GA Review
Hi. I'm going to review this article. Intothewoods29 (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, everything seems to check out, so I'm saying this is GA worthy. I liked how you defined so may terms. Some things I would do before any FA noms would be to check your refs; some of them might be called unreliable, like 2 and 4. There's a red link in the beginning, which should be fixed. It could also be expanded; I'd like a section about how the Communist government of Vietnam opposed the Aodai. I'd also check about Wikipe-tan on your article. ;) Intothewoods29 (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
1. flows well, organized
2.refs all seem good
3. keeps on topic
4. NPOV
5.Stable
6. pics all have tags.
- There must be some mistake. Reference 2 is Claire Ellis, author of the book Culture Shock! Vietnam. Reference 4 is an academic article on Google Scholar. Kauffner (talk) 03:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sources look terrible, I will try to help you.--Amore Mio (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Diacriticals
"Aodai" is an English-language word that appears in Merriam Webster, OED and other dictionaries -- always without diacriticals. So the diacriticals are inappropriate here. Picture galleries at the end aren't the Misplaced Pages way. Some of the pictures in the gallery don't even depict aodais. I've tried to integrated them with the text and also deleted a few to avoid putting undue emphasis on the nineteenth century. Kauffner (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)