| Utah Social Media Regulation Act | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Utah State Legislature | |
Long title
| |
| Signed by | Spencer Cox |
| Signed | March 23, 2023 |
| Status: Blocked | |
S.B. 152 and H.B. 311, collectively known as the Utah Social Media Regulation Act, are social media bills that were passed by the Utah State Legislature in March 2023. The bills would collectively impose restrictions on how social networking services serve minors in the state of Utah, including mandatory age verification, and restrictions on data collection, algorithmic recommendations, and on when social networks may be accessible to minors.
The Act was intended to take effect in March 2024. However, following a lawsuit over the Act by NetChoice, the Utah attorney general stated in January 2024 that its implementation had been delayed to October 2024, but was likely to be repealed and amended. On September 10, 2024 Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby issued a written order granting a request from NetChoice, a tech industry group, for a preliminary injunction, meaning that Utah will be unable to enforce its social media law as litigation plays out.The law was appealed to the 10th Circuit on October 11, 2024 and is wanting a decision.
Provisions
The Act comprises two bills, S.B. 152 and H.B. 311, which respectively regulate access to social network accounts registered to minors, and impose obligations on social networking services to follow design practices that protect the privacy of minors. The bills would apply to social networks with more than 5 million active users in the United States.
Social networking services must verify the age of all users in the state of Utah, or else their account must be deleted. The Act does not specify a specific method of age verification. Users who are under 18 must have consent from a parent or guardian to open an account, and the parent must be able to have access to the account and its data for monitoring.
Unless required to comply with state or federal law, social networks are prohibited from collecting data based on the activity of minors, and may not display targeted advertising or algorithmic recommendations of content, users, or groups to minors. A social network must not allow minors to access the service between the hours of 10:30 p.m., and 6:30 a.m. without parental consent. H.B. 311 prohibits social networks from exposing features to minors that cause them to have an "addiction" to the platform; the service must perform quarterly audits, and may be sued by users for harms caused by providing "addictive" features; there is a rebuttable presumption of harm if the plaintiff is 16 or younger.
The bills prescribe fines of $2,500 per-violation for violations of the provisions of S.B. 152, and up to $250,000 in liabilities (plus fines of $2,500 per-user) for violations of the addiction rules.
History
The two bills were passed in early-March 2023, and signed by Governor Spencer Cox on March 23, 2023. Cox cited studies linking social media addiction to increases in depression and suicide among youth. They were originally intended to take effect on March 1, 2024. In the wake of a lawsuit in Arkansas by the trade association NetChoice over a similar bill, state senator and bill author Mike McKell stated that he planned to introduce amendments when the legislature resumed in 2024.
In December 2023, NetChoice filed a lawsuit in Utah seeking to block the Act, citing that its definition of a social network was too vague, and that it "restricts who can express themselves, what can be said, and when and how speech on covered websites can occur, down to the very hours of the day minors can use covered websites. The First Amendment, reinforced by decades of precedent, allows none of this." In regards to its age verification requirements, NetChoice argued that "it may not be enough to simply verify the age of whatever person may be listed on a form of identification (even if they have such a record) because that record may not accurately reflect who the individual actually is." The office of the attorney general stated that the state was "reviewing the lawsuit but remains intently focused on the goal of this legislation: Protecting young people from negative and harmful effects of social media use."
In January 2024, Attorney General Sean Reyes asked the court to delay a hearing over the bill, stating that its effective date had been delayed to October 2024, and that the legislature planned to repeal and replace the bills.
See also
References
- "Federal judge blocks Utah social media law". Deseret News. 2024-09-11. Retrieved 2024-09-11.
- NetChoice v. Reyes, et al 24-4100 | U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit | Justia
- ^ LLP, Hunton Andrews Kurth (2023-03-10). "Utah Legislature Passes Bills Restricting Social Media Accounts for Minors". Privacy & Information Security Law Blog. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
- ^ Jr, Baker McKenzie-Cyrus Vance; Oliver, Mariana; Toltzis, Avishai; Roper, Elizabeth (2023-03-29). "Utah Signs Bills Regulating Minors' Social Media Usage". Lexology. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
- ^ Schott, Bryan (2023-12-18). "Utah faces new lawsuit over social media restrictions for minors. Here's why". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 2024-02-09.
- Miller, Saige (2023-03-24). "Utah passes an age-verification law for anyone using social media". NPR. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
- Jacobson, Matthew (2023-10-16). "Utah proposes new rules to part of bills in regulating social media companies". KUTV. Retrieved 2023-11-21.
- Moshiri, Azadeh (2023-03-24). "Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access". BBC News. Retrieved 2023-03-27.
- "Utah social media law set for adjustments after Ark. lawsuit". Pluribus News. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
- Jones, Derrick (2024-01-23). "Utah's social media child protection law put on hold". KSL. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
- Schott, Bryan (2024-01-17). "Utah's new social media regulation may 'completely change' this year on heels of second lawsuit". The Salt Lake Tribune. ISSN 0746-3502. Retrieved 2024-03-04.