Misplaced Pages

Rosa Vecht

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Dutch nurse

Rosa Vecht, from a 1915 publication.

Rosa Vecht (18 July 1881 – 23 January 1915) was the only Dutch nurse to die in World War I.

Early life

Roosje "Rosa" Vecht was born in Elburg, Gelderland, Netherlands, the eldest child of Mozes Vecht and Diena van Hamberg. Her parents were Jewish.

Career

Vecht trained as a nurse at the Israëlitisch Ziekenhuis (Jewish Hospital) in Rotterdam. She earned her license in 1907, and joined the Nederlandsche Bond voor Ziekenverpleging (Dutch Association for Sick Nursing) in 1908. In 1914 she joined the Belgian Red Cross, and worked at the British field hospital at Veurne. Marie Curie worked at the same hospital.

Personal life

Vecht died in 1915, aged 33 years, when she was fatally injured by shrapnel at Veurne in West Flanders, while saying goodbye before a planned evacuation. She died after an operation to amputate her leg at De Panne. She was the only known Dutch nurse to die during World War I. Her remains were buried with military honors at Adinkerke Military Cemetery, and reinterred in 1920, in the Jewish cemetery in Muiderberg. In 2015, to mark the 100th anniversary of her death, Vecht was remembered in a ceremony at the Menin Gate in Ypres.

References

  1. Willem Bouwman, "Hier gebeurde het: Rosa Vecht, de enige Nederlandse die sneuvelde tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog" Nederlands dagblad (10 December 2018).
  2. ^ "Moedige meid in oorlogstijd" Florence Nightingale Instituut.
  3. ^ Gudrun Steen, "Oorlogsheldin Rosa Vecht herdacht" HLN (24 January 2015).
  4. John Blacker, Have You Forgotten Yet? The First World War Memoirs of C. P. Blacker (Pen & Sword Books 2000): 17. ISBN 9781783835508
  5. "Nurse Vecht, A Heroine of the War, Killed by a Bomb" Sydney Morning Herald (21 May 2015): 8. via TroveOpen access icon
  6. "Medical Work in the War Zone" Trained Nurse and Hospital Review (May 1915): 274-275.
Categories: