GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk 21:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- I did a copyedit; not much, just syntax, the odd typo etc.
- "answered back" sound a bit aqward; I replaced it with "stated", as that is neutral.
- The article should mention what "metro standard" really means (longer and taller platforms, third-rail etc).
Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk 21:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
PS. Could you check the Commons categories Ullevål stadion stasjon and Berg stasjon and make sure they're in the right geographic category. Right now they're in Sogn, but should they instead be in Ullevål? Thanks, Arsenikk 21:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I removed the cat "Sogn, Oslo" from Ullevål stadion stasjon and added "Ullevål Hageby" (which is pretty close to the station), to which I added the cat "Ullevål". Berg stasjon is actually located in the borough Berg, but no cat or photos existed, so I put it in "Tåsen" and "Ullevål". Thanks for the notice. P.S: As you may see, I'm planning to make Sognsvann Line a GT, so I'm glad you nominated it. Your article really came in handy when I made Sognsvannsbanen an AA at nowp for some months ago, and I hope it's okay if I extend with some text at no:Sognsvannsbanen (e.g. Sognsvatn, newer history, etc.)? --Eisfbnore (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- I was wondering if you were going for a GT. Feel free to add anything useful to the Sognsvann Line article. Arsenikk 12:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)