Misplaced Pages

Hip fracture

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Subtrochanteric fracture) Broken bone in hip joint region

This article is about fractures of the proximal femur. For fractures of the nonacetabular portion of the hip bone, see Pelvic fracture. For fractures of the acetabulum, see Acetabular fracture. Not to be confused with femoral fracture.

Medical condition
Hip fracture
Other namesProximal femur fracture; femoral neck fracture ; femoral head fracture
Intertrochanteric hip fracture in a 17-year-old male
SymptomsPain around the hip particularly with movement, shortening of the leg
TypesIntracapsular, extracapsular (intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, greater trochanteric, lesser trochanteric)
CausesTrauma such as a fall
Risk factorsOsteoporosis, taking many medications, alcohol use, metastatic cancer
Diagnostic methodX-ray, MRI, CT scan, bone scan
Differential diagnosisOsteoarthritis, avascular necrosis of the hip, hernia, trochanteric bursitis
PreventionImproved lighting, removal of loose rugs, exercise, treatment of osteoporosis
TreatmentSurgery
MedicationOpioids, nerve block
Prognosis~20% one year risk of death (older people)
Frequency~15% of women at some point

A hip fracture is a break that occurs in the upper part of the femur (thigh bone), at the femoral neck or (rarely) the femoral head. Symptoms may include pain around the hip, particularly with movement, and shortening of the leg. Usually the person cannot walk.

A hip fracture is usually a femoral neck fracture. Such fractures most often occur as a result of a fall. (Femoral head fractures are a rare kind of hip fracture that may also be the result of a fall but are more commonly caused by more violent incidents such as traffic accidents.) Risk factors include osteoporosis, taking many medications, alcohol use, and metastatic cancer. Diagnosis is generally by X-rays. Magnetic resonance imaging, a CT scan, or a bone scan may occasionally be required to make the diagnosis.

Pain management may involve opioids or a nerve block. If the person's health allows, surgery is generally recommended within two days. Options for surgery may include a total hip replacement or stabilizing the fracture with screws. Treatment to prevent blood clots following surgery is recommended.

About 15% of women break their hip at some point in life; women are more often affected than men. Hip fractures become more common with age. The risk of death in the year following a fracture is about 20% in older people.

Signs and symptoms

the affected extremity is often shortened and unnaturally, externally rotated compared to the unaffected leg

The classic clinical presentation of a hip fracture is an elderly patient who sustained a low-energy fall and now has groin pain and is unable to bear weight. Pain may be referred to the supracondylar knee. On examination, the affected extremity is often shortened and externally rotated compared to the unaffected leg.

Complications

Nonunion, failure of the fracture to heal, is common in fractures of the neck of the femur, but much more rare with other types of hip fracture. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurs frequently (20%) in intracapsular hip fractures, because the blood supply is interrupted.

Malunion, healing of the fracture in a distorted position, is very common. The thigh muscles tend to pull on the bone fragments, causing them to overlap and reunite incorrectly. Shortening, varus deformity, valgus deformity, and rotational malunion all occur often because the fracture may be unstable and collapse before it heals. This may not be as much of a concern in patients with limited independence and mobility.

Hip fractures rarely result in neurological or vascular injury.

Medical

Many people are unwell before breaking a hip; it is common for the break to have been caused by a fall due to some illness, especially in the elderly. Nevertheless, the stress of the injury, and a likely surgery, increases the risk of medical illness including heart attack, stroke, and chest infection.

Hip fracture patients are at considerable risk for thromboemoblism, blood clots that dislodge and travel in the bloodstream. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is when the blood in the leg veins clots and causes pain and swelling. This is very common after hip fracture as the circulation is stagnant and the blood is hypercoagulable as a response to injury. DVT can occur without causing symptoms. A pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs when clotted blood from a DVT comes loose from the leg veins and passes up to the lungs. Circulation to parts of the lungs is cut off which can be very dangerous. Fatal PE may have an incidence of 2% after hip fracture and may contribute to illness and mortality in other cases.

Mental confusion is extremely common following a hip fracture. It usually clears completely, but the disorienting experience of pain, immobility, loss of independence, moving to a strange place, surgery, and drugs combine to cause delirium or accentuate pre-existing dementia.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) can occur. Patients are immobilized and in bed for many days; they are frequently catheterised, commonly causing infection.

Prolonged immobilization and difficulty moving make it hard to avoid pressure sores on the sacrum and heels of patients with hip fractures. Whenever possible, early mobilization is advocated; otherwise, alternating pressure mattresses should be used.

Risk factors

Hip fracture following a fall is likely to be a pathological fracture. The most common causes of weakness in bone are:

Mechanism

X-ray of a normal hip joint.

Functional anatomy

The hip joint is a ball-and-socket joint. The femur connects at the acetabulum of the pelvis and projects laterally before angling medially and inferiorly to form the knee. Although this joint has three degrees of freedom, it is still stable due to the interaction of ligaments and cartilage. The labrum lines the circumference of the acetabulum to provide stability and shock absorption. Articular cartilage covers the concave area of acetabulum, providing more stability and shock absorption. Surrounding the entire joint itself is a capsule secured by the tendon of the psoas muscle and three ligaments. The iliofemoral, or Y, ligament is located anteriorly and serves to prevent hip hyperextension. The pubofemoral ligament is located anteriorly just underneath the iliofemoral ligament and serves primarily to resist abduction, extension, and some external rotation. Finally the ischiofemoral ligament on the posterior side of the capsule resists extension, adduction, and internal rotation. When considering the biomechanics of hip fractures, it is important to examine the mechanical loads the hip experiences during low energy falls.

Biomechanics

The hip joint is unique in that it experiences combined mechanical loads. An axial load along the shaft of the femur results in compressive stress. Bending load at the neck of the femur causes tensile stress along the upper part of the neck and compressive stress along the lower part of the neck. While osteoarthritis and osteoporosis are associated with bone fracture as we age, these diseases are not the cause of the fracture alone. Low energy falls from standing are responsible for the majority of fractures in the elderly, but fall direction is also a key factor. Elderly patients tend to fall to the side instead of forward, and the lateral hip strikes the ground first. During a sideways fall, the chances of hip fracture see a 15-fold and 12-fold increase in elderly males and females, respectively.

Neurological factors

Elderly individuals are also predisposed to hip fractures due to many factors that can compromise proprioception and balance, including medications, vertigo, stroke, and peripheral neuropathy.

Diagnosis

Physical examination

Displaced fractures of the trochanter or femoral neck will classically cause external rotation and shortening of the leg when the patient is laying supine.

Imaging

Typically, radiographs are taken of the hip from the front (AP view), and side (lateral view). Frog leg views are to be avoided, as they may cause severe pain and further displace the fracture. In situations where a hip fracture is suspected but not obvious on x-ray, an MRI is the next test of choice. If an MRI is not available or the patient can not be placed into the scanner a CT may be used as a substitute. MRI sensitivity for radiographically occult fracture is greater than CT. Bone scan is another useful alternative however substantial drawbacks include decreased sensitivity, early false negative results and decreased conspicuity of findings due to age-related metabolic changes in the elderly.

A case demonstrating a possible order of imaging in initially subtle findings:

  • X-ray showing a suspected compressive subcapital fracture as a radiodense line X-ray showing a suspected compressive subcapital fracture as a radiodense line
  • CT scan shows the same, atypical for a fracture since the cortex is coherent CT scan shows the same, atypical for a fracture since the cortex is coherent
  • T1-weighted, turbo spin echo, MRI confirms a fracture, as the surrounding bone marrow has low signal from edema. T1-weighted, turbo spin echo, MRI confirms a fracture, as the surrounding bone marrow has low signal from edema.

As the patients most often require an operation, full pre-operative general investigation is required. This would normally include blood tests, ECG and chest x-ray.

Types

Hip fracture classification.
Subcapital fracture in a 92-year-old woman
Fracture (black arrow, pertrochanteric) versus a skin fold (white arrow).

X-rays of the affected hip usually make the diagnosis obvious; AP (anteroposterior) and lateral views should be obtained.

Capsule Area Classification
Intracapsular femoral head AO 31-C1 – 31-C3 Pipkin classification
femoral neck Subcapital AO 31-B1 – 31-B3 Garden classification, Pauwel's classification
Transcervical
Basicervical
Extracapsular Trochanteric Intertrochanteric (between the greater and lesser trochanter) AO 31-A1 – 31-A2 Evans' classification (1949), Ramadier's classification (1956), Boyd and Griffin's classification (1949), Decoulx & Lavarde's classification (1969), Ender's classification (1970), Tronzo's classification (1973), Evans-Jensen classification (1975), Deburge's classification (1976), Briot's classification (1980)
Pertrochanteric (through the trochanters) AO 31-A3
Subtrochanteric AO 32 Seinsheimer classification

Trochanteric fractures are subdivided into either intertrochanteric (between the greater and lesser trochanter) or pertrochanteric (through the trochanters) by the Müller AO Classification of fractures. Practically, the difference between these types is minor. The terms are often used synonymously. An isolated trochanteric fracture involves one of the trochanters without going through the anatomical axis of the femur, and may occur in young individuals due to forceful muscle contraction. Yet, an isolated trochanteric fracture may not be regarded as a true hip fracture because it is not cross-sectional.

Prevention

The majority of hip fractures are the result of a fall, particularly in the elderly. Therefore, identifying why the fall occurred, and implementing treatments or changes, is key to reducing the occurrence of hip fractures. Multiple contributing factors are often identified. These can include environmental factors and medical factors (such as postural hypotension or co-existing disabilities from disease such as Stroke or Parkinson's disease which cause visual and/or balance impairments). A recent study has identified a high incidence of undiagnosed cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) amongst patients with a hip fracture. This is relatively unrecognised consequent of CSM.

Additionally, there is some evidence to systems designed to offer protection in the case of a fall. Hip protectors, for example appear to decrease the number of hip fractures among the elderly, but they are often not used.

Management

Most hip fractures are treated surgically by implanting a prosthesis. Surgical treatment outweighs the risks of nonsurgical treatment which requires extensive bedrest. Prolonged immobilization increases risk of thromboembolism, pneumonia, deconditioning, and decubitus ulcers. Regardless, the surgery is a major stress, particularly in the elderly. Pain is also significant, and can also result in immobilization, so patients are encouraged to become mobile as soon as possible, often with the assistance of physical therapy. Skeletal traction pending surgery is not supported by the evidence. Regional nerve blocks are useful for pain management in hip fractures. Peripheral nerve blocks may reduce pain on movement and delirium, may improve time to first mobilisation, and may reduce the risk of postoperative lower respiratory tract infection. Surgery can be performed under general anaesthesia or with neuraxial techniques (spinal anaesthesia) – choice is based on surgical and patient factors, as outcomes such as mortality and post-procedure complications including pneumonia, MI, stroke or delirium, are not affected by anaesthetic technique.

Red blood cell transfusion is common for people undergoing hip fracture surgery due to the blood loss sustained during surgery and from the injury. The benefits of giving blood when the hemoglobin is less than 10 g/dL versus less than 8 g/dL are not clear. Waiting until the hemoglobin was less than 8 g/dL or the person had symptoms may increase the risk of heart problems. Intravenous iron is used in some centres to encourage an increase in haemoglobin levels, but it not known whether this makes a significant difference to outcomes that matter to patients.

If operative treatment is refused or the risks of surgery are considered to be too high the main emphasis of treatment is on pain relief. Skeletal traction may be considered for long-term treatment. Aggressive chest physiotherapy is needed to reduce the risk of pneumonia and skilled rehabilitation and nursing to avoid pressure sores and DVT/pulmonary embolism Most people will be bedbound for several months. Non-operative treatment is now limited to only the most medically unstable or demented patients or those who are nonambulatory at baseline with minimal pain during transfers.

Surgery on the same day or day following the break is estimated to reduce postoperative mortality in people who are medically stable.

Intracapsular fractures

Fracture treated with cannulated screws

For low-grade fractures (Garden types 1 and 2), standard treatment is fixation of the fracture in situ with screws or a sliding screw/plate device. This treatment can also be offered for displaced fractures after the fracture has been reduced.

Fractures managed by closed reduction can possibly be treated by percutaneously inserted screws.

In elderly patients with displaced or intracapsular fractures surgeons may decide to perform a hemiarthroplasty, replacing the broken part of the bone with a metal implant. However, in elderly people who are medically well and still active, a total hip replacement may be indicated. Independently mobile older adults with hip fractures may benefit from a total hip replacement instead of hemiarthroplasty.

Traction is contraindicated in femoral neck fractures due to it affecting blood flow to the head of the femur.

The latest evidence suggests that there may be little or no difference between screws and fixed angle plates as internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. The findings are based on low quality evidence that can't firmly conclude major difference in hip function, quality of life, and additional surgery.

Trochanteric fracture

Fracture supported by dynamic hip screw

A trochanteric fracture, below the neck of the femur, has a good chance of healing.

Closed reduction may not be satisfactory and open reduction then becomes necessary. The use of open reduction has been reported as 8-13% among pertrochanteric fractures, and 52% among intertrochanteric fractures. Both intertrochanteric and pertrochanteric fractures may be treated by a dynamic hip screw and plate, or an intramedullary rod.

The fracture typically takes 3–6 months to heal. As it is only common in elderly, removal of the dynamic hip screw is usually not recommended to avoid unnecessary risk of second operation and the increased risk of re-fracture after implant removal. The most common cause for hip fractures in the elderly is osteoporosis; if this is the case, treatment of the osteoporosis can well reduce the risk of further fracture. Only young patients tend to consider having it removed; the implant may function as a stress riser, increasing the risk of a break if another accident occurs.

Subtrochanteric fractures

Subtrochanteric fractures may be treated with an intramedullary nail or a screw-plate construction and may require traction pre-operatively, though this practice is uncommon. It is unclear if any specific type of nail results in different outcomes than any other type of nail.

A lateral incision over the trochanter is made and a cerclage wire is placed around the fracture for reduction. Once reduction has been achieved a guide canal for the nail is made through the proximal cortex and medullary. The nail is inserted through the canal and is fixated proximally and distally with screws. X-rays are obtained to ensure proper reduction and placement of the nail and screws are achieved.

Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation has been proven to increase daily functional status. Forty percent of individuals with hip fractures are also diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment which often results in poorer post-surgical outcomes. In such cases enhanced rehabilitation and care models have been shown to have limited positive effects in reducing delirium and hospital length of stay. It is unclear if the use of anabolic steroids affects recovery.

A updated Cochrane review (2022) involving over 4000 patients found evidence that gait training, balance and functional tasks training to be particularly effective when compared to conventional care. There is also moderate-certainty evidence that rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery, when delivered by a multidisciplinary team and supervised by an appropriate medical specialist, results in fewer cases of 'poor outcome', like death and deterioration in residential status. There is evidence early mobilisation helps. A UK study analysing data on over 135,000 people who had surgeyy for hip fracture found that people who get out of bed on the day of hip surgery, or the day after, were twice as likely to leave hospital within 30 days.

Nutrition supplementation

Oral supplements with non-protein energy, protein, vitamins and minerals started before or early after surgery may prevent complications during the first year after hip fracture in aged adults; without seemingly effects on mortality.

Surgical complications

Deep or superficial wound infection has an approximate incidence of 2%. It is a serious problem as superficial infection may lead to deep infection. This may cause infection of the healing bone and contamination of the implants. It is difficult to eliminate infection in the presence of metal foreign bodies such as implants. Bacteria inside the implants are inaccessible to the body's defence system and to antibiotics. The management is to attempt to suppress the infection with drainage and antibiotics until the bone is healed. Then the implant should be removed, following which the infection may clear up. Implant failure may occur; the metal screws and plate can break, back out, or cut out superiorly and enter the joint. This occurs either through inaccurate implant placement or if the fixation does not hold in weak and brittle bone. In the event of failure, the surgery may be redone or changed to a total hip replacement. Mal-positioning: The fracture can be fixed and subsequently heal in an incorrect position; especially rotation. This may not be a severe problem or may require subsequent osteotomy surgery for correction.

Prognosis

Hip fractures are very dangerous episodes, especially for elderly and frail patients. The risk of dying from the stress of the surgery and the injury in the first thirty days is about 7%. At one year after fracture, this may reach 30%. If the condition is untreated the pain and immobility imposed on the patient increase that risk. Problems such as pressure sores and chest infections are all increased by immobility. The prognosis of untreated hip fractures is very poor. However, most people who suffer a hip fracture are of relatively low risk of early mortality as deaths are concentrated in a numerically smaller, higher risk group. There are scoring tools available, such as the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score that can provide an estimate of risk based on the factors that are known to place people at higher risk, such as: advanced age; dementia or delirium on admission, anaemia on admission, co-morbidities; not living at home before the fracture; and previous diagnoses of cancer.

Post operation

Among those affected over the age of 65, 40% are transferred directly to long-term care facilities, long-term rehabilitation facilities, or nursing homes; most of those affected require some sort of living assistance from family or home-care providers. 50% permanently require walkers, canes, or crutches for mobility; all require some sort of mobility assistance throughout the healing process. Most of the recovery of walking ability and activities of daily living occurs within 6 months of the fracture. After the fracture about half of older people recover their pre-fracture level of mobility and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living, while 40–70% regain their level of independence for basic activities of daily living.

Among those affected over the age of 50, approximately 25% die within the next year due to complications such as blood clots (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism), infections, and pneumonia.

Patients with hip fractures are at high risk for future fractures including hip, wrist, shoulder, and spine. After treatment of the acute fracture, the risk of future fractures should be addressed. Currently, only 1 in 4 patients after a hip fracture receives treatment and work up for osteoporosis, the underlying cause of most of the fractures. Current treatment standards include the starting of a bisphosphonate to reduce future fracture risk by up to 50%.

Epidemiology

Age-standardised hip fracture rates.  Low (<150 / 100,000)  Medium (150–250 / 100,000)  High (>250 / 100,000)

Hip fractures are seen globally and are a serious concern at the individual and population level. By 2050, it is estimated that there will be six million cases of hip fractures worldwide. One study published in 2001 found that in the US alone, 310,000 individuals were hospitalized due to hip fractures, which can account for 30% of Americans who were hospitalized that year. Another study found that in 2011, femur neck fractures were among the most expensive conditions seen in US hospitals, with an aggregated cost of nearly $4.9 billion for 316,000 inpatient hospitalizations. Rates of hip fractures are declining in the United States, possibly due to increased use of bisphosphonates and risk management. Falling, poor vision, weight, and height are all seen as risk factors. Falling is one of the most common risk factors for hip fractures. Approximately 90% of hip fractures are attributed to falls from standing height.

Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with hip fractures and the cost to the health system, in England and Wales, the National Hip Fracture Database is a mandatory nationwide audit of care and treatment of all hip fractures.

Population

All populations experience hip fractures but numbers vary with race, gender, and age. Women have three times as many hip fractures as men. In a lifetime, men have an estimated 6% risk whereas postmenopausal women have an estimated 14% risk of having a hip fracture. These statistics provide insight over a lifespan, and conclude that women are twice as likely to have a hip fracture. The overwhelming majority of hip fractures occur in white individuals, while blacks and Hispanics have a lower rate of them. This may be due to their generally greater bone density and also because whites have longer overall lifespan and higher likelihood of reaching an advanced age where the risk of breaking a hip goes up. Deprivation is also a key factor: in England, it has been found that people in the poorest parts of the country are more likely to fracture a hip and less likely to recover well than those in the least deprived areas.

Age related

Age is the most dominant factor in hip fracture injuries, with most cases occurring in people over 75. The increase of age is related to the increase of the incidence of hip fracture, which is the most frequent cause of hospitalization in centenarians, overcoming congestive heart failure and respiratory infection. Falls are the most common cause of hip fractures; around 30–60% of older adults fall each year. This increases the risk for hip fracture and leads to the increased risk of death in older individuals, the rate of one year mortality is seen from 12 to 37%. For those remaining patients, half of them need assistance and cannot live independently. Also, older adults sustain hip fractures because of osteoporosis, which is a degenerative disease due to age and decrease in bone mass. The average age for sustaining a hip fracture is 77 years old for women and 72 years old for men.

References

  1. ^ Ferri FF (2017). Ferri's Clinical Advisor 2018 E-Book: 5 Books in 1. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 615. ISBN 9780323529570. Archived from the original on 13 October 2017.
  2. ^ "Hip Fractures". OrthoInfo - AAOS. April 2009. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2017.
  3. ^ Brunner LC, Eshilian-Oates L, Kuo TY (February 2003). "Hip fractures in adults". American Family Physician. 67 (3): 537–542. PMID 12588076.
  4. Guay J, Parker MJ, Griffiths R, Kopp SL (May 2018). "Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fractures: A Cochrane Review". Anesthesia and Analgesia. 126 (5): 1695–1704. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002489. PMID 28991122. S2CID 37497179.
  5. ^ Sarwark JF (2010). Essentials of musculoskeletal care. Rosemont, Ill.: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. ISBN 9780892035793. OCLC 706805938.
  6. Rabow MW, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA (2 September 2017). Current medical diagnosis & treatment 2018 (Fifty-seventh ed.). New York. ISBN 9781259861482. OCLC 959649794.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  7. "Fractures of the Femoral Neck". Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics. Duke University School of Medicine. Archived from the original on 18 January 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
  8. "Intertrochanteric Fractures". Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics. Duke University School of Medicine. Archived from the original on 18 January 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
  9. "Damage Control Orthopaedics: Patient Stabilization, Early Mobilization". 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons briefing. Medical News Today. 18 February 2007. Archived from the original on 22 November 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
  10. Yoon V, Maalouf NM, Sakhaee K (August 2012). "The effects of smoking on bone metabolism". Osteoporosis International. 23 (8): 2081–2092. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1940-y. PMID 22349964. S2CID 7420853.
  11. Hwang HF, Lee HD, Huang HH, Chen CY, Lin MR (August 2011). "Fall mechanisms, bone strength, and hip fractures in elderly men and women in Taiwan". Osteoporosis International. 22 (8): 2385–2393. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1446-4. PMID 20963399. S2CID 2199032.
  12. Rockwood Jr CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW (2010). Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 9781605476773. OCLC 444336477.
  13. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (November 1993). "Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 41 (11): 1226–1234. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07307.x. PMID 8227898. S2CID 41806696.
  14. Cumming RG, Le Couteur DG (2003). "Benzodiazepines and risk of hip fractures in older people: a review of the evidence". CNS Drugs. 17 (11): 825–837. doi:10.2165/00023210-200317110-00004. PMID 12921493. S2CID 26038041.
  15. Bakken MS, Engeland A, Engesæter LB, Ranhoff AH, Hunskaar S, Ruths S (July 2013). "Increased risk of hip fracture among older people using antidepressant drugs: data from the Norwegian Prescription Database and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Registry". Age and Ageing. 42 (4): 514–520. doi:10.1093/ageing/aft009. hdl:1956/10482. PMID 23438446.
  16. "Hip Fractures". The Lecturio Medical Concept Library. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  17. * "Prevention and Management of Hip Fracture on Older People. Section 7: Surgical management". Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017. Last modified 15 July 2002
    • Area of trochanteric fractures: Raaymakers E, Schipper I, Simmermacher R, van der Werken C. "Proximal femur". AO Foundation. Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
    • Area of subtrochanteric fractures: Lee MA. "Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures". Archived from the original on 26 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017. Updated: 22 Jun 2016
    • Area of femoral neck fractures: Page 333 in: Tornetta III P, Wiesel SM (2010). Operative Techniques in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 9781451102604.
  18. ^ Page 245 in: Dandy DJ, Edwards DJ (2009). Essential Orthopaedics and Trauma (5th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780702042096.
  19. ^ Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB (February 2001). "Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 72 (1): 36–41. doi:10.1080/000164701753606662. PMID 11327411. S2CID 13405033.
  20. Raaymakers E, Schipper I, Simmermacher R, van der Werken C. "Proximal femur". AO Foundation. Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
  21. Page 190 in: Gosselin RA, Spiegel DA, Foltz M (2014). Global Orthopedics: Caring for Musculoskeletal Conditions and Injuries in Austere Settings. Springer Science & Business. ISBN 9781461415787.
  22. Page 365 in: Simonds AK (2007). Non-Invasive Respiratory Support, Third edition: A Practical Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN 9780340809846.
  23. Page 303 in: Pope T, Bloem HL, Beltran J, Morrison WB, Wilson DJ (2014). Musculoskeletal Imaging E-Book (2nd ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780323278188.
  24. Rubenstein LZ (September 2006). "Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention". Age and Ageing. 35 Suppl 2 (suppl 2): ii37–ii41. doi:10.1093/ageing/afl084. PMID 16926202.
  25. Radcliff KE, Curry EP, Trimba R, Walker JB, Purtill JJ, Austin MS, et al. (April 2016). "High Incidence of Undiagnosed Cervical Myelopathy in Patients With Hip Fracture Compared With Controls". Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 30 (4): 189–193. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000485. PMID 26562581. S2CID 33628708.
  26. "Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy". Myelopathy.org. Archived from the original on 18 November 2015. Retrieved 9 March 2016.
  27. Santesso N, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R (March 2014). "Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (3): CD001255. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001255.pub5. PMC 10754476. PMID 24687239. S2CID 27652715.
  28. Handoll HH, Queally JM, Parker MJ (December 2011). "Pre-operative traction for hip fractures in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (12): CD000168. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000168.pub3. PMID 22161361.
  29. Ritcey B, Pageau P, Woo MY, Perry JJ (January 2016). "Regional Nerve Blocks For Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review". CJEM. 18 (1): 37–47. doi:10.1017/cem.2015.75. PMID 26330019.
  30. Guay J, Kopp S (November 2020). "Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11 (11): CD001159. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3. PMC 8130997. PMID 33238043.
  31. Guay J, Parker MJ, Gajendragadkar PR, Kopp S (February 2016). "Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD000521. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000521.pub3. PMC 6464323. PMID 26899415.
  32. Neuman MD, Feng R, Carson JL, Gaskins LJ, Dillane D, Sessler DI, et al. (November 2021). "Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults". The New England Journal of Medicine. 385 (22): 2025–2035. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2113514. PMID 34623788. S2CID 238474267.
  33. Brunskill SJ, Millette SL, Shokoohi A, Pulford EC, Doree C, Murphy MF, Stanworth S (April 2015). "Red blood cell transfusion for people undergoing hip fracture surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (4): CD009699. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009699.pub2. PMC 11065123. PMID 25897628.
  34. Gu WJ, Gu XP, Wu XD, Chen H, Kwong JS, Zhou LY, et al. (April 2018). "Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategy for Red Blood-Cell Transfusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Orthopaedic Patients". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 100 (8): 686–695. doi:10.2106/JBJS.17.00375. PMID 29664857. S2CID 4940514.
  35. Sinclair RC, Bowman MJ, Moppett IK, Gillies MA (May 2022). "Perioperative intravenous iron to treat patients with fractured hip surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Health Science Reports. 5 (3) (published 2022): e633. doi:10.1002/hsr2.633. PMC 9125168. PMID 35620535.
  36. Sobolev B, Guy P, Sheehan KJ, Kuramoto L, Sutherland JM, Levy AR, et al. (August 2018). "Mortality effects of timing alternatives for hip fracture surgery". CMAJ. 190 (31): E923–E932. doi:10.1503/cmaj.171512. PMC 6078777. PMID 30087128.
  37. Hoffmann R, Haas NP. "Fractures of the femoral neck (31-B)". OA Foundation. Archived from the original on 27 April 2017., citing: Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG (2007). OA Principles of Fracture management. Thieme Medical Publishers. ISBN 9781588905567.
  38. Lewis SR, Macey R, Parker MJ, Cook JA, Griffin XL (February 2022). "Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 (2): CD013410. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013410.pub2. PMC 8841979. PMID 35156194.
  39. Metcalfe D, Judge A, Perry DC, Gabbe B, Zogg CK, Costa ML (May 2019). "Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for independently mobile older adults with intracapsular hip fractures". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 20 (1): 226. doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2590-4. PMC 6525472. PMID 31101041.
  40. Tintinalli JE (2010). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide (Emergency Medicine (Tintinalli)). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. ISBN 978-0-07-148480-0.
  41. Lewis SR, Macey R, Eardley WG, Dixon JR, Cook J, Griffin XL (March 2021). "Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021 (3): CD013409. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013409.pub2. PMC 8092427. PMID 33687067.
  42. ^ Subtypes of trochanteric fractures: Raaymakers E, Schipper I, Simmermacher R, van der Werken C. "Proximal femur". OA Foundation. Archived from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
  43. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R (February 2003). "The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 74 (1): 53–58. doi:10.1080/00016470310013662. PMID 12635794.
    • This study cites the following primary source:
      Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Dockter S, et al. (1994). "Gammanagel-osteosynthes per- und subtrochanterer Femurfrakturen". Chirurg. 65.
  44. Queally JM, Harris E, Handoll HH, Parker MJ (September 2014). "Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (9): CD004961. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004961.pub4. PMC 10835205. PMID 25212485.
  45. , Weaver M. Closed Cephalomedullary Nailing of Subtrochanteric Hip Fracture. J Med Ins. 2016;2016(100) doi:https://jomi.com/article/100
  46. ^ Smith TO, Gilbert AW, Sreekanta A, Sahota O, Griffin XL, Cross JL, et al. (February 2020). "Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (2): CD010569. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010569.pub3. PMC 7006792. PMID 32031676.
  47. Farooqi V, van den Berg ME, Cameron ID, Crotty M (October 2014). "Anabolic steroids for rehabilitation after hip fracture in older people". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (10): CD008887. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008887.pub2. PMC 6669256. PMID 25284341.
  48. Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C (September 2022). "Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 (9): CD001704. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5. PMC 9451000. PMID 36070134.
  49. Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP (November 2021). "Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021 (11): CD007125. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007125.pub3. PMC 8586844. PMID 34766330.
  50. Beeston A (7 May 2021). "People who are active after hip surgery are more likely to be home within a month". NIHR Evidence. doi:10.3310/alert_46123. Retrieved 31 May 2024.
  51. Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Almilaji O, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S (26 February 2021). "Discharge after hip fracture surgery by mobilisation timing: secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database". Age and Ageing. 50 (2): 415–422. doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa204. ISSN 0002-0729. PMC 7936027. PMID 33098414.
  52. Avenell A, Smith TO, Curtain JP, Mak JC, Myint PK (November 2016). "Nutritional supplementation for hip fracture aftercare in older people". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 (11) (published 30 November 2016): CD001880. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001880.pub6. hdl:2164/9672. PMC 6464805. PMID 27898998.
  53. Patel R, Judge A, Johansen A, Marques EM, Griffin J, Bradshaw M, et al. (August 2022). "Multiple hospital organisational factors are associated with adverse patient outcomes post-hip fracture in England and Wales: the REDUCE record-linkage cohort study". Age and Ageing. 51 (8). doi:10.1093/ageing/afac183. PMC 9427326. PMID 36041740.
  54. Sedlář M, Kvasnička J, Krška Z, Tománková T, Linhart A (12 February 2015). "Early and subacute inflammatory response and long-term survival after hip trauma and surgery". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 60 (3): 431–436. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2015.02.002. PMID 25704919.Closed access icon
  55. Marufu TC, Mannings A, Moppett IK (December 2015). "Risk scoring models for predicting peri-operative morbidity and mortality in people with fragility hip fractures: Qualitative systematic review". Injury. 46 (12): 2325–2334. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.025. PMID 26553425. S2CID 26579231.
  56. ^ Dyer SM, Crotty M, Fairhall N, Magaziner J, Beaupre LA, Cameron ID, Sherrington C (September 2016). "A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture". BMC Geriatrics. 16 (1): 158. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0332-0. PMC 5010762. PMID 27590604.
  57. Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C (September 2012). "A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide". Osteoporosis International. 23 (9): 2239–2256. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3. PMC 3421108. PMID 22419370.
  58. ^ Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M (January 1996). "Epidemiology of hip fractures". Bone. 18 (1 Suppl): 57S–63S. doi:10.1016/8756-3282(95)00381-9. PMID 8717549.
  59. Huddleston JM, Whitford KJ (March 2001). "Medical care of elderly patients with hip fractures". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 76 (3): 295–298. doi:10.4065/76.3.295. PMID 11243276.
  60. Torio CM, Andrews RM. "National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011." HCUP Statistical Brief #160. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. August 2013. "Statistical Brief #160". Archived from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 1 May 2017.
  61. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (October 2009). "Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States". JAMA. 302 (14): 1573–1579. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1462. PMC 4410861. PMID 19826027.
  62. Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1997). "Epidemiology of hip fractures". Epidemiologic Reviews. 19 (2): 244–257. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017956. PMID 9494786.
  63. "The National Hip Fracture Database". www.nhfd.co.uk. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
  64. "Hip Fractures Among Older Adults". CDC. Archived from the original on 8 May 2015. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
  65. ^ Lauritzen JB (April 1997). "Hip fractures. Epidemiology, risk factors, falls, energy absorption, hip protectors, and prevention". Danish Medical Bulletin. 44 (2): 155–168. PMID 9151010.
  66. Bardsley M. "Focus on: Hip fracture". QualityWatch. Nuffield Trust & Health Foundation. Archived from the original on 15 May 2015. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
  67. Rodríguez-Molinero A, Yuste A, Banegas JR (February 2010). "High incidence of hip fracture in Spanish centenarians". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 58 (2): 403–405. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02706.x. PMID 20370877.
  68. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR (May 2002). "The epidemiology of falls and syncope". Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 18 (2): 141–158. doi:10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00002-2. PMID 12180240.
  69. Baumgaertner MR, Higgins TF. (2002) "Femoral Neck Fractures." Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults. pp. 1579-1586.

External links

ClassificationD
External resources
Fractures and cartilage damage
General
Head
Spinal fracture
Ribs
Shoulder fracture
Arm fracture
Humerus fracture:
Forearm fracture:
Hand fracture
Pelvic fracture
Leg
Tibia fracture:
Fibular fracture:
Combined tibia and fibula fracture:
Crus fracture:
Femoral fracture:
Foot fracture
Categories: