Misplaced Pages

Talk:.375 Remington Ultra Magnum

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .375 Remington Ultra Magnum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFirearms Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Chuck Hawks reference removed

Chuck Hawks reference removed - the link led to a password protected site that is completely unusable, and thus of no relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.167.200 (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Chuck Hawks reference removed - the link led to a password protected site that is completely unusable, and thus of no relevance.

I put the reference back. The rule for external links is not password sites. This is not the rule for sources. Many times a source quoted cannot be reached directly, for example an out-of-print book. This does not mean the source cannot be used. If you remove the source, you take a factual statement with a reference, and turn it into an unreferenced statement. If you have a better source, feel free to add/replace, but don't simply remove sources. Arthurrh 20:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

"Hot rodding"

A sentence in the intro describes how handloads can achieve higher velocities, but just a few paragraphs later, another sentence says this practice is unacceptably dangerous. One or the other ought to go. 67.170.198.151 (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

done AliveFreeHappy (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Categories: