Misplaced Pages

Softcore pornography

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Softcore porn) "Softcore porn" redirects here. For the opposite term see Hardcore pornography.Erotic still photography or film that is not sexually explicit
Sultana by Henry Clive. The engraving shows depiction of a woman dressed in a transparent cloth featuring nudity, as is common in softcore pornography.

Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography, film, or art that has a pornographic or erotic component but is less sexually graphic and intrusive than hardcore pornography, defined by a lack of visual sexual penetration. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in love scenes and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful. The distinction between softcore pornography and erotic photography or art, such as Vargas girl pin-ups, is largely a matter of debate.

Components

Softcore pornography may include sexual activity between two people or masturbation. It does not contain explicit depictions of sexual penetration, cunnilingus, fellatio, fingering, handjobs, or ejaculation. Depictions of erections of the penis may not be allowed, although attitudes towards this are ever-changing. Commercial pornography can be differentiated from erotica, which has high-art aspirations.

Portions of images that are considered too graphic and may be hidden in a variation of ways, such as the use of covered hair or clothing, particularly positioned hands or other body parts, carefully positioned foreground elements in the scene (often plants, pillows, furniture, or drapery) or carefully chosen camera angles.

Pornographic filmmakers sometimes make both hardcore and softcore types of a films, with the softcore version using less explicit angles of sex scenes or using the other techniques to "tone down" any objectionable feature. The softcore version may, for example, be edited for the in-house hotel pay-per-view market.

Total nudity is commonplace in several magazines, as well as in photography and on the Internet.

Regulation and censorship

Softcore films are commonly less regulated and restricted than hardcore pornography, and cater to a different market. In most countries, softcore films are eligible for movie ratings, usually on a restricted rating, though many such films are also released unrated. As with hardcore films, availability of softcore films varies depending on local laws. Also, the exhibition of such films may be restricted to those above a certain age, typically 18. At least one country, Germany, has different age limits for hardcore and softcore pornography, softcore material usually receives a FSK-16 rating (no one under 16 is allowed to buy) and hardcore material receiving a FSK-18 (no one under 18 allowed to buy). In some countries, broadcasting of softcore films is widespread on cable television networks, with some such as Cinemax producing their own in-house softcore films and television series.

In some countries, images of women's genitals are digitally manipulated so that they are not too "detailed". An Australian pornographic actress says that images of her own genitals sold to pornographic magazines in different countries are digitally manipulated to change the size and shape of the labia according to censorship standards in different countries.

History

Originally, softcore pornography was presented mainly in the form of men's magazines, in both still photos and art drawings (such as Vargas girls), when it was barely acceptable to show a glimpse of a woman's nipple in the 1950s. By the 1970s, mainstream magazines such as Playboy, Penthouse, and especially Hustler showcased nudity.

After the formation of the MPAA rating system in the United States and prior to the 1980s, numerous softcore films, with a wide range of production costs, were released to mainstream movie theatres, especially drive-ins. Emmanuelle and Alice in Wonderland received positive reviews from noted critics such as Roger Ebert.

See also

References

  1. Dubberley, Emily (2005). Carly Milne (ed.). Naked Ambition: Women Who Are Changing Pornography. Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-7867-1590-1. OCLC 62177941.
  2. "Pornography". Encarta. Archived from the original on February 18, 2009.
  3. Amis, Martin (March 17, 2001). "A rough trade". guardian.co.uk. Retrieved April 10, 2009.
  4. ^ "20th Century Nudes in Art". The Art History Archive. Retrieved July 19, 2009.
  5. Battista, Kathy (2011). "Cindy Hinant's make-up, glamour and TV show". Phaidon. Retrieved November 23, 2014. Similarly, Softcore are pornographic images obscured to the point of obliteration, give the appearance of grey monochromes. The sexually charged imagery only emerges in feint detail within intimate distance.
  6. The Labiaplasty Fad? – Sex. Hungry Beast. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. April 15, 2010. Archived from the original on October 31, 2021.
  7. Katy Marriner (2013). The Vagina Diaries – a study guide (PDF). Australian Teachers of Media - ATOM. ISBN 978-1-74295-374-8.
  8. Freedman, Mia (November 25, 2010). "Labiaplasty and Censorship - is there a link?". Mamamia.
  9. "Blame It On The Brazilian". Birdee. October 13, 2014. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
  10. Hefner, Hugh M. (2004). Playboy: 50 Years: The Cartoons. Chronicle Books. ISBN 978-0811839761.
  11. Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1975). "Emmanuelle". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
  12. Ebert, Roger (November 24, 1976). "Alice in Wonderland". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Pornography
Pornography
Types
Genres
Related
Organizations
Opposition to
pornography
Movements
Organizations
Overuse
Views
Media
Possible effects
People
Events
Miscellaneous
See also
Nudity
Nakedness and clothing
Nudity and sexuality
Issues in social nudity
Naturism
Nude recreation
By location
Social nudity advocates
Depictions of nudity
See also
Category Portal
Categories: