Misplaced Pages

Snyder v. Massachusetts

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1934 United States Supreme Court case
Snyder v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 7, 1933
Decided January 8, 1934
Full case nameSnyder v Massachusetts
Citations291 U.S. 97 (more)
Holding
That denying a defendant permission to attend a viewing of the scene of the crime, is not a violation of the fourteenth amendment's guarantee of due process.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo
Case opinions
MajorityCardozo, joined by Hughes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Stone
DissentRoberts, joined by Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler

Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 (1934), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that denying a criminal defendant permission to attend a viewing of the scene of the crime is not a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process.

The case arose from an armed robbery and murder that took place in a gasoline station in Somerville, Massachusetts. At the trial, the prosecution submitted a motion that the jury be directed to view the scene of the crime. The court granted the motion under a Massachusetts law. The defense submitted a motion to allow the client to view the scene along with the jury, but the motion was denied, so the viewing was made with only the judge, jury, bailiffs, court stenographer, district attorney, and defendants' counsel. Snyder was tried and sentenced to death for the murder. The trial court and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed the conviction, rejecting Snyder's contention that the trial judge's denial of his motion to allow him to be present at the view denied him due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo wrote the opinion of the Court, holding that there was no due process violation. Justice Owen Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Louis Brandeis, George Sutherland, and Pierce Butler.

References

  1. ^ Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 (1934)

External links


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: