Misplaced Pages

Talk:Świętokrzyskie Mountains

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMountains Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPoland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Highest between Sudetes and the Ural mountains"

In what sense? The HCM are rather low, with tallest peak under 1000 m. It is true that they are the highest elevation between the Sudetes/Carpathians mountainous region and Ural. However, within the Sudetes/Carpathians mountainous region, Carpathians are both much higher than Sudetes and further to the East. This actually makes Carpathians the highest mountains between Sudetes and Ural, higher than either in fact, and I'm saying this as a Sudetes patriot ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.47.121.189 (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

That claim is completely bogus, irrelevant and the citation quotes a random forum – unreliable source. While not making any directional sense either, as you note. It's not even mentioned in the Polish version of the article, as far as I can tell.
Removing. Anybody who still feels it belongs there, please give a proper reliable citation source and explanation. Technicality nitpicker (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories: