Misplaced Pages

State-merging

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

In quantum information theory, quantum state merging is the transfer of a quantum state when the receiver already has part of the state. The process optimally transfers partial information using entanglement and classical communication. It allows for sending information using an amount of entanglement given by the conditional quantum entropy, H ( A | B ) = H ( A B ) − H ( B ) . {\displaystyle H(A|B)\,=\,H(AB)-H(B)\,.} with H ( A ) {\displaystyle H(A)} the Von Neumann entropy, H ( A ) := − T r ρ A log ⁡ ρ A {\displaystyle H(A):=-Tr\rho _{A}\log \rho _{A}} . It thus provides an operational meaning to this quantity.

Unlike its classical counterpart, the quantum conditional entropy can be negative. In this case, the sender can transfer the state to the receiver using no entanglement, and as an added bonus, this amount of entanglement can be gained, rather than used. Thus quantum information can be negative.

The amount of classical information needed is the mutual information I ( A : R ) := H ( A ) + H ( R ) − H ( A R ) {\displaystyle I(A:R):=H(A)+H(R)-H(AR)} . The case where the classical communication is replaced by quantum communication was considered in. This is known as the Fully Quantum Slepian-Wolf Theorem, since everything is sent down the quantum channel. A single-shot version of state merging was found by Berta, and a multiparty single shot version was found in. The quantum discord has been interpreted using state merging.

References

  1. Horodecki, M.; Oppenheim, J.; Winter, A. (2005). "Partial quantum information". Nature. 436 (7051): 673–676. arXiv:quant-ph/0505062. Bibcode:2005Natur.436..673H. doi:10.1038/nature03909. PMID 16079840. S2CID 4413693.
  2. Horodecki, M.; Oppenheim, J.; Winter, A. (2007). "Quantum state merging and negative information". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 269 (1): 107–136. arXiv:quant-ph/0512247. Bibcode:2007CMaPh.269..107H. doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0118-x. S2CID 119421959.
  3. Abeyesinghe, A.; Devetak, I.; Hayden, P; Winter, A. (2009). "The mother of all protocols: restructuring quantum information's family tree". Proc. R. Soc. A. 465 (2108): 2537–2563. arXiv:quant-ph/0606225. Bibcode:2009RSPSA.465.2537A. doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0202. S2CID 44021187.
  4. Berta, M. (2009). "Single-shot quantum state merging". arXiv:0912.4495 .
  5. Dutil, N.; Hayden, P. (2010). "One-shot Multiparty State Merging". arXiv:1011.1974 .
  6. Madhok, V.; Datta, A. (2011). "Interpreting quantum discord through quantum state merging". Physical Review A. 83 (3): 032323. arXiv:1008.4135. Bibcode:2011PhRvA..83c2323M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032323. S2CID 10898479.
Category: