Misplaced Pages

Talk:.20 BR

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .20 BR article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFirearms Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

No references. Why does this still exist?

Deleted text: "20 caliber wildcats based on the 6.8mm SPC and 22 PPC present a middleground between the 20 BR and the more common 20 Tactical and commercially produced 204 Ruger" because makes little sense. I cannot find data for a 6.8mm SPC based .204 wildcat and the .20-22 PPC matches the capacity and performance of the .204 Ruger. StraightAsADie (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Update... I found the .20 PDK which is based on 6.8mm SPC in CotW 13th ed. Performance of the .20 PDK seems to be identical to the .20 BR. This has not changed my decision to remove that text from the article. StraightAsADie (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Categories: