Misplaced Pages

S v Mtewtwa

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
South African legal case

S v Mtewtwa
CourtEastern Cape Division
Full case name S v Mtewtwa
Argued24 March 1977 (1977-03-24)
Decided24 March 1977 (1977-03-24)
Citation1977 (3) SA 628 (E)
Court membership
Judges sittingSmalberger J, Stewart J
Case opinions
Decision byStewart J
Keywords
Criminal law, Liability, Defence of compulsion, Onus

S v Mtewtwa is an important case in South African criminal law, dealing with the defence of compulsion. The accused, in custody, was threatened by a warder with solitary confinement unless he committed a criminal act. The court considered what State must prove in such circumstances in order to obtain a conviction.

The court held that, where an accused's defence is one of compulsion, the onus lies on the State to show that a reasonable man would have resisted the compulsion. There is no onus on the accused to satisfy the court that he acted under compulsion.

Specifically, where a person is in custody and is threatened by a warder with solitary confinement, then, held the court, at the very least the State must show that the accused could reasonably have complained to the prison authorities of the warder's wrongful conduct and that such complaint would have averted the threatened confinement.

See also

References

Case law

  • S v Mtewtwa 1977 (3) SA 628 (E).

Notes

  1. 1977 (3) SA 628 (E).


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: