 | This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on (At Your Best) You Are Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626051113/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301121519/http://longboredsurfer.com/charts.php?year=1994 to http://longboredsurfer.com/charts.php?year=1994
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://frankocean.tumblr.com/post/108321281171
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Split
- Split, This section alone qualifies to have its own article and it meets the requirements stated at WP:Song, half (or possibly more) of the main article is occupied, composed and or about the Aaliyah version. Neo the Twin (talk) 03:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Can somebody explain to me why after a year this discussion hasn't been closed and there's still a split template hanging in the article. shelovesneo (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Shelovesneo: Split and merge discussions often wait around for a very long time with little participation — probably because implementing them is generally more complicated than other sorts of discussions. See Category:Articles to be merged and Category:Articles to be split. There isn't a the same sort of timeline, or much of a centralized listing as deletion discussions or requested moves. SilverLocust 💬 16:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- You could remove the template and just split this. Of course, it's possible somebody will later have objections and want to merge it back. Or Misplaced Pages:Proposed article splits seems to be a place you can seek more participants. I haven't ever requested a split. SilverLocust 💬 17:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- SilverLocust, how can I adequately perform the split? I'll be bold and do it. dxneo (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dxneo: There are some instructions at WP:PROPERSPLIT. SilverLocust 💬 08:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- SilverLocust, how can I adequately perform the split? I'll be bold and do it. dxneo (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- You could remove the template and just split this. Of course, it's possible somebody will later have objections and want to merge it back. Or Misplaced Pages:Proposed article splits seems to be a place you can seek more participants. I haven't ever requested a split. SilverLocust 💬 17:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Shelovesneo: Split and merge discussions often wait around for a very long time with little participation — probably because implementing them is generally more complicated than other sorts of discussions. See Category:Articles to be merged and Category:Articles to be split. There isn't a the same sort of timeline, or much of a centralized listing as deletion discussions or requested moves. SilverLocust 💬 16:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Can somebody explain to me why after a year this discussion hasn't been closed and there's still a split template hanging in the article. shelovesneo (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)