 Han-class SSN profile
| |
 A Type 091 submarine in 1993
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Name | Han class |
| Builders | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao |
| Operators |  People's Liberation Army Navy |
| Succeeded by | Type 093 |
| In commission | 1974–present |
| Completed | 5 |
| Active | 3 |
| Retired | 2 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Nuclear submarine |
| Displacement |
|
| Length |
|
| Beam | 10.6 m (34 ft 9 in) |
| Propulsion |
|
| Speed | |
| Range | Unlimited |
| Sensors and processing systems | Sonar |
| Armament | Torpedo tubes |
The Type 091 (NATO reporting name: Han class) is a first-generation nuclear-powered attack submarine produced by China. It was the People Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) first nuclear submarine, and the first indigenously produced nuclear attack submarine in Asia.
History
China's nuclear submarine program, "09 Project", was authorized by the Central Military Commission and Mao Zedong in July 1958. In October 1959, Mao ordered the program to proceed after the Soviets refused to assist. Work was slowed by the Great Leap Forward and the nuclear weapons program, which had priority and used similar resources. The submarine program was postponed in March 1963 and resumed in March 1965 after China's first nuclear weapons test. Research on foreign civilian nuclear marine propulsion continued during the pause. A loop-based nuclear reactor was selected over a more powerful but also more complex integrated design in July 1965; it most resembled the reactor used by the Japanese Mutsu. In general, the new submarine design represented a leap in size and complexity over the Type 033 diesel–electric submarines then available to the PLAN.
The program was expedited by designing and building the first Type 091 and the prototype reactor simultaneously. The first chief designer was Peng Shilu. The technical design was completed in 1967, and the detailed construction drawings were completed in 1969. Construction of the first boat, hull 401, began in November 1968 and it entered service in August 1974. The second boat, hull 402, was delayed by the Cultural Revolution and commissioned in December 1980. The main propulsion system of the first two boats had poor reliability, with mechanical problems and defective components. There were also reports of inadequate radiation shielding.
Hulls 403, 404 and 405 were completed to a modified design, with longer hulls and more powerful reactors. The last Type 091 launched in 1990.
Hull 404 was the first Type 091 to dive to the designed maximum operating depth of 300 meters in April 1988. The boats were only armed with torpedoes in 1989 due to the protracted development of the Yu-3; the first deep-water Yu-3 test firing occurred until May 1988.
The high cost and limitations of the Type 091 and Type 092 ballistic missile submarine made the development of new nuclear submarines a low priority from the late-1970s to the early-1990s.
The Type 091 has operated mainly in local waters, and has been involved in several incidents. One submarine shadowed the Kitty Hawk carrier battle group in October 1994, provoking a stand-off. Another entered Japanese territorial waters near Ishigaki Island (part of Okinawa Prefecture) near Taiwan in November 2004, causing the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force to go on alert for the second time since the Second World War; China apologized for the trespass and blamed "technical reasons" on the submarine.
Design
The Type 091 has a teardrop hull. It is as acoustically loud as Soviet nuclear submarines of the late-1950s and 1960s, and mainly suitable for the anti-surface role. By 1970s standards, the boats were slow, noisy, and had poor sensors.
The hydraulic positive ejection system to fire torpedoes at deep depths required fitting torpedo tubes that were too short to launch the Yu-1 and Yu-4 torpedoes. The boats were finally armed with the Yu-3 in 1989.
Hulls 403, 404 and 405 are eight meters longer than hulls 401 and 402. The additional space was used to improve crew habitability, maintainability, and nuclear safety. The reactors were upgraded to produce 20% more power based on work for the Type 092. They were later modernized with anechoic tiles, improved sensors and fire control, seven-bladed screw, YJ-82 anti-ship missiles, and possible the Yu-6 torpedo.
Failed lease to Pakistan
See also: Karachi affairIn 1989, Pakistan made an abortive attempt to procure a Type 091 for US$63 million in 1992, as a response to the Soviet K-43 leased to India in 1988.
Units
| Pennant number |
Name | Builder | Launched | Commissioned | Decommissioned | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | Changzheng 1 | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao | December 1970 | 1 August 1974 | 2000 | Preserved at the Chinese Navy Museum, Qingdao. |
| 402 | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao | 30 December 1980 | 2004 | |||
| 403 | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao | 21 September 1984 | Active | |||
| 404 | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao | November 1988 | Active | |||
| 405 | Bohai Shipyard, Huludao | 8 April 1990 | Active |
See also
References
- ^ Carlson & Wang 2023, p. 4.
- ^ Carlson & Wang 2023, p. 3.
- "China's Very First Nuclear Attack Submarines Had Some Major Fatal Flaws". 15 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2018-10-27. Retrieved 2018-10-27.
- Carlson & Wang 2023, p. 1.
- Carlson & Wang 2023, pp. 2–3.
- Carlson & Wang 2023, p. 2.
- "The achievements of CNNC during the year 2017". www.china5e.com (in Chinese). 中国能源网. Archived from the original on 2018-11-08. Retrieved 2018-12-31.
- Rehman 2012, p. 75.
- Erickson & Goldstein 2007, p. 58.
- Carlson & Wang 2023, pp. 6–7.
- Harris, John F.; Lippman, Thomas W. (1994-12-15). "CHINESE WATCHED AS U.S. NAVY TRACKED SUB". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2020-07-13. Retrieved 2021-09-21.
- "Faceoff Between U.S. Ship, Chinese Sub Is Revealed: Military: October incident in Yellow Sea highlights growing chance of naval conflict. Beijing sounds warning". Los Angeles Times. 1994-12-14. Archived from the original on 2021-09-21. Retrieved 2021-09-21.
- "China Apologizes for Submarine Incursion". Archived from the original on 2006-10-23.
- Carlson & Wang 2023, p. 11.
- United States Joint Economic Committee (2016). China's Economic Dilemmas in the 1990s: The Problem of Reforms, Modernisation and Interdependence. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-48543-0. Archived from the original on 1 January 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- Dittmer, Lowell (2015). South Asia's Nuclear Security Dilemma: India, Pakistan, and China: India, Pakistan, and China. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-45956-9. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
- ^ Zhao, Lei (27 October 2016). "Nuke submarine to go on display". China Daily. Archived from the original on 1 January 2019. Retrieved 31 December 2018.
- ^ Jane's Fighting Ships, 2023-24 Edition, ISBN 978-0-7106-3428-3, page 133
- ^ "Meet China's First Nuclear-Powered Submarine (It Was a Total Disaster)". 6 December 2018. Archived from the original on 2019-05-09. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
Sources
- Carlson, Christopher P.; Wang, Howard (August 2023). "A Brief Technical History of PLAN Nuclear Submarines". China Maritime Report (30). China Maritime Studies Institute.
- Erickson, Andrew S.; Goldstein, Lyle J. (Winter 2007). "China's future nuclear submarine force: Insights from Chinese Writings". Naval War College Review. 60 (1). United States Naval War College: 55–79. Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- Rehman, Iskander (Autumn 2012). "Drowning Stability: The Perils of Naval Nuclearization and Brinkmanship in the Indian Ocean". Naval War College Review. 65 (4). United States Naval War College: 64–88. Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
| Current and planned classes of nuclear-powered attack submarines | |
|---|---|
 Royal Australian Navy | |
 Brazilian Navy |
|
 People's Liberation Army Navy |
|
 French Navy | |
 Indian Navy |
|
 Russian Navy |
|
 Royal Navy | |
 United States Navy |
|