 | This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding | |
|---|---|
.svg) | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of England and Wales |
| Citation | IRLR 255 |
| Keywords | |
| Redundancy | |
Thomas & Betts Manufacturing Ltd v Harding IRLR 255 is a UK labour law case, concerning redundancy.
Facts
Ms Harding was a packer, and also worked on a production line. The production line was closed and she was dismissed for redundancy. She claimed there was still work for packers, and if needed, one who had not worked so long should be dismissed instead, so the dismissal was unfair.
Judgment
Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal’s decision that the dismissal was unfair.
 | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (February 2015) |