Misplaced Pages

Shpack Landfill

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Hazardous waste site in Massachusetts

Shpack Landfill
Superfund site
Rusting chemical waste drums at Shpack Landfill site in May 2003
Geography
TownNorton
CountyBristol
StateMassachusetts
Coordinates41°56′36″N 71°14′06″W / 41.94333°N 71.23500°W / 41.94333; -71.23500
Shpack Landfill is located in MassachusettsShpack LandfillShpack LandfillShpack Landfill's location in Massachusetts
Information
CERCLIS IDMAD980503973
Contaminants
Responsible
parties		Multiple
Progress
ProposedOctober 15, 1984 (1984-10-15)
ListedOctober 6, 1986 (1986-10-06)
Construction
completed		September 18, 2014 (2014-09-18)
DeletedSeptember 5, 2017 (2017-09-05)
List of Superfund sites

Shpack Landfill is a hazardous waste site in Norton, Massachusetts. After assessment by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) it was added to the National Priorities List in October 1986 for long-term remedial action. The site cleanup is directed by the federal Superfund program. The Superfund site covers 9.4 acres, mostly within Norton, with 3.4 acres in the adjoining city of Attleboro. The Norton site was operated as a landfill dump accepting domestic and industrial wastes, including low-level radioactive waste, between 1946 and 1965. The source of most of the radioactive waste, consisting of uranium and radium, was Metals and Controls Inc. which made enriched uranium fuel elements for the U.S. Navy under contract with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Metals and Controls merged with Texas Instruments in 1959. The Shpack landfill operation was shut down by a court order in 1965.

Geology

The site's geology broadly comprises glacial deposits 4.5–7.6 m (15–25 ft) deep overlying bedrock, with some areas overlain with peat to a depth of 1.5–9.2 m (4.9–30.2 ft). The bedrock was formed during the Triassic-Jurassic period and consists mainly of sandstone, greywacke, shale and conglomerate. Groundwater in the area is produced from both the bedrock and shallow aquifers. The water table is at or near the surface for most of the year, and the area is generally low and swampy.

Geography

The Superfund site consists of 9.4 acres and straddles the border between Norton and Attleboro. Approximately 6.0 acres in Norton were owned by the Shpack family who operated it as a landfill. This land was purchased by the town's Norton Conservation Commission in 1981 in order to facilitate remediation. The adjoining 3.4 acres are located in Attleboro and are part of a separate landfill operation owned by Attleboro Landfill Inc (ALI). The site is mostly level and was formerly a flat wetlands area. The site is bounded in the north by Peckham Street/Union Road, by Chartley Swamp in the south and east, and by the ALI landfill in the west.

History

The Shpack landfill was situated on land owned by Isadore and Lea Shpack. Isadore Shpack, a Russian Jewish immigrant and retired New York City municipal employee, began allowing dumping on the property in an effort to fill in its swamp. He then planned to raise an orchard and cultivate vegetables on the reclaimed land. Shpack allowed completely unregulated dumping and is reported locally to have accepted any type of waste which was refused by the neighbouring municipal landfill.

The ALI landfill was originally Attleboro's municipal dump from the 1940s until 1975. In 1975 it was purchased by Attleboro Landfill Inc. which continued to use it as a landfill until 1995.

Discovery of contamination

In 1978 John Sullivan, a 20-year-old local resident who was also a student at the Florida Institute of Technology, became curious about why snails in the area were losing their shells. He visited the Shpack site with a Geiger counter which detected a high level of radiation emissions. Initially ridiculed about his claim of discovering radioactivity at the dump, Sullivan contacted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which then carried out its own investigation and confirmed the presence of radioactivity. The site was found to contain radium-226, radium-228, uranium-235, uranium-236 and uranium-238. The presence of Uranium-236 was indicative of reprocessed reactor fuel being dumped at the site, and testing of Uranium-235 samples demonstrated enrichment as high as 76%. A second survey was conducted in 1980 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory as a result of which the site was designated for remedial action under the U.S. Department of Energy's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP is used to remediate or control sites "where radioactive contamination remains from the early years of the nation's atomic energy program."

Further surveys of the site uncovered extensive contamination with chemical wastes which had been dumped "in both bulk and containerized forms." The metal drums which originally contained the wastes had been emptied, burned and left on the surface of the site. Contaminants included volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals (e.g. nickel, cadmium, copper, lead and mercury), dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Cleanup action

In 1980 the Department Of Energy conducted an emergency cleanup of the site and removed approximately 900 lb of radioactive waste. In 1986 the site was listed as a Superfund site by the EPA. Further studies of the site were carried out during 1992-1993 although no remediation action took place. During 2000-2002 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - which had taken over the FUSRAP program in 1998 - performed "fieldwork" to prepare for a radiological survey and in 2004 the EPA put forward a cleanup plan. The project, estimated to cost $43 million, proposed the removal and disposal of 35,000 yd³ (26,759 m) of radioactive soil by the Army Corps of Engineers, with a second phase during which the EPA would remove the chemical wastes. Work was expected to begin in early 2005 and be completed by 2006.

Remediation eventually commenced in August 2005 but ceased in July 2006 due to lack of funds. During this time, the Army Corps of Engineers removed 2,700 yd (2,500 m)) of contaminated soil.

In 2017, the EPA declared the site clean and removed it from the National Priorities List.

Potentially Responsible Parties

On August 15, 2006, the EPA issued special notice letters to fourteen Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP). A PRP is "any individual or company potentially responsible for, or contributing to a spill or other contamination at a Superfund site." In 2009, the following parties signed a consent decree to undertake remediation at the site:

Under the terms of the decree the PRPs would be responsible for funding the remainder of the cleanup at an estimated cost of $29 million. The Town of Norton would not be held financially liable for cleanup costs, but would instead provide access to the site.

Texas Instruments (TI) subsequently filed a complaint alleging that liability for the disposal of radioactive materials relating to its work for the Atomic Energy Commission was subject to indemnity by the Department of Energy. The U.S. Department of Justice then commenced a lawsuit against TI on behalf of the Corps of Engineers, which TI settled in November 2012. TI agreed to pay $15 million towards remediation of the site, without acknowledging liability. The payment went to the Corps of Engineers.

See also

References

  1. "Contaminants of Concern at Shpack Landfill". Superfund Information Systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency. April 19, 2013. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  2. "Shpack Landfill". Superfund Site Progress Profile. United States Environmental Protection Agency. April 19, 2013. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  3. "Shpack Landfill, Attleboro and Norton, Massachusetts". Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England. United States Environmental Protection Agency. June 6, 2011. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  4. ^ Preer, Robert (September 23, 2001). "Dispute On Responsibility Halts Cleanup". The Boston Globe. Boston, MA. Archived from the original on March 1, 2016. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  5. "Shpack Landfill" (PDF). EPA Superfund Record of Decision. United States Environmental Protection Agency. September 30, 2004. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  6. Foster, Rick (October 10, 2010). "Our nuclear legacy". The Sun Chronicle. Attleboro, MA. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  7. ^ Preer, Robert (September 23, 2001). "Neighbors Still Waiting For Cleanup Of Landfill: Work Was Halted Over Dispute On Responsibility". The Boston Globe. Boston, MA. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  8. Massey, Joanna (January 25, 2004). "Norton Leaders Upset At US Delay On Cleanup: Agencies Called Uncoordinated". The Boston Globe. Boston, MA. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  9. "Shpack Landfill (State of Massachusetts)". Sites Undergoing Decommissioning. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March 29, 2012. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  10. ^ "EPA plans $43 million cleanup for Attleboro, Mass., Landfill". The Providence Journal. Providence, RI. October 5, 2004. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  11. ^ "Geology, Soils, Topography" (PDF). Open Space and Recreation Plan 2011-2018. Town of Norton. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  12. ^ Bechtel National Inc. Advanced Technology Division (May 1984). Radiological Survey Of The Former Shpack Landfill (PDF). United States Department of Energy. pp. 2–1. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  13. ^ Evaluation of Environmental Concerns Related to the Shpack Landfill Superfund Site. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. July 15, 2011. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  14. ^ "Shpack Landfill Superfund Site Norton MA: Proposed Plan" (PDF). United States Environmental Protection Agency. June 2004. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  15. ^ "Environmental Challenges" (PDF). Open Space and Recreation Plan 2011-2018. Town of Norton. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  16. EPA Workshop on Radioactively Contaminated Sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency. March 1990. pp. 69–72.
  17. "Attleboro Landfill Closure Project: Questions and Answers" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. August 14, 2012. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  18. Graf, Heather A. (March 2, 2007). "Delving into past of the Shpack landfill". Norton Mirror. Raynham, MA. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  19. ^ Legere, Christine (March 15, 2009). "Shpack cleanup to be completed by 2012, US says". The Boston Globe. Boston. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  20. ^ "Shpack Landfill Superfund Site: Record Of Decision Summary" (PDF). United States Environmental Protection Agency. September 2004. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  21. Sweeney, Emily (October 10, 2004). "Plan Finalized To Rid Landfill Of Radioactive Dirt". The Boston Globe. Boston, MA. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  22. "EPA, Army Corps Of Engineers To Hold Public Information Meeting On Shpack Landfill". Federal News Service. October 30, 2006. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  23. "EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Hold Public Information Meeting on Shpack Landfill". News Releases from Region 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. October 30, 2006. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  24. US EPA, OA (October 10, 2017). "EPA Removes the Shpack Landfill Site from the National Priorities List". US EPA. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
  25. "EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers to Hold Public Information Meeting on Shpack Landfill". News Releases from Region 1. May 22, 2007. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
  26. "Settlement Clears Way for Cleanup of Massachusetts Superfund Site". Ecology, Environment & Conservation. December 26, 2008. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
  27. Jean, Sheryl (November 29, 2012). "Texas Instruments agrees to pay $15 million to the U.S. government to help clean up the Shpack landfill superfund site in Massachusetts". The Dallas Morning News. Dallas, TX. Retrieved April 21, 2013.

External media

  • Shpack Landfill Update (September 13, 2012) – Locally produced video from Norton Community Television studios.
Categories: