Misplaced Pages

Special Investigations Unit

Unité des enquêtes spéciales
Unit overview
Formed	1990 (1990)
Jurisdiction	Ontario police services
Headquarters	5090 Commerce Boulevard Mississauga, Ontario
Motto	One Law for All
Annual budget	$6.9 million
Minister responsible	Hon. Doug Downey, Attorney General of Ontario
Unit executive	Joseph Martino, Director
Key document	Special Investigations Unit Act, 2019 (SO 2019, c. 1, Sched. 5)
Website	www.siu.on.ca

The Special Investigations Unit (SIU, or "the Unit"; French: Unité des enquêtes spéciales, UES) is the civilian police oversight agency of the province of Ontario, Canada. The SIU is responsible for investigating circumstances involving police that have resulted in a death or serious injury, or if a firearm was discharged at a person. The unit also investigates allegations of sexual assault. The unit's goal is to ensure that criminal law is applied appropriately to police conduct, as determined through independent investigations, increasing public confidence in the police services.

The director is responsible to the attorney general of Ontario, and the unit as an "arm's-length" agency of the Ministry of the Attorney General. The current director is Joseph Martino; he initially served in an acting capacity from April 2019 prior to his formal appointment in November 2019.

Overview

As a provincial civilian law enforcement agency, the SIU has the power and authority to investigate police officers regulated by the Special Investigations Unit Act and charge them with criminal offences. The SIU oversees 47 police services and upwards of 23,000 police officers from municipal, regional, and provincial services. However, the SIU does not have the authority to investigate First Nations constables, or federal police officers such as those employed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) or Canadian Forces Military Police.

Ontario is the first province to have such a civilian oversight agency in place, and one of the few jurisdictions worldwide with an independent civilian agency. (In 2007 Alberta created the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team, and in September, 2012, the Independent Investigations Office was established in British Columbia). As a result, the SIU has become a model of civilian oversight for other jurisdictions in the light of the international movement towards greater civilian accountability of the police.

After more than 30 years of operating under the Police Services Act, the SIU is now regulated by the Special Investigations Unit Act which came into force on December 1, 2020. The legislation serves to strengthen civilian oversight of law enforcement and increase transparency.

The SIU are completely independent of the police and have an arms-length relationship with the government. This means that although the SIU director reports to the provincial attorney general, the decision-making on cases and their day-to-day activities are independent of the government.

History

Before the SIU, police services investigated themselves or in some instances, another police service was assigned to conduct the investigation.

In December 1988, the Ontario government established the Task Force on Race Relations and Policing following the deaths of several black men. During hearings conducted by the task force, there was public concern, spearheaded by the Black Action Defence Committee, about a conflict of interest when the police conduct their own investigations.

The task force's report recommended 57 changes in the law and policing policies. As a result, the SIU was formed in 1990 under a new Ontario Police Services Act, introduced by Ontario Solicitor General Steven Offer. Initially, the SIU was headquartered in Toronto, but in 2000 it moved to its current location in Mississauga.

Notification

The police are legally obliged to notify the SIU to report any incidents that may fall within the SIU's jurisdiction, which is set out in section 16(1) of the Ontario SIU Act. Also, the SIU receives and acts on requests from members of the media, lawyers, coroners, medical professionals, the Office of the Independent Police Review Director and affected people who allege they have been injured or sexually assaulted by police. Once the SIU is notified, an investigative supervisor gathers information to determine whether the complaint/incident falls within their mandate. If so, they will launch an investigation.

Investigations

Although the circumstances of every case are unique, the approach to most investigations is the same. The investigative process begins by assigning a lead investigator and as many investigators, forensic investigators, and resources as necessary.

Investigations typically involve:

• Collecting evidence and securing it for forensic examination
• Interviewing witnesses
• Arranging for medical care
• Notifying the coroner if necessary
• Submitting an investigation brief, which is reviewed by the investigative supervisor, the executive officer, and the director.

Once all of the facts are gathered, the Director then makes a decision as to whether or not charges are warranted. Under section 35(1) of the SIU Act , the SIU director must ensure that the investigation is concluded within 120 days and provide public note or, failing that, provide a public statement on the status of the investigation every 30 days.

Investigators

The SIU consists of investigators from both civilian and police backgrounds. All of the Unit's investigators have extensive experience investigating serious incidents, such as deaths, sexual assault allegations, serious assaults, shootings, and motor vehicle incidents, and have their own secure facilities where investigations take place.

Forensics investigators

In the beginning, due to a shortage of resources, the SIU often relied on the Ontario Provincial Police for forensic investigation assistance and would involve the police services for interviewing witnesses. Similarly, there were many cases where the police service conducted the investigation under SIU supervision. This was a problem because the public still saw the police being policed by the police. As a result, the SIU's budget was increased to $4.7 million in the 1999–2000 fiscal year.

Currently, the SIU is equipped with their own in-house forensic identification team, staffed entirely by civilians. They are now well equipped with tools and personnel. The in-house forensic identification team is an important part of most investigations. It is managed by two supervisors and staffed by a handful of forensic identification technicians and includes a fully equipped laboratory. The forensics identification team is responsible for protecting, collecting, preserving, and analyzing the physical evidence. Their duties include the interpretation of trace evidence and recording of the autopsy process. The team has particular expertise in several areas of forensics, including collision reconstructions, scene mapping, and bloodstain pattern analysis. They also liaise with scientists at the Centre of Forensic Sciences in Ontario and other external experts for DNA analysis and ballistics.

Director

Affected Persons Program

Dealing in a compassionate and respectful manner with injured persons and families of those whose deaths are subject of an investigation is a top priority. To highlight this commitment, an affected persons coordinator (APC) position was developed in 2005, contributing to the ability of the SIU to respond meaningfully to the social needs of those persons impacted by the SIU investigations.

The APC takes the lead in liaising with affected individuals and/or families. The primary function of the APC is to do a very specific kind of outreach by helping persons impacted by the SIU investigations access required support services, such as professional counselling, financial assistance or admission into rehabilitation programs.

The APC also sends condolences to families that experience a death as a result of the police action that the SIU is investigating, and follows up to offer further assistance. The coordinator's services are available on a 24/7 basis and can be offered over the telephone or in person.

Occurrences

The following data is sourced from the SIU's annual reports:

Accusations of bias

The SIU has been accused of having a pro-police bias.

The attorney general stated in a 2003 report that:

Civilian oversight in the form of the SIU was intended to assist chiefs of police in shouldering their daunting duties, not to be an irritant. The fact that the SIU overwhelmingly clears officers should be seen by the as an endorsement of good policing.

In 2007, the Ontario ombudsman, André Marin launched an investigation and a year later released a scathing 121-page report "hammer the SIU for allowing the police to control its investigations and adopting an 'impotent stance' when challenged by police." Marin said, "There's no doubt in my mind that an SIU investigation is one which is currently done through blue-coloured glasses. There is no doubt that there is a police bias in their approach to investigations". The report also said, "The SIU has not only become complacent about ensuring that police officials follow the rules, it has bought into the fallacious argument that SIU investigations aren't like other criminal cases and it is acceptable to treat police witnesses differently from civilians."

Ian Scott, who was a prosecutor before he became director of the SIU, said in 2004 that police officers accused of excessive force had a one-in-five chance of getting the same level of justice as a civilian charged with a similar offense. But the actual figures as reported in 2008 in the Toronto Star suggest that ratio is much lower. The Star reported that of the 3,400 investigations conducted by the SIU (to that date), 95 resulted in criminal charges, 16 of those resulted in conviction, and only three police officers went to jail.

In 2011, the ombudsmen again investigated the SIU and the ministry responsible, the Ministry of the Attorney General. He released a report on the investigation in December. While he conceded that the Unit had improved over the past three years, he still found the ministry to be "actively working against the SIU director”. He found that "the ministry of the attorney general actively undermines the SIU, the watchdog that probes police-related deaths, serious injuries and sexual assaults and that "police officers either obstructed or failed to co-operate with the SIU in more than one-third of its cases in the past three years." He recommended legislation be enacted to better support the SIU. In response to his report, Attorney General John Gerretsen was quoted as saying, "There are always improvements that can be made to any system and whether or not legislation is in the offing remains to be seen. Only time will tell, I suppose.”

Affiliations

• Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE)
• First Nations Liaison Program – to foster a constructive growth in the SIU's relationship with First Nations communities.
• The SIU also runs several presentations and lectures at academic institutions, community centres, trade shows, jobs of professional associations. This is a positive interaction with the community, police officers and young people to educate them about the role and responsibility of the SIU.

See also

• Death of Sammy Yatim

References

1. "'Demanding' SIU caseload for 2018 was highest in its history". OrilliaMatters.com. 28 June 2019. Retrieved 2020-05-30.
2. "SIU Annual Report 2018" (PDF).
3. "Cop watchdog agency fears 'severe' financial cuts". thestar.com. 2019-04-05. Retrieved 2020-05-30.
4. "Special Investigations Unit Business Plan". 2021/22 – 2023/24 Special Investigations Unit Business Plan. Special Investigations Unit.
5. ^ "Doug Ford government seeking new director for police watchdog amid controversy over proposed law changes". Retrieved 2020-05-30.
6. ^ "Doug Ford government appoints new police watchdogs for Ontario". CBC News. November 27, 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
7. ^ "Special Investigations Unit Act". Queen's Printer for Ontario. 24 July 2014. Retrieved September 21, 2021.
8. "Jurisdiction". Special Investigations Unit. SIU. Retrieved September 21, 2021.
9. "Review Report on the Special Investigations Unit ReForms → Background". Ministry of the Attorney General. Archived from the original on October 3, 2006.
10. ^ Police Services Act, Queen's Printer for Ontario, 24 July 2014
11. Martino, Joseph. "Director". SIU Director's Welcome Message. Retrieved September 21, 2021.
12. "Special Investigations Unit". Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
13. ^ "Shaping Civilian Oversight". Special Investigations Unit. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
14. Lewis, Clare; Ralph Agard; Kamala Jean Gopie; James Harding; T. Sher Singh; Roy Williams (April 1989). The Report of the Race Relations and Policing Task Force. Toronto, Ontario: Race Relations and Policing Task Force.
15. "Special Investigations Unit Act". SIU Act. Queen's Printer for Ontario. 24 July 2014. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
16. ^ "Investigative Process". Special Investigations Unit. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
17. "SIU Staff". SIU.
18. ^ "Implementation of the Recommendations – The Review (Recommendations 1 to 8)". Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011.
19. Special Investigations Unit Business Plan 2021/22-2023/24
20. "SIU Annual Reports" (reports for 1996–97 through 2000–01 are available in paper form by request from the SIU)
21. Dawson, Tyler (July 8, 2016). "Watchdogs, oversight and Ontario's thin blue line: How the stakes got so high". Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
22. ^ Doolittle, Robyn (1 October 2008). "Ombudsman slams SIU bias". The Star. Toronto.
23. Bruser, Henry, David, Michelle (28 Oct 2010). "Are these cops above the law?". Toronto Star. Retrieved 29 July 2013.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
24. "Are these cops above the law?". Toronto Star. 28 Oct 2010. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
25. ^ Benzie, Robert (14 December 2011). "SIU 'undermined' by attorney general, ombudsman charges". The Star. Toronto.
26. "Ontario government slammed for undermining police watchdog". CBC News. 14 December 2011.
27. "Ombudsman Report - Investigation into the Ministry of the Attorney General's implementation of recommendations concerning reform of the Special Investigations Unit" (PDF). Ontario Ombudsman. December 2011.

v t e Government of Ontario departments and agencies
Ministries	Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Attorney General Cabinet Office Children, Community and Social Services Citizenship and Multiculturalism Colleges and Universities Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Education Energy Environment, Conservation and Parks Finance Francophone Affairs Public and Business Service Delivery Health Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries Indigenous Affairs Infrastructure Intergovernmental Affairs Labour, Training, Skills Development Long-Term Care Municipal Affairs and Housing Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry Seniors and Accessibility Solicitor General Transportation Treasury Board Secretariat Women's Issues
Boards and commissions	Alcohol and Gaming Commission Civilian Police Commission Energy Board Fairness Commissioner Film Review Board Human Rights Commission Landlord and Tenant Board Liquor Control Board Mining and Lands Commissioner Northland Transportation Commission Municipal Board Niagara Escarpment Commission Niagara Parks Commission Securities Commission St. Lawrence Parks Commission Workplace Safety and Insurance Board
Other Crown agencies and corporations	Agricorp Agricultural Research Institute Cancer Care Cannabis Retail Corporation Clean Water Conservation Ontario Health Cancer Care Ontario eHealth Trillium Gift of Life Network HealthForceOntario Health Quality Health Shared Services Ontario Local health integration networks Patient Ombudsman Financial Services Regulatory Authority Games Ontario Heritage Trust Independent Electricity System Operator Lottery and Gaming Corporation Metrolinx Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Ontario Place Parks Power Generation Public Health Real Estate Council Royal Ontario Museum Science Centre Science North Supply Ontario TFO TVO
Provincial services	Archives Crown Attorney Forensic Sciences Independent Police Review Director Provincial Police ServiceOntario Special Investigations Unit
Offices of the Legislature	Auditor General Elections Ontario Environmental Commissioner Information and Privacy Commissioner Integrity Commissioner Office of the Legislative Assembly Ombudsman Poet Laureate
Other	Executive Council Premier Deputy Premier Agent-General Emergency Management Ontario Arts Council Hydro One Ornge Parliament Network List of defunct Ontario ministries and agencies

• Civilian regulating boards
• Law enforcement agencies of Ontario
• Ontario government departments and agencies
• Police oversight organizations
• Government agencies established in 1990
• 1990 establishments in Ontario
• Organizations based in Mississauga