Misplaced Pages

A supercapacitor (SC), also called an ultracapacitor, is a high-capacity capacitor, with a capacitance value much higher than solid-state capacitors but with lower voltage limits. It bridges the gap between electrolytic capacitors and rechargeable batteries. It typically stores 10 to 100 times more energy per unit volume or mass than electrolytic capacitors, can accept and deliver charge much faster than batteries, and tolerates many more charge and discharge cycles than rechargeable batteries.

Unlike ordinary capacitors, supercapacitors do not use the conventional solid dielectric, but rather, they use electrostatic double-layer capacitance and electrochemical pseudocapacitance, both of which contribute to the total energy storage of the capacitor.

Supercapacitors are used in applications requiring many rapid charge/discharge cycles, rather than long-term compact energy storage: in automobiles, buses, trains, cranes and elevators, where they are used for regenerative braking, short-term energy storage, or burst-mode power delivery. Smaller units are used as power backup for static random-access memory (SRAM).

Background

The electrochemical charge storage mechanisms in solid media can be roughly (there is an overlap in some systems) classified into 3 types:

• Electrostatic double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) use carbon electrodes or derivatives with much higher electrostatic double-layer capacitance than electrochemical pseudocapacitance, achieving separation of charge in a Helmholtz double layer at the interface between the surface of a conductive electrode and an electrolyte. The separation of charge is of the order of a few ångströms (0.3–0.8 nm), much smaller than in a conventional capacitor. The electric charge in EDLCs is stored in a two-dimensional interphase (surface) of an electronic conductor (e.g. carbon particle) and ionic conductor (electrolyte solution).
• Batteries with solid electroactive materials store charge in bulk solid phases by virtue of redox chemical reactions.
• Electrochemical supercapacitors (ECSCs) fall in between EDLs and batteries. ECSCs use metal oxide or conducting polymer electrodes with a high amount of electrochemical pseudocapacitance additional to the double-layer capacitance. Pseudocapacitance is achieved by Faradaic electron charge-transfer with redox reactions, intercalation or electrosorption.

In solid-state capacitors, the mobile charges are electrons, and the gap between electrodes is a layer of a dielectric. In electrochemical double-layer capacitors, the mobile charges are solvated ions (cations and anions), and the effective thickness is determined on each of the two electrodes by their electrochemical double layer structure. In batteries the charge is stored in the bulk volume of solid phases, which have both electronic and ionic conductivities. In electrochemical supercapacitors, the charge storage mechanisms either combine the double-layer and battery mechanisms, or are based on mechanisms, which are intermediate between true double layer and true battery.

History

In the early 1950s, General Electric engineers began experimenting with porous carbon electrodes in the design of capacitors, from the design of fuel cells and rechargeable batteries. Activated charcoal is an electrical conductor that is an extremely porous "spongy" form of carbon with a high specific surface area. In 1957 H. Becker developed a "Low voltage electrolytic capacitor with porous carbon electrodes". He believed that the energy was stored as a charge in the carbon pores as in the pores of the etched foils of electrolytic capacitors. Because the double layer mechanism was not known by him at the time, he wrote in the patent: "It is not known exactly what is taking place in the component if it is used for energy storage, but it leads to an extremely high capacity."

General Electric did not immediately pursue this work. In 1966 researchers at Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIO) developed another version of the component as "electrical energy storage apparatus", while working on experimental fuel cell designs. The nature of electrochemical energy storage was not described in this patent. Even in 1970, the electrochemical capacitor patented by Donald L. Boos was registered as an electrolytic capacitor with activated carbon electrodes.

Early electrochemical capacitors used two aluminum foils covered with activated carbon (the electrodes) that were soaked in an electrolyte and separated by a thin porous insulator. This design gave a capacitor with a capacitance on the order of one farad, significantly higher than electrolytic capacitors of the same dimensions. This basic mechanical design remains the basis of most electrochemical capacitors.

SOHIO did not commercialize their invention, licensing the technology to NEC, who finally marketed the results as "supercapacitors" in 1978, to provide backup power for computer memory.

Between 1975 and 1980 Brian Evans Conway conducted extensive fundamental and development work on ruthenium oxide electrochemical capacitors. In 1991 he described the difference between "supercapacitor" and "battery" behaviour in electrochemical energy storage. In 1999 he defined the term "supercapacitor" to make reference to the increase in observed capacitance by surface redox reactions with faradaic charge transfer between electrodes and ions. His "supercapacitor" stored electrical charge partially in the Helmholtz double-layer and partially as result of faradaic reactions with "pseudocapacitance" charge transfer of electrons and protons between electrode and electrolyte. The working mechanisms of pseudocapacitors are redox reactions, intercalation and electrosorption (adsorption onto a surface). With his research, Conway greatly expanded the knowledge of electrochemical capacitors.

The market expanded slowly. That changed around 1978 as Panasonic marketed its Goldcaps brand. This product became a successful energy source for memory backup applications. Competition started only years later. In 1987 ELNA "Dynacap"s entered the market. First generation EDLC's had relatively high internal resistance that limited the discharge current. They were used for low current applications such as powering SRAM chips or for data backup.

At the end of the 1980s, improved electrode materials increased capacitance values. At the same time, the development of electrolytes with better conductivity lowered the equivalent series resistance (ESR) increasing charge/discharge currents. The first supercapacitor with low internal resistance was developed in 1982 for military applications through the Pinnacle Research Institute (PRI), and were marketed under the brand name "PRI Ultracapacitor". In 1992, Maxwell Laboratories (later Maxwell Technologies) took over this development. Maxwell adopted the term Ultracapacitor from PRI and called them "Boost Caps" to underline their use for power applications.

Since capacitors' energy content increases with the square of the voltage, researchers were looking for a way to increase the electrolyte's breakdown voltage. In 1994 using the anode of a 200 V high-voltage tantalum electrolytic capacitor, David A. Evans developed an "Electrolytic-Hybrid Electrochemical Capacitor". These capacitors combine features of electrolytic and electrochemical capacitors. They combine the high dielectric strength of an anode from an electrolytic capacitor with the high capacitance of a pseudocapacitive metal oxide (ruthenium (IV) oxide) cathode from an electrochemical capacitor, yielding a hybrid electrochemical capacitor. Evans' capacitors, coined Capattery, had an energy content about a factor of 5 higher than a comparable tantalum electrolytic capacitor of the same size. Their high costs limited them to specific military applications.

Recent developments include lithium-ion capacitors. These hybrid capacitors were pioneered by Fujitsu's FDK in 2007. They combine an electrostatic carbon electrode with a pre-doped lithium-ion electrochemical electrode. This combination increases the capacitance value. Additionally, the pre-doping process lowers the anode potential and results in a high cell output voltage, further increasing specific energy.

Research departments active in many companies and universities are working to improve characteristics such as specific energy, specific power, and cycle stability and to reduce production costs.

Design

Basic design

Electrochemical capacitors (supercapacitors) consist of two electrodes separated by an ion-permeable membrane (separator), and an electrolyte ionically connecting both electrodes. When the electrodes are polarized by an applied voltage, ions in the electrolyte form electric double layers of opposite polarity to the electrode's polarity. For example, positively polarized electrodes will have a layer of negative ions at the electrode/electrolyte interface along with a charge-balancing layer of positive ions adsorbing onto the negative layer. The opposite is true for the negatively polarized electrode.

Additionally, depending on electrode material and surface shape, some ions may permeate the double layer becoming specifically adsorbed ions and contribute with pseudocapacitance to the total capacitance of the supercapacitor.

Capacitance distribution

The two electrodes form a series circuit of two individual capacitors C₁ and C₂. The total capacitance C_total is given by the formula

${\displaystyle C_{\text{total}}={\frac {C_{1}\cdot C_{2}}{C_{1}+C_{2}}}}$

Supercapacitors may have either symmetric or asymmetric electrodes. Symmetry implies that both electrodes have the same capacitance value, yielding a total capacitance of half the value of each single electrode (if C₁ = C₂, then C_total = ½ C₁). For asymmetric capacitors, the total capacitance can be taken as that of the electrode with the smaller capacitance (if C₁ >> C₂, then C_total ≈ C₂).

Storage principles

Electrochemical capacitors use the double-layer effect to store electric energy; however, this double-layer has no conventional solid dielectric to separate the charges. There are two storage principles in the electric double-layer of the electrodes that contribute to the total capacitance of an electrochemical capacitor:

• Double-layer capacitance, electrostatic storage of the electrical energy achieved by separation of charge in a Helmholtz double layer.
• Pseudocapacitance, electrochemical storage of the electrical energy. The original type uses faradaic redox reactions with charge-transfer.

Both capacitances are only separable by measurement techniques. The amount of charge stored per unit voltage in an electrochemical capacitor is primarily a function of the electrode size, although the amount of capacitance of each storage principle can vary extremely.

Electrical double-layer capacitance

Every electrochemical capacitor has two electrodes, mechanically separated by a separator, which are ionically connected to each other via the electrolyte. The electrolyte is a mixture of positive and negative ions dissolved in a solvent such as water. At each of the two electrode surfaces originates an area in which the liquid electrolyte contacts the conductive metallic surface of the electrode. This interface forms a common boundary among two different phases of matter, such as an insoluble solid electrode surface and an adjacent liquid electrolyte. In this interface occurs a very special phenomenon of the double layer effect.

Applying a voltage to an electrochemical capacitor causes both electrodes in the capacitor to generate electrical double-layers. These double-layers consist of two layers of charges: one electronic layer is in the surface lattice structure of the electrode, and the other, with opposite polarity, emerges from dissolved and solvated ions in the electrolyte. The two layers are separated by a monolayer of solvent molecules, e.g., for water as solvent by water molecules, called inner Helmholtz plane (IHP). Solvent molecules adhere by physical adsorption on the surface of the electrode and separate the oppositely polarized ions from each other, and can be idealised as a molecular dielectric. In the process, there is no transfer of charge between electrode and electrolyte, so the forces that cause the adhesion are not chemical bonds, but physical forces, e.g., electrostatic forces. The adsorbed molecules are polarized, but, due to the lack of transfer of charge between electrolyte and electrode, suffered no chemical changes.

The amount of charge in the electrode is matched by the magnitude of counter-charges in outer Helmholtz plane (OHP). This double-layer phenomena stores electrical charges as in a conventional capacitor. The double-layer charge forms a static electric field in the molecular layer of the solvent molecules in the IHP that corresponds to the strength of the applied voltage.

The double-layer serves approximately as the dielectric layer in a conventional capacitor, albeit with the thickness of a single molecule. Thus, the standard formula for conventional plate capacitors can be used to calculate their capacitance:

${\displaystyle C=\varepsilon {\frac {A}{d}}}$.

Accordingly, capacitance C is greatest in capacitors made from materials with a high permittivity ε, large electrode plate surface areas A and small distance between plates d. As a result, double-layer capacitors have much higher capacitance values than conventional capacitors, arising from the extremely large surface area of activated carbon electrodes and the extremely thin double-layer distance on the order of a few ångströms (0.3–0.8 nm), of order of the Debye length.

Assuming that the minimum distance between the electrode and the charge accumulating region cannot be less than the typical distance between negative and positive charges in atoms of ~0.05 nm a general capacitance upper limit of ~18 μF/cm has been predicted for non-faradaic capacitors.

The main drawback of carbon electrodes of double-layer SCs is small values of quantum capacitance which act in series with capacitance of ionic space charge. Therefore, further increase of density of capacitance in SCs can be connected with increasing of quantum capacitance of carbon electrode nanostructures.

The amount of charge stored per unit voltage in an electrochemical capacitor is primarily a function of the electrode size. The electrostatic storage of energy in the double-layers is linear with respect to the stored charge, and correspond to the concentration of the adsorbed ions. Also, while charge in conventional capacitors is transferred via electrons, capacitance in double-layer capacitors is related to the limited moving speed of ions in the electrolyte and the resistive porous structure of the electrodes. Since no chemical changes take place within the electrode or electrolyte, charging and discharging electric double-layers in principle is unlimited. Real supercapacitors lifetimes are only limited by electrolyte evaporation effects.

Electrochemical pseudocapacitance

Applying a voltage at the electrochemical capacitor terminals moves electrolyte ions to the opposite polarized electrode and forms a double-layer in which a single layer of solvent molecules acts as separator. Pseudocapacitance can originate when specifically adsorbed ions out of the electrolyte pervade the double-layer. This pseudocapacitance stores electrical energy by means of reversible faradaic redox reactions on the surface of suitable electrodes in an electrochemical capacitor with an electric double-layer. Pseudocapacitance is accompanied with an electron charge-transfer between electrolyte and electrode coming from a de-solvated and adsorbed ion whereby only one electron per charge unit is participating. This faradaic charge transfer originates by a very fast sequence of reversible redox, intercalation or electrosorption processes. The adsorbed ion has no chemical reaction with the atoms of the electrode (no chemical bonds arise) since only a charge-transfer take place.

The electrons involved in the faradaic processes are transferred to or from valence electron states (orbitals) of the redox electrode reagent. They enter the negative electrode and flow through the external circuit to the positive electrode where a second double-layer with an equal number of anions has formed. The electrons reaching the positive electrode are not transferred to the anions forming the double-layer, instead they remain in the strongly ionized and "electron hungry" transition-metal ions of the electrode's surface. As such, the storage capacity of faradaic pseudocapacitance is limited by the finite quantity of reagent in the available surface.

A faradaic pseudocapacitance only occurs together with a static double-layer capacitance, and its magnitude may exceed the value of double-layer capacitance for the same surface area by factor of 100, depending on the nature and the structure of the electrode, because all the pseudocapacitance reactions take place only with de-solvated ions, which are much smaller than solvated ion with their solvating shell. The amount of pseudocapacitance has a linear function within narrow limits determined by the potential-dependent degree of surface coverage of the adsorbed anions.

The ability of electrodes to accomplish pseudocapacitance effects by redox reactions, intercalation or electrosorption strongly depends on the chemical affinity of electrode materials to the ions adsorbed on the electrode surface as well as on the structure and dimension of the electrode pores. Materials exhibiting redox behavior for use as electrodes in pseudocapacitors are transition-metal oxides like RuO₂, IrO₂, or MnO₂ inserted by doping in the conductive electrode material such as active carbon, as well as conducting polymers such as polyaniline or derivatives of polythiophene covering the electrode material.

The amount of electric charge stored in a pseudocapacitance is linearly proportional to the applied voltage. The unit of pseudocapacitance is farad, same as that of capacitance.

Although conventional battery-type electrode materials also use chemical reactions to store charge, they show very different electrical profiles, as the rate of discharge is limited by the speed of diffusion. Grinding those materials down to nanoscale frees them of the diffusion limit and give them a more pseudocapacitative behavior, making them extrinsic pseudocapacitors. Chodankar et al. 2020, figure 2 shows the representative voltage-capacity curves for bulk LiCoO₂, nano LiCoO₂, a redox pseudocapacitor (RuO₂), and a intercalation pseudocapacitor (T-Nb₂O₅).

Asymmetric capacitors

Supercapacitors can also be made with different materials and principles at the electrodes. If both of those materials use a fast, supercapacitor-type reaction (capacitance or pseudocapacitance), the result is called an asymmetric capacitor. The two electrodes have different electric potentials; when combined with proper balancing, the result is improved energy density with no loss of lifespan or current capacity.

Hybrid capacitors

A number of newer supercapacitors are "hybrid": only one electrode uses a fast reaction (capacitance or pseudocapacitance), the other using a more "battery-like" (slower but higher-capacity) material. For example, an EDLC anode can be combined with an activated carbon–Ni(OH)₂ cathode, the latter being a slow faradaic material. The CV and GCD profiles of a hybrid capacitor have a shape between that of a battery and an SC, more similar to that of an SC. Hybrid capacitors have much higher energy density, but have inferior cycle life and current capacity owing to the slower electrode.

Potential distribution

Conventional capacitors (also known as electrostatic capacitors), such as ceramic capacitors and film capacitors, consist of two electrodes separated by a dielectric material. When charged, the energy is stored in a static electric field that permeates the dielectric between the electrodes. The total energy increases with the amount of stored charge, which in turn correlates linearly with the potential (voltage) between the plates. The maximum potential difference between the plates (the maximal voltage) is limited by the dielectric's breakdown field strength. The same static storage also applies for electrolytic capacitors in which most of the potential decreases over the anode's thin oxide layer. The somewhat resistive liquid electrolyte (cathode) accounts for a small decrease of potential for "wet" electrolytic capacitors, while electrolytic capacitors with solid conductive polymer electrolyte this voltage drop is negligible.

In contrast, electrochemical capacitors (supercapacitors) consists of two electrodes separated by an ion-permeable membrane (separator) and electrically connected via an electrolyte. Energy storage occurs within the double-layers of both electrodes as a mixture of a double-layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance. When both electrodes have approximately the same resistance (internal resistance), the potential of the capacitor decreases symmetrically over both double-layers, whereby a voltage drop across the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the electrolyte is achieved. For asymmetrical supercapacitors like hybrid capacitors the voltage drop between the electrodes could be asymmetrical. The maximum potential across the capacitor (the maximal voltage) is limited by the electrolyte decomposition voltage.

Both electrostatic and electrochemical energy storage in supercapacitors are linear with respect to the stored charge, just as in conventional capacitors. The voltage between the capacitor terminals is linear with respect to the amount of stored energy. Such linear voltage gradient differs from rechargeable electrochemical batteries, in which the voltage between the terminals remains independent of the amount of stored energy, providing a relatively constant voltage.

Comparison with other storage technologies

Supercapacitors compete with electrolytic capacitors and rechargeable batteries, especially lithium-ion batteries. The following table compares the major parameters of the three main supercapacitor families with electrolytic capacitors and batteries.

Electrolytic capacitors feature nearly unlimited charge/discharge cycles, high dielectric strength (up to 550 V) and good frequency response as alternating current (AC) reactance in the lower frequency range. Supercapacitors can store 10 to 100 times more energy than electrolytic capacitors, but they do not support AC applications.

With regards to rechargeable batteries, supercapacitors feature higher peak currents, low cost per cycle, no danger of overcharging, good reversibility, non-corrosive electrolyte and low material toxicity. Batteries offer lower purchase cost and stable voltage under discharge, but require complex electronic control and switching equipment, with consequent energy loss and spark hazard given a short.

Styles

Supercapacitors are made in different styles, such as flat with a single pair of electrodes, wound in a cylindrical case, or stacked in a rectangular case. Because they cover a broad range of capacitance values, the size of the cases can vary.

Supercapacitors are constructed with two metal foils (current collectors), each coated with an electrode material such as activated carbon, which serve as the power connection between the electrode material and the external terminals of the capacitor. Specifically to the electrode material is a very large surface area. In this example the activated carbon is electrochemically etched, so that the surface area of the material is about 100,000 times greater than the smooth surface. The electrodes are kept apart by an ion-permeable membrane (separator) used as an insulator to protect the electrodes against short circuits. This construction is subsequently rolled or folded into a cylindrical or rectangular shape and can be stacked in an aluminum can or an adaptable rectangular housing. The cell is then impregnated with a liquid or viscous electrolyte of organic or aqueous type. The electrolyte, an ionic conductor, enters the pores of the electrodes and serves as the conductive connection between the electrodes across the separator. Finally, the housing is hermetically sealed to ensure stable behavior over the specified lifetime.

Types

Electrical energy is stored in supercapacitors via two storage principles, static double-layer capacitance and electrochemical pseudocapacitance; and the distribution of the two types of capacitance depends on the material and structure of the electrodes. There are three types of supercapacitors based on storage principle:

• Double-layer capacitors (EDLCs): with activated carbon electrodes or derivatives with much higher electrostatic double-layer capacitance than electrochemical pseudocapacitance
• Pseudocapacitors: with transition metal oxide or conducting polymer electrodes with a high electrochemical pseudocapacitance
• Hybrid capacitors: with asymmetric electrodes, one of which exhibits mostly electrostatic and the other mostly electrochemical capacitance, such as lithium-ion capacitors

Because double-layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance both contribute inseparably to the total capacitance value of an electrochemical capacitor, a correct description of these capacitors only can be given under the generic term. The concepts of supercapattery and supercabattery have been recently proposed to better represent those hybrid devices that behave more like the supercapacitor and the rechargeable battery, respectively.

The capacitance value of a supercapacitor is determined by two storage principles:

• Double-layer capacitance – electrostatic storage of the electrical energy achieved by separation of charge in a Helmholtz double layer at the interface between the surface of a conductor electrode and an electrolytic solution electrolyte. The separation of charge distance in a double-layer is on the order of a few ångströms (0.3–0.8 nm) and is static in origin.
• Pseudocapacitance – Electrochemical storage of the electrical energy, achieved by redox reactions, electrosorption or intercalation on the surface of the electrode by specifically adsorbed ions, that results in a reversible faradaic charge-transfer on the electrode.

Double-layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance both contribute inseparably to the total capacitance value of a supercapacitor. However, the ratio of the two can vary greatly, depending on the design of the electrodes and the composition of the electrolyte. Pseudocapacitance can increase the capacitance value by as much as a factor of ten over that of the double-layer by itself.

Electric double-layer capacitors (EDLC) are electrochemical capacitors in which energy storage predominantly is achieved by double-layer capacitance. In the past, all electrochemical capacitors were called "double-layer capacitors". Contemporary usage sees double-layer capacitors, together with pseudocapacitors, as part of a larger family of electrochemical capacitors called supercapacitors. They are also known as ultracapacitors.

Materials

The properties of supercapacitors come from the interaction of their internal materials. Especially, the combination of electrode material and type of electrolyte determine the functionality and thermal and electrical characteristics of the capacitors.

Electrodes

Supercapacitor electrodes are generally thin coatings applied and electrically connected to a conductive, metallic current collector. Electrodes must have good conductivity, high temperature stability, long-term chemical stability (inertness), high corrosion resistance and high surface areas per unit volume and mass. Other requirements include environmental friendliness and low cost.

The amount of double-layer as well as pseudocapacitance stored per unit voltage in a supercapacitor is predominantly a function of the electrode surface area. Therefore, supercapacitor electrodes are typically made of porous, spongy material with an extraordinarily high specific surface area, such as activated carbon. Additionally, the ability of the electrode material to perform faradaic charge transfers enhances the total capacitance.

Generally the smaller the electrode's pores, the greater the capacitance and specific energy. However, smaller pores increase equivalent series resistance (ESR) and decrease specific power. Applications with high peak currents require larger pores and low internal losses, while applications requiring high specific energy need small pores.

Electrodes for EDLCs

The most commonly used electrode material for supercapacitors is carbon in various manifestations such as activated carbon (AC), carbon fibre-cloth (AFC), carbide-derived carbon (CDC), carbon aerogel, graphite (graphene), graphane and carbon nanotubes (CNTs).

Carbon-based electrodes exhibit predominantly static double-layer capacitance, even though a small amount of pseudocapacitance may also be present depending on the pore size distribution. Pore sizes in carbons typically range from micropores (less than 2 nm) to mesopores (2-50 nm), but only micropores (<2 nm) contribute to pseudocapacitance. As pore size approaches the solvation shell size, solvent molecules are excluded and only unsolvated ions fill the pores (even for large ions), increasing ionic packing density and storage capability by faradaic H
₂ intercalation.

Activated carbon

Activated carbon was the first material chosen for EDLC electrodes. Even though its electrical conductivity is approximately 0.003% that of metals (1,250 to 2,000 S/m), it is sufficient for supercapacitors. Activated carbon is an extremely porous form of carbon with a high specific surface area — a common approximation is that 1 gram (0.035 oz) (a pencil-eraser-sized amount) has a surface area of roughly 1,000 to 3,000 square metres (11,000 to 32,000 sq ft) — about the size of 4 to 12 tennis courts. The bulk form used in electrodes is low-density with many pores, giving high double-layer capacitance. Solid activated carbon, also termed consolidated amorphous carbon (CAC) is the most used electrode material for supercapacitors and may be cheaper than other carbon derivatives. It is produced from activated carbon powder pressed into the desired shape, forming a block with a wide distribution of pore sizes. An electrode with a surface area of about 1000 m/g results in a typical double-layer capacitance of about 10 μF/cm and a specific capacitance of 100 F/g. As of 2010 virtually all commercial supercapacitors use powdered activated carbon made from coconut shells. Coconut shells produce activated carbon with more micropores than does charcoal made from wood.

Activated carbon fibres

Activated carbon fibres (ACF) are produced from activated carbon and have a typical diameter of 10 μm. They can have micropores with a very narrow pore-size distribution that can be readily controlled. The surface area of ACF woven into a textile is about 2500 m/g. Advantages of ACF electrodes include low electrical resistance along the fibre axis and good contact to the collector. As for activated carbon, ACF electrodes exhibit predominantly double-layer capacitance with a small amount of pseudocapacitance due to their micropores.

Carbon aerogel

Carbon aerogel is a highly porous, synthetic, ultralight material derived from an organic gel in which the liquid component of the gel has been replaced with a gas. Aerogel electrodes are made via pyrolysis of resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels and are more conductive than most activated carbons. They enable thin and mechanically stable electrodes with a thickness in the range of several hundred micrometres (μm) and with uniform pore size. Aerogel electrodes also provide mechanical and vibration stability for supercapacitors used in high-vibration environments. Researchers have created a carbon aerogel electrode with gravimetric densities of about 400–1200 m/g and volumetric capacitance of 104 F/cm, yielding a specific energy of 325 kJ/kg (90 Wh/kg) and specific power of 20 W/g. Standard aerogel electrodes exhibit predominantly double-layer capacitance. Aerogel electrodes that incorporate composite material can add a high amount of pseudocapacitance.

Carbide-derived carbon

Carbide-derived carbon (CDC), also known as tunable nanoporous carbon, is a family of carbon materials derived from carbide precursors, such as binary silicon carbide and titanium carbide, that are transformed into pure carbon via physical, e.g., thermal decomposition or chemical, e.g., halogenation) processes. Carbide-derived carbons can exhibit high surface area and tunable pore diameters (from micropores to mesopores) to maximize ion confinement, increasing pseudocapacitance by faradaic H
₂ adsorption treatment. CDC electrodes with tailored pore design offer as much as 75% greater specific energy than conventional activated carbons. As of 2015, a CDC supercapacitor offered a specific energy of 10.1 Wh/kg, 3,500 F capacitance and over one million charge-discharge cycles.

Graphene

Graphene is a one-atom thick sheet of graphite, with atoms arranged in a regular hexagonal pattern, also called "nanocomposite paper".

Graphene has a theoretical specific surface area of 2630 m/g which can theoretically lead to a capacitance of 550 F/g. In addition, an advantage of graphene over activated carbon is its higher electrical conductivity. As of 2012, a new development used graphene sheets directly as electrodes without collectors for portable applications.

In one embodiment, a graphene-based supercapacitor uses curved graphene sheets that do not stack face-to-face, forming mesopores that are accessible to and wettable by ionic electrolytes at voltages up to 4 V. A specific energy of 85.6 Wh/kg (308 kJ/kg) is obtained at room temperature equaling that of a conventional nickel–metal hydride battery, but with 100–1000 times greater specific power.

The two-dimensional structure of graphene improves charging and discharging. Charge carriers in vertically oriented sheets can quickly migrate into or out of the deeper structures of the electrode, thus increasing currents. Such capacitors may be suitable for 100/120 Hz filter applications, which are unreachable for supercapacitors using other carbon materials.

Carbon nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), also called buckytubes, are carbon molecules with a cylindrical nanostructure. They have a hollow structure with walls formed by one-atom-thick sheets of graphite. These sheets are rolled at specific and discrete ("chiral") angles, and the combination of chiral angle and radius controls properties such as electrical conductivity, electrolyte wettability and ion access. Nanotubes are categorized as single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) or multi-walled nanotubes (MWNTs). The latter have one or more outer tubes successively enveloping a SWNT, much like the Russian matryoshka dolls. SWNTs have diameters ranging between 1 and 3 nm. MWNTs have thicker coaxial walls, separated by spacing (0.34 nm) that is close to graphene's interlayer distance.

Nanotubes can grow vertically on the collector substrate, such as a silicon wafer. Typical lengths are 20 to 100 μm.

Carbon nanotubes can greatly improve capacitor performance, due to the highly wettable surface area and high conductivity.

A SWNT-based supercapacitor with aqueous electrolyte was systematically studied at University of Delaware in Prof. Bingqing Wei's group. Li et al., for the first time, discovered that the ion-size effect and the electrode-electrolyte wettability are the dominant factors affecting the electrochemical behavior of flexible SWCNTs-supercapacitors in different 1 molar aqueous electrolytes with different anions and cations. The experimental results also showed for flexible supercapacitor that it is suggested to put enough pressure between the two electrodes to improve the aqueous electrolyte CNT supercapacitor.

CNTs can store about the same charge as activated carbon per unit surface area, but nanotubes' surface is arranged in a regular pattern, providing greater wettability. SWNTs have a high theoretical specific surface area of 1315 m/g, while that for MWNTs is lower and is determined by the diameter of the tubes and degree of nesting, compared with a surface area of about 3000 m/g of activated carbons. Nevertheless, CNTs have higher capacitance than activated carbon electrodes, e.g., 102 F/g for MWNTs and 180 F/g for SWNTs.

MWNTs have mesopores that allow for easy access of ions at the electrode–electrolyte interface. As the pore size approaches the size of the ion solvation shell, the solvent molecules are partially stripped, resulting in larger ionic packing density and increased faradaic storage capability. However, the considerable volume change during repeated intercalation and depletion decreases their mechanical stability. To this end, research to increase surface area, mechanical strength, electrical conductivity and chemical stability is ongoing.

Electrodes for pseudocapacitors

MnO₂ and RuO₂ are typical materials used as electrodes for pseudocapacitors, since they have the electrochemical signature of a capacitive electrode (linear dependence on current versus voltage curve) as well as exhibiting aic behavior. Additionally, the charge storage originates from electron-transfer mechanisms rather than accumulation of ions in the electrochemical double layer. Pseudocapacitors were created through faradaic redox reactions that occur within the active electrode materials. More research was focused on transition-metal oxides such as MnO₂ since transition-metal oxides have a lower cost compared to noble metal oxides such as RuO₂. Moreover, the charge storage mechanisms of transition-metal oxides are based predominantly on pseudocapacitance. Two mechanisms of MnO₂ charge storage behavior were introduced. The first mechanism implies the intercalation of protons (H) or alkali metal cations (C) in the bulk of the material upon reduction followed by deintercalation upon oxidation.

MnO₂ + H (C) + e ⇌ MnOOH(C)

The second mechanism is based on the surface adsorption of electrolyte cations on MnO₂.

(MnO₂)_surface + C + e ⇌ (MnO₂ C)_surface

Not every material that exhibits faradaic behavior can be used as an electrode for pseudocapacitors, such as Ni(OH)₂ since it is a battery type electrode (non-linear dependence on current versus voltage curve).

Metal oxides

Brian Evans Conway's research described electrodes of transition metal oxides that exhibited high amounts of pseudocapacitance. Oxides of transition metals including ruthenium (RuO
₂), iridium (IrO
₂), iron (Fe
₃O
₄), manganese (MnO
₂) or sulfides such as titanium sulfide (TiS
₂) alone or in combination generate strong faradaic electron–transferring reactions combined with low resistance. Ruthenium dioxide in combination with H
₂SO
₄ electrolyte provides specific capacitance of 720 F/g and a high specific energy of 26.7 Wh/kg (96.12 kJ/kg).

Charge/discharge takes place over a window of about 1.2 V per electrode. This pseudocapacitance of about 720 F/g is roughly 100 times higher than for double-layer capacitance using activated carbon electrodes. These transition metal electrodes offer excellent reversibility, with several hundred-thousand cycles. However, ruthenium is expensive and the 2.4 V voltage window for this capacitor limits their applications to military and space applications. Das et al. reported highest capacitance value (1715 F/g) for ruthenium oxide based supercapacitor with electrodeposited ruthenium oxide onto porous single wall carbon nanotube film electrode. A high specific capacitance of 1715 F/g has been reported which closely approaches the predicted theoretical maximum RuO
₂ capacitance of 2000 F/g.

In 2014, a RuO
₂ supercapacitor anchored on a graphene foam electrode delivered specific capacitance of 502.78 F/g and areal capacitance of 1.11 F/cm) leading to a specific energy of 39.28 Wh/kg and specific power of 128.01 kW/kg over 8,000 cycles with constant performance. The device was a three-dimensional (3D) sub-5 nm hydrous ruthenium-anchored graphene and carbon nanotube (CNT) hybrid foam (RGM) architecture. The graphene foam was conformally covered with hybrid networks of RuO
₂ nanoparticles and anchored CNTs.

Less expensive oxides of iron, vanadium, nickel and cobalt have been tested in aqueous electrolytes, but none has been investigated as much as manganese dioxide (MnO
₂). However, none of these oxides are in commercial use.

Conductive polymers

Another approach uses electron-conducting polymers as pseudocapacitive material. Although mechanically weak, conductive polymers have high conductivity, resulting in a low ESR and a relatively high capacitance. Such conducting polymers include polyaniline, polythiophene, polypyrrole and polyacetylene. Such electrodes also employ electrochemical doping or dedoping of the polymers with anions and cations. Electrodes made from, or coated with, conductive polymers have costs comparable to carbon electrodes.

Conducting polymer electrodes generally suffer from limited cycling stability. However, polyacene electrodes provide up to 10,000 cycles, much better than batteries.

Electrodes for hybrid capacitors

All commercial hybrid supercapacitors are asymmetric. They combine an electrode with high amount of pseudocapacitance with an electrode with a high amount of double-layer capacitance. In such systems the faradaic pseudocapacitance electrode with their higher capacitance provides high specific energy while the non-faradaic EDLC electrode enables high specific power. An advantage of the hybrid-type supercapacitors compared with symmetrical EDLC's is their higher specific capacitance value as well as their higher rated voltage and correspondingly their higher specific energy.

Composite electrodes

Composite electrodes for hybrid-type supercapacitors are constructed from carbon-based material with incorporated or deposited pseudocapacitive active materials like metal oxides and conducting polymers. As of 2013 most research for supercapacitors explores composite electrodes. CNTs give a backbone for a homogeneous distribution of metal oxide or electrically conducting polymers (ECPs), producing good pseudocapacitance and good double-layer capacitance. These electrodes achieve higher capacitances than either pure carbon or pure metal oxide or polymer-based electrodes. This is attributed to the accessibility of the nanotubes' tangled mat structure, which allows a uniform coating of pseudocapacitive materials and three-dimensional charge distribution. The process to anchor pseudocapactive materials usually uses a hydrothermal process. However, a recent researcher, Li et al., from the University of Delaware found a facile and scalable approach to precipitate MnO2 on a SWNT film to make an organic-electrolyte based supercapacitor.

Another way to enhance CNT electrodes is by doping with a pseudocapacitive dopant as in lithium-ion capacitors. In this case the relatively small lithium atoms intercalate between the layers of carbon. The anode is made of lithium-doped carbon, which enables lower negative potential with a cathode made of activated carbon. This results in a larger voltage of 3.8-4 V that prevents electrolyte oxidation. As of 2007 they had achieved capacitance of 550 F/g. and reach a specific energy up to 14 Wh/kg (50.4 kJ/kg).

Battery-type electrodes

Rechargeable battery electrodes influenced the development of electrodes for new hybrid-type supercapacitor electrodes as for lithium-ion capacitors. Together with a carbon EDLC electrode in an asymmetric construction offers this configuration higher specific energy than typical supercapacitors with higher specific power, longer cycle life and faster charging and recharging times than batteries.

Asymmetric electrodes (pseudo/EDLC)

Recently some asymmetric hybrid supercapacitors were developed in which the positive electrode were based on a real pseudocapacitive metal oxide electrode (not a composite electrode), and the negative electrode on an EDLC activated carbon electrode.

Asymmetric supercapacitors (ASC) have shown a great potential candidate for high-performance supercapacitor due to their wide operating potential which can remarkably enhance the capacitive behavior. An advantage of this type of supercapacitors is their higher voltage and correspondingly their higher specific energy (up to 10-20 Wh/kg (36-72 kJ/kg)).And they also have good cycling stability.

For example, researchers use a kind of novel skutterudite Ni–CoP₃ nanosheets and use it as positive electrodes with activated carbon (AC) as negative electrodes to fabricate asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC). It exhibits high energy density of 89.6 Wh/kg at 796 W/kg and stability of 93% after 10,000 cycles, which can be a great potential to be an excellent next-generation electrode candidate. Also, carbon nanofibers/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/manganese oxide (f-CNFs/PEDOT/MnO₂) were used as positive electrodes and AC as negative electrodes. It has high specific energy of 49.4 Wh/kg and good cycling stability (81.06% after cycling 8000 times). Besides, many kinds of nanocomposite are being studied as electrodes, like NiCo₂S₄@NiO, MgCo₂O₄@MnO₂ and so on. For example, Fe-SnO₂@CeO₂ nanocomposite used as electrode can provide a specific energy and specific power of 32.2 Wh/kg and 747 W/kg. The device exhibited the capacitance retention of 85.05 % over 5000 cycles of operation. As far as known no commercial offered supercapacitors with such kind of asymmetric electrodes are on the market.

Electrolytes

Electrolytes consist of a solvent and dissolved chemicals that dissociate into positive cations and negative anions, making the electrolyte electrically conductive. The more ions the electrolyte contains, the better its conductivity. In supercapacitors electrolytes are the electrically conductive connection between the two electrodes. Additionally, in supercapacitors the electrolyte provides the molecules for the separating monolayer in the Helmholtz double-layer and delivers the ions for pseudocapacitance.

The electrolyte determines the capacitor's characteristics: its operating voltage, temperature range, ESR and capacitance. With the same activated carbon electrode an aqueous electrolyte achieves capacitance values of 160 F/g, while an organic electrolyte achieves only 100 F/g.

The electrolyte must be chemically inert and not chemically attack the other materials in the capacitor to ensure long time stable behavior of the capacitor's electrical parameters. The electrolyte's viscosity must be low enough to wet the porous, sponge-like structure of the electrodes. An ideal electrolyte does not exist, forcing a compromise between performance and other requirements.

Water is a relatively good solvent for inorganic chemicals. Treated with acids such as sulfuric acid (H
₂SO
₄), alkalis such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), or salts such as quaternary phosphonium salts, sodium perchlorate (NaClO
₄), lithium perchlorate (LiClO
₄) or lithium hexafluoride arsenate (LiAsF
₆), water offers relatively high conductivity values of about 100 to 1000 mS/cm. Aqueous electrolytes have a dissociation voltage of 1.15 V per electrode (2.3 V capacitor voltage) and a relatively low operating temperature range. They are used in supercapacitors with low specific energy and high specific power.

Electrolytes with organic solvents such as acetonitrile, propylene carbonate, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl carbonate, γ-butyrolactone and solutions with quaternary ammonium salts or alkyl ammonium salts such as tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (N(Et)
₄BF
₄) or triethyl (metyl) tetrafluoroborate (NMe(Et)
₃BF
₄) are more expensive than aqueous electrolytes, but they have a higher dissociation voltage of typically 1.35 V per electrode (2.7 V capacitor voltage), and a higher temperature range. The lower electrical conductivity of organic solvents (10 to 60 mS/cm) leads to a lower specific power, but since the specific energy increases with the square of the voltage, a higher specific energy.

Ionic electrolytes consists of liquid salts that can be stable in a wider electrochemical window, enabling capacitor voltages above 3.5 V. Ionic electrolytes typically have an ionic conductivity of a few mS/cm, lower than aqueous or organic electrolytes.

Separators

Separators have to physically separate the two electrodes to prevent a short circuit by direct contact. It can be very thin (a few hundredths of a millimeter) and must be very porous to the conducting ions to minimize ESR. Furthermore, separators must be chemically inert to protect the electrolyte's stability and conductivity. Inexpensive components use open capacitor papers. More sophisticated designs use nonwoven porous polymeric films like polyacrylonitrile or Kapton, woven glass fibers or porous woven ceramic fibres.

Collectors and housing

Current collectors connect the electrodes to the capacitor's terminals. The collector is either sprayed onto the electrode or is a metal foil. They must be able to distribute peak currents of up to 100 A. If the housing is made out of a metal (typically aluminum) the collectors should be made from the same material to avoid forming a corrosive galvanic cell.

Electrical parameters

Capacitance

Capacitance values for commercial capacitors are specified as "rated capacitance C_R". This is the value for which the capacitor has been designed. The value for an actual component must be within the limits given by the specified tolerance. Typical values are in the range of farads (F), three to six orders of magnitude larger than those of electrolytic capacitors. The capacitance value results from the energy ${\displaystyle W}$ (expressed in Joule) of a loaded capacitor loaded via a DC voltage V_DC.

${\displaystyle W={\frac {1}{2}}\cdot C_{\text{DC}}\cdot V_{\text{DC}}^{2}}$

This value is also called the "DC capacitance".

Measurement

Conventional capacitors are normally measured with a small AC voltage (0.5 V) and a frequency of 100 Hz or 1 kHz depending on the capacitor type. The AC capacitance measurement offers fast results, important for industrial production lines. The capacitance value of a supercapacitor depends strongly on the measurement frequency, which is related to the porous electrode structure and the limited electrolyte's ion mobility. Even at a low frequency of 10 Hz, the measured capacitance value drops from 100 to 20 percent of the DC capacitance value.

This extraordinarily strong frequency dependence can be explained by the different distances the ions have to move in the electrode's pores. The area at the beginning of the pores can be easily accessed by the ions; this short distance is accompanied by low electrical resistance. The greater the distance the ions have to cover, the higher the resistance. This phenomenon can be described with a series circuit of cascaded RC (resistor/capacitor) elements with serial RC time constants. These result in delayed current flow, reducing the total electrode surface area that can be covered with ions if polarity changes – capacitance decreases with increasing AC frequency. Thus, the total capacitance is achieved only after longer measuring times. Out of the reason of the very strong frequency dependence of the capacitance, this electrical parameter has to be measured with a special constant current charge and discharge measurement, defined in IEC standards 62391-1 and -2.

Measurement starts with charging the capacitor. The voltage has to be applied and after the constant current/constant voltage power supply has achieved the rated voltage, the capacitor must be charged for 30 minutes. Next, the capacitor has to be discharged with a constant discharge current I_discharge. Then the time t₁ and t₂, for the voltage to drop from 80% (V₁) to 40% (V₂) of the rated voltage is measured. The capacitance value is calculated as:

${\displaystyle C_{\text{total}}=I_{\text{discharge}}\cdot {\frac {t_{2}-t_{1}}{V_{1}-V_{2}}}}$

The value of the discharge current is determined by the application. The IEC standard defines four classes:

1. Memory backup, discharge current in mA = 1 • C (F)
2. Energy storage, discharge current in mA = 0,4 • C (F) • V (V)
3. Power, discharge current in mA = 4 • C (F) • V (V)
4. Instantaneous power, discharge current in mA = 40 • C (F) • V (V)

The measurement methods employed by individual manufacturers are mainly comparable to the standardized methods.

The standardized measuring method is too time consuming for manufacturers to use during production for each individual component. For industrial-produced capacitors, the capacitance value is instead measured with a faster, low-frequency AC voltage, and a correlation factor is used to compute the rated capacitance.

This frequency dependence affects capacitor operation. Rapid charge and discharge cycles mean that neither the rated capacitance value nor specific energy are available. In this case the rated capacitance value is recalculated for each application condition.

The time t a supercapacitor can deliver a constant current I can be calculated as:

${\displaystyle t={\frac {C\cdot (U_{\text{charge}}-U_{\text{min}})}{I}}}$

as the capacitor voltage decreases from U_charge down to U_min.

If the application needs a constant power P for a certain time t this can be calculated as:

${\displaystyle t={\frac {1}{2P}}\cdot C\cdot (U_{\text{charge}}^{2}-U_{\text{min}}^{2}).}$

wherein also the capacitor voltage decreases from U_charge down to U_min.

Operating voltage

Supercapacitors are low voltage components. Safe operation requires that the voltage remain within specified limits. The rated voltage U_R is the maximum DC voltage or peak pulse voltage that may be applied continuously and remain within the specified temperature range. Capacitors should never be subjected to voltages continuously in excess of the rated voltage.

The rated voltage includes a safety margin against the electrolyte's breakdown voltage at which the electrolyte decomposes. The breakdown voltage decomposes the separating solvent molecules in the Helmholtz double-layer, e.g. water splits into hydrogen and oxygen. The solvent molecules then cannot separate the electrical charges from each other. Higher voltages than rated voltage cause hydrogen gas formation or a short circuit.

Standard supercapacitors with aqueous electrolyte normally are specified with a rated voltage of 2.1 to 2.3 V and capacitors with organic solvents with 2.5 to 2.7 V. Lithium-ion capacitors with doped electrodes may reach a rated voltage of 3.8 to 4 V, but have a low voltage limit of about 2.2 V. Supercapacitors with ionic electrolytes can exceed an operating voltage of 3.5 V.

Operating supercapacitors below the rated voltage improves the long-time behavior of the electrical parameters. Capacitance values and internal resistance during cycling are more stable and lifetime and charge/discharge cycles may be extended.

Higher application voltages require connecting cells in series. Since each component has a slight difference in capacitance value and ESR, it is necessary to actively or passively balance them to stabilize the applied voltage. Passive balancing employs resistors in parallel with the supercapacitors. Active balancing may include electronic voltage management above a threshold that varies the current.

Internal resistance

Charging/discharging a supercapacitor is connected to the movement of charge carriers (ions) in the electrolyte across the separator to the electrodes and into their porous structure. Losses occur during this movement that can be measured as the internal DC resistance.

With the electrical model of cascaded, series-connected RC (resistor/capacitor) elements in the electrode pores, the internal resistance increases with the increasing penetration depth of the charge carriers into the pores. The internal DC resistance is time dependent and increases during charge/discharge. In applications often only the switch-on and switch-off range is interesting. The internal resistance R_i can be calculated from the voltage drop ΔV₂ at the time of discharge, starting with a constant discharge current I_discharge. It is obtained from the intersection of the auxiliary line extended from the straight part and the time base at the time of discharge start (see picture right). Resistance can be calculated by:

${\displaystyle R_{\text{i}}={\frac {\Delta V_{2}}{I_{\text{discharge}}}}}$

The discharge current I_discharge for the measurement of internal resistance can be taken from the classification according to IEC 62391-1.

This internal DC resistance R_i should not be confused with the internal AC resistance called equivalent series resistance (ESR) normally specified for capacitors. It is measured at 1 kHz. ESR is much smaller than DC resistance. ESR is not relevant for calculating supercapacitor inrush currents or other peak currents.

R_i determines several supercapacitor properties. It limits the charge and discharge peak currents as well as charge/discharge times. R_i and the capacitance C results in the time constant ${\displaystyle \tau }$

${\displaystyle \tau =R_{\text{i}}\cdot C}$

This time constant determines the charge/discharge time. A 100 F capacitor with an internal resistance of 30 mΩ for example, has a time constant of 0.03 • 100 = 3 s. After 3 seconds charging with a current limited only by internal resistance, the capacitor has 63.2% of full charge (or is discharged to 36.8% of full charge).

Standard capacitors with constant internal resistance fully charge during about 5 τ. Since internal resistance increases with charge/discharge, actual times cannot be calculated with this formula. Thus, charge/discharge time depends on specific individual construction details.

Current load and cycle stability

Because supercapacitors operate without forming chemical bonds, current loads, including charge, discharge and peak currents are not limited by reaction constraints. Current load and cycle stability can be much higher than for rechargeable batteries. Current loads are limited only by internal resistance, which may be substantially lower than for batteries.

Internal resistance "R_i" and charge/discharge currents or peak currents "I" generate internal heat losses "P_loss" according to:

${\displaystyle P_{\text{loss}}=R_{\text{i}}\cdot I^{2}}$

This heat must be released and distributed to the ambient environment to maintain operating temperatures below the specified maximum temperature.

Heat generally defines capacitor lifetime due to electrolyte diffusion. The heat generation coming from current loads should be smaller than 5 to 10 K at maximum ambient temperature (which has only minor influence on expected lifetime). For that reason the specified charge and discharge currents for frequent cycling are determined by internal resistance.

The specified cycle parameters under maximal conditions include charge and discharge current, pulse duration and frequency. They are specified for a defined temperature range and over the full voltage range for a defined lifetime. They can differ enormously depending on the combination of electrode porosity, pore size and electrolyte. Generally a lower current load increases capacitor life and increases the number of cycles. This can be achieved either by a lower voltage range or slower charging and discharging.

Supercapacitors (except those with polymer electrodes) can potentially support more than one million charge/discharge cycles without substantial capacity drops or internal resistance increases. Beneath the higher current load is this the second great advantage of supercapacitors over batteries. The stability results from the dual electrostatic and electrochemical storage principles.

The specified charge and discharge currents can be significantly exceeded by lowering the frequency or by single pulses. Heat generated by a single pulse may be spread over the time until the next pulse occurs to ensure a relatively small average heat increase. Such a "peak power current" for power applications for supercapacitors of more than 1000 F can provide a maximum peak current of about 1000 A. Such high currents generate high thermal stress and high electromagnetic forces that can damage the electrode-collector connection requiring robust design and construction of the capacitors.

Device capacitance and resistance dependence on operating voltage and temperature

Device parameters such as capacitance initial resistance and steady state resistance are not constant, but are variable and dependent on the device's operating voltage. Device capacitance will have a measurable increase as the operating voltage increases. For example: a 100F device can be seen to vary 26% from its maximum capacitance over its entire operational voltage range. Similar dependence on operating voltage is seen in steady state resistance (R_ss) and initial resistance (R_i). Device properties can also be seen to be dependent on device temperature. As the temperature of the device changes either through operation of varying ambient temperature, the internal properties such as capacitance and resistance will vary as well. Device capacitance is seen to increase as the operating temperature increases.

Energy capacity

Supercapacitors occupy the gap between high power/low energy electrolytic capacitors and low power/high energy rechargeable batteries. The energy W_max (expressed in Joule) that can be stored in a capacitor is given by the formula

${\displaystyle W_{\text{max}}={\frac {1}{2}}\cdot C_{\text{total}}\cdot V_{\text{loaded}}^{2}}$

This formula describes the amount of energy stored and is often used to describe new research successes. However, only part of the stored energy is available to applications, because the voltage drop and the time constant over the internal resistance mean that some of the stored charge is inaccessible. The effective realized amount of energy W_eff is reduced by the used voltage difference between V_max and V_min and can be represented as:

${\displaystyle W_{\text{eff}}={\frac {1}{2}}\ C\cdot \ (V_{\text{max}}^{2}-V_{\text{min}}^{2})}$

This formula also represents the energy asymmetric voltage components such as lithium ion capacitors.

Specific energy and specific power

The amount of energy that can be stored in a capacitor per mass of that capacitor is called its specific energy. Specific energy is measured gravimetrically (per unit of mass) in watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg).

The amount of energy can be stored in a capacitor per volume of that capacitor is called its energy density (also called volumetric specific energy in some literature). Energy density is measured volumetrically (per unit of volume) in watt-hours per litre (Wh/L). Units of liters and dm can be used interchangeably.

As of 2013 commercial energy density varies widely, but in general range from around 5 to 8 Wh/L. In comparison, petrol fuel has an energy density of 32.4 MJ/L or 9000 Wh/L. Commercial specific energies range from around 0.5 to 15 Wh/kg. For comparison, an aluminum electrolytic capacitor stores typically 0.01 to 0.3 Wh/kg, while a conventional lead–acid battery stores typically 30 to 40 Wh/kg and modern lithium-ion batteries 100 to 265 Wh/kg. Supercapacitors can therefore store 10 to 100 times more energy than electrolytic capacitors, but only one tenth as much as batteries. For reference, petrol fuel has a specific energy of 44.4 MJ/kg or 12300 Wh/kg.

Although the specific energy of supercapacitors is defavorably compared with batteries, capacitors have the important advantage of the specific power. Specific power describes the speed at which energy can be delivered to the load (or, in charging the device, absorbed from the generator). The maximum power P_max specifies the power of a theoretical rectangular single maximum current peak of a given voltage. In real circuits the current peak is not rectangular and the voltage is smaller, caused by the voltage drop, so IEC 62391–2 established a more realistic effective power P_eff for supercapacitors for power applications, which is half the maximum and given by the following formulas :

${\displaystyle P_{\text{eff}}={\frac {1}{8}}\cdot {\frac {V^{2}}{R_{i}}}}$,

${\displaystyle P_{\text{max}}={\frac {1}{4}}\cdot {\frac {V^{2}}{R_{i}}}}$

with V = voltage applied and R_i, the internal DC resistance of the capacitor.

Just like specific energy, specific power is measured either gravimetrically in kilowatts per kilogram (kW/kg, specific power) or volumetrically in kilowatts per litre (kW/L, power density). Supercapacitor specific power is typically 10 to 100 times greater than for batteries and can reach values up to 15 kW/kg.

Ragone charts relate energy to power and are a valuable tool for characterizing and visualizing energy storage components. With such a diagram, the position of specific power and specific energy of different storage technologies is easily to compare, see diagram.

Lifetime

Since supercapacitors do not rely on chemical changes in the electrodes (except for those with polymer electrodes), lifetimes depend mostly on the rate of evaporation of the liquid electrolyte. This evaporation is generally a function of temperature, current load, current cycle frequency and voltage. Current load and cycle frequency generate internal heat, so that the evaporation-determining temperature is the sum of ambient and internal heat. This temperature is measurable as core temperature in the center of a capacitor body. The higher the core temperature, the faster the evaporation, and the shorter the lifetime.

Evaporation generally results in decreasing capacitance and increasing internal resistance. According to IEC/EN 62391-2, capacitance reductions of over 30%, or internal resistance exceeding four times its data sheet specifications, are considered "wear-out failures," implying that the component has reached end-of-life. The capacitors are operable, but with reduced capabilities. Whether the aberration of the parameters have any influence on the proper functionality depends on the application of the capacitors.

Such large changes of electrical parameters specified in IEC/EN 62391-2 are usually unacceptable for high current load applications. Components that support high current loads use much smaller limits, e.g., 20% loss of capacitance or double the internal resistance. The narrower definition is important for such applications, since heat increases linearly with increasing internal resistance, and the maximum temperature should not be exceeded. Temperatures higher than specified can destroy the capacitor.

The real application lifetime of supercapacitors, also called "service life," "life expectancy," or "load life," can reach 10 to 15 years or more, at room temperature. Such long periods cannot be tested by manufacturers. Hence, they specify the expected capacitor lifetime at the maximum temperature and voltage conditions. The results are specified in datasheets using the notation "tested time (hours)/max. temperature (°C)," such as "5000 h/65 °C". With this value, and expressions derived from historical data, lifetimes can be estimated for lower temperature conditions.

Datasheet lifetime specification is tested by the manufactures using an accelerated aging test called an "endurance test," with maximum temperature and voltage over a specified time. For a "zero defect" product policy, no wear out or total failure may occur during this test.

The lifetime specification from datasheets can be used to estimate the expected lifetime for a given design. The "10-degrees-rule" used for electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolyte is used in those estimations, and can be used for supercapacitors. This rule employs the Arrhenius equation: a simple formula for the temperature dependence of reaction rates. For every 10 °C reduction in operating temperature, the estimated life doubles.

${\displaystyle L_{x}=L_{0}\cdot 2^{\frac {T_{0}-T_{x}}{10}}}$

With:

• L_x = estimated lifetime
• L₀ = specified lifetime
• T₀ = upper specified capacitor temperature
• T_x = actual operating temperature of the capacitor cell

Calculated with this formula, capacitors specified with 5000 h at 65 °C, have an estimated lifetime of 20,000 h at 45 °C.

Lifetimes are also dependent on the operating voltage, because the development of gas in the liquid electrolyte depends on the voltage. The lower the voltage, the smaller the gas development, and the longer the lifetime. No general formula relates voltage to lifetime. The voltage dependent curves shown from the picture are an empirical result from one manufacturer.

Life expectancy for power applications may be also limited by current load or number of cycles. This limitation has to be specified by the relevant manufacturer and is strongly type dependent.

Self-discharge

Storing electrical energy in the double-layer separates the charge carriers within the pores by distances in the range of molecules. Irregularities can occur over this short distance, leading to a small exchange of charge carriers and gradual discharge. This self-discharge is called leakage current. Leakage depends on capacitance, voltage, temperature, and the chemical stability of the electrode/electrolyte combination. At room temperature, leakage is so low that it is specified as time to self-discharge in hours, days, or weeks. As an example, a 5.5 V/F Panasonic "Goldcapacitor" specifies a voltage drop at 20 °C from 5.5 V to 3 V in 600 hours (25 days or 3.6 weeks) for a double cell capacitor.

Post charge voltage relaxation

It has been noticed that after the EDLC experiences a charge or discharge, the voltage will drift over time, relaxing toward its previous voltage level. The observed relaxation can occur over several hours and is likely due to long diffusion time constants of the porous electrodes within the EDLC.

Polarity

Since the positive and negative electrodes (or simply positrode and negatrode, respectively) of symmetric supercapacitors consist of the same material, theoretically supercapacitors have no true polarity and catastrophic failure does not normally occur. However reverse-charging a supercapacitor lowers its capacity, so it is recommended practice to maintain the polarity resulting from the formation of the electrodes during production. Asymmetric supercapacitors are inherently polar.

Pseudocapacitor and hybrid supercapacitors which have electrochemical charge properties may not be operated with reverse polarity, precluding their use in AC operation. However, this limitation does not apply to EDLC supercapacitors

A bar in the insulating sleeve identifies the negative terminal in a polarized component.

In some literature, the terms "anode" and "cathode" are used in place of negative electrode and positive electrode. Using anode and cathode to describe the electrodes in supercapacitors (and also rechargeable batteries, including lithium-ion batteries) can lead to confusion, because the polarity changes depending on whether a component is considered as a generator or as a consumer of current. In electrochemistry, cathode and anode are related to reduction and oxidation reactions, respectively. However, in supercapacitors based on electric double-layer capacitance, there is no oxidation nor reduction reactions on any of the two electrodes. Therefore, the concepts of cathode and anode do not apply.

Comparison of selected commercial supercapacitors

The range of electrodes and electrolytes available yields a variety of components suitable for diverse applications. The development of low-ohmic electrolyte systems, in combination with electrodes with high pseudocapacitance, enable many more technical solutions.

The following table shows differences among capacitors of various manufacturers in capacitance range, cell voltage, internal resistance (ESR, DC or AC value) and volumetric and gravimetric specific energy. In the table, ESR refers to the component with the largest capacitance value of the respective manufacturer. Roughly, they divide supercapacitors into two groups. The first group offers greater ESR values of about 20 milliohms and relatively small capacitance of 0.1 to 470 F. These are "double-layer capacitors" for memory back-up or similar applications. The second group offers 100 to 10,000 F with a significantly lower ESR value under 1 milliohm. These components are suitable for power applications. A correlation of some supercapacitor series of different manufacturers to the various construction features is provided in Pandolfo and Hollenkamp.

In commercial double-layer capacitors, or, more specifically, EDLCs in which energy storage is predominantly achieved by double-layer capacitance, energy is stored by forming an electrical double layer of electrolyte ions on the surface of conductive electrodes. Since EDLCs are not limited by the electrochemical charge transfer kinetics of batteries, they can charge and discharge at a much higher rate, with lifetimes of more than 1 million cycles. The EDLC energy density is determined by operating voltage and the specific capacitance (farad/gram or farad/cm) of the electrode/electrolyte system. The specific capacitance is related to the Specific Surface Area (SSA) accessible by the electrolyte, its interfacial double-layer capacitance, and the electrode material density.

Commercial EDLCs are based on two symmetric electrodes impregnated with electrolytes comprising tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate salts in organic solvents. Current EDLCs containing organic electrolytes operate at 2.7 V and reach energy densities around 5-8 Wh/kg and 7 to 10 Wh/L. The specific capacitance is related to the specific surface area (SSA) accessible by the electrolyte, its interfacial double-layer capacitance, and the electrode material density. Graphene-based platelets with mesoporous spacer material is a promising structure for increasing the SSA of the electrolyte.

Standards

Supercapacitors vary sufficiently that they are rarely interchangeable, especially those with higher specific energy. Applications range from low to high peak currents, requiring standardized test protocols.

Test specifications and parameter requirements are specified in the generic specification IEC/EN 62391–1, Fixed electric double layer capacitors for use in electronic equipment.

The standard defines four application classes, according to discharge current levels:

1. Memory backup
2. Energy storage, mainly used for driving motors require a short time operation,
3. Power, higher power demand for a long time operation,
4. Instantaneous power, for applications that requires relatively high current units or peak currents ranging up to several hundreds of amperes even with a short operating time

Three further standards describe special applications:

• IEC 62391–2, Fixed electric double-layer capacitors for use in electronic equipment - Blank detail specification - Electric double-layer capacitors for power application
• IEC 62576, Electric double-layer capacitors for use in hybrid electric vehicles. Test methods for electrical characteristics
• BS/EN 61881-3, Railway applications. Rolling stock equipment. Capacitors for power electronics. Electric double-layer capacitors

Applications

Supercapacitors have advantages in applications where a large amount of power is needed for a relatively short time, where a very high number of charge/discharge cycles or a longer lifetime is required. Typical applications range from milliamp currents or milliwatts of power for up to a few minutes to several amps current or several hundred kilowatts power for much shorter periods.

Supercapacitors do not support alternating current (AC) applications.

Consumer electronics

In applications with fluctuating loads, such as laptop computers, PDAs, GPS, portable media players, hand-held devices, and photovoltaic systems, supercapacitors can stabilize the power supply.

Supercapacitors deliver power for photographic flashes in digital cameras and for LED flashlights that can be charged in much shorter periods of time, e.g., 90 seconds.

Some portable speakers are powered by supercapacitors.

A cordless electric screwdriver with supercapacitors for energy storage has about half the run time of a comparable battery model, but can be fully charged in 90 seconds. It retains 85% of its charge after three months left idle.

Power generation and distribution

Grid power buffering

Numerous non-linear loads, such as EV chargers, HEVs, air conditioning systems, and advanced power conversion systems cause current fluctuations and harmonics. These current differences create unwanted voltage fluctuations and therefore power oscillations on the grid. Power oscillations not only reduce the efficiency of the grid, but can cause voltage drops in the common coupling bus, and considerable frequency fluctuations throughout the entire system. To overcome this problem, supercapacitors can be implemented as an interface between the load and the grid to act as a buffer between the grid and the high pulse power drawn from the charging station.

Low-power equipment power buffering

Supercapacitors provide backup or emergency shutdown power to low-power equipment such as RAM, SRAM, micro-controllers and PC Cards. They are the sole power source for low energy applications such as automated meter reading (AMR) equipment or for event notification in industrial electronics.

Supercapacitors buffer power to and from rechargeable batteries, mitigating the effects of short power interruptions and high current peaks. Batteries kick in only during extended interruptions, e.g., if the mains power or a fuel cell fails, which lengthens battery life.

Uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) may be powered by supercapacitors, which can replace much larger banks of electrolytic capacitors. This combination reduces the cost per cycle, saves on replacement and maintenance costs, enables the battery to be downsized and extends battery life.

Supercapacitors provide backup power for actuators in wind turbine pitch systems, so that blade pitch can be adjusted even if the main supply fails.

Voltage stabilization

Supercapacitors can stabilize voltage fluctuations for powerlines by acting as dampers. Wind and photovoltaic systems exhibit fluctuating supply evoked by gusting or clouds that supercapacitors can buffer within milliseconds.

Micro grids

Micro grids are usually powered by clean and renewable energy. Most of this energy generation, however, is not constant throughout the day and does not usually match demand. Supercapacitors can be used for micro grid storage to instantaneously inject power when the demand is high and the production dips momentarily, and to store energy in the reverse conditions. They are useful in this scenario, because micro grids are increasingly producing power in DC, and capacitors can be utilized in both DC and AC applications. Supercapacitors work best in conjunction with chemical batteries. They provide an immediate voltage buffer to compensate for quick changing power loads due to their high charge and discharge rate through an active control system. Once the voltage is buffered, it is put through an inverter to supply AC power to the grid. Supercapacitors cannot provide frequency correction in this form directly in the AC grid.

Energy harvesting

Supercapacitors are suitable temporary energy storage devices for energy harvesting systems. In energy harvesting systems, the energy is collected from the ambient or renewable sources, e.g., mechanical movement, light or electromagnetic fields, and converted to electrical energy in an energy storage device. For example, it was demonstrated that energy collected from RF (radio frequency) fields (using an RF antenna as an appropriate rectifier circuit) can be stored to a printed supercapacitor. The harvested energy was then used to power an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for over 10 hours.

Batteries

The UltraBattery is a hybrid rechargeable lead-acid battery and a supercapacitor. Its cell construction contains a standard lead-acid battery positive electrode, standard sulphuric acid electrolyte and a specially prepared negative carbon-based electrode that store electrical energy with double-layer capacitance. The presence of the supercapacitor electrode alters the chemistry of the battery and affords it significant protection from sulfation in high rate partial state of charge use, which is the typical failure mode of valve regulated lead-acid cells used this way. The resulting cell performs with characteristics beyond either a lead-acid cell or a supercapacitor, with charge and discharge rates, cycle life, efficiency and performance all enhanced.

Medical

Supercapacitors are used in defibrillators where they can deliver 500 joules to shock the heart back into sinus rhythm.

Military

Supercapacitors' low internal resistance supports applications that require short-term high currents. Among the earliest uses were motor startup (cold engine starts, particularly with diesels) for large engines in tanks and submarines. Supercapacitors buffer the battery, handling short current peaks, reducing cycling and extending battery life. Further military applications that require high specific power are phased array radar antennae, laser power supplies, military radio communications, avionics displays and instrumentation, backup power for airbag deployment and GPS-guided missiles and projectiles.

Transport

A primary challenge of all transport is reducing energy consumption and reducing CO
₂ emissions. Recovery of braking energy (recuperation or regenerative braking) helps with both. This requires components that can quickly store and release energy over long times with a high cycle rate. Supercapacitors fulfill these requirements and are therefore used in various applications in transportation.

Aviation

In 2005, aerospace systems and controls company Diehl Luftfahrt Elektronik GmbH chose supercapacitors to power emergency actuators for doors and evacuation slides used in airliners, including the Airbus 380.

Cars

The Toyota Yaris Hybrid-R concept car uses a supercapacitor to provide bursts of power. PSA Peugeot Citroën started using supercapacitors (circa 2014) as part of its stop-start fuel-saving system, which permits faster initial acceleration. Mazda's i-ELOOP system stores energy in a supercapacitor during deceleration and uses it to power on-board electrical systems while the engine is stopped by the stop-start system.

Rail

Supercapacitors can be used to supplement batteries in starter systems in diesel railroad locomotives with diesel–electric transmission. The capacitors capture the braking energy of a full stop and deliver the peak current for starting the diesel engine and acceleration of the train and ensures the stabilization of line voltage. Depending on the driving mode up to 30% energy saving is possible by recovery of braking energy. Low maintenance and environmentally friendly materials encouraged the choice of supercapacitors.

Plant machinery

Mobile hybrid Diesel–electric rubber tyred gantry cranes move and stack containers within a terminal. Lifting the boxes requires large amounts of energy. Some of the energy could be recaptured while lowering the load, resulting in improved efficiency. A triple hybrid forklift truck uses fuel cells and batteries as primary energy storage and supercapacitors to buffer power peaks by storing braking energy. They provide the fork lift with peak power over 30 kW. The triple-hybrid system offers over 50% energy savings compared with Diesel or fuel-cell systems. Supercapacitor-powered terminal tractors transport containers to warehouses. They provide an economical, quiet and pollution-free alternative to Diesel terminal tractors.

Light rail

Supercapacitors make it possible not only to reduce energy, but to replace overhead lines in historical city areas, so preserving the city's architectural heritage. This approach may allow many new light rail city lines to replace overhead wires that are too expensive to fully route.

In 2003 Mannheim adopted a prototype light-rail vehicle (LRV) using the MITRAC Energy Saver system from Bombardier Transportation to store mechanical braking energy with a roof-mounted supercapacitor unit. It contains several units each made of 192 capacitors with 2700 F / 2.7 V interconnected in three parallel lines. This circuit results in a 518 V system with an energy content of 1.5 kWh. For acceleration when starting this "on-board-system" can provide the LRV with 600 kW and can drive the vehicle up to 1 km without overhead line supply, thus better integrating the LRV into the urban environment. Compared to conventional LRVs or Metro vehicles that return energy into the grid, onboard energy storage saves up to 30% and reduces peak grid demand by up to 50%.

In 2009 supercapacitors enabled LRVs to operate in the historical city area of Heidelberg without overhead wires, thus preserving the city's architectural heritage. The SC equipment cost an additional €270,000 per vehicle, which was expected to be recovered over the first 15 years of operation. The supercapacitors are charged at stop-over stations when the vehicle is at a scheduled stop. In April 2011 German regional transport operator Rhein-Neckar, responsible for Heidelberg, ordered a further 11 units.

In 2009, Alstom and RATP equipped a Citadis tram with an experimental energy recovery system called "STEEM". The system is fitted with 48 roof-mounted supercapacitors to store braking energy, which provides tramways with a high level of energy autonomy by enabling them to run without overhead power lines on parts of its route, recharging while traveling on powered stop-over stations. During the tests, which took place between the Porte d'Italie and Porte de Choisy stops on line T3 of the tramway network in Paris, the tramset used an average of approximately 16% less energy.

In 2012 tram operator Geneva Public Transport began tests of an LRV equipped with a prototype roof-mounted supercapacitor unit to recover braking energy.

Siemens is delivering supercapacitor-enhanced light-rail transport systems that include mobile storage.

Hong Kong's South Island metro line is to be equipped with two 2 MW energy storage units that are expected to reduce energy consumption by 10%.

In August 2012 the CSR Zhuzhou Electric Locomotive corporation of China presented a prototype two-car light metro train equipped with a roof-mounted supercapacitor unit. The train can travel up 2 km without wires, recharging in 30 seconds at stations via a ground mounted pickup. The supplier claimed the trains could be used in 100 small and medium-sized Chinese cities. Seven trams (street cars) powered by supercapacitors were scheduled to go into operation in 2014 in Guangzhou, China. The supercapacitors are recharged in 30 seconds by a device positioned between the rails. That powers the tram for up to 4 kilometres (2.5 mi). As of 2017, Zhuzhou's supercapacitor vehicles are also used on the new Nanjing streetcar system, and are undergoing trials in Wuhan.

In 2012, in Lyon (France), the SYTRAL (Lyon public transportation administration) started experiments of a "way side regeneration" system built by Adetel Group which has developed its own energy saver named "NeoGreen" for LRV, LRT and metros.

In 2014 China began using trams powered with supercapacitors that are recharged in 30 seconds by a device positioned between the rails, storing power to run the tram for up to 4 km — more than enough to reach the next stop, where the cycle can be repeated.

In 2015, Alstom announced SRS, an energy storage system that charges supercapacitors on board a tram by means of ground-level conductor rails located at tram stops. This allows trams to operate without overhead lines for short distances. The system has been touted as an alternative to the company's ground-level power supply (APS) system, or can be used in conjunction with it, as in the case of the VLT network in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, which opened in 2016.

CAF also offers supercapacitors on their Urbos 3 trams in the form of their ACR system.

Buses

Maxwell Technologies, an American supercapacitor maker, claimed that more than 20,000 hybrid buses use the devices to increase acceleration, particularly in China.

The first hybrid electric bus with supercapacitors in Europe came in 2001 in Nuremberg, Germany. It was MAN's so-called "Ultracapbus", and was tested in real operation in 2001/2002. The test vehicle was equipped with a diesel-electric drive in combination with supercapacitors. The system was supplied with 8 Ultracap modules of 80 V, each containing 36 components. The system worked with 640 V and could be charged/discharged at 400 A. Its energy content was 0.4 kWh with a weight of 400 kg.

The supercapacitors recaptured braking energy and delivered starting energy. Fuel consumption was reduced by 10 to 15% compared to conventional diesel vehicles. Other advantages included reduction of CO
₂ emissions, quiet and emissions-free engine starts, lower vibration and reduced maintenance costs.

As of 2002 in Luzern, Switzerland an electric bus fleet called TOHYCO-Rider was tested. The supercapacitors could be recharged via an inductive contactless high-speed power charger after every transportation cycle, within 3 to 4 minutes.

In early 2005 Shanghai tested a new form of electric bus called capabus that runs without powerlines (catenary free operation) using large onboard supercapacitors that partially recharge whenever the bus is at a stop (under so-called electric umbrellas), and fully charge in the terminus. In 2006, two commercial bus routes began to use the capabuses; one of them is route 11 in Shanghai. It was estimated that the supercapacitor bus was cheaper than a lithium-ion battery bus, and one of its buses had one-tenth the energy cost of a diesel bus with lifetime fuel savings of $200,000.

A hybrid electric bus called tribrid was unveiled in 2008 by the University of Glamorgan, Wales, for use as student transport. It is powered by hydrogen fuel or solar cells, batteries and ultracapacitors.

Motor racing

The FIA, a governing body for motor racing events, proposed in the Power-Train Regulation Framework for Formula 1 version 1.3 of 23 May 2007 that a new set of power train regulations be issued that includes a hybrid drive of up to 200 kW input and output power using "superbatteries" made with batteries and supercapacitors connected in parallel (KERS). About 20% tank-to-wheel efficiency could be reached using the KERS system. The Toyota TS030 Hybrid LMP1 car, a racing car developed under Le Mans Prototype rules, uses a hybrid drivetrain with supercapacitors. In the 2012 24 Hours of Le Mans race a TS030 qualified with a fastest lap only 1.055 seconds slower (3:24.842 versus 3:23.787) than the fastest car, an Audi R18 e-tron quattro with flywheel energy storage. The supercapacitor and flywheel components, whose rapid charge-discharge capabilities help in both braking and acceleration, made the Audi and Toyota hybrids the fastest cars in the race. In the 2012 Le Mans race the two competing TS030s, one of which was in the lead for part of the race, both retired for reasons unrelated to the supercapacitors. The TS030 won three of the 8 races in the 2012 FIA World Endurance Championship season. In 2014 the Toyota TS040 Hybrid used a supercapacitor to add 480 horsepower from two electric motors.

Hybrid electric vehicles

Supercapacitor/battery combinations in electric vehicles (EV) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) are well investigated. A 20 to 60% fuel reduction has been claimed by recovering brake energy in EVs or HEVs. The ability of supercapacitors to charge much faster than batteries, their stable electrical properties, broader temperature range and longer lifetime are suitable, but weight, volume and especially cost mitigate those advantages.

Supercapacitors' lower specific energy makes them unsuitable for use as a stand-alone energy source for long distance driving. The fuel economy improvement between a capacitor and a battery solution is about 20% and is available only for shorter trips. For long distance driving the advantage decreases to 6%. Vehicles combining capacitors and batteries run only in experimental vehicles.

As of 2013 all automotive manufacturers of EV or HEVs have developed prototypes that uses supercapacitors instead of batteries to store braking energy in order to improve driveline efficiency. The Mazda 6 is the only production car that uses supercapacitors to recover braking energy. Branded as i-eloop, the regenerative braking is claimed to reduce fuel consumption by about 10%. Russian Yo-cars Ё-mobile series was a concept and crossover hybrid vehicle working with a gasoline driven rotary vane type and an electric generator for driving the traction motors. A supercapacitor with relatively low capacitance recovers brake energy to power the electric motor when accelerating from a stop. Toyota's Yaris Hybrid-R concept car uses a supercapacitor to provide quick bursts of power. PSA Peugeot Citroën fit supercapacitors to some of its cars as part of its stop-start fuel-saving system, as this permits faster start-ups when the traffic lights turn green.

Gondolas

In Zell am See, Austria, an aerial lift connects the city with Schmittenhöhe mountain. The gondolas sometimes run 24 hours per day, using electricity for lights, door opening and communication. The only available time for recharging batteries at the stations is during the brief intervals of guest loading and unloading, which is too short to recharge batteries. Supercapacitors offer a fast charge, higher number of cycles and longer life time than batteries. Emirates Air Line (cable car), also known as the Thames cable car, is a 1-kilometre (0.62 mi) gondola line in London, UK, that crosses the Thames from the Greenwich Peninsula to the Royal Docks. The cabins are equipped with a modern infotainment system, which is powered by supercapacitors.

Developments

As of 2013 commercially available lithium-ion supercapacitors offered the highest gravimetric specific energy to date, reaching 15 Wh/kg (54 kJ/kg). Research focuses on improving specific energy, reducing internal resistance, expanding temperature range, increasing lifetimes and reducing costs. Projects include tailored-pore-size electrodes, pseudocapacitive coating or doping materials and improved electrolytes.

Research into electrode materials requires measurement of individual components, such as an electrode or half-cell. By using a counterelectrode that does not affect the measurements, the characteristics of only the electrode of interest can be revealed. Specific energy and power for real supercapacitors only have more or less roughly 1/3 of the electrode density.

Market

As of 2016 worldwide sales of supercapacitors is about US$400 million.

The market for batteries (estimated by Frost & Sullivan) grew from US$47.5 billion, (76.4% or US$36.3 billion of which was rechargeable batteries) to US$95 billion. The market for supercapacitors is still a small niche market that is not keeping pace with its larger rival.

In 2016, IDTechEx forecast sales to grow from $240 million to $2 billion by 2026, an annual increase of about 24%.

Supercapacitor costs in 2006 were US$0.01 per farad or US$2.85 per kilojoule, moving in 2008 below US$0.01 per farad, and were expected to drop further in the medium term.

See also

• Capa vehicle – Type of transportation vehiclePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Capacitor types – Manufacturing styles of an electronic device
• Conjugated microporous polymer – type of porous materialPages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
• Electric vehicle battery – Battery used to power the electric motors of a battery electric vehicle or hybrid electric vehicle
• Flywheel energy storage – Method of storing energy
• List of emerging technologies – New technologies actively in development
• Lithium-ion capacitor – Hybrid type of capacitor
• Mechanically powered flashlight – Human-powered flashlight
• Nanoflower – Compound that results in formations which in microscopic view resemble flowers

References

1. Qi, Zhaoxiang; Koenig, Gary M. (July 2017). "Review Article: Flow battery systems with solid electroactive materials". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena. 35 (4): 040801. Bibcode:2017JVSTB..35d0801Q. doi:10.1116/1.4983210. ISSN 2166-2746.
2. Häggström, Fredrik; Delsing, Jerker (27 November 2018). "IoT Energy Storage - A Forecast". Energy Harvesting and Systems. 5 (3–4): 43–51. doi:10.1515/ehs-2018-0010. S2CID 64526195. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
3. Bueno, Paulo R. (28 February 2019). "Nanoscale origins of super-capacitance phenomena". Journal of Power Sources. 414: 420–434. Bibcode:2019JPS...414..420B. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.010. ISSN 0378-7753. S2CID 104416995.
4. Tehrani, Z.; Thomas, D.J.; Korochkina, T.; Phillips, C.O.; Lupo, D.; Lehtimäki, S.; O'Mahony, J.; Gethin, D.T. (2 January 2017). "Large-area printed supercapacitor technology for low-cost domestic green energy storage" (PDF). Energy. 118: 1313–1321. Bibcode:2017Ene...118.1313T. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.019. ISSN 0360-5442. S2CID 55090490.
5. Linden's Handbook of Batteries, Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. 21 January 2024. ISBN 978-0-07-162421-3.
6. US 2800616, Becker, H.I., "Low voltage electrolytic capacitor", issued 1957-07-23 
7. Ho, J.; Jow, R.; Boggs, S. (January 2010). "Historical Introduction to Capacitor Technology" (PDF). IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine. 26 (1): 20–25. doi:10.1109/mei.2010.5383924. S2CID 23077215.
8. A brief history of supercapacitors AUTUMN 2007 Batteries & Energy Storage Technology Archived 6 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine
9. US 3288641, Rightmire, Robert A., "Electrical energy storage apparatus", issued 1966-11-29 
10. ^ J. G. Schindall, The Change of the Ultra-Capacitors, IEEE Spectrum, November 2007
11. US 3536963, D. L. Boos, "Electrolytic capacitor having carbon paste electrodes", issued 1970-10-27 
12. ^ Conway, Brian Evans (1999), Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications (in German), Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 1–8, ISBN 978-0306457364
13. ^ Conway, Brian Evans (May 1991). "Transition from 'Supercapacitor' to 'Battery' Behavior in Electrochemical Energy Storage". J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (6): 1539–1548. Bibcode:1991JElS..138.1539C. doi:10.1149/1.2085829.
14. Panasonic, Electric Double Layer Capacitor, Technical guide,1. Introduction,Panasonic Goldcaps Archived 9 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine
15. "Electric double-layer capacitors". ELNA. Archived from the original on 13 March 2015. Retrieved 21 February 2015.
16. ^ Adam Marcus Namisnyk. A survey of electrochemical supercapacitor technology (PDF) (Technical report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2014. Retrieved 21 February 2015.
17. US 5369547, David A. Evans, "Containers with anodes and cathodes with electrolytes", issued 1994-11-29 
18. David A. Evans (Evans Company): High Energy Density Electrolytic-Electrochemical Hybrid Capacitor Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine In: Proceedings of the 14th Capacitor & Resistor Technology Symposium. 22 March 1994
19. Evans Capacitor Company 2007 Capattery series Archived 15 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine
20. David A. Evans: The Littlest Big Capacitor - an Evans Hybrid Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine Technical Paper, Evans Capacitor Company 2007
21. "FDK, Corporate Information, FDK History 2000s". FDK. Retrieved 21 February 2015.
22. ^ Naoi, K.; Simon, P. (Spring 2008). "New Materials and New Configurations for Advanced Electrochemical Capacitors" (PDF). Interface. 17 (1): 34–37.
23. ^ Frackowiak, Elzbieta; Béguin, Francois (May 2001). "Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors". Carbon. 39 (6): 937–950. Bibcode:2001Carbo..39..937F. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00183-4.
24. ^ Halper, Marin S.; Ellenbogen, James C. (March 2006). "Supercapacitors: A Brief Overview" (PDF). MITRE Nanosystems Group. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
25. "The electrical double layer". 2011. Archived from the original on 31 May 2011. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
26. Srinivasan, S. (2006). "2. Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces: Structure and Kinetics of Charge Transfer". Fuel Cells: From Fundamentals to Applications. Springer eBooks. ISBN 978-0-387-35402-6.
27. Butko, Alexey V.; Butko, Vladimir Y.; Kumzerov, Yurii A. (2023). "General Capacitance Upper Limit and Its Manifestation for Aqueous Graphene Interfaces". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24 (13): 10861. doi:10.3390/ijms241310861. PMC 10341730. PMID 37446037.
28. Yu, G.L.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.; Mayorov, A.S.; Blake, P.; Schedin, F.; Morozov, S.V.; Ponomarenko, L.A.; Chiappini, F.; Wiedmann, S.; Zeitler, U.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S.; Elias, D.C. (February 2013). "Interaction phenomena in graphene seen through quantum capacitance". PNAS. 110 (9): 3282–3286. arXiv:1302.3967. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.3282Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300599110. PMC 3587260. PMID 23401538.
29. ^ Conway, Brian Evans, "Electrochemical Capacitors — Their Nature, Function and Applications", Electrochemistry Encyclopedia, archived from the original on 13 August 2012
30. Frackowiak, Elzbieta; Jurewicz, K.; Delpeux, K.; Béguin, Francois (July 2001). "Nanotubular Materials For Supercapacitors". J. Power Sources. 97–98: 822–825. Bibcode:2001JPS....97..822F. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00736-4.
31. Garthwaite, Josie (12 July 2011). "How ultracapacitors work (and why they fall short)". Earth2Tech. GigaOM Network. Archived from the original on 22 November 2012. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
32. ^ Chodankar, Nilesh R.; Pham, Hong Duc; Nanjundan, Ashok Kumar; Fernando, Joseph F. S.; Jayaramulu, Kolleboyina; Golberg, Dmitri; Han, Young-Kyu; Dubal, Deepak P. (September 2020). "True Meaning of Pseudocapacitors and Their Performance Metrics: Asymmetric versus Hybrid Supercapacitors" (PDF). Small. 16 (37): e2002806. doi:10.1002/smll.202002806. PMID 32761793. S2CID 225371915.
33. Rani, J. R.; Thangavel, R.; Oh, S. I.; Lee, Y. S.; Jang, J. H. (2019). "An Ultra-High-Energy Density Supercapacitor; Fabrication Based on Thiol-functionalized Graphene Oxide Scrolls". Nanomaterials. 9 (2): 148. doi:10.3390/nano9020148. PMC 6409971. PMID 30682829.
34. Yu, L. P.; Chen, G. Z. (2016). "Redox electrode materials for supercapatteries" (PDF). J. Power Sources. 326: 604–612. Bibcode:2016JPS...326..604Y. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.095. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 July 2018. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
35. Malmberg, Siret (23 September 2020). "Electrochemical Evaluation of Directly Electrospun Carbide-Derived Carbon-Based Electrodes in Different Nonaqueous Electrolytes for Energy Storage Applications". Journal of Carbon Research. 6.
36. Malmberg, Siret; Arulepp, Mati; Savest, Natalja; Tarasova, Elvira; Vassiljeva, Viktoria; Krasnou, Illia; Käärik, Maike; Mikli, Valdek; Krumme, Andres (1 January 2020). "Directly electrospun electrodes for electrical double-layer capacitors from carbide-derived carbon". Journal of Electrostatics. 103: 103396. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2019.103396. ISSN 0304-3886.
37. "Could hemp nanosheets topple graphene for better supercapacitor electrodes?". Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence. 14 August 2014. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
38. ^ Pandolfo, A.G.; Hollenkamp, A.F. (June 2006). "Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors". J. Power Sources. 157 (1): 11–27. Bibcode:2006JPS...157...11P. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.065.
39. Kim Kinoshita (June 1992). Electrochemical Oxygen Technology. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-57043-1.
40. ^ "EnterosorbU, FAQ". Carbon-Ukraine. 2015.
41. US 6787235, Nesbitt, C.C. & Sun, X., "Consolidated amorphous carbon materials, their manufacture and use", issued 2004-09-07, assigned to Reticle, Inc. 
42. Laine, J.; Yunes, S. (1992). "Effect of the preparation method on the pore size distribution of activated carbon from coconut shell". Carbon. 30 (4): 601–604. Bibcode:1992Carbo..30..601L. doi:10.1016/0008-6223(92)90178-Y.
43. Fischer, U.; Saliger, R.; Bock, V.; Petricevic, R.; Fricke, J. (October 1997). "Carbon aerogels as electrode material in supercapacitors". J. Porous Mat. 4 (4): 281–285. doi:10.1023/A:1009629423578. S2CID 91596134.
44. Lerner, E.J. (October 2004). "Less is more with aerogels: A laboratory curiosity develops practical uses" (PDF). The Industrial Physicist. American Institute of Physics. pp. 26–30. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
45. LaClair, M. (1 February 2003). "Replacing energy storage with carbon aerogel supercapacitors". Power Electronics. Penton. Archived from the original on 21 October 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
46. Chien, Hsing-Chi; Cheng, Wei-Yun; Wang, Yong-Hui; Lu, Shih-Yuan (5 December 2012). "Ultrahigh Specific Capacitances for Supercapacitors Achieved by Nickel Cobaltite/Carbon Aerogel Composites". Advanced Functional Materials. 22 (23): 5038–5043. doi:10.1002/adfm.201201176. ISSN 1616-3028. S2CID 97810530.
47. Presser, V.; Heon, M.; Gogotsi, Y. (March 2011). "Carbide-derived carbons – From porous networks to nanotubes and graphene". Adv. Funct. Mater. 21 (5): 810–833. doi:10.1002/adfm.201002094. S2CID 96797238.
48. Korenblit, Y.; Rose, M.; Kockrick, E.; Borchardt, L.; Kvit, A.; Kaskel, S.; Yushin, G. (February 2010). "High-rate electrochemical capacitors based on ordered mesoporous silicon carbide-derived carbon" (PDF). ACS Nano. 4 (3): 1337–1344. doi:10.1021/nn901825y. PMID 20180559. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2014. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
49. "SkelCap High Energy Ultracapacitors - Data Sheet" (PDF). Skeleton Technologies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
50. Yoo, J. J.; Balakrishnan, K.; Huang, J.; Meunier, V.; Sumpter, B. G.; Srivastava, A.; Conway, M.; Reddy, A. L. M.; Yu, J.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. (March 2011). "Ultrathin planar graphene supercapacitors". Nano Letters. 11 (4): 1423–1427. Bibcode:2011NanoL..11.1423Y. doi:10.1021/nl200225j. PMID 21381713.
51. Palaniselvam, Thangavelu; Baek, Jong-Beom (2015). "Graphene based 2D-materials for supercapacitors". 2D Materials. 2 (3): 032002. Bibcode:2015TDM.....2c2002P. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/032002. S2CID 135679359.
52. Pushparaj, V.L.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Kumar, A.; Murugesan, S.; Ci, L.; Vajtai, R.; Linhardt, R.J.; Nalamasu, O.; Ajayan, P.M. (August 2007). "Flexible energy storage devices based on nanocomposite paper". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104 (34): 13574–13577. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10413574P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706508104. PMC 1959422. PMID 17699622.
53. Marcus, J. (15 March 2012). "Researchers develop graphene supercapacitor holding promise for portable electronics". PhysOrg. Science X network. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
54. El-Kady, M.F.; Strong, V.; Dubin, S.; Kaner, R.B. (March 2012). "Laser scribing of high-performance and flexible graphene-based electrochemical capacitors". Science. 335 (6074): 1326–1330. Bibcode:2012Sci...335.1326E. doi:10.1126/science.1216744. PMID 22422977. S2CID 18958488.
55. ^ Dumé, B. (26 November 2010). "Graphene supercapacitor breaks storage record". Physics World. IOP. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
56. ^ Chenguang, L.; Zhenning, Y.; Neff, D.; Zhamu, A.; Jang, B.Z. (November 2010). "Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density". Nano Letters. 10 (12): 4863–4868. Bibcode:2010NanoL..10.4863L. doi:10.1021/nl102661q. PMID 21058713.
57. Miller, J.R.; Outlaw, R.A.; Holloway, B.C. (September 2010). "Graphene double-layer capacitor with ac line-filtering". Science. 329 (5999): 1637–1639. Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1637M. doi:10.1126/science.1194372. PMID 20929845. S2CID 33772133.
58. Akbulut, S. (2011). Optimization of Carbon Nanotube Supercapacitor Electrode (PDF) (M.Sc. thesis). Nashville, Tennessee: Graduate School of Vanderbilt University.
59. ^ Arepalli, S.; H. Fireman; C. Huffman; P. Moloney; P. Nikolaev; L. Yowell; C.D. Higgins; K. Kim; P.A. Kohl; S.P. Turano; W.J. Ready (2005). "Carbon-Nanotube-Based Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitor Technologies for Spaceflight Applications" (PDF). JOM. 57 (12): 24–31. Bibcode:2005JOM....57l..26A. doi:10.1007/s11837-005-0179-x. S2CID 110891569. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2009.
60. ^ Signorelli, R.; D.C. Ku; J.G. Kassakian; J.E. Schindall (2009). "Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors Using Carbon Nanotube Electrode Structures". Proc. IEEE. 97 (11): 1837–1847. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2009.2030240. hdl:1721.1/54729. S2CID 29479545.
61. Li, X.; J. Rong; B. Wei (2010). "Electrochemical Behavior of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Supercapacitors under Compressive Stress". ACS Nano. 4 (10): 6039–6049. doi:10.1021/nn101595y. PMID 20828214.
62. Conway, B. E.; Birss, V.; Wojtowicz, J. (1997). "The role and the utilization of pseudocapacitance for energy storage by supercapacitors". Journal of Power Sources. 66 (1–2): 1–14. Bibcode:1997JPS....66....1C. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02474-3. hdl:1880/44956. S2CID 94810807.
63. Dillon, A.C. (2010). "Carbon Nanotubes for Photoconversion and Electrical Energy Storage". Chem. Rev. 110 (11): 6856–6872. doi:10.1021/cr9003314. PMID 20839769.
64. Toupin, Mathieu; Brousse, Thierry; Bélanger, Daniel (2004). "Charge Storage Mechanism of MnO2 Electrode Used in Aqueous Electrochemical Capacitor". Chem. Mater. 16 (16): 3184–3190. doi:10.1021/cm049649j.
65. Pang, Suh-Cem; Anderson, Marc A.; Chapman, Thomas W. (2000). "Novel Electrode Materials for Thin-Film Ultracapacitors: Comparison of Electrochemical Properties of Sol-Gel-Derived and Electrodeposited Manganese Dioxide". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 147 (2): 444–450. Bibcode:2000JElS..147..444P. doi:10.1149/1.1393216.
66. Brousse, Thierry; Bélanger, Daniel; Long, Jeffrey W. (1 January 2015). "To Be or Not To Be Pseudocapacitive?". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 162 (5): A5185–A5189. doi:10.1149/2.0201505jes. ISSN 0013-4651.
67. Zheng, J. P. (1995). "Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide as an Electrode Material for Electrochemical Capacitors". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 142 (8): 2699–2703. Bibcode:1995JElS..142.2699Z. doi:10.1149/1.2050077.
68. Das, Rajib K.; Liu, Bo; Reynolds, John R.; Rinzler, Andrew G. (2009). "Engineered Macroporosity in Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Films". Nano Letters. 9 (2): 677–683. Bibcode:2009NanoL...9..677D. doi:10.1021/nl803168s. PMID 19170555.
69. Wang, W.; Guo, S.; Lee, I.; Ahmed, K.; Zhong, J.; Favors, Z.; Zaera, F.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C. S. (2014). "Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide Nanoparticles Anchored to Graphene and Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Foam for Supercapacitors". Scientific Reports. 4: 4452. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E4452W. doi:10.1038/srep04452. PMC 3964521. PMID 24663242.
70. "Improved supercapacitors for better batteries, electric vehicles « the Kurzweil Library + collections".
71. Simon, Y.Gogotsi (November 2008). "Materials for electrochemical capacitors" (PDF). Nature Materials. 7 (11): 845–854. Bibcode:2008NatMa...7..845S. doi:10.1038/nmat2297. PMID 18956000. S2CID 189826716.
72. Coin type PAS capacitor, Taiyo Yuden, Shoe Electronics Ltd.
73. Li, Xin; Wei, Bingqing (2012). "Facile synthesis and super capacitive behavior of SWNT/MnO2 hybrid films". Nano Energy. 1 (3): 479–487. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.02.011.
74. H. Gualous et al.: Lithium Ion capacitor characterization and modelling ESSCAP'08 −3rd European Symposium on Supercapacitors and Applications, Rome/Italy 2008
75. "FDK To Begin Mass Production of High-Capacity Li-Ion Capacitors; Automotive and Renewable Energy Applications". Green Car Congress. 4 January 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
76. ^ Naoi, Katsuhiko; Naoi, Wako; Aoyagi, Shintaro; Miyamoto, Jun-Ichi; Kamino, Takeo (2013). "New Generation "Nanohybrid Supercapacitor"". Accounts of Chemical Research. 46 (5): 1075–1083. doi:10.1021/ar200308h. PMID 22433167.
77. ^ Asaithambi, S.; Sakthivel, P.; Karuppaiah, M.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Balamurugan, K.; Ahamad, Tansir; Khan, M. A. Majeed; Ramalingam, G.; Mohammed, Mustafa K. A.; Ravi, G. (1 April 2021). "Preparation of Fe-SnO2@CeO2 nanocomposite electrode for asymmetric supercapacitor device performance analysis". Journal of Energy Storage. 36: 102402. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102402. ISSN 2352-152X. S2CID 233572817.
78. ^ Mohd Abdah, Muhammad Amirul Aizat; Azman, Nur Hawa Nabilah; Kulandaivalu, Shalini; Sulaiman, Yusran (14 November 2019). "Asymmetric supercapacitor of functionalised electrospun carbon fibers/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/manganese oxide//activated carbon with superior electrochemical performance". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 16782. Bibcode:2019NatSR...916782M. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53421-w. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6856085. PMID 31728061.
79. ^ Huang, Yuanyuan; Shi, Tielin; Jiang, Shulan; Cheng, Siyi; Tao, Xiangxu; Zhong, Yan; Liao, Guanglan; Tang, Zirong (7 December 2016). "Enhanced cycling stability of NiCo2S4@NiO core-shell nanowire arrays for all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 38620. Bibcode:2016NatSR...638620H. doi:10.1038/srep38620. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5141571. PMID 27924927. S2CID 19483393.
80. ^ Jiang, Jing; Li, Zhipeng; He, Xinrui; Hu, Yalin; Li, Fu; Huang, Pei; Wang, Chao (2020). "Novel Skutterudite CoP3–Based Asymmetric Supercapacitor with Super High Energy Density". Small. 16 (31): 2000180. doi:10.1002/smll.202000180. ISSN 1613-6829. PMID 32596998. S2CID 220255613.
81. P. Simon, A. Burke, Nanostructured Carbons: Double-Layer Capacitance and More
82. Tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate - Compound SummaryCID 2724277 from PubChem
83. ^ Salanne, Mathieu (30 May 2017). "Ionic Liquids for Supercapacitor Applications". Topics in Current Chemistry. 375 (3): 63. doi:10.1007/s41061-017-0150-7. ISSN 2364-8961. PMID 28560657. S2CID 22068271.
84. A. Schneuwly, R. Gallay, Properties and applications of supercapacitors, From the state-of-the-art to future trends, PCIM 2000
85. A. Laforgue et al. Development of New Generation Supercapacitors for Transportation Applications Archived 10 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine
86. Nesscap Ultracapacitor - Technical Guide NESSCAP Co., Ltd. 2008
87. ^ Maxwell BOOSTCAP Product Guide – Maxwell Technologies BOOSTCAP Ultracapacitors– Doc. No. 1014627.1 Archived 12 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine Maxwell Technologies, Inc. 2009
88. Maxwell, K2 series Archived 17 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine
89. ^ Marts, John (9 May 2018). Enhanced physics-based reduced-order model of non-Faradaic electrical double-layer capacitor dynamics. Digital collections of Colorado (Thesis). University of Colorado Colorado Springs. Kraemer Family Library. hdl:10976/166930.
90. (in vehicle propulsion, the efficiency of energy conversions should be considered resulting in 3700 Wh/kg considering a typical 30% internal combustion engine efficiency)
91. Christen, T.; Ohler, C. (2002). "Optimizing energy storage components using Ragone plots". J. Power Sources. 110 (1): 107–116. Bibcode:2002JPS...110..107C. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00228-8.
92. Dunn-Rankin, D.; Leal, E. Martins; Walther, D.C. (2005). "Personal power systems". Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 31 (5–6): 422–465. Bibcode:2005PECS...31..422D. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.04.001.
93. Maxwell Application Note Application Note - Energy Storage Modules Life Duration Estimation. Archived 13 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine Maxwell Technologies, Inc. 2007
94. Panasonic Electronic Devices CO., LTD.: Gold capacitors Characteristics data Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine In: Technical Guide of Electric Double Layer Capacitors, Edition 7.4, 2011)
95. Bonaccorso, F., Colombo, L., Yu, G., Stoller, M., Tozzini, V., Ferrari, A., . . . Pellegrini, V. (2015). Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science, 1246501-1246501.
96. ^ P. Van den Bossche et al.: The Cell versus the System: Standardization challenges for electricity storage devices EVS24 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Stavanger/Norway 2009
97. Graham Pitcher If the cap fits .. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine. New Electronics. 26 March 2006
98. "Ultracapacitor LED Flashlight Charges In 90 Seconds - Slashdot". Tech.slashdot.org. 10 December 2008. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
99. "Helium Bluetooth speakers powered by supercapacitors". Gizmag.com. 27 November 2013. Retrieved 29 November 2013.
100. "Coleman FlashCell Cordless Screwdriver Recharges In Just 90 Seconds". OhGizmo!. 11 September 2007. Archived from the original on 7 March 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
101. ^ M. Farhadi and O. Mohammed, Real-time operation and harmonic analysis of isolated and non-isolated hybrid DC microgrid, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol.50, no.4, pp.2900–2909, Jul./Aug. 2014.
102. Mangaraj, Mrutyunjaya; Panda, Anup Kumar; Penthia, Trilochan (2016). "Supercapacitor supported DSTATCOM for harmonic reduction and power factor correction". 2016 IEEE Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/SCEECS.2016.7509275. ISBN 978-1-4673-7918-2. S2CID 16899819.
103. Farhadi, Mustafa; Mohammed, Osama (2015). "Adaptive Energy Management in Redundant Hybrid DC Microgrid for Pulse Load Mitigation". IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 6: 54–62. doi:10.1109/TSG.2014.2347253. S2CID 37615694.
104. Farhadi, Mustafa; Mohammed, Osama (2015). "Performance enhancement of actively controlled hybrid DC microgrid and pulsed power load". 51 (5): 3570–3578. doi:10.1109/tia.2015.2420630. S2CID 17217802. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
105. R. Gallay, Garmanage, Technologies and applications of Supercapacitors Archived 30 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, University of Mondragon, 22 June 2012
106. David A. Johnson, P.E. "SuperCapacitors as Energy Storage". Discoversolarenergy.com. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
107. A. Stepanov, I. Galkin, Development of supercapacitor based uninterruptible power supply Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Doctoral school of energy- and geo-technology, 15–20 January 2007. Kuressaare, Estonia
108. "Supercapacitor UPS". Marathon Power. Archived from the original on 20 April 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
109. ^ "Maxwell Technologies Ultracapacitors (ups power supply) Uninterruptible Power Supply Solutions". Maxwell.com. Archived from the original on 22 May 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
110. International Energy Agency, Photovoltaic Power Systems Program, The role of energy storage for mini-grid stabilization Archived 14 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine, IEA PVPS Task 11, Report IEA-PVPS T11-02:2011, July 2011
111. J. R. Miller, JME, Inc. and Case Western Reserve University, Capacitors for Power Grid Storage, (Multi-Hour Bulk Energy Storage using Capacitors)
112. Ghazanfari, A.; Hamzeh, M.; Mokhtari, H.; Karimi, H. (December 2012). "Active Power Management of Multihybrid Fuel Cell/Supercapacitor Power Conversion System in a Medium Voltage Microgrid". IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 3 (4): 1903–1910. doi:10.1109/TSG.2012.2194169. ISSN 1949-3053. S2CID 2107900.
113. Crispo, Rick; Brekken, Ted K. A. (2013). "A motor-generator and supercapacitor based system for microgrid frequency stabilization". 2013 1st IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (Sus Tech). pp. 162–166. doi:10.1109/SusTech.2013.6617314. ISBN 978-1-4673-4630-6. S2CID 23894868.
114. Inthamoussou, F. A.; Pegueroles-Queralt, J.; Bianchi, F. D. (September 2013). "Control of a Supercapacitor Energy Storage System for Microgrid Applications". IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. 28 (3): 690–697. Bibcode:2013ITEnC..28..690I. doi:10.1109/TEC.2013.2260752. hdl:11336/23530. ISSN 0885-8969. S2CID 7454678.
115. Lehtimäki, Suvi; Li, Miao; Salomaa, Jarno; Pörhönen, Juho; Kalanti, Antti; Tuukkanen, Sampo; Heljo, Petri; Halonen, Kari; Lupo, Donald (2014). "Performance of printable supercapacitors in an RF energy harvesting circuit". International Journal of Electrical Power. 58: 42–46. Bibcode:2014IJEPE..58...42L. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.004.
116. yec.com.tw. "super capacitor supplier list | YEC | This high-energy capacitor from a defibrillator can deliver a lethal 500 joules of energy". YEC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
117. ^ "First one up the drive: A new sort of storage device gives lithium-ion batteries a run for their money". The Economist. 12 July 2014.
118. Jaafar, Amine; Sareni, Bruno; Roboam, Xavier; Thiounn-Guermeur, Marina (2010). "Sizing of a hybrid locomotive based on accumulators and ultracapacitors". 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/VPPC.2010.5729131. ISBN 978-1-4244-8220-7. S2CID 26839128.
119. J. R. Miller, A. F. Burke, Electrochemical Capacitors: Challenges and Opportunities for Real-World Applications, ECS, Vol. 17, No. 1, Spring 2008
120. fuelcellworks.com. "Fuel Cell Works Supplemental News Page". Archived from the original on 21 May 2008. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
121. "SINAUTEC, Automobile Technology, LLC". Sinautecus.com. Archived from the original on 8 October 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
122. M. Fröhlich, M. Klohr, St. Pagiela: Energy Storage System with UltraCaps on Board of Railway Vehicles Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine In: Proceedings - 8th World Congress on Railway Research Mai 2008, Soul, Korea
123. Bombardier, MITRAC Energy Saver Support PDF
124. Bombardier, MITRAC Energy Saver Presentation PDF
125. "Rhein-Neckar Verkehr orders more supercapacitor trams". Railway Gazette. 5 April 2011. Archived from the original on 8 June 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
126. "STEEM - promoting energy savings for tramways". Alstom, STEEM.
127. "Supercapacitors to be tested on Paris STEEM tram". Railway Gazette. 8 July 2009. Archived from the original on 17 September 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
128. "Genève tram trial assesses supercapacitor performance". Railway Gazette. 7 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
129. "Energy Storage - Siemens Global Website". Siemens.com. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
130. "Supercapacitor energy storage for South Island Line". Railway Gazette. 3 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
131. "Supercapacitor light metro train unveiled". Railway Gazette. 23 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
132. ^ "First one up the drive". The Economist. 10 July 2014.
133. 武汉首列超级电容100%低地板有轨电车首发试乘 (Wuhan's first supercapacitor 100%-low-floor streetcar starts its first trial run), 中国新闻网, 31 May 2016
134. "4-Neo Green Power" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2014. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
135. "UITP 2015: Alstom launches SRS, a new ground-based static charging system, and extends its APS solution to road transportation". www.alstom.com. Retrieved 4 November 2017.
136. "Alstom's integrated tramway system starts commercial operation in Rio a few months before the Olympics". www.alstom.com. Retrieved 4 November 2017.
137. "The Ultracapbus - VAG Nürnberg - Öffentlicher Personennahverkehr in Nürnberg". Vag.de. Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
138. Stefan Kerschl, Eberhard Hipp, Gerald Lexen: Effizienter Hybridantrieb mit Ultracaps für Stadtbusse Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine 14. Aachener Kolloquium Fahrzeug- und Motorentechnik 2005 (German)
139. V. Härri, S. Eigen, B. Zemp, D. Carriero: Kleinbus "TOHYCO-Rider" mit SAM-Superkapazitätenspeicher Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine Jahresbericht 2003 - Programm "Verkehr & Akkumulatoren", HTA Luzern, Fachhochschule Zentralschweiz (Germany)
140. Hamilton, Tyler (19 October 2009). "Next Stop: Ultracapacitor Buses | MIT Technology Review". Technologyreview.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
141. "Green 'tribrid' minibus unveiled". BBC. 5 June 2008. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
142. "Launch of Europe's First Tribrid Green Minibus". 30 May 2008. Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
143. Formula One 2011: Power-Train Regulation Framework Archived 17 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine. 24 May 2007. Retrieved on 23 April 2013.
144. "Die große Analyse: KERS für Dummys - Formel 1 bei". Motorsport-total.com. 25 May 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
145. "Toyota TS030 LMP1 hybrid revealed". Racecar Engineering. 24 January 2012. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
146. Schurig, Marcus (9 April 2012). "Die Hybridtechnik im Toyota TS030: Mit Superkondensatoren zum LeMans-Erfolg".
147. Fred Jaillet (15 June 2012). "Post TOYOTA Racing Impresses In Le Mans Qualifying • TOYOTA Racing - FIA World Endurance Championship Team". Toyotahybridracing.com. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
148. A.F. Burke, Batteries and Ultracapacitors for Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles Archived 7 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine
149. Cap-XX Supercapacitors for Automotive & Other Vehicle Applications Archived 19 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine, March 2012
150. A. Pesaran, J. Gonder, Recent Analysis of UCAPs in Mild Hybrids Archived 7 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, 6th Advanced Automotive Battery Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 17–19 May 2006
151. AFS TRINITY UNVEILS 150 MPG EXTREME HYBRID (XH™) SUV Archived 29 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine. AFS Trinity Power Corporation. 13 January 2008. Retrieved on 31 March 2013.
152. Ross, Jeffrey N. "2014 Mazda6 i-Eloop to net 40 mpg hwy, 28 mpg city".
153. A. E. KRAMER, Billionaire Backs a Gas–Electric Hybrid Car to Be Built in Russia, The New York Times, 13 December 2010
154. Londoner Emirates Air Line: Teuerste Seilbahn der Welt mit fraglicher verkehrlicher Bedeutung
155. ISR, Internationale Seilbahn Rundschau, Beste Unterhaltung über den Wolken
156. Yang, X.; Cheng, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, D. (August 2013). "Liquid-mediated dense integration of graphene materials for compact capacitive energy storage". Science. 341 (6145): 534–537. Bibcode:2013Sci...341..534Y. doi:10.1126/science.1239089. PMID 23908233. S2CID 206549319.
157. Fastcap. "Paradigm shift". FastCap Systems. Archived from the original on 21 June 2013. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
158. "New carbon material boosts supercapacitors". Rsc.org. 13 May 2011. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
159. Y. Zhu; et al. (May 2011). "Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene". Science. 332 (3067): 1537–1541. Bibcode:2011Sci...332.1537Z. doi:10.1126/science.1200770. PMID 21566159. S2CID 10398110.
160. Kim, T.Y.; Jung, G.; Yoo, S.; Suh, K.S.; Ruoff, R.S. (July 2013). "Activated graphene-based carbons as supercapacitor electrodes with macro- and mesopores". ACS Nano. 7 (8): 6899–6905. doi:10.1021/nn402077v. PMID 23829569. S2CID 5063753.
161. "Microporous polymer material for supercapacitors with large capacitance, high energy and power densities and excellent cycle life". Green Car Congress.
162. Kou, Yan; Xu, Yanhong; Guo, Zhaoqi; Jiang, Donglin (2011). "Supercapacitive Energy Storage and Electric Power Supply Using an Aza-Fused π-Conjugated Microporous Framework". Angewandte Chemie. 50 (37): 8753–8757. Bibcode:2011AngCh.123.8912K. doi:10.1002/ange.201103493. PMID 21842523.
163. Izadi-Najafabadi, A.; Yamada, T.; Futaba, D. N.; Yudasaka, M.; Takagi, H.; Hatori, H.; Iijima, S.; Hata, K. (2011). "High-Power Supercapacitor Electrodes from Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorn/Nanotube Composite". ACS Nano. 5 (2): 811–819. doi:10.1021/nn1017457. PMID 21210712.
164. Tang, Zhe; Chun-hua, Tang; Gong, Hao (2012). "A High Energy Density Asymmetric Supercapacitor from Nano-architectured Ni(OH)2/Carbon Nanotube Electrodes". Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 (6): 1272–1278. doi:10.1002/adfm.201102796. S2CID 93356811.
165. Chien, Hsing-Chi; Cheng, Wei-Yun; Wang, Yong-Hui; Lu, Shih-Yuan (2012). "Ultrahigh Specific Capacitances for Supercapacitors Achieved by Nickel Cobaltite/Carbon Aerogel Composites". Advanced Functional Materials. 22 (23): 5038–5043. doi:10.1002/adfm.201201176. S2CID 97810530.
166. Mai, L; Li, H; Zhao, Y; Xu, L; Xu, X; Luo, Y; Zhang, Z; Ke, W; Niu, C; Zhang, Q. (2013). "Fast ionic diffusion-enabled nanoflake electrode by spontaneous electrochemical pre-intercalation for high-performance supercapacitor". Sci Rep. 3: 1718. Bibcode:2013NatSR...3E1718M. doi:10.1038/srep01718. PMC 3634106.
167. Zang, L.; et al. (2014). "Porous 3D graphene-based bulk materials with exceptional high surface area and excellent conductivity for supercapacitors". Sci Rep. 3: 1408. Bibcode:2013NatSR...3E1408Z. doi:10.1038/srep01408. PMC 3593215. PMID 23474952.
168. Wu, Zhong-Shuai; Feng, Xinliang; Cheng, Hui-Ming (2013). "Recent advances in graphene-based planar micro-supercapacitors for on-chip energy storage". National Science Review. 1 (2): 277–292. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt003.
169. "Ultra-thin capacitors could acclerate development of next-gen electronics | KurzweilAI". www.kurzweilai.net. 28 February 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
170. Wang, Chengxiang; Osada, Minoru; Ebina, Yasuo; Li, Bao-Wen; Akatsuka, Kosho; Fukuda, Katsutoshi; Sugimoto, Wataru; Ma, Renzhi; Sasaki, Takayoshi (19 February 2014). "All-Nanosheet Ultrathin Capacitors Assembled Layer-by-Layer via Solution-Based Processes". ACS Nano. 8 (3): 2658–2666. doi:10.1021/nn406367p. PMID 24548057. S2CID 7232811.
171. Borghino, Dario (19 April 2015). "New device combines the advantages of batteries and supercapacitors". www.gizmag.com. Retrieved 10 February 2016.
172. "Flexible 3D graphene supercapacitors may power portables and wearables | KurzweilAI". www.kurzweilai.net. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
173. Peng, Zhiwei; Lin, Jian; Ye, Ruquan; Samuel, Errol L. G.; Tour, James M. (28 January 2015). "Flexible and Stackable Laser-Induced Graphene Supercapacitors". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 7 (5): 3414–3419. doi:10.1021/am509065d. PMID 25584857.
174. "Battery breakthrough charges in seconds, lasts for a week | KurzweilAI". www.kurzweilai.net. 25 November 2016. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
175. Choudhary, Nitin; Li, Chao; Chung, Hee-Suk; Moore, Julian; Thomas, Jayan; Jung, Yeonwoong (27 December 2016). "High-Performance One-Body Core/Shell Nanowire Supercapacitor Enabled by Conformal Growth of Capacitive 2D WS2 Layers". ACS Nano. 10 (12): 10726–10735. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06111. ISSN 1936-0851. PMID 27732778.
176. Raut, A.; Parker, C.; Glass, J. (2010). "A method to obtain a Ragone plot for evaluation of carbon nanotube supercapacitor electrodes". Journal of Materials Research. 25 (8): 1500–1506. Bibcode:2010JMatR..25.1500R. doi:10.1557/JMR.2010.0192. S2CID 110695012.
177. "The Global Supercapacitor Market is Facing Unique Challenges in 2016". MarketEYE. 10 March 2016. Archived from the original on 3 November 2016. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
178. Dennis Zogbi, Paumanok Group, 4 March 2013, Supercapacitors the Myth, the Potential and the Reality
179. "Supercapacitor Technologies and Markets 2016-2026". IDTechEx. 1 November 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
180. T2+2™ Market Overview Archived 16 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Ch. Ahern, Supercapacitors, 10 December 2009, Project Number NET0007IO

Further reading

• Tatrari, G.; Ahmed, M.; Shah, F. U. (2024). "Synthesis, thermoelectric and energy storage performance of transition metal oxides composites". Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 498: 215470. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215470.

• Abruña, H. D.; Kiya, Y.; Henderson, J. C. (2008). "Batteries and Electrochemical Capacitors" (PDF). Phys. Today. 61 (12): 43–47. Bibcode:2008PhT....61l..43A. doi:10.1063/1.3047681. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
• Bockris, J. O'M.; Devanathan, M. A. V.; Muller, K. (1963). "On the Structure of Charged Interfaces". Proc. R. Soc. A. 274 (1356): 55–79. Bibcode:1963RSPSA.274...55B. doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0114. S2CID 94958336.
• Béguin, Francois; Raymundo-Piñeiro, E.; Frackowiak, Elzbieta (2009). "Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors and Pseudocapacitors". Carbons for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion Systems. Advanced Materials and Technologies. Vol. 20091238. CRC Press. pp. 329–375. doi:10.1201/9781420055405-c8 (inactive 12 November 2024). ISBN 978-1-4200-5540-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
• Conway, Brian Evans (1999). Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3058-6. ISBN 978-0306457364.
• Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Sun, A.; Liu, R.-S. (2011). "8. Electrochemical Supercapacitors". Electrochemical Technologies for Energy Storage and Conversion. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. pp. 317–382. ISBN 978-3-527-32869-7.
• Leitner, K. W.; Winter, M.; Besenhard, J. O. (2003). "Composite Supercapacitor Electrodes". J. Solid State Electr. 8 (1): 15–16. doi:10.1007/s10008-003-0412-x. S2CID 95416761.
• Kinoshita, K. (18 January 1988). Carbon: Electrochemical and Physicochemical Properties. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-84802-8.
• Vol'fkovich, Y. M.; Serdyuk, T. M. (2002). "Electrochemical Capacitors". Russ. J. Electrochem. 38 (9): 935–959. doi:10.1023/A:1020220425954.
• Palaniselvam, Thangavelu; Baek, Jong-Beom (2015). "Graphene based 2D-materials for supercapacitors". 2D Materials. 2 (3): 032002. Bibcode:2015TDM.....2c2002P. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/032002. S2CID 135679359.
• Ploehn, Harry (2015). "Composite for energy storage takes the heat". Nature. 523 (7562): 536–537. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..536P. doi:10.1038/523536a. PMID 26223620. S2CID 4398225.
• Li, Qui (2015). "Flexible high-temperature dielectric materials from polymer nanocomposites". Nature. 523 (7562): 576–579. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..576L. doi:10.1038/nature14647. PMID 26223625. S2CID 4472947.

External links

• Supercapacitors: A Brief Overview

• Capacitors
• Energy conversion