Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ștefan Kovács

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconRomania
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group.
WikiProject iconFootball: France Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the French football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ștefan vs Istvan

There is no sources that indicates that his real name was Istvan. Csurla , please stop adding the Hungarian name to the infobox. 79.117.211.187 (talk) 09:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

You are wrong. There is source for István and it is also indicated in artcile. Pls read again. - Csurla (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hungarian:

Bő egy hónappal később, június 9-én, a belgrádi Szport című lap megalapításának 10. évfordulója tiszteletére rendezett meccsen (Crvena zvezda–Világválogatott 2-2, tizenegyesekkel 7-6) Mészöly Kálmán és Albert Flórián játszott a jugoszláv fővárosban, a csapat edzője az Ajax erdélyi mestere, Kovács István volt.

the trainer of team was Transilvanian István Kovács who managed Ajax.

Bye - Csurla (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

It is written only that the Hungarian form of the name was Kovács István, not that this was his native name 79.117.216.98 (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
He was Hungarian, his native name is Hungarian. Easy? - Csurla (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
You have to show us his birth certificate / identity card to prove that his given name was Istvan 79.117.184.208 (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Why? I preferred the discussion with real user instead of anon. Pls make an account. - Csurla (talk) 21:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

WP:RSN

I asked for some extra oponions about Csurla's source here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#WP:SPS_or_not.3FPlease don't modify the article again before consensus Folbal1 (talk) 08:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I disagree with modification. You are the only one user who delete eveything this article with related Stefan Kovács Hungarian origin. Stop the war! You have any normally contribution in wikipedia just deletion from this article. - Csurla (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

There is no reliable source about that (in my opinion) Folbal1 (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
And in this reason enough you delete fact? It's not enugh. You create edit warring! Pls stop this activities in wikipedia. You just destroy here. - Csurla (talk) 09:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion, SPS is failed . - Csurla (talk) 10:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Protected

I have fully protected the page for two days to stop the edit warring. The thing to do now is to calmly discuss the content and to try and find a solution that you can both live with. If you can't find a solution by yourself, then I recommend going to WP:3O or WP:DRN. I don't fully protecting pages for too long, though, so if the edit warring continues after the protection expires then I will probably use blocks instead. Best — Mr. Stradivarius 12:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

This part contains a proper source but it was deleted. Protection is a good idea, but without this part absolutely wrong choice. - Csurla (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, admins don't get to be picky about which version they protect an article at - see The Wrong Version. Now you need to find a consensus on what to do, and once you've done that then I can unprotect the article for you. — Mr. Stradivarius 21:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I added a part to article with reliable source. Meanwhile I found further sources. That is the consesus for me. I will added this part as soon as possible. Folbal1 just try to find newer administative reason for deletion. - Csurla (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, if you have a consensus "for you" that doesn't include Folbal, then that isn't much of a consensus in my view. If you still disagree after the protection expires then the correct thing is to go to dispute resolution, preferably WP:3O or WP:DRN. I don't like fully protecting pages more than is absolutely necessary, so if you begin edit warring again after the protection expires then I will be handing out blocks this time. Best — Mr. Stradivarius 08:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Categories: