Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
"Valuable" book
No serious, published historian considers Gedgaudas a serious researcher or his book a valuable resource. The cited Voruta article is by lt:Rimantas Matulis who is not a published historian but an activist ("veikėjas"). The reviewed book is by lt:Jonas Laurinavičius (1938), a journalist. The book barely gets any attention on the Internet and appears received no reviews from credible academic authors. It has been clearly labeled as pseudo-historical by Tomas Baranauskas. The book is not held widely in libraries; looks like only 3 in Lithuania and 2 in Belarus. If either Gedgaudas' or Laurinavičius' were considered "valuable", there would be a lot more and better references to them in the academic press. Renata (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
