Misplaced Pages

Rokhlin's theorem

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Rokhlin invariant) On the intersection form of a smooth, closed 4-manifold with a spin structure

In 4-dimensional topology, a branch of mathematics, Rokhlin's theorem states that if a smooth, orientable, closed 4-manifold M has a spin structure (or, equivalently, the second Stiefel–Whitney class w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} vanishes), then the signature of its intersection form, a quadratic form on the second cohomology group H 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle H^{2}(M)} , is divisible by 16. The theorem is named for Vladimir Rokhlin, who proved it in 1952.

Examples

Q M : H 2 ( M , Z ) × H 2 ( M , Z ) Z {\displaystyle Q_{M}\colon H^{2}(M,\mathbb {Z} )\times H^{2}(M,\mathbb {Z} )\rightarrow \mathbb {Z} }
is unimodular on Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } by Poincaré duality, and the vanishing of w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} implies that the intersection form is even. By a theorem of Cahit Arf, any even unimodular lattice has signature divisible by 8, so Rokhlin's theorem forces one extra factor of 2 to divide the signature.
  • A K3 surface is compact, 4 dimensional, and w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} vanishes, and the signature is −16, so 16 is the best possible number in Rokhlin's theorem.
  • A complex surface in C P 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {CP} ^{3}} of degree d {\displaystyle d} is spin if and only if d {\displaystyle d} is even. It has signature ( 4 d 2 ) d / 3 {\displaystyle (4-d^{2})d/3} , which can be seen from Friedrich Hirzebruch's signature theorem. The case d = 4 {\displaystyle d=4} gives back the last example of a K3 surface.
  • Michael Freedman's E8 manifold is a simply connected compact topological manifold with vanishing w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} and intersection form E 8 {\displaystyle E_{8}} of signature 8. Rokhlin's theorem implies that this manifold has no smooth structure. This manifold shows that Rokhlin's theorem fails for the set of merely topological (rather than smooth) manifolds.
  • If the manifold M is simply connected (or more generally if the first homology group has no 2-torsion), then the vanishing of w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} is equivalent to the intersection form being even. This is not true in general: an Enriques surface is a compact smooth 4 manifold and has even intersection form II1,9 of signature −8 (not divisible by 16), but the class w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} does not vanish and is represented by a torsion element in the second cohomology group.

Proofs

Rokhlin's theorem can be deduced from the fact that the third stable homotopy group of spheres π 3 S {\displaystyle \pi _{3}^{S}} is cyclic of order 24; this is Rokhlin's original approach.

It can also be deduced from the Atiyah–Singer index theorem. See  genus and Rochlin's theorem.

Robion Kirby (1989) gives a geometric proof.

The Rokhlin invariant

Since Rokhlin's theorem states that the signature of a spin smooth manifold is divisible by 16, the definition of the Rokhlin invariant is deduced as follows:

For 3-manifold N {\displaystyle N} and a spin structure s {\displaystyle s} on N {\displaystyle N} , the Rokhlin invariant μ ( N , s ) {\displaystyle \mu (N,s)} in Z / 16 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /16\mathbb {Z} } is defined to be the signature of any smooth compact spin 4-manifold with spin boundary ( N , s ) {\displaystyle (N,s)} .

If N is a spin 3-manifold then it bounds a spin 4-manifold M. The signature of M is divisible by 8, and an easy application of Rokhlin's theorem shows that its value mod 16 depends only on N and not on the choice of M. Homology 3-spheres have a unique spin structure so we can define the Rokhlin invariant of a homology 3-sphere to be the element sign ( M ) / 8 {\displaystyle \operatorname {sign} (M)/8} of Z / 2 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /2\mathbb {Z} } , where M any spin 4-manifold bounding the homology sphere.

For example, the Poincaré homology sphere bounds a spin 4-manifold with intersection form E 8 {\displaystyle E_{8}} , so its Rokhlin invariant is 1. This result has some elementary consequences: the Poincaré homology sphere does not admit a smooth embedding in S 4 {\displaystyle S^{4}} , nor does it bound a Mazur manifold.

More generally, if N is a spin 3-manifold (for example, any Z / 2 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /2\mathbb {Z} } homology sphere), then the signature of any spin 4-manifold M with boundary N is well defined mod 16, and is called the Rokhlin invariant of N. On a topological 3-manifold N, the generalized Rokhlin invariant refers to the function whose domain is the spin structures on N, and which evaluates to the Rokhlin invariant of the pair ( N , s ) {\displaystyle (N,s)} where s is a spin structure on N.

The Rokhlin invariant of M is equal to half the Casson invariant mod 2. The Casson invariant is viewed as the Z-valued lift of the Rokhlin invariant of integral homology 3-sphere.

Generalizations

The Kervaire–Milnor theorem (Kervaire & Milnor 1960) states that if Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } is a characteristic sphere in a smooth compact 4-manifold M, then

signature ( M ) = Σ Σ mod 1 6 {\displaystyle \operatorname {signature} (M)=\Sigma \cdot \Sigma {\bmod {1}}6} .

A characteristic sphere is an embedded 2-sphere whose homology class represents the Stiefel–Whitney class w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} . If w 2 ( M ) {\displaystyle w_{2}(M)} vanishes, we can take Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } to be any small sphere, which has self intersection number 0, so Rokhlin's theorem follows.

The Freedman–Kirby theorem (Freedman & Kirby 1978) states that if Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } is a characteristic surface in a smooth compact 4-manifold M, then

signature ( M ) = Σ Σ + 8 Arf ( M , Σ ) mod 1 6 {\displaystyle \operatorname {signature} (M)=\Sigma \cdot \Sigma +8\operatorname {Arf} (M,\Sigma ){\bmod {1}}6} .

where Arf ( M , Σ ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Arf} (M,\Sigma )} is the Arf invariant of a certain quadratic form on H 1 ( Σ , Z / 2 Z ) {\displaystyle H_{1}(\Sigma ,\mathbb {Z} /2\mathbb {Z} )} . This Arf invariant is obviously 0 if Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } is a sphere, so the Kervaire–Milnor theorem is a special case.

A generalization of the Freedman-Kirby theorem to topological (rather than smooth) manifolds states that

signature ( M ) = Σ Σ + 8 Arf ( M , Σ ) + 8 ks ( M ) mod 1 6 {\displaystyle \operatorname {signature} (M)=\Sigma \cdot \Sigma +8\operatorname {Arf} (M,\Sigma )+8\operatorname {ks} (M){\bmod {1}}6} ,

where ks ( M ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {ks} (M)} is the Kirby–Siebenmann invariant of M. The Kirby–Siebenmann invariant of M is 0 if M is smooth.

Armand Borel and Friedrich Hirzebruch proved the following theorem: If X is a smooth compact spin manifold of dimension divisible by 4 then the  genus is an integer, and is even if the dimension of X is 4 mod 8. This can be deduced from the Atiyah–Singer index theorem: Michael Atiyah and Isadore Singer showed that the  genus is the index of the Atiyah–Singer operator, which is always integral, and is even in dimensions 4 mod 8. For a 4-dimensional manifold, the Hirzebruch signature theorem shows that the signature is −8 times the  genus, so in dimension 4 this implies Rokhlin's theorem.

Ochanine (1980) proved that if X is a compact oriented smooth spin manifold of dimension 4 mod 8, then its signature is divisible by 16.

References

Categories: