Misplaced Pages

Thomson Newspapers Co v Canada (AG)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Freedom of expression case in Supreme Court of Canada
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Thomson Newspapers Co v Canada" AG – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Thomson Newspapers Co v Canada (AG)
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Decided 1 S.C.R. 877
Citation 1 S.C.R. 877
Case history
Subsequent actionsThe Supreme Court struck down the law, finding it violated section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and was too restrictive to be justified under section 1 of the Charter.
Case opinions
The law restricting the publication, broadcast, or dissemination of opinion surveys within the last three days of a federal election campaign violated section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Thomson Newspapers Co v Canada (AG), 1 S.C.R. 877, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to freedom of expression in which the Supreme Court struck down a law that prohibited the publication, broadcast, or dissemination of opinion surveys within the last three days of a federal election campaign, as it violated section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The provision clearly restricted expression and was found to be too restrictive to be justified under section 1 of the Charter.

See also

External links


Flag of CanadaJustice icon

This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: