Misplaced Pages

Theban tomb TT8
Burial site of Kha and Merit
The burial chamber of Kha and Merit as discovered in 1906
TT8
Coordinates	25°43′44″N 32°36′03″E / 25.7289°N 32.6009°E / 25.7289; 32.6009
Location	Deir el-Medina, Theban Necropolis
Discovered	Before 1818 (chapel) 15 February 1906 (tomb)
Excavated by	Ernesto Schiaparelli (1906) Bernard Bruyère (1924)
Decoration	Offering and feasting scenes (chapel) Undecorated (tomb)
Layout	Straight axis
← Previous TT7Next → TT9

The tomb of Kha and Merit, also known by its tomb number Theban Tomb 8 or TT8, is the funerary chapel and burial place of the ancient Egyptian foreman Kha and his wife Merit, in the northern cemetery of the workmen's village of Deir el-Medina. Kha supervised the workforce who constructed royal tombs during the reigns of the pharaohs Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV and Amenhotep III (r. 1425 – 1353 BC) in the mid-Eighteenth Dynasty of the early New Kingdom of Egypt. Of unknown background, he probably rose to his position through skill and was rewarded by at least one king. He and his wife Merit had three known children. Kha died in his 60s, while Merit died before him, seemingly unexpectedly, in her 20s or 30s.

The couple's pyramid-shaped chapel has been known since at least 1818 when one of their funerary stele was purchased by the antiquarian Bernardino Drovetti. Scenes from the chapel were first copied in the 19th century by early Egyptologists including John Gardiner Wilkinson and Karl Lepsius. The paintings show Kha and Merit receiving offerings from their children and appearing before Osiris, god of the dead. The decoration has been damaged over the millennia, deteriorating due to structural decay and human actions.

Kha and Merit's tomb was cut into the base of the cliffs opposite their chapel. This position allowed the entrance to be quickly buried by debris deposited by landslides and later tomb construction, hiding its location from ancient robbers. The undisturbed tomb was discovered in February 1906 in excavations led by the Egyptologist Ernesto Schiaparelli on behalf of the Italian Archaeological Mission. The burial chamber contained over 400 items including carefully arranged stools and beds, neatly stacked storage chests of personal belongings, clothing and tools, tables piled with foods such as bread, meats and fruit, and the couple's two large wooden sarcophagi housing their coffined mummies. Merit's body was fitted with a funerary mask; Kha was provided with one of the earliest known copies of the Book of the Dead. Their mummies have never been unwrapped. X-rays, CT scanning and chemical analyses have revealed neither were embalmed in the typical fashion but that both bodies are well preserved. Both wear metal jewellery beneath their bandages, although only Kha has funerary amulets.

Almost all of the contents of the tomb were awarded to the excavators and were shipped to Italy soon after the discovery. They have been displayed in the Museo Egizio in Turin since its arrival, and an entire gallery is devoted to it. This has been redesigned several times.

Kha's career and family

and
Kha and Merit in hieroglyphs
Era: New Kingdom (1550–1069 BC)

Kha (transliterated as ḪꜤi or ḪꜤ) was an official in the workmen's village known today as Deir el-Medina during the mid-Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom. Often referred to as an architect or foreman in modern publications, he directed the workmen that cut and decorated royal tombs in the Valley of the Kings ("the Great Place") in the reigns of three successive pharaohs: Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, and Amenhotep III (r. 1425 – 1353 BC). Kha's origins are unknown. His only attested parent is his father, Iuy, who bears no titles and about whom nothing is known. Therefore, Kha is assumed to have attained his position through skill. Kha had a close relationship with an official named Neferhebef, suggested to be his mentor or tutor, who directed the construction of the tomb of Amenhotep II. Neferhebef is depicted with his wife in a place of honour in Kha's funerary chapel, and his name appears on items in Kha's tomb.

Kha likely began his career in the reign of Amenhotep II, possibly working on the royal tomb under the supervision of Neferhebef. The Egyptologist Barbara Russo proposes that Kha attained the role of "chief of the Great Place" (ḥry m st Ꜥꜣ(t)) during the reign of Thutmose IV and reached the peak of his career during the reign of Amenhotep III, when he was given the title of "overseer of works in the Great Place" (imy-r kꜣ(w)t m st Ꜥꜣ(t)). He also bore the titles "overseer of the works of the central administration" (imy-r kꜣ(w)t pr-Ꜥꜣ) and "royal scribe" (sš nswt).

Kha received several royal gifts over his career. The first was a gilded cubit rod given by Amenhotep II, and he later received a bronze bowl from Amenhotep III. His most significant award was a "gold of honour" or "gold of favour" (nbw n ḥswt), a reward given by the king to officials in recognition of their service, although which ruler it was given by is debated. Thutmose IV or Amenhotep III are considered the most likely candidates based on the style of the jewellery worn by the mummies of Kha and Merit. Preparations for his tomb likely began in the reign of Thutmose IV whose name occurs most frequently as a seal on vessels. Based on the style of his coffins and the art style seen on painted funerary chests in the tomb, Kha probably died in the third decade of Amenhotep III's reign.

Merit (Mryt) also transcribed as Meryt, was Kha's wife. She was titled "lady of the house" (nbt pr), a common title given to married women. She seems to have unexpectedly predeceased Kha, as she was buried in a coffin intended for him. They had three known children: two sons named Amenemopet and Nakhteftaneb, and a daughter named Merit. Amenemopet also worked in Deir el-Medina and was titled "servant in the royal necropolis". No title is known for Nakhteftaneb; he seems to have been in charge of the funerary cult of his parents. Merit became a priestess of Amun. All the children outlived their mother but Amenemopet may have died before his father.

Chapel

Location and description

The funerary chapel of Kha and Merit, numbered TT8, stands on a terrace at the northern end of the Deir el-Medina necropolis. It is a small pyramid, whose sides measure 4.66 by 4.72 metres (15.3 ft × 15.5 ft) with an incline of 75 degrees, giving the structure a projected total height of 9.32 metres (30.6 ft). Constructed of mudbrick, the exterior was plastered and painted white. It is an early example of the pyramid form at Deir el-Medina, derived from the tombs of contemporary nobility; this shape became typical in the workmen's village in later dynasties. Kha and his workmen would have built their own chapels in their down time between work on royal construction projects. The chapel would be the focus of the owner's cult after death, the place where visitors gave offerings to sustain the deceased in the afterlife.

The chapel faces northeast and has a single doorway with large doorposts. Nothing remains of the lintel and cornice they supported. Like other pyramid-chapels in the necropolis, there was probably a niche in the face of the pyramid, above the door, which held a small stele. The interior of the chapel is a single room, longer than it is wide, measuring 3 by 1.6 metres (9.8 ft × 5.2 ft) with a vaulted ceiling 2.15 metres (7.1 ft) high. A niche in the back wall housed a stele now in the Museo Egizio in Turin, Italy.

The pyramid-chapel was capped by a pyramidion of whitewashed sandstone. It is decorated on all sides with sunk bas-reliefs of Kha worshipping the sun god Ra and inscribed with hymns to the god at the stages of his journey: the east and damaged north faces adore Ra at sunrise, the south face praises him as he crosses the sky, and the west face worships Ra as he sets. The pyramidion was reused in antiquity for a small, anonymous pyramid-chapel near the courtyard of TT290, a few metres south-east of TT8 and was rediscovered on 8 February 1923 by the Egyptologist Bernard Bruyère. It is now housed in the Louvre in Paris, France.

A rectangular walled enclosure surrounds the chapel, cut back into the rocky hillside at its rear. In front of the chapel is a rectangular courtyard, measuring approximately 8 by 8 metres (26 ft × 26 ft), which was probably entered through a small pylon-shaped gateway. Typically in Deir el-Medina, the tomb shaft was cut within this courtyard. In this case, it was instead cut into the base of the cliffs opposite. In 1924, Bernard Bruyère excavated the courtyard to see if an existing burial shaft close to the area was the reason for the separation. On the right side of the courtyard, 3 metres (9.8 ft) from the entrance of the chapel, in the expected location of a shaft, he found a pit 0.75 metres (2.5 ft) deep and 1 metre (3.3 ft) wide lined with mudbrick. Schiaparelli suggested that this pit was where some of the couple's funerary items, known before the discovery of the tomb, were originally deposited. Bruyère suggested the separation of chapel and tomb was instead because of the very poor quality rock beneath the courtyard.

The chapel was in a ruined state by the 19th and 20th centuries; the exterior was partially restored by the Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale (IFAO). It is not open to tourists.

• The chapel during Schiaparelli's 1906 excavations
• The interior of Kha and Merit's funerary chapel in 1906
• Pyramidion of Kha's chapel, now in the Louvre

Decoration

The interior of the chapel was plastered and fully decorated. On stylistic grounds, it was completed in the reigns of Thutmose IV or Amenhotep III. As with the exterior, the decorative scheme mimics the types of scenes and layouts seen in the chapels of the elite. Kha presumably employed his own skilled workmen to execute the decoration. Unlike the tombs of nobles, the texts have errors such as unconventional hieroglyph groupings and omitted signs, indicating that the artists had limited literacy.

The ceiling is covered with two different geometric and floral patterns separated by a central inscription that runs the length of the room. The vault is bordered on each side by another band of text and an upper frieze of alternating lotus flowers, buds, and grapes separates the inscriptions from the wall scenes proper.

The left wall depicts a banquet scene. Kha and Merit are depicted on the far right, seated before an offering table; their daughter adjusts her father's collar and one of their sons presents them with offerings. Below this scene, a narrow register depicts an additional offering of four amphorae garlanded with flowers and fruit and attended by a servant. The rest of the wall depicts guests and musicians. In a lower register, offering bearers advance in the opposite direction, towards a seated couple who are now mostly obliterated by damage.

The right wall has the same layout as the left. The large scene depicts the god Osiris seated in a raised kiosk (canopy supported by columns); he receives offerings from Kha and Merit, who are accompanied by their children. In the two smaller registers, servants approach with offerings of a goat or gazelle and a white ox wearing a floral garland.

The back wall is divided into three registers around the central stele niche. A pair of Anubis-jackals lying on rectangular tomb-shrines face each other across a large bouquet in the uppermost, semi-circular register; unlike the rest of the decoration, which has a yellow background, this is executed on a light grey background. In the second register, Kha is depicted twice, once on the left and once on the right, kneeling and offering a bouquet. The left side of the lowest register shows Neferhebef and Taiunes seated with offerings before them and receiving ministrations from a man, on the right side of the register, dressed in the leopard skin of a sem-priest (one who conducted funerary rituals). He may be their son but his identity is unknown as the inscription is badly damaged.

The chapel was damaged only a decade or so after it went into use during the reign of Amenhotep III's successor, Akhenaten. The name of the god Amun was erased wherever it occurred as part of Akhenaten's iconoclasm against the deity. It was later restored but in a way that does not match the original text. Later, all the faces of the figures were hammered out, possibly by Copts. The decoration near the door deteriorated further after the partial collapse of the ceiling in this area. The back wall was damaged in the 19th century during the removal of the stele, and a graffito in hieratic, mentioned by Karl Lepsius in the 1840s, was destroyed sometime after his publication.

In the 19th century, the paintings were copied by several early Egyptologists including John Gardiner Wilkinson and Lepsius. Ernesto Schiaparelli briefly described the chapel in his 1927 publication of the burial chamber; a full study of the decoration was made in the 1930s by Jeanne Marie Thérèse Vandier d'Abbadie during the IFAO's excavations of the village.

Steles

A painted stone stele dedicated to Kha and Merit stood in the niche in the back wall of the chapel. Around 1818 it was removed from the chapel and purchased by agents of the Italian antiquarian Bernardino Drovetti. In 1824 it was donated to the Museo Egizio as part of the Drovetti collection. The first register depicts Kha adoring Osiris and Anubis, who sit back to back. In the second register, Kha and Merit, accompanied by a young child, sit before a table of offerings; their son Amenemopet stands on the far side officiating. The two lines of text at the bottom of the stele give offerings to the gods Amun, Ra, Ra-Horakhty, and Osiris, and ask for funerary offerings to be given.

A second stele is housed in the British Museum, London. The large upper register depicts Thutmose IV offering floral bouquets and incense to an enthroned Amun and the deified Ahmose-Nefertari, who stands behind him; Kha kneels in adoration below them in the second register. This stele was likely originally made for the Kha of TT8 and was later restored and adapted by another Deir el-Medina foreman, Inherkau (whose name can be abbreviated to Kha), owner of TT299. The image of Amun, hacked out during Akhenaten's reign, was restored, and the name and titles of Inherkau's wife Henutdjuu were added in ink instead of being cut into the stone.

Tomb

Discovery and clearance

The tomb was discovered on 15 February 1906 during excavations by the Italian Archaeological Mission headed by the Egyptologist Ernesto Schiaparelli, director of Museo Egizio. The Mission began investigating the village of Deir el-Medina in 1905 and their 1906 excavation season focused on the village necropolis. Knowing that Kha and Merit's chapel in the northern cemetery was older than the visible Twentieth Dynasty tombs in the area, Schiaparelli reasoned that Eighteenth Dynasty tombs were likely present at the base of the nearby cliffs, buried by debris from their own and later tomb construction.

He began excavations at the mouth of the valley and proceeded towards the end. More than 250 workers, divided into several gangs, excavated for four weeks, uncovering only opened and robbed tombs. In February 1906, after clearing debris along two-thirds of the valley's length, they encountered an area of clean white limestone chip 25 metres (82 ft) north of Kha and Merit's chapel. Two further days of digging uncovered an irregular opening with a set of roughly-cut descending stairs. The doorway at the base of the staircase was sealed by a plastered wall of stacked stones. The excavators suspected the burial was unrobbed as the blocking showed no evidence of resealing; a hole was made to admit the foreman Khalifa who confirmed the tomb beyond was unviolated. Two members of Schiaparelli's team, the supervisor Benvenuto Savina and Alessandro Casati, guarded the entrance overnight.

The following morning, with the Inspector of Antiquities of Upper Egypt, Arthur Weigall, in attendance, the first wall was demolished, revealing the first of two horizontal corridors separated by a blocking wall. The second corridor contained overflow from the burial chamber, including Kha's bed with bundles of persea branches underneath, a large lamp stand, baskets, jars, baskets of fruit, a wooden stool, and a whip with Kha's name written on it. At the end of passage was a locked wooden door which Weigall recalled "seemed so modern that Professor Schiaparelli called to his servant for the key, who quite seriously replied 'I don't know where it is, sir.'" A thin saw was inserted between the two planks of wood to cut the crossbars on the back of the door, allowing entry into the burial chamber and preserving the lock.

Weigall entered the burial chamber first, followed by Schiaparelli and members of his team. The room was packed with objects, carefully ordered and arranged by members of the funeral party over 3000 years earlier. The excavators were struck by how fresh and undecayed the contents looked after three millennia; Weigall in particular commented that, from the state of the items, the tomb seemed to have been closed only months before.

The tomb and its contents were recorded, photographed, and cleared in only three days, possibly due to fear of theft. A single plan drawing was made which noted the locations of 18 key objects, and several photos of the interior with artefacts in situ were taken. Schiaparelli's brother, Cesare, was a photographer and Schiaparelli's use of photography to record TT8 was not typical at the time; usually, the arrangement of the contents would be recorded in a hand-drawn plan and items would be individually photographed (if at all) only once removed from the tomb. On 18 February 1906 the contents were transferred to the tomb of Amun-her-khepeshef (QV55) in the Valley of the Queens before being shipped to Cairo and ultimately to Italy.

TT8 received limited attention until 1927, when Schiaparelli published a full account of the discovery of the tomb and a description of its contents, a year before his death. In his 1928 review of the publication for the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Egyptologist Henry Hall praised the large volume for its readability and inclusion of many photographs of the artefacts, but also characterised it as "not scientifically precise". He criticised its lack of detail expected for an Egyptological publication, such as the absence of scale bars in the photos, no or poor reproduction of the hieroglyphic text, and no inventory listing all the objects. Such critiques have been echoed by modern authors. In her 2010 book on the tomb, then-director of Museo Egizio Eleni Vassilika calls Schiaparelli's treatment "uneven" and criticises the narrative's many tangents and mistakes. Among its omissions and mistakes are neglecting to mention the date of the discovery or give the dimensions of the tomb, stating that many of Kha's possessions were in a box too small for them, and that Merit's toilet box was unsealed. The publication used a blank floor plan and only three photos of the burial chamber, leading to ongoing confusion regarding the positioning of objects which are not included in the unpublished plan or seen in photographs, such as the slatted table and senet game board.

Architecture

Kha and Merit's tomb was not dug in the forecourt of their funerary chapel but cut into the base of the cliffs 25 metres (82 ft) away. It is one of only a few tombs in Deir el-Medina to exhibit this separation. It likely contributed to the tomb escaping the attention of robbers, as did its position at the base of the cliffs, which allowed the entrance to be covered by debris from landslides and later tombs cut above.

The tomb is entered via a 4 m (13 ft) deep shaft and a staircase that descends to a depth of 8.50 m (27.9 ft), followed by two straight corridors with a total length of 13.40 m (44.0 ft). Walls of stacked stones divided the corridor from the stairs and the corridors from each other. The first corridor is long, low and roughly cut. The second is shorter but higher and wider; this part is sometimes referred to as the antechamber because it stored objects that did not fit in the burial chamber. At the end is a single burial chamber set at a right angle to the axis. The room measures 5.6 m × 3.4 m (18 ft × 11 ft) with a 2.9 m (9.5 ft) high barrel-vaulted ceiling. The walls were smoothed, plastered, and painted yellow but otherwise undecorated.

Contents

The tomb of Kha and Merit was discovered entirely unrobbed, containing over 440 items. It is a rare example of an intact non-noble burial from the height of the Eighteenth Dynasty, and is the best provisioned of any similar tomb known from Egypt. The majority of the objects were used by Kha and Merit in life, such as clothing and furniture. Clothing was laundered and neatly folded in baskets or chests, and some furniture was given a fresh coat of paint. Other pieces were made to be placed in the tomb, having painted decoration in imitation of expensive inlay work and hieroglyphic texts that are often full of grammatical errors. The various boxes and chests were labelled for the use of either Kha or Merit with brief inscriptions in ink. Different kinds of breads, meats, vegetables, fruits and wine were provided for the deceased to eat in the afterlife. Despite the large number of items within the tomb, they were carefully laid out in an orderly fashion. The quality and quantity of objects is assumed to be typical of an upper-middle class burial. Although less richly outfitted than noble or royal burials, it provides a more complete picture of the variety of food, clothing, and personal objects expected in burials during the mid-Eighteenth Dynasty. Since 2017, the tomb's contents have been the subject of the "TT8 Project", a multidisciplinary and non-invasive study of all the objects, the full publication of which is planned for 2024.

Personal possessions

The personal items belonging to the couple were found neatly stored in various boxes, chests, and baskets. Kha's personal possessions make up the bulk of the objects, with some 196 items inscribed for him. These included work tools such as a rare folding wooden cubit rod (in its own leather pouch), scribal palettes, a drill, chisel, an adze, and a possible level. Among his cosmetics were bronze razors in a leather bag, a comb, and tubes of kohl. Also present were items for preparing and serving drinks, including a funnel, two metal strainers, a silver jar, and faience bowls. His clothing, marked with his monogram, was stored in several boxes and a bag. All were made of linen and consisted of 59 loincloths and 19 tunics, and further rectangular pieces of fabric, identified by Schiaparelli as four shawls and 26 sashes or kilts; seven of these were knotted together with loincloths to form sets of clothing. Other objects belonging to Kha were distributed around the tomb, such as four sticks (two with decorative bark inlay), and a traveling mat, folded on a net of doum palm nuts.

Several items within the tomb were gifts to Kha from others. A cubit rod covered entirely in gold leaf and bearing the cartouches of Amenhotep II was an award from that king, although Kha's name does not appear on it. Another royal gift was a large dish with the throne name of Amenhotep III inscribed on the handle. Likely produced in the royal workshops, it was given to Kha as part of a royal award. A large metal situla bears the name and titles of Userhat, a priest of the royal funerary cults of Mutnofret, a wife of Thutmose I, and Sitamun, in this case most likely referring to the daughter of Ahmose I. He worked on the western bank of Thebes, presumably the Deir el-Medina area, and the gift was in recognition of Kha's high status at the height of his career. One of Kha's two scribal palettes belonged to Amenmes, a high official of the reign of Thutmose IV who was buried in TT118. He was "overseer of all of the construction works of the king", meaning he possibly worked with Kha. One stick was a gift from Neferhebef, with a dedicatory inscription recording that it was made by him, presumably for Kha, but the space where Kha's name would be inserted was left blank. Another stick belonged to Khaemwaset, who probably worked alongside Kha as he too bears the title "chief of the Great Place". Kha's senet board belonged to Benermeret, a member of the cult of Amun at Karnak temple, who had it inscribed and decorated for his parents Neferhebef and Taiunes.

Merit's personal possessions were much fewer than Kha's, and were placed beside her bed, near the door. Egyptologist Lynn Meskell considers this difference in the quantity of items to be a reflection of the inequality between the sexes at the elite level of ancient Egyptian society. A large wooden cabinet, 1.10 metres (3.6 ft) tall, contained her wig which Schiaparelli said "still shines with the perfumed oils that were applied to it". It is one of the best surviving examples from ancient Egypt and represents the "enveloping" style of wig common during the Eighteenth and early Nineteenth Dynasties. It is made of locks of human hair styled into tight waves ending in tiny ringlets. At the back, the wig forms three large plaits. It would not have been thick enough to entirely cover Merit's own hair when worn and would have been an addition to her own styled hair. Investigation using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry indicated the presence of plant oils and "balsam". As no fixative such as resin is present on the wig, it is suggested it was styled by braiding when wet, and that the oils mentioned by Schiaparelli were meant to keep the hair soft. Two smaller baskets contained personal effects such as needles, a razor, bone hairpins, combs, spare braids of hair, a tool possibly used to curl hair or wigs, and dried raisins. Schiaparelli considered a large sheet, stained with oil but carefully stored, to be Merit's dressing gown. Merit's cosmetics were stored inside a box with funerary inscriptions and decorated in imitation of inlay, likely painted especially for the funeral. They consisted of a wooden comb and vessels of alabaster and faience holding ointments and oils; two objects, a small jar for oils and a kohl tube, were made of multi-coloured glass, a relatively rare material at the time.

• A selection of Kha's work tools, including an adze with his monogram incised on the blade, a chisel, and a possible level
• Kha's folding cubit rod with leather case
• Kha's senet board, originally made for Neferhebef
• Merit's wig, styled by being plaited while wet and unplaited when dry, to give a crimped effect

Furniture and furnishings

The tomb contained many items of everyday furniture sourced from Kha and Merit's house in Deir el-Medina. The largest pieces of furniture belonging to the couple were their beds, each with a strung cord mattress. Kha's bed was placed in the corridor outside the burial chamber owing to lack of space within the room. Merit's was made up with sheets, blankets, and two headrests, one of which was entirely wrapped in fabric. A footrest inscribed for Kha was associated with her bed.

At least ten wooden stools of various forms were placed in the burial chamber; the majority were painted white and most had woven seats. The most unusual example was a folding stool with a leather seat and legs ending in duck heads inlaid with ivory. A further wooden stool with a central cut-out was found in the antechamber; it is thought to be a toilet seat or commode, the only example of its type known from ancient Egypt. There was only a single high-backed chair, on which was placed a statuette of Kha. It may have been a purely funerary piece, as it lacks wear on the strung seat and uses paint instead of costly inlay; alternatively, it may have been used plain and decorated for the tomb.

The tables were largely simple constructions, with three specifically funerary examples made of cane or reed and papyrus. A single small table had more elaborate construction, being made of wooden slats in imitation of canework; it held Kha's senet box when found, which may have been its usual purpose. Thirteen chests of varying sizes and styles made up the rest of the furniture placed within the tomb. All were of wood, and largely plain or white-washed. Five were probably made especially for the tomb, painted in imitation of inlay; of these, three bore scenes of Kha and Merit receiving offerings from their children.

The two wooden lamp stands are the only examples of their kind from ancient Egypt. They are made in the shape of papyrus stalks with open umbels and approximately 1.5 metres (4.9 ft) tall. Only the example found inside the burial chamber had a bronze lamp, variously identified as having the shape of a leaf, bird, or bulti-fish; it was found half-full of fat with a burnt wick.

• Folding stool with leather seat and legs ending in carved duck heads
• Merit's bed, around which many of her personal belongings were found, and some of the numerous wooden stools found in the tomb
• One of the wooden boxes with painted decoration in imitation of inlay
• Replica of the papyrus-shaped lampstand and lamp from the burial chamber

Food and drink

The tomb was stocked with numerous foodstuffs which were piled on tables and in bowls, packed in amphorae, and stored in baskets. The most numerous category was bread which Schiaparelli said was of "a more varied and plentiful assortment than has been discovered in any other tomb or exists in any museum". The bulk of the loaves were arranged on the low tables or packed within a large ceramic vessel. Most were of the standard round flat form but others were made into various shapes such as triangles, jars or trussed animals. Some have grooves or holes that may suggest fertility. Wine was also well represented, the containers for which were labelled with their year and place of origin. Most were sealed but those that were open evaporated over the millennia, leaving only a residue. Chunks of meat and roasted birds were stored salted in amphorae while salted fish were placed in bowls among the bread. Vegetable dishes consisted of minced and seasoned greens in bowls and jars accompanied by bundles of garlic and onions, and baskets of cumin seeds. Fruits included grapes, dates, figs, and nets of doum palm nuts. Imported species were represented by a box of almonds (mixed with domestically-grown tiger nuts) and a basket of juniper berries. Thirteen sealed alabaster vessels contained oils, seven of which Schiaparelli identified as the "seven sacred oils" used in funerary ritual. Also included was oil and salt for cooking and the fuel needed for the kitchen fire, in the form of dried cow dung. Few of the sealed vessels were opened by Schiaparelli so the contents of sealed (and unsealed) containers have been investigated using non-invasive techniques such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and types of mass spectrometry (MS), which has identified the presence of oils, fats, beeswax, and other organic compounds.

• Carob fruit secured to a tall stand with papyrus strips
• Various forms of bread, including one shaped like a trussed gazelle
• An opened and broken amphora containing salted birds
• Sealed and unsealed painted amphorae and jugs that contained liquids

Sarcophagi and coffins

The largest items within the tomb were the two outer coffins or sarcophagi containing the coffins and mummies of Kha and Merit. Kha's was placed against the far wall, with Merit's positioned at a right angle to it against the long wall. Both were covered by large linen sheets, with the fabric covering Kha's being approximately 15 metres (49 ft) long and 2 metres (6.6 ft) wide. The two sarcophagi are nearly identical in form, both being shaped like the shrine of Lower Egypt, with cavetto cornices and vaulted lids with uprights at each end. They differ in size, with Kha's being larger at 300 centimetres (9.8 ft) long, to Merit's 228.5 centimetres (7.50 ft), and base style as Kha's has sledge runners and Merit's does not. Both are made of black-painted sycamore wood without any additional decoration. Referred to as "bitumen" in Schiaparelli's publication, the black coating is made mainly of Pistacia resin and small amounts of other plant-derived products. Similar sarcophagi with gilded or painted text and figures were used by contemporary nobles and royalty, as evidenced from the tombs of nobles in the Valley of the Kings and Schiaparelli's excavations in the Valley of the Queens. Due to their large size, they were brought into the tomb in sections and reassembled; marks made on the edges of each piece assisted in this task.

Kha's sarcophagus contained a further set of two nested coffins. Both are mummiform, depicting the deceased as a wrapped mummy wearing a long wig and broad collar with the arms crossed on the chest and the hands in fists. Below the collar and hands, a vulture goddess (identified as Nekhbet or Nut) spreads her wings over the torso. The coffin has vertical and horizontal bands of text whose positions, at centre front and sides, bicep, hip, knee, and ankle, are similar to those of the plain fabric bindings on mummy wrappings. The outer coffin has a black-based design, with the striped wig, face and hands, collar, bands of text and figures of gods picked out in gilding; the eyes are inlaid in coloured glass. The goddess Nephthys is depicted on top of the head of the coffin and Isis is depicted under the feet. A small mound of wax, possibly beeswax, was placed on the crown of the head. When revealed, the coffin was covered almost entirely by Kha's copy of the Book of the Dead. Underneath, the neck of the coffin was draped with two garlands made of melilot leaves, cornflowers, and lotus petals.

The innermost coffin has a similar design to the outer but is entirely gilded. Both the eyes and eyebrows are inlaid with stone or glass, with blue glass for the eyebrows and cosmetic lines, set in bronze or copper sockets. The interior is painted black. Another floral garland was placed across the chest of this coffin. The red-dyed flax ropes used to lower the inner coffin into the outer were still in place around the ankles and neck. Additionally, the inner coffin sat on a layer of natron inside the outer coffin. The lids of the coffins were closed with small wooden dowels. Egyptologist Arielle Kozloff considers Kha's coffins to be "superb examples" of the wealth and craftsmanship seen during the reign of Amenhotep III. Their style and workmanship suggests they were made in a royal workshop.

Merit's sarcophagus contained only a single coffin wrapped in a linen shroud. The coffin was not made for her; it is much too large for her mummy and the inscriptions only name Kha. Merit's coffin combines features of Kha's outer and inner coffins, with the lid being entirely gilded and the trough having a black-based design. The discrepancy in design represents a merging of the typical two-coffin set into one. Her coffin is of lesser quality than Kha's and is less costly; the sculpting of the face is rougher, the figures of deities are roughly rendered, and the text is incised instead of being modelled in plaster. The difference in quality may be due to this coffin being commissioned by Kha earlier in his career, before he could afford a more expensive two-coffin set. A large figure of the goddess Nut is painted on the interior of the coffin trough. Merit probably died unexpectedly, resulting in a coffin made for her husband being used for her burial.

• The outer mummiform or middle coffin of Kha with floral garlands across the chest
• Inner coffin of Kha
• Outer coffin or sarcophagus of Merit
• Merit's inner coffin has similar decoration to Kha's but lacks hands

Mummies

The wrapped mummies of Kha and Merit were found undisturbed within their coffins. Schiaparelli decided against unwrapping them, so the pair have been investigated with non-invasive methods. They were X-rayed in 1966 and 2014, and CT scanned in 2002 at the Institute of Radiology in Turin and again in 2016. Neither had undergone a mummification procedure typical for the Eighteenth Dynasty; their internal organs were not removed, explaining the absence of canopic jars. The lack of organ removal has led to suggestions that the bodies were treated using a shorter procedure, with little care, or that they were not embalmed at all despite their status. However, their organs, including their eyes and optic nerves, are excellently preserved. Chemical analysis of samples of their mummy wrappings indicate that they were both treated with an embalming recipe. Kha's consists of a mix of animal fat or plant oil and plant-derived extracts, gums, and conifer resin. Merit's is different, consisting of fish oil mixed with plant extracts, gums, resin, and beeswax; similar results, with the addition of Pistacia resin, were obtained from a sample of the red shroud that covered her mummy within the coffin. Both of these embalming recipes were made of costly ingredients that were hard to obtain, some of which were imported into Egypt, and would have had effective anti-bacterial and insecticidal properties. Natron, the main desiccating agent used in mummification, was also used within Kha's coffin and appears as white spots on the surface of Merit's wrappings. This study indicates that, contrary to previous opinions, their bodies were indeed embalmed, at significant effort and cost. That the methods used for them differ from the royal mummification method is not surprising, given the difference in status and the economics of Deir el-Medina; Bianucci and co-authors suggest that few in Deir el-Medina would have been mummified in the typical (royal) fashion.

Kha

The mummy of Kha is wrapped in many layers of linen and covered with a linen shroud. The shroud is secured by a double layer of linen bandages running down the centre of the body. This is crossed by four narrow bands at the shoulders, hips, knees, and ankles. Restoration work carried out in the 2000s used a nylon net to consolidate the outer layers of linen, weakened by a previous fungal attack. Kha's mummy was not fitted with a funerary mask. It is thought he donated his mask to Merit but the reason that he did not have another made for his own burial is unknown. His wrapped mummy is 168 centimetres (5.51 ft) tall. He lies on his back with his arms extended; his hands are placed over the pubic area.

Kha likely died in his 60s, with an estimated height in life of 1.71 or 1.72 metres (5.6 ft) and a robust build. His health is consistent with his age at the time of his death. His teeth were in poor condition, with many tooth losses and much wear to the remaining dentition. He had arthritis in his knees and lower back, and many arteries show signs of calcification. His gallbladder contained fourteen gallstones, most probably pigment stones. His right elbow joint had a calcified inflammation (enthesopathy), which may have been caused by repetitive chopping motions. The 2005 CT examination showed that the first lumbar vertebra was fractured, which left it flattened. X-ray analysis in 2014 suggested this damage occurred after his death. His cause of death is unknown. No attempt was made to remove his organs, which are still in place and well preserved. There is a large air-filled gap between Kha's torso and the bandage layers, suggesting his body was not fully dried before wrapping. Despite his sarcophagus being placed in the furthest corner of the tomb, Kha is thought to have died after his wife, as some of his objects were placed in the corridor because of the lack of space.

Kha's body is equipped with metal jewellery, likely of gold. Around his neck is a necklace of large gold disc beads known as a shebyu collar. This item of jewellery was given by the king as part of the "gold of honour", a reward for service. These necklaces are well known from the Eighteenth Dynasty, being depicted in many statues and tombs of nobility including those of Sennefer, Ay and Horemheb. Kha's collar has only a single strand of beads instead of the usual minimum of two, leading to the suggestion by Egyptologist Susanne Binder that this may be the longest, outermost strand of a multi-stranded shebyu collar. He wears a pair of large earrings, one of the earliest known ancient Egyptian men to do so. These may also have been part of his royal reward, as similar earrings are depicted, albeit more rarely, in "gold of honour" reward scenes. Kha wears six finger rings; three have fixed oval bezels, one has a fixed rectangular bezel, and two have swivelling bezels of faience or stone. Further jewellery is purely funerary in nature. These consist of a stone heart scarab on a gold wire or chain, a stone or faience tyet amulet, and a gold foil bracelet around each upper arm. On his forehead is a stone snake head amulet, typically made of carnelian or jasper. The usual location of this amulet is around the neck, where it assists in the deceased's ability to breathe in the afterlife. Its placement on his forehead is possibly in imitation of the royal uraeus (rearing cobra) worn by kings.

Merit

The space around Merit's body was packed with fabric bearing her husband's monogram. A sheet of linen was folded into a pad placed under the mummy and the space under her feet and around her body was filled with eight rolls of bandages. The mummy was wrapped in a further sheet of linen over the top of the shroud, the end of which was tucked under her gilded mummy mask. Her white shroud is stitched up the back with a whip stitch using a thick cord. In 2002 her mummy was sewed into a custom-dyed nylon net to consolidate the fabric.

Merit's mummy is fitted with a mask made of cartonnage, a papier-mâché-like material made from linen and plaster. It has inlaid eyes, of which only one original remains, made of alabaster and obsidian with cosmetic lines and eyebrows of blue paste. The surface is covered in gold leaf, now tarnished to a reddish colour, and the striped wig is coloured with Egyptian blue. The broad collar is composed of alternating bands of carnelian, dark blue paste imitating lapis lazuli, and turquoise. The pectoral necklace below the collar is decorated with a blue and red vulture painted on a yellow background. The mask was probably intended for Kha and was donated for his wife's burial. By the time of discovery the mask had sustained some damage, particularly to the back and sides, and one of the inlaid eyes was missing. This may be a result of the mask being much too big for Merit's head, leading to collapse once placed in the coffin. Alternatively, the damage and the missing eye have been attributed to rough handling by Schiaparelli's workmen. The mask was restored in 1967 but degraded quickly and further restoration was carried out in 2002. It was placed on a new padded mount in 2004. The back of the mask could not be restored as it was found detached underneath the mummy, soaked in oils and resins and flattened by weight; it is now stored separately.

The wrapped mummy of Merit is 147 centimetres (4.82 ft) tall. She is positioned on her back with her arms extended and hands nearly crossed over the pubis. Her age at death is estimated to be between 25 and 35 years. Estimates for her height in life vary between 1.48 metres (4.9 ft) and 1.60 metres (5.2 ft). She wears a long, crimped wig on her head, which is turned slightly to the right. Given her age at death, her teeth have little wear but some teeth have been lost and others have cavities. She is less well-preserved than her husband, with many of her ribs and vertebrae broken and displaced by postmortem damage to the torso. No attempt was made to remove her brain or other internal organs. Given that she was buried in a coffin intended for Kha, her death was probably unexpected but her cause of death is unknown.

Like Kha, her body wears metal jewellery. Around her neck is a triple-strand necklace of fine gold beads; the strings have broken and the beads have scattered, with some being seen by her ankles. Across her chest and shoulders is a gold and stone broad collar similar in design to one from the burial of three foreign wives of Thutmose III and the collars seen on the coffins and mask of Thuya, the mother-in-law of Amenhotep III. Her ears are double pierced and she wears two pairs of ribbed hoop earrings. She wears four gold rings on her left hand; a further ring is seen behind her shoulder in X-ray and CT images. This ring was either displaced from her finger by postmortem damage or was intended for her right hand and forgotten during the wrapping process, being slipped into the shroud before burial. A second gold ring was found during conservation work, stuck to the back of her mask in the embalming resins. The bezel is incised with an image of the goddess Hathor as a cow, wearing a menat-necklace, standing on a boat. This design is similar to a ring found on the body of Nefertity in tomb DM1159a. Around her hips is a beaded girdle of metal cowrie shell-shaped beads interspersed with strings of small non-metal beads. Similar girdles are known from the burials of the Middle Kingdom princess Sithathoriunet and three of Thutmose III's foreign wives. On each wrist are ten-stranded bracelets of metal and non-metal beads with a sliding catch. They appear to have the same design as the necklace and girdle and probably formed part of a set. Merit was not equipped with any funerary amulets, possibly because of her unexpected death.

Other funerary equipment

Kha's copy of the Book of the Dead was found laid out atop his outer mummiform coffin. Schiaparelli noted that at the time of its discovery the papyrus was "perfectly conserved and as supple as if recently made". It is 13.8 metres (45 ft) long and contains 33 chapters. It is one of the earliest-known copies of the Book of the Dead and is similar to the copies of the near-contemporary nobles Maiherpri and Yuya. The text is written in cursive hieroglyphs like Maiherpri's but the sequence of chapters is more similar to Yuya's copy. Additionally, like Yuya, Kha is depicted wearing a heart amulet. The colourful vignettes depict Kha generically, showing less customisation than either noble's books. As was typical, Kha and Merit's names and titles were inserted into gaps left in the pre-written text. In her 2019 study of the document, the Egyptologist Susanne Töpfer suggested that the papyrus may have been commissioned for someone else, as there is an instance where a name has been erased and overwritten, and the attire of the god Osiris was changed from a feathered shroud to a plain white one.

A second copy of the Book of the Dead naming the couple is now in the Bibliothèque nationale de France in Paris. Its provenance is unknown. It may originally have come from the pit Bruyère found in front of their chapel. It was among the antiquities donated to the Bibliothèque nationale in 1862 by Honoré Théodoric d'Albert de Luynes. The papyrus is incomplete, being only 197 centimetres (78 in) long with 13 chapters; it was probably cut up for easier sale on the antiquities market. This copy was likely intended for Merit as her name appears more often than Kha's, a unique instance in the Eighteenth Dynasty of a woman being provided with her own copy. Alternatively, it could be a separate copy that ultimately went unused and was put aside for reuse.

A wooden funerary statuette was placed in the tomb, standing on a chair. The 43 cm (17 in) tall figure depicts a youthful Kha wearing a kilt, striding forward. Around the shoulders was a garland of melilot leaves; another was folded at its feet. The eyes and wig are painted and the column of text down the front of his kilt is filled with yellow pigment but the surface is otherwise plain. The inscription asks that his ka (soul) may receive "all that appears on the table of offerings to Amun, king of the gods". The rectangular base is inscribed with an offering formula ensuring Kha received the standard bread, beer, ox and fowl with the additional alabaster, linen, wine, and milk. There are occasional examples of such figures from other contemporary non-noble Theban tombs; their inclusion may have been more common than these finds suggest, as many unprovenanced statuettes are known from museum collections. These figures are generally absent from contemporary elite (robbed) burials, possibly indicating they were made of valuable metal and looted by ancient robbers.

Kha was provided with two ushabti figures for his use in the afterlife. One is made of stone and the other is wooden and was provided with its own miniature sarcophagus and agricultural tools. These were placed immediately behind and in front of the statuette. Merit was not given any ushabti. This inequality between the spouses may not have been unusual as a similar imbalance is seen in the burial of Amenhotep III's parents-in-law, Yuya and Thuya.

Location and display of objects

Following the discovery, Gaston Maspero, director of the Egyptian Antiquities Service, awarded the majority of the contents of TT8 to Schiaparelli. They are housed in the Museo Egizio in Turin, Italy, where Schiaparelli was appointed director in 1894. The Egyptian Museum in Cairo retained only a few objects from the tomb, keeping one of the two lamp stands, loaves of bread, three blocks of salt, and nineteen pottery vases.

Maspero's reasons for allowing nearly the entire contents of this intact tomb to leave Egypt are unknown. Maspero was a friend and former mentor of Schiaparelli. It is probable that Maspero considered the contents of TT8 to be duplicates or not unlike anything already in the museum's collection. Vassilika suggests that, with the discovery of the largely unrobbed noble burial of Yuya and Thuya in the previous year, 1905, the discovery of more noble burials may have been expected. The writer Dennis C. Forbes suggests space may also have been a factor, with the contents of Yuya and Thuya's tomb, and that of Maiherpri, discovered in 1899, occupying a large amount of exhibition space.

The contents of the tomb have been displayed since their arrival in Italy. Within months of arriving, the change in humidity affected the leather seats of the stools and the Book of the Dead, rendering them cracked and fragile. The objects were displayed within a single small room, refurbished in the 1960s, which then-museum director Silvio Curto said gave visitors "a good idea of the place at the moment of discovery". They were moved to a larger gallery in the 2000s, and redisplayed again in 2015 in an even more spacious gallery after the Museo Egizio underwent extensive renovations.

Notes

1. His name is also rendered as KhaꜤ (with an Egyptological ayin) or Khai.
2. Beginning with the title of Ernesto Schiaparelli's 1927 publication, Kha has been commonly referred to as an "architect". His role is otherwise equated to a "foreman".
3. Ernesto Schiaparelli considered Kha to have spent the bulk of his career under the preceding king, Thutmose III, based on seals bearing his throne name within the tomb, and the lack of a royal gift from that ruler. Schiaparelli suggested Kha was born late in the reign of Thutmose I, and placed his death in the reign of Amenhotep III, making him over 100 years old at death. From examination of his mummy, it is estimated Kha died in middle age, making it is unlikely that he was a mature professional over 60 years earlier during the rule of Thutmose III. It may instead reflect the use of this king's name long after his reign.
4. Russo suggests Kha entered the bureaucracy at the end of his career based on these two titles. Eleni Vassilika suggests "royal scribe" was an early position he held, while Russo considers it was late in his career based on the style and intricacy of the two staffs the title appears on. The Egyptologist Dimitri Laboury [fr] doubts the title referred to Kha at all as the texts in both the chapel and tomb have many grammatical errors. He posits the sticks were gifts from a colleague who bore the title.
5. The standard numbering system for private tombs in the Theban necropolis was implemented by the Antiquities Service in the early 1900s and published by the Egyptologists Alan Gardiner and Arthur Weigall in 1913. Tombs and chapels discovered later were added in sequence. Kha and Merit's burial chamber, separated from their chapel, was initially given the tomb number 269 before being connected with the existing chapel number.
6. Brief descriptions of the find were published as early as March 1906. A description of the contents appeared in 1908 when the gallery displaying the objects opened. Schiaparelli himself authored two brief letters in 1906, and a very brief, partial description of the goods and their owner, Kha, in 1920.
7. Kha and Merit are presumed to have lived in Deir el-Medina. No house can be definitely assigned to them. Vassilika and Russo consider the possibility that they lived temporarily in the village during work periods and had a separate residence elsewhere, based on the large quantity of furniture and the small house sizes in the workmen's village.

References

Citations

1. Porter & Moss 1960, p. 16.
2. ^ Porter & Moss 1960, pp. 16–18.
3. Eaton-Krauss 1999, p. 128.
4. Ranke 1935, p. 263; Binder 2008, p. 240.
5. Russo 2012, p. 33.
6. Rice 1999, pp. xlvii, 91.
7. Schiaparelli 2008.
8. Martina et al. 2005.
9. Bianucci et al. 2015.
10. Bierbrier 1982, p. 18.
11. ^ Sousa 2019, pp. 56–57.
12. ^ La Nasa et al. 2022.
13. Reeves & Wilkinson 1996, p. 18.
14. Ferraris 2018, p. 12.
15. Russo 2012, p. 67.
16. Töpfer 2019, p. 12.
17. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 7.
18. Russo 2012, pp. 15, 22, 73, 77.
19. Forbes 1998, p. 112.
20. Russo 2012, p. 73.
21. Schiaparelli 2008, p. 60.
22. Hall 1928, p. 203.
23. Vassilika 2010, p. 25; Russo 2012, pp. 34–35.
24. Trapani 2012, p. 167; Cooney 2008, p. 4.
25. ^ Russo 2012, pp. 67–69.
26. Russo 2012, p. 70.
27. Laboury 2023, p. 127.
28. Russo 2012, pp. 23, 31.
29. Binder 2008, p. 240.
30. Trapani 2012, p. 167.
31. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 4.
32. Forbes 1998, p. 102.
33. ^ Martina et al. 2005, p. 42.
34. Koltsida 2007, p. 125.
35. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 8.
36. Trapani 2015, pp. 2221–2222.
37. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 9.
38. ^ Russo 2012, p. 66.
39. Porter & Moss 1960, pp. 2, 16–17.
40. Porter & Moss 1960, p. vii; Gardiner & Weigall 1913, p. 10.
41. Bruyère 1925, p. 53.
42. ^ Sousa 2019, p. 63.
43. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 2; Bruyère 1924, p. 53.
44. Meskell 1998, p. 371.
45. Russo 2012, p. 64; Sousa 2019, p. 63.
46. Meskell 1998, p. 371; Russo 2012, p. 64.
47. Bierbrier 1982, p. 55; Dodson & Ikram 2008, p. 54; Vassilika 2010, p. 10.
48. Dodson & Ikram 2008, p. 14.
49. ^ Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 2.
50. ^ Ferraris 2022, p. 610.
51. Bruyère 1924, pp. 51–54.
52. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 10.
53. Schiaparelli 2008, p. 56.
54. ^ Russo 2012, p. 4.
55. Bruyère 1925, pp. 53–55.
56. ^ Forbes 1998, p. 135.
57. Russo 2012, p. 22.
58. Laboury 2023, pp. 126–127.
59. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 4.
60. Porter & Moss 1960, p. 1618.
61. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, pp. 5–7.
62. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 7.
63. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 57.
64. ^ Sousa 2019, p. 64.
65. Schiaparelli 2008, p. 58.
66. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, pp. 5, 7.
67. ^ Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 8.
68. Wilkinson 2003, p. 97.
69. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, pp. 4–5, 8.
70. Hobson 1987, pp. 118–119.
71. Vandier d'Abbadie 1939, p. 1.
72. Del Vesco & Poole 2018, pp. 98–99.
73. Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 2.
74. Eaton-Krauss 1999, pp. 127–128.
75. ^ La Nasa et al. 2022, p. 1.
76. Del Vesco & Poole 2018, p. 107.
77. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 15–16.
78. Vassilika 2010, p. 22.
79. Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 16–17.
80. Weigall 1911, pp. 178–179.
81. Weigall 1911, p. 178.
82. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 17.
83. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 15–17.
84. Weigall 1911, pp. 180–182.
85. ^ Sousa 2019, p. 63; Forbes 1998, p. 61.
86. Vassilika 2010, p. 20.
87. Ferraris 2022, pp. 600, 607.
88. Ferraris 2018, pp. 26–30.
89. Hall 1928, p. 205.
90. ^ Vassilika 2010, pp. 25–26.
91. Forbes 1998, pp. 114, 132.
92. Vassilika 2010, pp. 22–23.
93. ^ Sousa 2019, p. 89.
94. Ferraris 2018, p. 21.
95. Forbes 1998, p. 132.
96. Forbes 1998, p. 46.
97. Russo 2012, p. 3.
98. Vassilika 2010, pp. 13–16.
99. Weigall 1911.
100. ^ Forbes 1998, p. 113.
101. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 28–33.
102. Meskell 1998, p. 372.
103. Nishimoto 2017, p. 450.
104. Sousa 2019, p. 73.
105. Russo 2012, p. 11.
106. Russo 2012, p. 45.
107. Russo 2012, pp. 46–47.
108. Russo 2012, pp. 22–23.
109. Russo 2012, pp. 36, 77.
110. Russo 2012, pp. 19–20.
111. Russo 2012, p. 18.
112. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 33.
113. Meskell 1998, p. 376.
114. ^ Buckley & Fletcher 2016.
115. Forbes 1998, p. 85.
116. Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 33–34.
117. Forbes 1998, pp. 84–85.
118. Forbes 1998, pp. 86–87.
119. Vassilika 2010, pp. 45–50.
120. Forbes 1998, p. 87.
121. ^ Forbes 1998, p. 88.
122. Russo 2012, p. 65.
123. Forbes 1998, p. 91.
124. ^ Forbes 1998, p. 144.
125. Forbes 1998, pp. 91–2.
126. Vassilika 2010, pp. 55–56.
127. Vassilika 2010, p. 100.
128. Forbes 1998, pp. 88–89.
129. Forbes 1998, p. 89; Vassilika 2010, p. 102.
130. Vassilika 2010, pp. 12, 63.
131. Forbes 1998, p. 90.
132. Forbes 1998, pp. 96–102.
133. Forbes 1998, p. 92.
134. Forbes 1998, p. 93.
135. Schiaparelli 2008, p. 44.
136. Wilkinson 1992, p. 111.
137. Forbes 1998, pp. 92–93.
138. Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 46–47.
139. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 46–50.
140. ^ Forbes 1998, pp. 105–108.
141. Shahat 2019, pp. 69–70.
142. Festa et al. 2021.
143. Forbes 1998, p. 63.
144. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 19.
145. Vassilika 2010, pp. 33, 65.
146. Forbes 1998, pp. 63–64.
147. Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 15.
148. ^ Forbes 1998, p. 64.
149. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 65.
150. ^ Kozloff 1998, pp. 118–119.
151. Sousa 2019, p. 78.
152. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 20.
153. Vassilika 2010, p. 68.
154. Forbes 1998, pp. 64–65.
155. Kozloff 1998, p. 118.
156. Forbes 1998, pp. 65–68.
157. Schiaparelli 2008, pp. 21–22.
158. ^ Sousa 2019, p. 80.
159. Bettum 2018, p. 285.
160. ^ Meskell 1998, p. 373.
161. ^ Curto & Mancini 1968, p. 77.
162. Schiaparelli 2008, p. 22.
163. Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 4–6.
164. ^ Gordan-Rastelli 2019, p. 51.
165. Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 3.
166. ^ Martina et al. 2005, p. 44.
167. Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 16–18.
168. Marochetti et al. 2005, p. 243.
169. ^ Marochetti et al. 2005, p. 246.
170. Casini 2017, p. 66.
171. Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 6.
172. Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 6–7.
173. Ferraris 2018, pp. 43–45.
174. ^ Martina et al. 2005, p. 43.
175. Cesarani et al. 2009, p. 1194.
176. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 7.
177. Ferraris 2018, p. 45.
178. Forbes 1998, pp. 113, 144.
179. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 12–13.
180. Brand 2006, pp. 17–18.
181. Binder 2008, p. 43.
182. Trapani 2015, pp. 2222–2223.
183. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 13.
184. ^ Marochetti et al. 2005, p. 245.
185. ^ Marochetti et al. 2005, p. 244.
186. Curto & Mancini 1968, pp. 77–78.
187. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 27.
188. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, p. 9.
189. Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 9–11.
190. ^ Bianucci et al. 2015, pp. 14–15.
191. Russo 2012, p. 31.
192. Vassilika 2010, p. 70.
193. Sousa 2019, pp. 86, 88–89.
194. Forbes 1998, p. 121.
195. Töpfer 2019, pp. 14–16.
196. ^ Vassilika 2010, pp. 76–77.
197. Ferraris 2018, pp. 75, 89–91.
198. ^ Schiaparelli 2008, p. 26.
199. Sousa 2019, p. 66.
200. Smith 1992, p. 200.
201. Sousa 2019, pp. 74–75.
202. Forbes 1998, p. 75.
203. Vassilika 2010, p. 18.
204. ^ Forbes 1998, pp. 61–63.
205. ^ Vassilika 2010, p. 24.
206. ^ Forbes 1998, pp. 114–115.

Works cited

• Bettum, Anders (2018). "Nesting (Part Two): Merging of Coffin Layers in New Kingdom Coffin Decoration". In Taylor, John H.; Vandenbeusch, Marie (eds.). Ancient Egyptian Coffins: Craft Traditions and Functionality. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 275–291. ISBN 978-90-429-3465-8. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Bianucci, Raffaella; Habicht, Michael E.; Buckley, Stephen; Fletcher, Joann; Seiler, Roger; Öhrström, Lena M.; Vassilika, Eleni; Böni, Thomas; Rühli, Frank J. (22 July 2015). "Shedding New Light on the 18th Dynasty Mummies of the Royal Architect Kha and His Spouse Merit". PLOS ONE. 10 (7): e0131916. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1031916B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131916. PMC 4511739. PMID 26200778.
• Bierbrier, Morris (1982). The Tomb-builders of the Pharaohs. London: British Museum Publications. ISBN 978-0-7141-8044-1. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Binder, Susanne (2008). The Gold of Honour in New Kingdom Egypt. Oxford: Aris and Phillips. ISBN 978-0-85668-899-7. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Brand, Peter (2006). "The Shebyu-Collar in the New Kingdom Part I". Studies in Memory of Nicholas B. Millet (Journal of the Society for the Study of Egyptian Antiquities). 33: 17–28. Retrieved 16 April 2023.
• Bruyère, Bernard (1924). Rapport sur les fouilles de Deir el Médineh (1922–1923). Fouilles de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale (in French). Vol. 1. Caire: Institut français d'archéologie orientale. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
• Bruyère, Bernard (1925). Rapport sur les fouilles de Deir el Médineh (1923–1924). Fouilles de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale (in French). Vol. 2. Caire: Institut français d'archéologie orientale. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
• Buckley, Stephen; Fletcher, Joann (21 November 2016). "The Hair and Wig of Meryt: Grooming in the 18th Dynasty". Internet Archaeology (42). doi:10.11141/ia.42.6.4. ISSN 1363-5387. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
• Casini, Emanuele (2017). "Remarks on Ancient Egyptian Cartonnage Mummy Masks from the Late Old Kingdom to the End of the New Kingdom". In Chyla, Julia M.; Dębowska-Ludwin, Joanna; Rosińska-Balik, Karolina; Walsh, Carl (eds.). Current Research in Egyptology 2016: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Symposium. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 56–73. ISBN 978-1-78570-600-4.
• Cesarani, Federico; Martina, Maria Cristina; Boano, Rosa; Grilletto, Renato; D’Amicone, Elvira; Venturi, Claudio; Gandini, Giovanni (1 July 2009). "Multidetector CT Study of Gallbladder Stones in a Wrapped Egyptian Mummy". RadioGraphics. 29 (4): 1191–1194. doi:10.1148/rg.294085246. ISSN 0271-5333. PMID 19605665.
• Cooney, Kathyln M. (2008). "Scarab". In Wendrich, Willeke (ed.). UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. pp. 1–11. Retrieved 16 August 2024.
• Curto, Silvio; Mancini, M. (1968). "News of Kha' and Meryt". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 54: 77–81. doi:10.2307/3855908. JSTOR 3855908.
• Del Vesco, Paolo; Poole, Federico (2018). "Deir el-Medina in the Egyptian Museum of Turin. An Overview, and the Way Forward". In Dorn, Andreas; Polis, Stéphane (eds.). Outside the Box: Selected Papers from the Conference "Deir el-Medina and the Theban Necropolis in Contact" Liège, 27–29 October 2014. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège. pp. 97–130. ISBN 978-2-87562-166-5. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
• Dodson, Aidan; Ikram, Salima (2008). The Tomb in Ancient Egypt: Royal and Private Sepulchres from the Early Dynastic Period to the Romans. London; New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-05139-9.
• Eaton-Krauss, M. (1999). "The Fate of Sennefer and Senetnay at Karnak Temple and in the Valley of the Kings". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 85: 113–129. doi:10.2307/3822430. JSTOR 3822430.
• Ferraris, Enrico (2018). La Tomba di Kha e Merit (in Italian) (eBook ed.). Modena: Franco Cosimo Panini. ISBN 978-8-857-01438-8.
• Ferraris, Enrico (2022). "TT8 Project: An Introduction". In Töpfer, Susanne; Del Vesco, Paolo; Poole, Federico (eds.). Deir el-Medina: Through the Kaleidoscope; Proceedings of the International Workshop Turin 8th–10th October 2018. Turin: Museo Egizio. pp. 599–619. ISBN 978-8-857-01830-0. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Festa, G.; Saladino, M. L.; Mollica Nardo, V.; Armetta, F.; Renda, V.; Nasillo, G.; Pitonzo, R.; Spinella, A.; Borla, M.; Ferraris, E.; Turina, V.; Ponterio, R. C. (9 February 2021). "Identifying the Unknown Content of an Ancient Egyptian Sealed Alabaster Vase from Kha and Merit's Tomb Using Multiple Techniques and Multicomponent Sample Analysis in an Interdisciplinary Applied Chemistry Course". Journal of Chemical Education. 98 (2): 461–468. Bibcode:2021JChEd..98..461F. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00386. hdl:10447/530775. ISSN 0021-9584. S2CID 230616659. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
• Forbes, Dennis C. (1998). Tombs. Treasures. Mummies : Seven Great Discoveries of Egyptian Archaeology in Five Volumes. Book Two, The Tombs of Maiherpri (KV36) & Kha & Merit (TT8) (2015 Reprint ed.). Weaverville: Kmt Communications LLC. ISBN 978-1-512-37195-6.
• Gardiner, Alan H.; Weigall, Arthur E. P. (1913). A Topographical Catalogue of the Private Tombs of Thebes. London: Bernard Quaritch. OCLC 458905002. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Gordan-Rastelli, Lucy (2019). "Invisible Archaeology: Beyond the Naked Eye". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 30 (3): 39–54. Archived from the original on 7 January 2023.
• Hall, H. R. (May 1928). "Review: Relazione sui lavori della Missione Archeologica Italiana in Egitto (Anni 1903–1920); II. La tomba intatta dell' architetto Cha by E. Schiaparelli. Torino: R. Museo di Antichita. 1927. Pp. 187; 169 illustrations". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 14 (1/2): 203. doi:10.2307/3854100. JSTOR 3854100.
• Hobson, Christine (1987). The World of the Pharaohs: A Complete Guide to Ancient Egypt (1993 paperback ed.). New York: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-27560-3.
• Koltsida, Aikaterini (2007). "Domestic Space and Gender Roles in Ancient Egyptian Village Households: A View from Amarna Workmen's Village and Deir el-Medina". British School at Athens Studies. 15: 121–127. ISSN 2159-4996. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Kozloff, Arielle P. (1998). "The Decorative and Funerary Arts During the Reign of Amenhotep III". In O'Connor, David; Cline, Eric H. (eds.). Amenhotep III: Perspectives on His Reign. United States of America: The University of Michigan Press. pp. 95–123. ISBN 0-472-10742-9. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Laboury, Dimitri (2023). "On the Alleged Involvement of the Deir el-Medina Crew in the Making of Elite Tombs in the Theban Necropolis During the Eighteenth Dynasty: A Reassessment". In Bryan, Betsy M.; Dorman, Peter F. (eds.). Mural Decoration in the Theban Necropolis. United States of America: University of Chicago. pp. 115–138. ISBN 978-1-61491-089-3. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• La Nasa, Jacopo; Degano, Ilaria; Modugno, Francesca; Guerrini, Camilla; Facchetti, Federica; Turina, Valentina; Carretta, Andrea; Greco, Christian; Ferraris, Enrico; Colombini, Maria Perla; Ribechini, Erika (May 2022). "Archaeology of the Invisible: The Scent of Kha and Merit". Journal of Archaeological Science. 141: 105577. Bibcode:2022JArSc.141j5577L. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2022.105577. S2CID 247374925.
• Marochetti, Elisa Fiore; Oliva, Cinza; Doneux, Kristine; Curti, Alessandra; Janot, Francis (2005). "The Mummies of Kha and Merit: Embalming Ritual and Restauration[sic] Work". Journal of Biological Research – Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale. 80 (1): 243–247. doi:10.4081/jbr.2005.10195. S2CID 239503089. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
• Martina, Maria Cristina; Cesarani, Federico; Boano, Rosa; Donadoni Roveri, Anna Maria; Ferraris, Andrea; Grilletto, Renato; Gandini, Giovanni (2005). "Kha and Merit: Multidetector Computed Tomography and 3D Reconstructions of Two Mummies from the Egyptian Museum of Turin". Journal of Biological Research – Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale. 80 (1). doi:10.4081/jbr.2005.10088. S2CID 86115996. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
• Meskell, Lynn (1998). "Intimate Archaeologies: The Case of Kha and Merit". World Archaeology. 29 (3): 363–379. doi:10.1080/00438243.1998.9980385. ISSN 0043-8243. JSTOR 125036.
• Nishimoto, Naoko (2017). "The Folding Cubit Rod of Kha in Museo Egizio di Torino, S.8391". In Rosati, Gloria; Guidotti, Maria Cristina (eds.). Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Egyptologists: Florence Egyptian Museum Florence, 23–30 August 2015. Oxford: Archaeopress Publishing Limited. pp. 450–456. ISBN 978-1-78491-600-8. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
• Porter, Bertha; Moss, Rosalind L. B. Moss (1960). Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs, and Paintings I: The Theban Necropolis Part 1. Private Tombs (PDF) (1970 reprint ed.). Oxford: Griffith Institute. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
• Ranke, Hermann (1935). Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Bd. 1: Verzeichnis der Namen (PDF). Glückstadt: J.J. Augustin. OCLC 5339823. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
• Reeves, Nicholas; Wilkinson, Richard H. (1996). The Complete Valley of the Kings: Tombs and Treasures of Egypt's Greatest Pharaohs (2010 paperback ed.). London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-28403-2.
• Rice, Michael (1999). Who's Who In Ancient Egypt. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-15448-0. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
• Russo, Barbara (2012). Kha (TT 8) and His Colleagues: The Gifts in His Funerary Equipment and Related Artefacts from Western Thebes. London: Golden House Publications. ISBN 978-1-906137-28-1.
• Schiaparelli, Ernesto (2008) . La Tomba Intatta Dell'architetto Kha Nella Necropoli Di Tebe: The Intact Tomb of the Architect Kha in the Necropolis of Thebes (in Italian and English). Translated by Fisher, Barbara. Turin: AdArte. ISBN 978-8-889-08209-6.
• Shahat, Amr Khalaf (December 2019). "An Archaeobotanical Study of the Food in the Tomb of Kha and Merit". Backdirt: Annual Review of the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA: 68–71. Retrieved 22 September 2024.
• Smith, Stuart Tyson (1992). "Intact Theban tombs and the New Kingdom burial assemblage". Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo. 48: 193–231. Retrieved 14 November 2022.
• Sousa, Rogério (19 December 2019). Gilded Flesh: Coffins and Afterlife in Ancient Egypt. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. ISBN 978-1-78925-263-7.
• Töpfer, Susanne (2019). Il Libro dei Morti di Kha (in Italian). Turin: Museo Egizio. ISBN 978-88-570-1509-5. Retrieved 14 November 2022.
• Trapani, Marcella (2012). "Behind the Mirror: Art and Prestige in Kha's Funerary Equipment". In Kóthay, Katalin Anna (ed.). Art and Society. Ancient and Modern Contexts of Egyptian Art. Budapest: Museum of Fine Arts. pp. 159–168. ISBN 978-963-7063-91-6. Retrieved 13 November 2022.
• Trapani, Marcella (2015). "Kha's Funerary Equipment at the Egyptian Museum in Turin: Resumption of the Archaeological Study". In Kousoulis, P.; Lazaridis, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Egyptologists, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, 22–29 May 2008 (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 241) Volume II. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 2217–2232. ISBN 978-90-429-2550-2. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
• Vandier d'Abbadie, Jeanne Marie Thérèse (1939). "La chapelle de Khâ". Deux tombes de Deir el Médineh. Mémoires publiés par les membres de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale (in French). Vol. 73. Institut français d'archéologie orientale. pp. 1–18. OCLC 23426988. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
• Vassilika, Eleni (2010). The Tomb of Kha: The Architect. Firenze: Scala Group S.p.A. ISBN 978-8-881-17128-6.
• Weigall, Arthur E. P. B. (1911). The Treasury of Ancient Egypt. Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons. OCLC 656123535. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
• Wilkinson, Richard H. (1992). Reading Egyptian Art: A Hieroglyphic Guide to Ancient Egyptian Painting and Sculpture (1998 ed.). London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0-500-27751-6.
• Wilkinson, Richard H. (2003). The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05120-8.

External links

• Virtual reconstruction of tomb as discovered
• Virtual tour of the Museo Egizio including the "Tomb of Kha" gallery
• Virtual tour of Archeologia Invisibile exhibition featuring the mummies of Kha and Merit, and 3D printed replicas of their jewellery (in Italian)
• Bibliography of TT8 on the Theban Mapping Project (archived)
• Scans of tracings of parts of TT8 chapel paintings by N. de Garis Davies

v t e Theban Necropolis
Temple sites	Deir el-Bahari Medinet Habu Mortuary Temple of Seti I Mortuary Temple of Amenhotep III Ramesseum
Royal Necropolis	Valley of the Kings burials Valley of the Queens burials Royal Cache Bab el-Gasus
Other burials	el-Assasif el-Khokha el-Tarif Dra' Abu el-Naga' Qurnet Murai Sheikh Abd el-Qurna
Related articles	Aten Beautiful Festival of the Valley Deir el-Medina
List of Theban tombs

• 1906 archaeological discoveries
• Buildings and structures completed in the 14th century BC
• Museo Egizio
• Buildings and structures of the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt
• Theban tombs