Misplaced Pages

Precision agriculture (PA) is a management strategy that gathers, processes and analyzes temporal, spatial and individual plant and animal data and combines it with other information to support management decisions according to estimated variability for improved resource use efficiency, productivity, quality, profitability and sustainability of agricultural production.” It is used in both crop and livestock production. Precision agriculture often employs technologies to automate agricultural operations, improving their diagnosis, decision-making or performing. The goal of precision agriculture research is to define a decision support system for whole farm management with the goal of optimizing returns on inputs while preserving resources.

Among these many approaches is a phytogeomorphological approach which ties multi-year crop growth stability/characteristics to topological terrain attributes. The interest in the phytogeomorphological approach stems from the fact that the geomorphology component typically dictates the hydrology of the farm field.

The practice of precision agriculture has been enabled by the advent of GPS and GNSS. The farmer's and/or researcher's ability to locate their precise position in a field allows for the creation of maps of the spatial variability of as many variables as can be measured (e.g. crop yield, terrain features/topography, organic matter content, moisture levels, nitrogen levels, pH, EC, Mg, K, and others). Similar data is collected by sensor arrays mounted on GPS-equipped combine harvesters. These arrays consist of real-time sensors that measure everything from chlorophyll levels to plant water status, along with multispectral imagery. This data is used in conjunction with satellite imagery by variable rate technology (VRT) including seeders, sprayers, etc. to optimally distribute resources. However, recent technological advances have enabled the use of real-time sensors directly in soil, which can wirelessly transmit data without the need of human presence.

Precision agriculture can benefit from unmanned aerial vehicles, that are relatively inexpensive and can be operated by novice pilots. These agricultural drones can be equipped with multispectral or RGB cameras to capture many images of a field that can be stitched together using photogrammetric methods to create orthophotos. These multispectral images contain multiple values per pixel in addition to the traditional red, green blue values such as near infrared and red-edge spectrum values used to process and analyze vegetative indexes such as NDVI maps. These drones are capable of capturing imagery and providing additional geographical references such as elevation, which allows software to perform map algebra functions to build precise topography maps. These topographic maps can be used to correlate crop health with topography, the results of which can be used to optimize crop inputs such as water, fertilizer or chemicals such as herbicides and growth regulators through variable rate applications.

Precision agriculture education

Everyone in the agricultural industry, including teachers, is still getting their feet wet with precision agriculture technologies. Precision agriculture has led many to believe that industry-related technologies should lead research and education instead of the other way around. In classrooms, conferences, workshops, and field days, educators of precision agriculture have struggled to keep up with the number of questions being asked. Training people to use precision agriculture technologies has proven difficult, in contrast to teaching the fundamental ideas and concepts, which have been intuitive and rather straightforward.

History

Precision agriculture is a key component of the third wave of modern agricultural revolutions. The first agricultural revolution was the increase of mechanized agriculture, from 1900 to 1930. Each farmer produced enough food to feed about 26 people during this time. The 1960s prompted the Green Revolution with new methods of genetic modification, which led to each farmer feeding about 156 people. It is expected that by 2050, the global population will reach about 9.6 billion, and food production must effectively double from current levels in order to feed every mouth. With new technological advancements in the agricultural revolution of precision farming, each farmer will be able to feed 265 people on the same acreage.

Overview

The first wave of the precision agricultural revolution came in the forms of satellite and aerial imagery, weather prediction, variable rate fertilizer application, and crop health indicators. The second wave aggregates the machine data for even more precise planting, topographical mapping, and soil data.

Precision agriculture aims to optimize field-level management with regard to:

• crop science: by matching farming practices more closely to crop needs (e.g. fertilizer inputs);
• environmental protection: by reducing environmental risks and footprint of farming (e.g. limiting leaching of nitrogen);
• economics: by boosting competitiveness through more efficient practices (e.g. improved management of fertilizer usage and other inputs).

Precision agriculture also provides farmers with a wealth of information to:

• build up a record of their farm
• improve decision-making
• foster greater traceability
• enhance marketing of farm products
• improve lease arrangements and relationship with landlords
• enhance the inherent quality of farm products (e.g. protein level in bread-flour wheat)

Prescriptive planting

Prescriptive planting is a type of farming system that delivers data-driven planting advice that can determine variable planting rates to accommodate varying conditions across a single field, in order to maximize yield. It has been described as "Big Data on the farm." Monsanto, DuPont and others are launching this technology in the US.

Principles

Precision agriculture uses many tools but here are some of the basics: tractors, combines, sprayers, planters, diggers, which are all considered auto-guidance systems. The small devices on the equipment that uses GIS (geographic information system) are what makes precision agriculture what it is. You can think of the GIS system as the “brain.” To be able to use precision agriculture the equipment needs to be wired with the right technology and data systems. More tools include Variable rate technology (VRT), Global positioning system and Geographical information system, Grid sampling, and remote sensors.

Geolocating

Geolocating a field enables the farmer to overlay information gathered from analysis of soils and residual nitrogen, and information on previous crops and soil resistivity. Geolocation is done in two ways

• The field is delineated using an in-vehicle GPS receiver as the farmer drives a tractor around the field.
• The field is delineated on a basemap derived from aerial or satellite imagery. The base images must have the right level of resolution and geometric quality to ensure that geolocation is sufficiently accurate.

Variables

Intra and inter-field variability may result from a number of factors. These include climatic conditions (hail, drought, rain, etc.), soils (texture, depth, nitrogen levels), cropping practices (no-till farming), weeds and disease. Permanent indicators—chiefly soil indicators—provide farmers with information about the main environmental constants. Point indicators allow them to track a crop's status, i.e., to see whether diseases are developing, if the crop is suffering from water stress, nitrogen stress, or lodging, whether it has been damaged by ice and so on. This information may come from weather stations and other sensors (soil electrical resistivity, detection with the naked eye, satellite imagery, etc.). Soil resistivity measurements combined with soil analysis make it possible to measure moisture content. Soil resistivity is also a relatively simple and cheap measurement.

Strategies

Using soil maps, farmers can pursue two strategies to adjust field inputs:

• Predictive approach: based on analysis of static indicators (soil, resistivity, field history, etc.) during the crop cycle.
• Control approach: information from static indicators is regularly updated during the crop cycle by:
  • sampling: weighing biomass, measuring leaf chlorophyll content, weighing fruit, etc.
  • remote sensing: measuring parameters like temperature (air/soil), humidity (air/soil/leaf), wind or stem diameter is possible thanks to Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of things (IoT)
  • proxy-detection: in-vehicle sensors measure leaf status; this requires the farmer to drive around the entire field.
  • aerial or satellite remote sensing: multispectral imagery is acquired and processed to derive maps of crop biophysical parameters, including indicators of disease. Airborne instruments are able to measure the amount of plant cover and to distinguish between crops and weeds.

Decisions may be based on decision-support models (crop simulation models and recommendation models) based on big data, but in the final analysis it is up to the farmer to decide in terms of business value and impacts on the environment- a role being takenover by artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on machine learning and artificial neural networks.

It is important to realize why PA technology is or is not adopted, "for PA technology adoption to occur the farmer has to perceive the technology as useful and easy to use. It might be insufficient to have positive outside data on the economic benefits of PA technology as perceptions of farmers have to reflect these economic considerations."

Implementing practices

New information and communication technologies make field level crop management more operational and easier to achieve for farmers. Application of crop management decisions calls for agricultural equipment that supports variable-rate technology (VRT), for example varying seed density along with variable-rate application (VRA) of nitrogen and phytosanitary products.

Precision agriculture uses technology on agricultural equipment (e.g. tractors, sprayers, harvesters, etc.):

• positioning system (e.g. GPS receivers that use satellite signals to precisely determine a position on the globe);
• geographic information systems (GIS), i.e., software that makes sense of all the available data;
• variable-rate farming equipment (seeder, spreader).

Usage around the world

The concept of precision agriculture first emerged in the United States in the early 1980s. In 1985, researchers at the University of Minnesota varied lime inputs in crop fields. It was also at this time that the practice of grid sampling appeared (applying a fixed grid of one sample per hectare). Towards the end of the 1980s, this technique was used to derive the first input recommendation maps for fertilizers and pH corrections. The use of yield sensors developed from new technologies, combined with the advent of GPS receivers, has been gaining ground ever since. Today, such systems cover several million hectares.

In the American Midwest (US), it is associated not with sustainable agriculture but with mainstream farmers who are trying to maximize profits by spending money only in areas that require fertilizer. This practice allows the farmer to vary the rate of fertilizer across the field according to the need identified by GPS guided Grid or Zone Sampling. Fertilizer that would have been spread in areas that don't need it can be placed in areas that do, thereby optimizing its use.

Around the world, precision agriculture developed at a varying pace. Precursor nations were the United States, Canada and Australia. In Europe, the United Kingdom was the first to go down this path, followed closely by France, where it first appeared in 1997–1998. In Latin America the leading country is Argentina, where it was introduced in the middle 1990s with the support of the National Agricultural Technology Institute. Brazil established a state-owned enterprise, Embrapa, to research and develop sustainable agriculture. The development of GPS and variable-rate spreading techniques helped to anchor precision farming management practices. Today, less than 10% of France's farmers are equipped with variable-rate systems. Uptake of GPS is more widespread, but this hasn't stopped them using precision agriculture services, which supplies field-level recommendation maps.

While digital technologies can transform the landscape of agricultural machinery, making mechanization both more precise and more accessible, non-mechanized production is still dominant in many low- and middle-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Research on precision agriculture for non-mechanized production is increasing and so is its adoption. Examples include the AgroCares hand-held soil scanner, uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) services (also known as drones), and GNSS to map field boundaries and establish land tenure. However, it is not clear how many agricultural producers actually use digital technologies.

Precision livestock farming supports farmers in real-time by continuously monitoring and controlling animal productivity, environmental impacts, and health and welfare parameters. Sensors attached to animals or to barn equipment operate climate control and monitor animals’ health status, movement and needs. For example, cows can be tagged with the electronic identification (EID) that allows a milking robot to access a database of udder coordinates for specific cows. Global automatic milking system sales have increased over recent years, but adoption is likely mostly in Northern Europe, and likely almost absent in low- and middle-income countries. Automated feeding machines for both cows and poultry also exist, but data and evidence regarding their adoption trends and drivers is likewise scarce.

The economic and environmental benefits of precision agriculture have also been confirmed in China, but China is lagging behind countries such as Europe and the United States because the Chinese agricultural system is characterized by small-scale family-run farms, which makes the adoption rate of precision agriculture lower than other countries. Therefore, China is trying to better introduce precision agriculture technology into its own country and reduce some risks, paving the way for China's technology to develop precision agriculture in the future.

In December 2014, the Russian President made an address to the Russian Parliament where he called for a National Technology Initiative (NTI). It is divided into subcomponents such as the FoodNet initiative. The FoodNet initiative contains a set of declared priorities, such as precision agriculture. This field is of special interest to Russia as an important tool in developing elements of the bioeconomy in Russia.

Economic and environmental impacts

Precision agriculture, as the name implies, means application of precise and correct amount of inputs like water, fertilizer, pesticides etc. at the correct time to the crop for increasing its productivity and maximizing its yields. Precision agriculture management practices can significantly reduce the amount of nutrient and other crop inputs used while boosting yields. Farmers thus obtain a return on their investment by saving on water, pesticide, and fertilizer costs.

The second, larger-scale benefit of targeting inputs concerns environmental impacts. Applying the right amount of chemicals in the right place and at the right time benefits crops, soils and groundwater, and thus the entire crop cycle. Consequently, precision agriculture has become a cornerstone of sustainable agriculture, since it respects crops, soils and farmers. Sustainable agriculture seeks to assure a continued supply of food within the ecological, economic and social limits required to sustain production in the long term.

A 2013 article tried to show that precision agriculture can help farmers in developing countries like India.

Precision agriculture reduces the pressure of agriculture on the environment by increasing the efficiency of machinery and putting it into use. For example, the use of remote management devices such as GPS reduces fuel consumption for agriculture, while variable rate application of nutrients or pesticides can potentially reduce the use of these inputs, thereby saving costs and reducing harmful runoff into the waterways.

GPS also reduces the amount of compaction to the ground by following previously made guidance lines. This will also allow for less time in the field and reduce the environmental impact of the equipment and chemicals.

Precision agriculture produces large quantities of varied sensing data which creates an opportunity to adapt and reuse such data for archaeology and heritage work, enhancing understanding of archaeology in contemporary agricultural landscapes.

Emerging technologies

Precision agriculture is an application of breakthrough digital farming technologies. Over $4.6 billion has been invested in agriculture tech companies—sometimes called agtech.

Robots

Self-steering tractors have existed for some time now, as John Deere equipment works like a plane on autopilot. The tractor does most of the work, with the farmer stepping in for emergencies. Technology is advancing towards driverless machinery programmed by GPS to spread fertilizer or plow land. Autonomy of technology is driven by the demanding need of diagnoses, often difficult to accomplish solely by hands-on farmer-operated machinery. In many instances of high rates of production, manual adjustments cannot sustain. Other innovations include, partly solar powered, machines/robots that identify weeds and precisely kill them with a dose of a herbicide or lasers.

Agricultural robots, also known as AgBots, already exist, but advanced harvesting robots are being developed to identify ripe fruits, adjust to their shape and size, and carefully pluck them from branches.

Drones and satellite imagery

Drone and satellite technology are used in precision farming. This often occurs when drones take high quality images while satellites capture the bigger picture. Aerial photography from light aircraft can be combined with data from satellite records to predict future yields based on the current level of field biomass. Aggregated images can create contour maps to track where water flows, determine variable-rate seeding, and create yield maps of areas that were more or less productive.

The Internet of things

The Internet of things is the network of physical objects outfitted with electronics that enable data collection and aggregation. IoT comes into play with the development of sensors and farm-management software. For example, farmers can spectroscopically measure nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in liquid manure, which is notoriously inconsistent. They can then scan the ground to see where cows have already urinated and apply fertilizer to only the spots that need it. This cuts fertilizer use by up to 30%. Moisture sensors in the soil determine the best times to remotely water plants. The irrigation systems can be programmed to switch which side of tree trunk they water based on the plant's need and rainfall.

Innovations are not just limited to plants—they can be used for the welfare of animals. Cattle can be outfitted with internal sensors to keep track of stomach acidity and digestive problems. External sensors track movement patterns to determine the cow's health and fitness, sense physical injuries, and identify the optimal times for breeding. All this data from sensors can be aggregated and analyzed to detect trends and patterns.

As another example, monitoring technology can be used to make beekeeping more efficient. Honeybees are of significant economic value and provide a vital service to agriculture by pollinating a variety of crops. Monitoring of a honeybee colony's health via wireless temperature, humidity and CO₂ sensors helps to improve the productivity of bees, and to read early warnings in the data that might threaten the very survival of an entire hive.

Smartphone applications

Smartphone and tablet applications are becoming increasingly popular in precision agriculture. Smartphones come with many useful applications already installed, including the camera, microphone, GPS, and accelerometer. There are also applications made dedicated to various agriculture applications such as field mapping, tracking animals, obtaining weather and crop information, and more. They are easily portable, affordable, and have high computing power.

Machine learning

Machine learning is commonly used in conjunction with drones, robots, and internet of things devices. It allows for the input of data from each of these sources. The computer then processes this information and sends the appropriate actions back to these devices. This allows for robots to deliver the perfect amount of fertilizer or for IoT devices to provide the perfect quantity of water directly to the soil. Machine learning may also provide predictions to farmers at the point of need, such as the contents of plant-available nitrogen in soil, to guide fertilization planning. As more agriculture becomes ever more digital, machine learning will underpin efficient and precise farming with less manual labour.

Conferences

• InfoAg Conference
• European conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA) (biennial)
• International Conference on Precision Agriculture (ICPA) (biennial)

See also

• Agriculture – Cultivation of plants and animals
• Agricultural drone – Unmanned aerial vehicles
• Automatic milking – Milking of dairy animals without human labour
• Digital agriculture – Electronic agricultural data collection, storage, analysis, and sharing
• Geostatistics – Branch of statistics focusing on spatial data sets
• Integrated farming – Holistic agricultural management system
• Integrated pest management – Approach for economic control of pests
• Landsat program – American network of Earth-observing satellites for international research purposes
• NDVI – Graphical indicator of remotely sensed live green vegetationPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Nutrient budgeting – Comparison between nutrients in soil and in crops
• Nutrient management – Management of nutrients in agriculture
• Phytobiome – Community of plants (phyto) situated in their specific ecological areas (biome)
• Precision beekeeping – Monitoring of individual bee colonies
• Precision fermentation – Biochemical process applied in industrial productionPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Precision livestock farming
• Precision viticulture – Precision farming applied to optimize vineyard performance
• Satellite crop monitoring
• SPOT (satellites) – Commercial Earth-imaging satellite system operated by the French space agency CNESPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Variable rate technology – Precise use of a material in agriculturePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets

Sources

 This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from In Brief to The State of Food and Agriculture 2022 – Leveraging automation in agriculture for transforming agrifood systems​, FAO, FAO.

Notes

1. "Precision Farming : Image of the Day". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 30 January 2001. Retrieved 12 October 2009.
2. "Precision Ag Definition | International Society of Precision Agriculture". www.ispag.org. Retrieved 2 December 2024.
3. Monteiro, António; Santos, Sérgio; Gonçalves, Pedro (2021). "Precision Agriculture for Crop and Livestock Farming—Brief Review". Animals. 11 (8): 2345. doi:10.3390/ani11082345. hdl:10400.19/6997. PMC 8388655. PMID 34438802.
4. ^ The State of Food and Agriculture 2022 − Leveraging agricultural automation for transforming agrifood systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2022. doi:10.4060/cb9479en. ISBN 978-92-5-136043-9.
5. ^ In Brief to The State of Food and Agriculture 2022 − Leveraging automation in agriculture for transforming agrifood systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2022. doi:10.4060/cc2459en. ISBN 978-92-5-137005-6.
6. McBratney, A., Whelan, B., Ancev, T., 2005. Future Directions of Precision Agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 6, 7-23.
7. Whelan, B.M., McBratney, A.B., 2003. Definition and Interpretation of potential management zones in Australia, In: Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, Geelong, Victoria, 2–6 Feb. 2003.
8. Howard, J.A., Mitchell, C.W., 1985. Phytogeomorphology. Wiley.
9. Kaspar, Thomas C.; Colvin, Thomas S.; Jaynes, Daniel B.; et al. (March 2003). "Relationship Between Six Years of Corn Yields and Terrain Attributes". Precision Agriculture. 4 (1): 87–101. Bibcode:2003PrAgr...4...87K. doi:10.1023/A:1021867123125. ISSN 1385-2256. S2CID 40514787.
10. McBratney, A. B.; Pringle, M. J. (September 1999). "Estimating Average and Proportional Variograms of Soil Properties and Their Potential Use in Precision Agriculture". Precision Agriculture. 1 (2): 125–152. Bibcode:1999PrAgr...1..125M. doi:10.1023/A:1009995404447. ISSN 1385-2256. S2CID 22339888.
11. Reyns, P., Missotten, B., Ramon, H. et al. Precision Agriculture (2002) 3: 169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013823603735
12. M. Sophocleous et al., "A Stand-Alone, In Situ, Soil Quality Sensing System for Precision Agriculture," in IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics, doi: 10.1109/TAFE.2024.3351953.
13. M. Sophocleous and J. Georgiou, “Precision agriculture: Challenges in sensors and electronics for real-time soil and plant monitoring,” 2017 IEEE Biomed. Circuits Syst. Conf., pp. 1–4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOCAS.2017.8325180
14. Sophocleous, M. (2016). "IoT & Thick-Film Technology for Underground Sensors in Agriculture".
15. "DJI Agriculture".
16. Anderson, Chris (May–June 2014). "Agricultural Drones Relatively cheap drones with advanced sensors and imaging capabilities are giving farmers new ways to increase yields and reduce crop damage". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 7 March 2017. Retrieved 21 December 2016.
17. Kitchen, N. R.; Snyder, C. J.; Franzen, D. W.; Wiebold, W. J. (2002). "[No title found]". Precision Agriculture. 3 (4): 341–351. doi:10.1023/A:1021588721188.
18. ^ "Digital agriculture: Helping to feed a growing world". 23 February 2017. Archived from the original on 15 October 2018. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
20. Arama Kukutai (27 April 2016). "Can Digital Farming Deliver on its Promise?". www.agnewscenter.com.
21. Bunge, Jacob (25 February 2014). "Big Data Comes to the Farm, Sowing Mistrust". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
22. "Digital disruption on the farm". The Economist. 24 May 2014. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
23. "Important tools to succeed in precision farming". Archived from the original on 31 October 2019. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
24. "Precision Farming Tools: Soil Electrical Conductivity" (PDF). Retrieved 12 June 2016.
25. "New Waspmote Sensor Board enables extreme precision agriculture in vineyards and greenhouses- Libelium". www.libelium.com.
26. Mahlein, Anne-Katrin (1 September 2015). "Plant Disease Detection by Imaging Sensors – Parallels and Specific Demands for Precision Agriculture and Plant Phenotyping". Plant Disease. 100 (2): 241–251. doi:10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0340-FE. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30694129.
27. "The future of agriculture: Factory fresh". The Economist. 9 June 2016. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
28. Aubert, Benoit (2012). "IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption decision of precision agriculture technology" (PDF). Decision Support Systems. 54: 510–520. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.07.002. S2CID 9124615. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
29. Herring, David (29 January 2001). "Precision Farming : Feature Articles". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. Retrieved 12 October 2009.
30. "Simon Blackmore: Farming with robots". SPIE Newsroom. 2 June 2016. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
31. "precision agriculture with satellite imagery". Archived from the original on 7 April 2011.
32. Nyaga, Justine M.; Onyango, Cecilia M.; Wetterlind, Johanna; Söderström, Mats (1 August 2021). "Precision agriculture research in sub-Saharan Africa countries: a systematic map". Precision Agriculture. 22 (4): 1217–1236. Bibcode:2021PrAgr..22.1217N. doi:10.1007/s11119-020-09780-w. ISSN 1573-1618. S2CID 254944417.
33. Onyango, Cecilia M.; Nyaga, Justine M.; Wetterlind, Johanna; Söderström, Mats; Piikki, Kristin (22 January 2021). "Precision Agriculture for Resource Use Efficiency in Smallholder Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review". Sustainability. 13 (3): 1158. doi:10.3390/su13031158. ISSN 2071-1050.
34. "Proceedings of 1st African Conference of Precision Agriculture – African Plant Nutrition Institute (APNI)". Retrieved 23 December 2022.
35. ^ Lowenberg-DeBoer, James; Erickson, Bruce (2019). "Setting the Record Straight on Precision Agriculture Adoption". Agronomy Journal. 111 (4): 1552–1569. Bibcode:2019AgrJ..111.1552L. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.12.0779. ISSN 0002-1962. S2CID 182858544.
36. Van Beek, C (2020). Adoption level is the most underestimated factor in fertiliser recommendations (PDF). AgroCares. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 December 2022. Retrieved 23 December 2022.
37. Schillings, Juliette; Bennett, Richard; Rose, David Christian (2021). "Exploring the Potential of Precision Livestock Farming Technologies to Help Address Farm Animal Welfare". Frontiers in Animal Science. 2. doi:10.3389/fanim.2021.639678. ISSN 2673-6225.
38. Knight, C.H. (2020). "Review: Sensor techniques in ruminants: more than fitness trackers". Animal. 14 (S1): s187–s195. Bibcode:2020Anim...14.s187K. doi:10.1017/S1751731119003276. PMID 32024562. S2CID 211050256.
39. "Global milking robots market size by type, by herd size, by geographic scope and forecast". Verified Market Research. 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
40. Rodenburg, Jack (2017). "Robotic milking: Technology, farm design, and effects on work flow". Journal of Dairy Science. 100 (9): 7729–7738. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11715. ISSN 0022-0302. PMID 28711263.
41. Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2022). Economics of adoption for digital automated technologies in agriculture. Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2022. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 22-10. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). doi:10.4060/cc2624en. ISBN 978-92-5-137080-3.
42. Kendall, H.; Naughton, P.; Clark, B.; et al. (2017). "Precision Agriculture in China: Exploring Awareness, Understanding, Attitudes and Perceptions of Agricultural Experts and End-Users in China". Advances in Animal Biosciences. 8 (2): 703–707. doi:10.1017/S2040470017001066.
43. Osmakova, Alina; Kirpichnikov, Michael; Popov, Vladimir (2018). "Recent biotechnology developments and trends in the Russian Federation". New Biotechnology. 40 (Pt A): 76–81. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.001. PMID 28634066.
44. "Рынки Нти".
45. Pepitone, Julianne (3 August 2016). "Hacking the farm: How farmers use 'digital agriculture' to grow more crops". CNNMoney.
46. ^ "The future of agriculture". The Economist. 9 June 2016.
47. Rajvanshi, Anil K. "Is precision agriculture the solution to India's farming crisis". Archived from the original on 16 October 2013.
48. Schieffer, J.; Dillon, C. (2015). "The economic and environmental impacts of precision agriculture and interactions with agro-environmental policy". Precision Agriculture. 16 (1): 46–61. Bibcode:2015PrAgr..16...46S. doi:10.1007/s11119-014-9382-5. S2CID 9071060.
49. Opitz, Rachel (2023). "Remote Sensing Data to Support Integrated Decision Making in Cultural and Natural Heritage Management - Impasses and opportunities for collaboration in agricultural areas". Internet Archaeology (62). doi:10.11141/ia.62.10. hdl:1854/LU-01HM8S728JA2VW72B5MGQWYJJV.
50. Zhang, Qin (2016). Precision Agriculture Technology for Crop Farming. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p. 134. ISBN 9781482251074.
51. Papadopoulos, Loukia (21 October 2022). "This new farming robot uses lasers to kill 200,000 weeds per hour". interestingengineering.com. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
52. "Verdant Robotics launches multi-action agricultural robot for 'superhuman farming'". Robotics & Automation News. 23 February 2022. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
53. ^ "Five technologies changing agriculture". 7 October 2016.
54. M. Sophocleous, Thick-Film Underground Sensors. LAP LAMPERT Academic Publishing, 2016. ISBN 978-3-659-95270-8 https://www.morebooks.de/store/us/book/thick-film-underground-sensors/isbn/978-3-659-95270-8
55. M. Sophocleous and J. K. Atkinson, “A novel thick-film electrical conductivity sensor suitable for liquid and soil conductivity measurements,” Sensors Actuators, B Chem., vol. 213, pp. 417–422, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.110
56. "Precision beekeeping with wireless temperature monitoring". IoT ONE. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
57. Suporn Pongnumkul, Pimwadee Chaovalit, and Navaporn Surasvadi, “Applications of Smartphone-Based Sensors in Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Research,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015.
58. Goap, Amarendra; Sharma, Deepak; Shukla, A.K.; Rama Krishna, C. (December 2018). "An IoT based smart irrigation management system using Machine learning and open source technologies". Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 155: 41–49. Bibcode:2018CEAgr.155...41G. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.040. S2CID 53787393.
59. Grell, Max; Barandun, Giandrin; Asfour, Tarek; Kasimatis, Michael; Collins, Alex; Wang, Jieni; Guder, Firat (9 October 2020). "Determining and Predicting Soil Chemistry with a Point-of-Use Sensor Toolkit and Machine Learning Model". bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2020.10.08.331371. S2CID 222348520.

External links

Media related to Precision farming at Wikimedia Commons

• Precision agriculture, IBM

• Agricultural revolutions
• Agricultural soil science
• Agricultural technology
• Global Positioning System
• Applications of geographic information systems