Talk:.577/450 Martini–Henry

< Talk:.577

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .577/450 Martini–Henry article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Categorisation

This doesn't seem to fit with the other contents of the Ammunition category. Mike Wilson 22:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Removed it from Ammunition cat. Mike Wilson 07:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Use on game

I would love to see some more information about the cartridge's use against dangerous game/wildlife. My great grandfather worked on a project to lay telegraph lines in Rhodesia in the early part of the 20th Century. A fellow Briton was attacked by a young lion during the night and my relative shot the creature just below the right eye socket with a .577 Martini Henry. The lion dropped the man and turned on my relative. Fortunately, the lion was speared to death by native workers before it could inflict serious injury to him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Have a Martini Heney Rifle The recoil is something with this cartridge

The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Have a Martini Heney Rifle The recoil is something with this cartridge

The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Aren't the numbers reversed? Shouldn't this be the .450/.577 Martini-Henry?

Granted, I'm no "expert" but, I've always heard this round referred to as the .450/.577 Martini-Henry round. How did the numbers get reversed?Al Lowe (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll second that

Can/will somebody better at this than I/me please reverse/swap the numbers. It's confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 (talk) 04:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Early British cartridge designations are often this way around, (.500/450 Nitro Express, .450/400 Nitro Express, .400/350 Nitro Express etc), that is what they called it and what all of the sources still call it, it should not be swapped around. Cavalryman (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC).

Late to the party I know, but the official British designation was .45 calibre. When in British army service it was not known as 577/450. Fdsdh1 (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Categories: