Misplaced Pages

Tokamak Physics Experiment

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Former American plasma physics experiment

The Tokamak Physics Experiment (TPX) was a plasma physics experiment that was designed but not built. It was designed by an inter-organizational team in the USA led by Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. The experiment was designed to test theories about how Tokamaks would behave in a high-performance, steady-state regime.

TPX
Tokamak Physics Experiment
Device typeTokamak
LocationUnited States
AffiliationPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory and others
Technical specifications
Major radius2.25 m (7 ft 5 in)
Minor radius0.5 m (1 ft 8 in)
Magnetic field4.0 T (40,000 G)
Heating power17.5 MW
Plasma current2.0 MA
History
Date(s) of constructionNot built
Year(s) of operationNot built–Not built
Succeeded byKSTAR

Goals

TPX was to be the successor to the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR). While TFTR was designed to achieve Q>1 (more fusion power produced by the plasma than injected into the plasma), TFTR only operated for short pulses, and did not provide data from and experience with plasmas behave like those of an economic Fusion power reactor. Specifically, TPX was designed to fill this need.

TPX was designed to test theories which suggested ways of making a future fusion power reactor compact, economic, and reliable. Specifically, TPX was designed to be near steady state, with pulse lengths of 1,000 seconds (more than 15 minutes). It was designed to operate at high Bootstrap current, meaning that less power would have to be expended driving toroidal current. It was designed to operate at high values of Beta, meaning that it would be able to store more plasma pressure for a given magnetic field. It was designed to operate with a high level of confinement, meaning that less auxiliary heating would be required.

History

After the cancellation of the Compact Ignition Tokamak in 1991, the United States Department of Energy directed the US fusion program to find ways to improve the tokamak. In 1993, a conceptual design review was held for TPX in 1993, finalizing the conceptual design. The design team was managed by Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and included members from other US institutions. The program was canceled in 1995, as the proposed cost was too high. The proposed cost was $539 Million in 1993 dollars.

Legacy

The KSTAR tokamak built South Korea is based on the TPX design. KSTAR uses Hydrogen, not Deuterium as TPX was designed to, so neutron activation of components is not as large a problem. Because of this, the titanium vacuum vessel of the TPX design was replaced with a stainless steel vessel in KSTAR, and the remote maintenance system was removed from the design.

Description

Because TPX was designed to be steady-state (or at least long-pulse, with 1,000 seconds duration), the electromagnetic coils which provide the magnetic field were to be superconducting. They were to be made of Niobium–tin superconducting cables. The toroidal magnetic field strength at the center of the plasma was to be 4.0 Tesla.

TPX was designed to have its toroidal electric current be 100% non-inductively driven. Because of this, it was to have three current drive systems: An 8 MW neutral beam injector system, an 8 MW ion cyclotron resonance system, and a 1.5 MW lower hybrid wave system. The toroidal current carried by the plasma was to be up to 2.0 MA.

Because TPX was designed to test at least six different high-performance scenarios, its poloidal field coils and current drive systems were designed for flexibility. Some examples of possible scenarios are: one inspired by the ARIES-I reactor design which had an aggressive Beta, one inspired by the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor Supershot regime, and one with a profile which produced an internal transport barrier for enhanced confinement.

References

  1. ^ Schmidt, J. A.; Thomassen, K. I.; Goldston, R. J.; Neilson, G. H.; Nevins, W. M.; Sinnis, J. C.; Andersen, P.; Bair, W.; Barr, W. L.; Batchelor, D. B.; Baxi, C. (1993-09-01). "The design of the Tokamak Physics Experiment (TPX)". Journal of Fusion Energy. 12 (3): 221–258. Bibcode:1993JFuE...12..221S. doi:10.1007/BF01079667. ISSN 1572-9591. S2CID 1993786.
  2. "PPPL physicist Hutch Neilson receives award for decades of leadership on national and international fusion experiments". Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Retrieved 2021-12-03.
  3. Davidson, Ronald C.; Goldston, Robert J.; Neilson, George H.; Thomassen, Keith I. (1995-06-01). "The Tokamak Physics Experiment". Physics of Plasmas. 2 (6): 2417–2426. Bibcode:1995PhPl....2.2417D. doi:10.1063/1.871265. ISSN 1070-664X.
Fusion power, processes and devices
Core topics
Nuclear fusion
Processes,
methods
Confinement
type
Gravitational
  • Alpha process
  • Triple-alpha process
  • CNO cycle
  • Fusor
  • Helium flash
  • Nova
  • Proton–proton chain
  • Carbon-burning
  • Lithium burning
  • Neon-burning
  • Oxygen-burning
  • Silicon-burning
  • R-process
  • S-process
  • Magnetic
    Magneto-inertial
    Inertial
    Electrostatic
    Other forms
    Devices,
    experiments
    Magnetic
    confinement
    Tokamak
    International
    Americas
    Asia,
    Oceania
    Europe
    Stellarator
    Americas
    Asia,
    Oceania
    Europe
    Pinch
    RFP
    Mirror
    Other
    Magneto-inertial
    Inertial
    confinement
    Laser
    Americas
    Asia
    Europe
    Non-laser
    Category: