GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 12:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Have started reviewing the article. ASHU 12:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Review
- No disambiguation links found. All inter wiki-links are correct.
- No edit wars found.
Problems
- Found dead links and have tagged them in article. Please remove them.
Done Have removed the only dead link found manually. ASHU 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Final Analysis
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Not much concerns here. ASHU 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references and corrected where problems were found ASHU 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- All aspects have been covered. ASHU 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: