Misplaced Pages

State v. Lyerla

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
South Dakota criminal case

This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "State v. Lyerla" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2017)
State v. Lyerla
CourtSupreme Court of South Dakota
Full case name State of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee. v. Gerald K. Lyerla, Defendant and Appellant.
DecidedJune 8, 1988 (1988-06-08)
Citation424 N.W.2d 908
Court membership
Judges sittingGeorge W. Wuest, Robert E. Morgan, Frank Henderson, Richard W. Sabers, John K. Konenkamp
Case opinions
Decision byKonenkamp
ConcurrenceMorgan, Henderson, Wuest
DissentSabers
Keywords

State v. Lyerla, Supreme Court of South Dakota, 424 N.W.2d 908 (1988), is a criminal case in which it was found that an attempt to commit a crime with an element of recklessness is a logical impossibility; specifically, that attempted second degree murder is logically impossible.

Lyerla randomly shot into a truck three times after being goaded by the driver of the truck. One shot killed the driver and the others did not hit the driver or either of two passengers.

Lyerla was convicted of second degree murder for killing the driver. Lyerla was convicted on two counts of attempted second degree murder of each passenger.

Lyerla appealed on the ground that it is a logical impossibility to attempt second degree murder, since attempt requires specific intent and recklessness implies lack of such intent. Implied in the jury finding of second degree murder, rather than first degree murder which was also sought, was lack of specific intent to kill anyone in the truck, but rather a reckless disregard for their life.

The court agreed with Lyerla and reversed the conviction. The court wrote:

"In order to attempt to commit a crime, there must exist in the mind of the perpetrator the specific intent to commit the acts constituting the offence. To attempt second degree murder one must intend to have a criminally reckless state of mind... logical impossibility."

Notes

  1. Circuit judge; sitting in place of Robert A. Miller

References

  1. ^ Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1,

External links

Text of State v. Lyerla is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Leagle


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: