuador |
| • coordinates | 1°23′30.408″S 78°4′48.7668″W / 1.39178000°S 78.080213000°W / -1.39178000; -78.080213000 |
| • elevation | 1,430 m (4,690 ft) |
| Mouth | Amazon River |
| • location | 70 km (43 mi) downstream from Iquitos, Loreto Region, Peru |
| • coordinates | 3°27′28″S 72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W / -3.45778; -72.71750 |
| • elevation | 78 m (256 ft) |
| Length | 1,130 km (700 mi) |
| Basin size | 103,307.79 km (39,887.36 sq mi) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Francisco de Orellana (near mouth) |
| • average | (Period: 1971–2000)7,147.8 m/s (252,420 cu ft/s) |
| • minimum | 3,200 m/s (110,000 cu ft/s) |
| • maximum | 10,800 m/s (380,000 cu ft/s) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Mazán (Bella Vista) |
| • average | (Period: 1991–2023)7,000 m/s (250,000 cu ft/s) |
| • minimum | 3,250 m/s (115,000 cu ft/s) |
| • maximum | 11,200 m/s (400,000 cu ft/s) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Santa Clotilde |
| • average | (Period: 2002–2011)5,895 m/s (208,200 cu ft/s) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Nueva Rocafuerte |
| • average | (Period: 2001–2009)2,032 m/s (71,800 cu ft/s) |
| Discharge | |
| • location | Puerto Francisco de Orellana |
| • average | (Period: 2001–2009)1,105 m/s (39,000 cu ft/s) |
| Basin features | |
| Progression | Amazon → Atlantic Ocean |
| River system | Amazon River |
| Tributaries | |
| • left | Jatunyaçu, Misahualli, Payamino, Coca, Aguarico, Tamboyaçu |
| • right | Anzu, Llocullón, Tiputini, Yasuní, Anahiri, Curaray, Tacshacuraray, Mazán |
The Napo River (Spanish: Río Napo) is a tributary to the Amazon River that rises in Ecuador on the flanks of the east Andean volcanoes of Antisana, Sincholagua and Cotopaxi.
The total length is 1,075 km (668 mi). The river drains an area of ca 103,000 km. The mean annual discharge at Mazán 6,800 m/s (240,000 cu ft/s).
Geography
Before it reaches the plains it receives a great number of small streams from impenetrable, saturated and much broken mountainous districts, where the dense and varied vegetation seems to fight for every piece of ground. From the north it is joined by the Coca River, having its sources in the gorges of Cayambe volcano on the equator, and also a powerful river, the Aguarico having its headwaters between Cayambe and the Colombia frontier. From the west, it receives a secondary tributary, the Curaray, from the Andean slopes, between Cotopaxi and the Tungurahua volcano. From its Coca branch to the mouth of the Curaray the Napo is full of snags and shelving sandbanks and throws out numerous canoes among jungle-tangled islands, which in the wet season are flooded, giving the river an immense width. From the Coca to the Amazon it runs through a forested plain where not a hill is visible from the river - its uniformly level banks being only interrupted by swamps and lagoons. From the Amazon the Napo is navigable for river craft up to its Curaray branch, a distance of about 216 mi (348 km), and perhaps a bit further; thence, by painful canoe navigation, its upper waters may be ascended as far as Santa Rosa, the usual point of embarkation for any venturesome traveller who descends from the Quito tableland. The Coca river may be penetrated as far up as its middle course, where it is jammed between two mountain walls, in a deep canyon, along which it dashes over high falls and numerous reefs. This is the stream made famous by the expedition of the Spanish conquistador Gonzalo Pizarro.
Hydrometric stations on the Napo River:
| Station | River kilometer (rkm) | Elevation (m) | Drainage basin
(km) |
Average discharge
(m/s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Napo | |||||
| Francisco de Orellana | 0 | 78 | 103,307.79 | 7,147.8 | 6,611 |
| Mazán | 79.76 | 85 | 100,518 | 7,033 | 6,464.5 |
| Bellavista | 194.51 | 105 | 90,305.3 | 6,416.1 | – |
| Santa Clotilde | 256.24 | 113 | 85,770 | 6,124.4 | 5,700 |
| Campo Serio | 421.35 | 140 | 50,342.9 | 3,430.3 | – |
| Cabo Pantoja | 546.8 | 166 | 44,698.2 | 3,007.5 | 3,280 |
| Nuevo Rocafuerte | 574.1 | 173 | 27,489.4 | 1,937.3 | 2,032 |
| Pañacocha | 673 | 203 | 21,731.4 | 1,552.1 | – |
| Upper Napo | |||||
| Puerto Francisco de Orellana | 782 | 243 | 12,343 | 1,016 | 1,105 |
| Puerto Napo | 950 | 427 | 4,182.4 | 260.9 | 377.6 |
Discharge
Napo River at Bellavista average (Q), dominante (Qd) discharge (m/s) and sediment load (S – million ton/year). Period from 1991/09–2009/08:
| Water year | Q | S | Qd | Water year | Q | S | Qd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991/1992 | 5,667 | 28.608 | 6,009 | 2001/2002 | 5,979 | 32.431 | 6,335 |
| 1992/1993 | 7,104 | 47.718 | 7,447 | 2002/2003 | 5,669 | 32.154 | 6,312 |
| 1993/1994 | 8,013 | 67.159 | 8,583 | 2003/2004 | 6,148 | 41.916 | 7,054 |
| 1994/1995 | 6,055 | 34.801 | 6,525 | 2004/2005 | 6,456 | 37.953 | 6,767 |
| 1995/1996 | 5,956 | 34.017 | 6,463 | 2005/2006 | 6,143 | 34.77 | 6,523 |
| 1996/1997 | 6,262 | 38.258 | 6,790 | 2006/2007 | 6,535 | 40.344 | 6,942 |
| 1997/1998 | 9,839 | 105.956 | 10,354 | 2007/2008 | 6,615 | 40.832 | 6,977 |
| 1998/1999 | 6,839 | 51.48 | 7,686 | 2008/2009 | 7,428 | 52.504 | 7,749 |
| 1999/2000 | 6,725 | 49.735 | 7,576 | ||||
| 2000/2001 | 6,452 | 38.527 | 6,810 | Average | 6,660 | 44.953 | 7,161 |
Napo River at Bellavista average, minimum and maximum discharge (m/s). Period from 2009/09 to 2023/08:
| Water year | Mean | Min | Max | Water year | Mean | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009/2010 | 7,177 | 2016/2017 | 7,273.6 | 3,200 | 11,150 | ||
| 2010/2011 | 5,768.2 | 1,649 | 10,860 | 2017/2018 | 7,284 | 1,550 | 13,500 |
| 2011/2012 | 7,447.4 | 2,894 | 12,230 | 2018/2019 | 8,234 | 2,850 | 12,200 |
| 2012/2013 | 7,452.7 | 3,102 | 11,230 | 2019/2020 | 8,100 | 3,100 | 12,700 |
| 2013/2014 | 8,652 | 3,230 | 13,700 | 2020/2021 | 8,410 | 3,620 | 14,000 |
| 2014/2015 | 9,336 | 4,810 | 13,450 | 2021/2022 | 6,855 | 2,078 | 13,500 |
| 2015/2016 | 5,761 | 498.6 | 10,200 | 2022/2023 | 5,849 | 1,201 | 15,200 |
Minimum 498.6 m/s (2016/02); Maximum: 15,820 m/s (2015/07);
Napo River at Bellavista average, maximum, minimum and multiannual average (normal) discharge (m/s) and anomaly (%):
| Mean | Max | Min | Normal | (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010/09 – 2011/08 | |||||
| SEP | 2,620.5 | 3,089 | 1,969 | 5,121.2 | –49 |
| OCT | 2,413.5 | 3,061 | 1,649 | 4,898.6 | –51 |
| NOV | 3,818.7 | 4,778 | 2,696 | 5,595.1 | –32 |
| DEC | 4,774.1 | 6,240 | 4,148 | 5,660.6 | –16 |
| JAN | 3,604.2 | 5,001 | 2,174 | 4,580.7 | –21 |
| FEB | 2,480.7 | 3,478 | 1,920 | 4,386.9 | –43 |
| MAR | 4,753.4 | 7,127 | 3,790 | 5,824.1 | –18 |
| APR | 9,206.8 | 10,240 | 7,865 | 7,502.4 | 23 |
| MAY | 9,561.5 | 10,040 | 8,348 | 8,941.3 | 7 |
| JUN | 10,193.8 | 10,860 | 8,821 | 9,422.9 | 8 |
| JUL | 9,846.3 | 10,590 | 7,904 | 8,844.7 | 11 |
| AUG | 5,944.6 | 8,658 | 3,758 | 6,610.8 | –10 |
| Mean | 5,768.2 | 6,930 | 4,587 | 6,449.1 | –12 |
| 2011/09 – 2012/08 | |||||
| SEP | 4,551.3 | 5,441 | 3,757 | 5,121.2 | 11 |
| OCT | 5,344.9 | 6,995 | 2,894 | 4,898.6 | 9 |
| NOV | 4,427 | 6,878 | 3,023 | 5,595.1 | –21 |
| DEC | 6,536.8 | 9,160 | 5,205 | 5,660.6 | 15 |
| JAN | 7,998.7 | 9,501 | 4,868 | 4,580.7 | 75 |
| FEB | 6,536.8 | 8,302 | 5,155 | 4,386.9 | 49 |
| MAR | 9,557.2 | 12,150 | 5,417 | 5,824.1 | 64 |
| APR | 11,843.7 | 12,230 | 10,870 | 7,502.4 | 58 |
| MAY | 10,322.7 | 10,790 | 9,702 | 8,941.3 | 15 |
| JUN | 8,878.8 | 9,961 | 7,011 | 9,422.9 | –6 |
| JUL | 8,189.3 | 9,228 | 7,197 | 8,844.7 | –7 |
| AUG | 5,182 | 7,605 | 3,975 | 6,612.4 | –22 |
| Mean | 7,447.4 | 9,020 | 5,756 | 6,449.2 | 15.5 |
| 2012/09 – 2013/08 | |||||
| SEP | 5,037 | 7,822 | 3,249 | 5,096 | –1 |
| OCT | 5,113 | 6,457 | 4,632 | 4,918 | 4 |
| NOV | 4,130 | 5,660 | 3,102 | 5,567 | –26 |
| DEC | 4,755 | 6,838 | 3,568 | 5,698 | –17 |
| JAN | 7,589 | 9,183 | 3,854 | 4,723 | 61 |
| FEB | 5,851 | 9,071 | 4,170 | 4,465 | 31 |
| MAR | 10,060 | 10,740 | 9,127 | 5,973 | 68 |
| APR | 9,405 | 10610 | 8,675 | 7,683 | 22 |
| MAY | 8,322 | 10,570 | 6,932 | 8,999 | –8 |
| JUN | 10,495 | 11,230 | 9,743 | 9,400 | 12 |
| JUL | 9,675 | 10,410 | 8,402 | 8,817 | 10 |
| AUG | 9,001 | 9,776 | 8,386 | 6,551 | 37 |
| Mean | 7,452.7 | 9,030 | 6,153 | 6,490.8 | 15 |
| Period | Discharge | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Francisco de Orellana
(near mouth) 3°27′28″S 72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W / -3.45778; -72.71750 | ||
| 2010–2015 | 7,400 m/s (260,000 cu ft/s) | |
| 7,500 m/s (260,000 cu ft/s) | ||
| 1971–2000 | 7,147.8 m/s (252,420 cu ft/s) | |
| 8,936 m/s (315,600 cu ft/s) | ||
| 4,555.23 m/s (160,866 cu ft/s) | ||
| Bellavista (Mazán) | ||
| 1930–2006 | 6,464 m/s (228,300 cu ft/s) | |
| 1981–2020 | 6,800 m/s (240,000 cu ft/s) | |
| 1989–2010 | 6,360 m/s (225,000 cu ft/s)
(Q–dominante: 6,865 m/s (242,400 cu ft/s) |
|
| 1991–2009 | 6,660 m/s (235,000 cu ft/s) | |
| 1997–2015 | 6,734.2 m/s (237,820 cu ft/s) | |
| 2000–2011 | 6,461 m/s (228,200 cu ft/s) | |
| 2001–2012 | 6,758 m/s (238,700 cu ft/s) | |
| 2001–2009 | 6,369 m/s (224,900 cu ft/s) | |
| 2002–2008 | 6,489 m/s (229,200 cu ft/s) | |
| 2003–2009 | 6,855 m/s (242,100 cu ft/s) | |
| 2004–2010 | 6,609 m/s (233,400 cu ft/s) | |
| 2001–2005 | 6,976 m/s (246,400 cu ft/s) | |
| 2004–2006 | 6,267 m/s (221,300 cu ft/s) | |
| 2016–2017 | 9,338 m/s (329,800 cu ft/s) | |
| 1971–2000 | 7,032 m/s (248,300 cu ft/s) | |
Tributaries
List of the major tributaries of the Napo River (from the mouth upwards):
| Left
tributary |
Right
tributary |
Length (km) | Basin size (km) | Average discharge (m/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Napo | 1,089.03 | 103,307.79 | 7,147.8 | |
| Lower Napo | ||||
| Sucusari | 590.7 | 39.8 | ||
| Mazán | 509.11 | 7,721.3 | 532.9 | |
| Yanayaçu | 1,340 | 89 | ||
| Zapote | 140.8 | 9.3 | ||
| Papaya | 278 | 17.5 | ||
| Tacshacuraray | 203.1 | 2,760.5 | 196.5 | |
| Huirina | 610 | 33.2 | ||
| Tamboryaçu | 4,958 | 327.2 | ||
| Pucara | 827 | 50.4 | ||
| Curaray | 772.77 | 26,704.7 | 2,044.4 | |
| Tarapoto | 679 | 46.1 | ||
| Gomez | 424.8 | 32.6 | ||
| Loro Caparin | 794.1 | 61.8 | ||
| Anshiri | 2,682.5 | 202.1 | ||
| Santa Maria | 1,471.5 | 107.8 | ||
| Aguarico | 502.5 | 13,404.5 | 889.3 | |
| Yasuní | 238.5 | 3,386.8 | 237.7 | |
| Tiputini | 380.4 | 4,423.1 | 320.2 | |
| Huiririma | 13.2 | |||
| Cariyuturi | 253.5 | 18.3 | ||
| Pañyaçu | 80 | 876.7 | 68.4 | |
| Indillana | 71.8 | 636.3 | 51.5 | |
| Itaya | 120.6 | 9.6 | ||
| Jivino | 121.7 | 707.9 | 56 | |
| Blanco | 249 | 17.6 | ||
| Coca | 245.1 | 5,308.1 | 338.9 | |
| Upper Napo | ||||
| Payamino | 110.4 | 2,012.6 | 171.2 | |
| Suyunoyaçu | 198.8 | 16.8 | ||
| Suno | 96.7 | 1,891.4 | 161.2 | |
| Arajuno | 835.9 | 97.9 | ||
| Pusuno | 160.2 | 15.2 | ||
| Misahuallí | 68.7 | 1,659.6 | 170.6 | |
| Jatunyaçu | 107 | 3,221.2 | 302.7 | |
| Anzu | 69.7 | 817.1 | 75 | |
Period: 1971–2000
See also
References
- Ziesler, R.; Ardizzone, G.D. (1979). "Amazon River System". The Inland waters of Latin America. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 92-5-000780-9. Archived from the original on 8 November 2014.
- ^ "Amazon".
- ^ Charles J., Vörösmarty; Berrien, Moore; Annette L., Grace; M. Patricia, Gildea (1989). CONTINENTAL SCALE MODELS OF WATER BALANCE AND FLUVIAL TRANSPORT: AN APPLICATIONS TO SOUTH AMERICA (PDF). Vol. 3. p. 241-265.
- ^ "Reportes hidrológicos". Archived from the original on 2023-10-03. Retrieved 2023-10-03.
- ^ "6_1-6_Linea Ambiental" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-06-07. Retrieved 2021-10-15.
- ^ Claire, F. Beveridge; Jhan-Carlo, Espinoza; Simone, Athayde; Sandra, Bibiana Correa; Thiago, B. A. Couto; Sebastian, A. Heilpern; Clinton, N. Jenkins; Natalia, C. Piland; Renata, Utsunomiya; Sly, Wongchuig; Elizabeth, P. Anderson (2024). "The Andes–Amazon–Atlantic pathway: A foundational hydroclimate system for social–ecological system sustainability". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121 (22): e2306229121. Bibcode:2024PNAS..12106229B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2306229121. PMC 11145265. PMID 38722826. Cite error: The named reference "The Andes–Amazon–Atlantic pathway: A foundational hydroclimate system for social–ecological system sustainability" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Christophoul, Frédéric (January 2009). "Sediment budget of the Napo River, Amazon basin, Ecuador and Peru". www.academia.edu Hydrological …, 2009.
- ^ ESTUDIO BINACIONAL DE NAVEGABILIDAD DEL RÍO NAPO (PDF). 2010.
- "Hydro-SHEDS".
- "SO-HYBAM".
- "Senamhi". 7 September 2021. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
- "EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2011". Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28.
- "EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2012". Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28.
- "BOLETIN EXTRAORDINARIO DE LA EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA Y PLUVIOMÉTRICA EN LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA PERUANA – AGOSTO 2013". Archived from the original on 2021-11-02. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
- William, Santini (2019). An index concentration method for suspended load monitoring in large rivers of the Amazonian foreland. doi:10.5194/esurf-2018-93.
- "Oficina Nacional de Evaluación de Recursos Naturales (ONERN)".
- "Empresa de Electricidad del Perú S.A.-ELECTROPERU-Plataforma del Estado Peruano". 19 May 2023.
- "HYBAM".
- Julio Isaac, Montenegro Gambini (2015). Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling in a bend of napo amazonian river: Morphodynamics and infrastructure implications. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27735.68008.
- Jamie, Towner (2019). "Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- Filizola, Naziano; Melo, Edileuza; Armijos, Elisa; McGlynn, John (2015). "Preliminary Analysis of Potential for River Hydrokinetic Energy Tecnologies in the Amazon Basin". Idb Publications. doi:10.18235/0000222.
- Alain, Laraque; Jean-Sébastien, Moquet (2011). "Chemical weathering and atmospheric/soil CO2 uptake in the Andean and Foreland Amazon basins". Chemical Geology. 287 (1–2): 1–26. Bibcode:2011ChGeo.287....1M. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.005.
- Ricardo Zubieta, Barragán (2013). Modelado hidrológico distribuido de la cuenca amazónica peruana utilizando precipitación obtenida por satélite.
- Philippe, Vauchel; Jorge Luis, Carranza Vasle; Alain, Crave (2013). "Suspended sediment dynamics in the Amazon River of Peru". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 44: 75. Bibcode:2013JSAES..44...75A. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2012.09.002.
- Ricardo, Zubieta; Augusto, Getirana; Jhan Carlo, Espinoza; Waldo, Lavado-Casimiro; Luis, Aragon (2017). "Hydrological modeling of the Peruvian-Ecuadorian Amazon Basin using GPM-IMERG satellite-based precipitation dataset". Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 21 (7): 3543–3555. Bibcode:2017HESS...21.3543Z. doi:10.5194/hess-21-3543-2017. PMC 7402198. PMID 32753831.