Misplaced Pages

Talk:'Izbān

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Talk:'Azban)
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconYemen Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAsia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Do we really need all these sub districts when they are all listed with villages in the main district article? These should just be redirects to Shar'ab as-Salam District.

Insertcleverphrasehere (click me!) 00:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Insertcleverphrasehere, I think I am going to remove much of that long list in Shar'ab as-Salam article. The sub districts are much notable than villages yet there are a lot of villages stubs in Misplaced Pages.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
SharabSalam, yet that would just fragment all the information and make everything harder to find. Isn't it better to just have a single article than dozens of stubs? — Insertcleverphrasehere (click me!) 01:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Insertcleverphrasehere, there are too much villages in other districts. If I put all of their names in the district articles it will create a very long list. I have seen many villages stubs in Misplaced Pages. As I said, just type "Category:Villages" in the search bar and you will see that there are a lot of villages stubs. I didn't want to create villages stubs. I preferred creating sub districts, a bigger adminstrative division. I wrote the names of the villages in these articles. Also, I am planning to expand these articles. There is some content from Abu Muhammad al-Hasan al-Hamdani book that can help expand these articles.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 01:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
SharabSalam, Ok. — Insertcleverphrasehere (click me!) 02:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Insertcleverphrasehere, one last thing, see this village stub Jurgiškės for example, one source, the population is less than 80 people. And it's not just this stub, Misplaced Pages has many of these kinds of stubs. At least the sub-districts articles that I am creating have thousands of population and there is more than one source.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
SharabSalam, Yes. Villiages are inherently notable per WP:GEO, sub-districts are artificail municipal divisions and get no such luxury, so the issue isn't really "how many people". That being said, if there is a reasonable reason for organising the articles this way. It's fine. — Insertcleverphrasehere (click me!) 03:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Categories: