Misplaced Pages

SYN cookies

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Technique used to resist SYN flood attacks

SYN cookie is a technique used to resist SYN flood attacks. The technique's primary inventor Daniel J. Bernstein defines SYN cookies as "particular choices of initial TCP sequence numbers by TCP servers." In particular, the use of SYN cookies allows a server to avoid dropping connections when the SYN queue fills up. Instead of storing additional connections, a SYN queue entry is encoded into the sequence number sent in the SYN+ACK response. If the server then receives a subsequent ACK response from the client with the incremented sequence number, the server is able to reconstruct the SYN queue entry using information encoded in the TCP sequence number and proceed as usual with the connection.

Implementation

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

To initiate a TCP connection, the client sends a TCP SYN packet to the server. The server responds with a TCP SYN+ACK packet, which includes a sequence number used by TCP to reassemble the data stream. According to the TCP specification, the initial sequence number sent by an endpoint can be any value chosen by that endpoint. Since this sequence number is chosen by the sender, returned by the recipient, and has no predefined internal structure, it can be overloaded to carry additional data. The following outlines one possible implementation, though there is no public standard, so the order, length, and semantics of the fields may vary between SYN cookie implementations.

SYN cookies are initial sequence numbers that are carefully constructed according to the following rules:

  • let t be a slowly incrementing timestamp (typically time() logically right-shifted 6 positions, which gives a resolution of 64 seconds)
  • let m be the maximum segment size (MSS) value that the server would have stored in the SYN queue entry
  • let s be the result of a cryptographic hash function computed over the server IP address and port number, the client IP address and port number, and the value t. The returned value s must be a 24-bit value.

The initial TCP sequence number, i.e. the SYN cookie, is computed as follows:

  • Top 5 bits: t mod 32
  • Middle 3 bits: an encoded value representing m
  • Bottom 24 bits: s

(Note: since m must be encoded using 3 bits, the server is restricted to sending up to 8 unique values for m when SYN cookies are in use.)

When a client sends back a TCP ACK packet to the server in response to the server's SYN+ACK packet, the client must (according to the TCP spec) use n+1 in the packet's Acknowledgement number, where n is the initial sequence number sent by the server. The server then subtracts 1 from the acknowledgement number to reveal the SYN cookie sent to the client.

The server then performs the following operations.

  • Checks the value t against the current time to see if the connection has expired.
  • Recomputes s to determine whether this is, indeed, a valid SYN cookie.
  • Decodes the value m from the 3-bit encoding in the SYN cookie, which it then can use to reconstruct the SYN queue entry.

From this point forward, the connection proceeds as normal.

Drawbacks

The use of SYN cookies does not break any protocol specifications, and therefore should be compatible with all TCP implementations. There are, however, two caveats that take effect when SYN cookies are in use. Firstly, the server is limited to only 8 unique MSS values, as that is all that can be encoded in 3 bits. Secondly, early implementations rejected all TCP options (such as large windows or timestamps), because the server discarded the SYN queue entry where that information would otherwise be stored. however v2.6.26 of the Linux kernel added partial support of TCP options by encoding them into the timestamp option. Finally, SYN cookies place increased load on server resources. Encrypting responses is computationally expensive. The SYN cookie does not reduce traffic, which makes it ineffective against SYN flooding attacks that target bandwidth as the attack vector.

While these restrictions necessarily lead to a sub-optimal experience, their effect is rarely noticed by clients because they are only applied when under attack. In such a situation, the loss of the TCP options in order to save the connection is usually considered to be a reasonable compromise.

A problem arises when the connection-finalizing ACK packet sent by the client is lost, and the application layer protocol requires the server to speak first (SMTP and SSH are two examples). In this case, the client assumes that the connection was established successfully and waits for the server to send its protocol banner, or resend the SYN+ACK packet; however, the server is not aware of the session and will not resend the SYN+ACK because it discarded the backlog queue entry that would enable it to do so. Eventually, the client will abort the connection due to an application layer timeout, but this may take a relatively long time.

TCP Cookie Transactions (TCPCT) standard was designed to overcome these shortcomings of SYN cookies and improve it on a couple of aspects. Unlike SYN cookies, TCPCT is a TCP extension and required support from both endpoints. It was moved to "Historic" status by RFC 7805 in 2016.

Security considerations

Simple firewalls that are configured to allow all outgoing connections but to restrict which ports an incoming connection can reach (for example, allow incoming connections to a Web server on port 80 but restrict all other ports), work by blocking only incoming SYN requests to unwanted ports. If SYN cookies are in operation, care should be taken to ensure an attacker is not able to bypass such a firewall by forging ACKs instead, trying random sequence numbers until one is accepted. SYN cookies should be switched on and off on a per-port basis, so that SYN cookies being enabled on a public port does not cause them to be recognised on a non-public port. The original Linux kernel implementation misunderstood this part of Bernstein's description and used a single global variable to switch on SYN cookies for all ports; this was pointed out by a research student and subsequently fixed in CVE-2001-0851.

History

The technique was created by Daniel J. Bernstein and Eric Schenk in September 1996. The first implementation (for SunOS) was released by Jeff Weisberg a month later, and Eric Schenk released his Linux implementation in February 1997. FreeBSD implements syncookies since FreeBSD 4.5 (January 2002).

See also

References

  1. , cr.yp.to September 1996
  2. Patrick McManus, Improving Syncookies, lwn.net April 2008
  3. András Korn, Defense mechanisms against network attacks and worms (pdf), 2011
  4. Kleen, Andi (May 31, 1999). "Syncookies implementation for the Linux kernel (version 2.2.9)". static unsigned long tcp_lastsynq_overflow
  5. Brown, Silas S. (Oct 15, 2001). "Linux networking: Security bug in SYN cookies". Archived from the original on 2017-10-14. The solution (as pointed out by D. J. Bernstein in a private communication in response to the above) is to make the variable tcp_lastsynq_overflow local to each listening port, instead of being a global.
  6. "Linux kernel using syn cookies could allow an attacker to bypass filtering". 2001. Archived from the original on 2013-04-13. Retrieved 2013-03-17.
  7. "Syncookies".

External links

Categories: