Misplaced Pages

In mathematics, a set A is a subset of a set B if all elements of A are also elements of B; B is then a superset of A. It is possible for A and B to be equal; if they are unequal, then A is a proper subset of B. The relationship of one set being a subset of another is called inclusion (or sometimes containment). A is a subset of B may also be expressed as B includes (or contains) A or A is included (or contained) in B. A k-subset is a subset with k elements.

When quantified, ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$ is represented as ${\displaystyle \forall x\left(x\in A\Rightarrow x\in B\right).}$

One can prove the statement ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$ by applying a proof technique known as the element argument:

Let sets A and B be given. To prove that ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B,}$

1. suppose that a is a particular but arbitrarily chosen element of A
2. show that a is an element of B.

The validity of this technique can be seen as a consequence of universal generalization: the technique shows ${\displaystyle (c\in A)\Rightarrow (c\in B)}$ for an arbitrarily chosen element c. Universal generalisation then implies ${\displaystyle \forall x\left(x\in A\Rightarrow x\in B\right),}$ which is equivalent to ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B,}$ as stated above.

Definition

If A and B are sets and every element of A is also an element of B, then:

• A is a subset of B, denoted by ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$, or equivalently,
• B is a superset of A, denoted by ${\displaystyle B\supseteq A.}$

If A is a subset of B, but A is not equal to B (i.e. there exists at least one element of B which is not an element of A), then:

• A is a proper (or strict) subset of B, denoted by ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq B}$, or equivalently,
• B is a proper (or strict) superset of A, denoted by ${\displaystyle B\supsetneq A.}$

The empty set, written ${\displaystyle \{\}}$ or ${\displaystyle \varnothing ,}$ has no elements, and therefore is vacuously a subset of any set X.

Basic properties

• Reflexivity: Given any set ${\displaystyle A}$, ${\displaystyle A\subseteq A}$
• Transitivity: If ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$ and ${\displaystyle B\subseteq C}$, then ${\displaystyle A\subseteq C}$
• Antisymmetry: If ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$ and ${\displaystyle B\subseteq A}$, then ${\displaystyle A=B}$.

Proper subset

• Irreflexivity: Given any set ${\displaystyle A}$, ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq A}$ is False.
• Transitivity: If ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq B}$ and ${\displaystyle B\subsetneq C}$, then ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq C}$
• Asymmetry: If ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq B}$ then ${\displaystyle B\subsetneq A}$ is False.

⊂ and ⊃ symbols

Some authors use the symbols ${\displaystyle \subset }$ and ${\displaystyle \supset }$ to indicate subset and superset respectively; that is, with the same meaning as and instead of the symbols ${\displaystyle \subseteq }$ and ${\displaystyle \supseteq .}$ For example, for these authors, it is true of every set A that ${\displaystyle A\subset A.}$ (a reflexive relation).

Other authors prefer to use the symbols ${\displaystyle \subset }$ and ${\displaystyle \supset }$ to indicate proper (also called strict) subset and proper superset respectively; that is, with the same meaning as and instead of the symbols ${\displaystyle \subsetneq }$ and ${\displaystyle \supsetneq .}$ This usage makes ${\displaystyle \subseteq }$ and ${\displaystyle \subset }$ analogous to the inequality symbols ${\displaystyle \leq }$ and ${\displaystyle <.}$ For example, if ${\displaystyle x\leq y,}$ then x may or may not equal y, but if ${\displaystyle x<y,}$ then x definitely does not equal y, and is less than y (an irreflexive relation). Similarly, using the convention that ${\displaystyle \subset }$ is proper subset, if ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B,}$ then A may or may not equal B, but if ${\displaystyle A\subset B,}$ then A definitely does not equal B.

Examples of subsets

• The set A = {1, 2} is a proper subset of B = {1, 2, 3}, thus both expressions ${\displaystyle A\subseteq B}$ and ${\displaystyle A\subsetneq B}$ are true.
• The set D = {1, 2, 3} is a subset (but not a proper subset) of E = {1, 2, 3}, thus ${\displaystyle D\subseteq E}$ is true, and ${\displaystyle D\subsetneq E}$ is not true (false).
• The set {x: x is a prime number greater than 10} is a proper subset of {x: x is an odd number greater than 10}
• The set of natural numbers is a proper subset of the set of rational numbers; likewise, the set of points in a line segment is a proper subset of the set of points in a line. These are two examples in which both the subset and the whole set are infinite, and the subset has the same cardinality (the concept that corresponds to size, that is, the number of elements, of a finite set) as the whole; such cases can run counter to one's initial intuition.
• The set of rational numbers is a proper subset of the set of real numbers. In this example, both sets are infinite, but the latter set has a larger cardinality (or power) than the former set.

Another example in an Euler diagram:

• A is a proper subset of B.
• C is a subset but not a proper subset of B.

Power set

The set of all subsets of ${\displaystyle S}$ is called its power set, and is denoted by ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}(S)}$.

The inclusion relation ${\displaystyle \subseteq }$ is a partial order on the set ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}(S)}$ defined by ${\displaystyle A\leq B\iff A\subseteq B}$. We may also partially order ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}(S)}$ by reverse set inclusion by defining ${\displaystyle A\leq B{\text{ if and only if }}B\subseteq A.}$

For the power set ${\displaystyle \operatorname {\mathcal {P}} (S)}$ of a set S, the inclusion partial order is—up to an order isomorphism—the Cartesian product of ${\displaystyle k=|S|}$ (the cardinality of S) copies of the partial order on ${\displaystyle \{0,1\}}$ for which ${\displaystyle 0<1.}$ This can be illustrated by enumerating ${\displaystyle S=\left\{s_{1},s_{2},\ldots ,s_{k}\right\},}$, and associating with each subset ${\displaystyle T\subseteq S}$ (i.e., each element of ${\displaystyle 2^{S}}$) the k-tuple from ${\displaystyle \{0,1\}^{k},}$ of which the ith coordinate is 1 if and only if ${\displaystyle s_{i}}$ is a member of T.

The set of all ${\displaystyle k}$-subsets of ${\displaystyle A}$ is denoted by ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {A}{k}}}$, in analogue with the notation for binomial coefficients, which count the number of ${\displaystyle k}$-subsets of an ${\displaystyle n}$-element set. In set theory, the notation ${\displaystyle ^{k}}$ is also common, especially when ${\displaystyle k}$ is a transfinite cardinal number.

Other properties of inclusion

• A set A is a subset of B if and only if their intersection is equal to A. Formally:

${\displaystyle A\subseteq B{\text{ if and only if }}A\cap B=A.}$

• A set A is a subset of B if and only if their union is equal to B. Formally:

${\displaystyle A\subseteq B{\text{ if and only if }}A\cup B=B.}$

• A finite set A is a subset of B, if and only if the cardinality of their intersection is equal to the cardinality of A. Formally:

${\displaystyle A\subseteq B{\text{ if and only if }}|A\cap B|=|A|.}$

• The subset relation defines a partial order on sets. In fact, the subsets of a given set form a Boolean algebra under the subset relation, in which the join and meet are given by intersection and union, and the subset relation itself is the Boolean inclusion relation.
• Inclusion is the canonical partial order, in the sense that every partially ordered set ${\displaystyle (X,\preceq )}$ is isomorphic to some collection of sets ordered by inclusion. The ordinal numbers are a simple example: if each ordinal n is identified with the set ${\displaystyle }$ of all ordinals less than or equal to n, then ${\displaystyle a\leq b}$ if and only if ${\displaystyle \subseteq .}$

See also

• Convex subset – In geometry, set whose intersection with every line is a single line segmentPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Inclusion order – Partial order that arises as the subset-inclusion relation on some collection of objects
• Mereology – Study of parts and the wholes they form
• Region – Connected open subset of a topological spacePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Subset sum problem – Decision problem in computer science
• Subsumptive containment – System of elements that are subordinated to each other
• Subspace – Mathematical set with some added structurePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Total subset – Subset T of a topological vector space X where the linear span of T is a dense subset of X

References

1. Rosen, Kenneth H. (2012). Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-07-338309-5.
2. Epp, Susanna S. (2011). Discrete Mathematics with Applications (Fourth ed.). p. 337. ISBN 978-0-495-39132-6.
3. Stoll, Robert R. (1963). Set Theory and Logic. San Francisco, CA: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-63829-4.
4. Rudin, Walter (1987), Real and complex analysis (3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 6, ISBN 978-0-07-054234-1, MR 0924157
5. Subsets and Proper Subsets (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-23, retrieved 2012-09-07
6. Weisstein, Eric W. "Subset". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-08-23.

Bibliography

• Jech, Thomas (2002). Set Theory. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.

External links

• Media related to Subsets at Wikimedia Commons
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Subset". MathWorld.

v t e Mathematical logic
General	Axiom list Cardinality First-order logic Formal proof Formal semantics Foundations of mathematics Information theory Lemma Logical consequence Model Theorem Theory Type theory
Theorems (list)  and paradoxes	Gödel's completeness and incompleteness theorems Tarski's undefinability Banach–Tarski paradox Cantor's theorem, paradox and diagonal argument Compactness Halting problem Lindström's Löwenheim–Skolem Russell's paradox
Logics	Traditional Classical logic Logical truth Tautology Proposition Inference Logical equivalence Consistency Equiconsistency Argument Soundness Validity Syllogism Square of opposition Venn diagram Propositional Boolean algebra Boolean functions Logical connectives Propositional calculus Propositional formula Truth tables Many-valued logic 3 finite ∞ Predicate First-order list Second-order Monadic Higher-order Fixed-point Free Quantifiers Predicate Monadic predicate calculus
Set theory	Set hereditary Class (Ur-)Element Ordinal number Extensionality Forcing Relation equivalence partition Set operations: intersection union complement Cartesian product power set identities Types of sets Countable Uncountable Empty Inhabited Singleton Finite Infinite Transitive Ultrafilter Recursive Fuzzy Universal Universe constructible Grothendieck Von Neumann Maps and cardinality Function/Map domain codomain image In/Sur/Bi-jection Schröder–Bernstein theorem Isomorphism Gödel numbering Enumeration Large cardinal inaccessible Aleph number Operation binary Set theories Zermelo–Fraenkel axiom of choice continuum hypothesis General Kripke–Platek Morse–Kelley Naive New Foundations Tarski–Grothendieck Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel Ackermann Constructive
Formal systems (list), language and syntax	Alphabet Arity Automata Axiom schema Expression ground Extension by definition conservative Relation Formation rule Grammar Formula atomic closed ground open Free/bound variable Language Metalanguage Logical connective ¬ ∨ ∧ → ↔ = Predicate functional variable propositional variable Proof Quantifier ∃ ! ∀ rank Sentence atomic spectrum Signature String Substitution Symbol function logical/constant non-logical variable Term Theory list Example axiomatic systems (list) of arithmetic: Peano second-order elementary function primitive recursive Robinson Skolem of the real numbers Tarski's axiomatization of Boolean algebras canonical minimal axioms of geometry: Euclidean: Elements Hilbert's Tarski's non-Euclidean Principia Mathematica
Proof theory	Formal proof Natural deduction Logical consequence Rule of inference Sequent calculus Theorem Systems axiomatic deductive Hilbert list Complete theory Independence (from ZFC) Proof of impossibility Ordinal analysis Reverse mathematics Self-verifying theories
Model theory	Interpretation function of models Model equivalence finite saturated spectrum submodel Non-standard model of arithmetic Diagram elementary Categorical theory Model complete theory Satisfiability Semantics of logic Strength Theories of truth semantic Tarski's Kripke's T-schema Transfer principle Truth predicate Truth value Type Ultraproduct Validity
Computability theory	Church encoding Church–Turing thesis Computably enumerable Computable function Computable set Decision problem decidable undecidable P NP P versus NP problem Kolmogorov complexity Lambda calculus Primitive recursive function Recursion Recursive set Turing machine Type theory
Related	Abstract logic Algebraic logic Automated theorem proving Category theory Concrete/Abstract category Category of sets History of logic History of mathematical logic timeline Logicism Mathematical object Philosophy of mathematics Supertask
Mathematics portal

v t e Set theory
Overview	Set (mathematics)
Axioms	Adjunction Choice countable dependent global Constructibility (V=L) Determinacy projective Extensionality Infinity Limitation of size Pairing Power set Regularity Union Martin's axiom Axiom schema replacement specification
Operations	Cartesian product Complement (i.e. set difference) De Morgan's laws Disjoint union Identities Intersection Power set Symmetric difference Union
Concepts Methods	Almost Cardinality Cardinal number (large) Class Constructible universe Continuum hypothesis Diagonal argument Element ordered pair tuple Family Forcing One-to-one correspondence Ordinal number Set-builder notation Transfinite induction Venn diagram
Set types	Amorphous Countable Empty Finite (hereditarily) Filter base subbase Ultrafilter Fuzzy Infinite (Dedekind-infinite) Recursive Singleton Subset · Superset Transitive Uncountable Universal
Theories	Alternative Axiomatic Naive Cantor's theorem Zermelo General Principia Mathematica New Foundations Zermelo–Fraenkel von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel Morse–Kelley Kripke–Platek Tarski–Grothendieck
Paradoxes Problems	Russell's paradox Suslin's problem Burali-Forti paradox
Set theorists	Paul Bernays Georg Cantor Paul Cohen Richard Dedekind Abraham Fraenkel Kurt Gödel Thomas Jech John von Neumann Willard Quine Bertrand Russell Thoralf Skolem Ernst Zermelo

v t e Common logical symbols
∧  or  & and ∨ or ¬  or  ~ not → implies ⊃ implies, superset ↔  or  ≡ iff | nand ∀ universal quantification ∃ existential quantification ⊤ true, tautology ⊥ false, contradiction ⊢ entails, proves ⊨ entails, therefore ∴ therefore ∵ because
Philosophy portal Mathematics portal

• Basic concepts in set theory