Talk:"Slut!" - Misplaced Pages

"Slut!" has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

"Slut!" is part of the 1989 (Taylor's Version) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 5, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed
April 22, 2024	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 4 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Slut! to "Slut!". The result of the discussion was moved.

Alleged single status

Is it really one as per WP: SINGLESCRIT? ℛonherry☘ 20:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes. Under "Factors that suggest a song is a single", The song was serviced to radio stations with an official add date and "Factors that don't affect the legitimacy of a single", The song was only released in one territory/to one radio format. — Status (talk · contribs) 01:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

I examined the article (using Google Translate of course) and it does say that "Slut!" was available on radio (anche 5 nuove canzoni, contenute in “1989 (Taylor’s Version)”: “Slut!” da oggi in radio, “Say Don’t Go (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”, “Now That We Don’t Talk (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”, “Suburban Legends (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)” e “Is It Over Now? (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”.) So yes, it is a single, just that not a US single. Ippantekina (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Yep. ℛonherry☘ 09:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Slut! → "Slut!" – The quotation marks are part of the title, and multiple critics have pointed out the quotation marks as a defining feature of this song. Ippantekina (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Comment If that's the case, then should the song's title be written ""Like this"" (standard formatting quotation marks and quotation marks used in the title) in the article prose instead of "Like this" (standard formatting quotation marks only, currently used in the article prose)? QuietCicada - Talk 02:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

We can do "'Slut'" (as in "'Heroes'"). Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Support based on above comparison to the article "Heroes" (David Bowie song). -JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Support per nom Bluesatellite (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Support per nom. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 05:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Support per nom and because quotations marks are actual punctuation marks and not stylization. Stylization would be if it was titled "SluT!" or "5lut!" or something like that. 94.191.152.112 (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Categories: